Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

view Case Commentaries

State v. Rupp: Nebraska Clarifies Specificity Requirements for Ineffective-Assistance Claims on Direct Appeal

State v. Rupp: Nebraska Clarifies Specificity Requirements for Ineffective-Assistance Claims on Direct Appeal

Date: Dec 14, 2025
State v. Rupp: Nebraska Clarifies How Specifically Ineffective-Assistance Claims Must Be Pleaded on Direct Appeal I. Introduction In State v. Rupp, 320 Neb. 502 (Dec. 12, 2025), the Nebraska Supreme...
Implied Student–University Contracts, Transcript Rights, and PREP Act Preemption: Commentary on Ramaekers v. Creighton University

Implied Student–University Contracts, Transcript Rights, and PREP Act Preemption: Commentary on Ramaekers v. Creighton University

Date: Dec 14, 2025
Implied Student–University Contracts, Transcript Rights, and PREP Act Preemption: Commentary on Ramaekers v. Creighton University I. Introduction In Ramaekers v. Creighton University, 320 Neb. 478...

    Double Counting Future Business Income in Divorce: When a Business Buyout and Earning Capacity Eliminate the Need for Traditional Spousal Support — In re Marriage of Owen & Brinker (Iowa 2025)

Double Counting Future Business Income in Divorce: When a Business Buyout and Earning Capacity Eliminate the Need for Traditional Spousal Support — In re Marriage of Owen & Brinker (Iowa 2025)

Date: Dec 14, 2025
Double Counting Future Business Income in Divorce: When a Business Buyout and Earning Capacity Eliminate the Need for Traditional Spousal Support — In re Marriage of Owen & Brinker (Iowa 2025) I....
Iowa Rule 1.413 Sanctions Cannot Include Dismissal: Commentary on In re the Marriage of Matthew Kraus and Molly Kraus

Iowa Rule 1.413 Sanctions Cannot Include Dismissal: Commentary on In re the Marriage of Matthew Kraus and Molly Kraus

Date: Dec 14, 2025
Iowa Rule 1.413 Sanctions Cannot Include Dismissal: Commentary on In re the Marriage of Matthew Kraus and Molly Kraus I. Introduction The Iowa Supreme Court’s decision in In re the Marriage of...
United States v. Hawkins and the Limits of Reasonable Suspicion to Extend Traffic Stops

United States v. Hawkins and the Limits of Reasonable Suspicion to Extend Traffic Stops

Date: Dec 14, 2025
United States v. Hawkins and the Limits of Reasonable Suspicion to Extend Traffic Stops I. Introduction The Fourth Circuit’s published decision in United States v. Tremayne T. Hawkins (No. 24‑4502,...
Alternate Health-Care Agents as Witnesses and Disability Discrimination: Commentary on Jane Doe v. UMMS (4th Cir. 2025)

Alternate Health-Care Agents as Witnesses and Disability Discrimination: Commentary on Jane Doe v. UMMS (4th Cir. 2025)

Date: Dec 14, 2025
Alternate Health-Care Agents as Witnesses and Disability Discrimination: Commentary on Jane Doe v. University of Maryland Medical System Corp. (4th Cir. 2025) I. Introduction This unpublished Fourth...
No Equal Protection Right to Reimbursement for Community‑Service LFO Payments After Blake: Commentary on State v. Danielson

No Equal Protection Right to Reimbursement for Community‑Service LFO Payments After Blake: Commentary on State v. Danielson

Date: Dec 14, 2025
No Equal Protection Right to Reimbursement for Community‑Service LFO Payments After Blake: Commentary on State v. Danielson I. Introduction In State v. Danielson (consolidated with State v. Nelson),...
Presumption of Timeliness and the “Extraordinary Circumstances” Limit on Laches in CNMI Land Cases: Commentary on Shon v. Choo (2025 MP 12)

Presumption of Timeliness and the “Extraordinary Circumstances” Limit on Laches in CNMI Land Cases: Commentary on Shon v. Choo (2025 MP 12)

Date: Dec 14, 2025
Presumption of Timeliness and the “Extraordinary Circumstances” Limit on Laches in CNMI Land Cases: Commentary on Shon v. Choo, 2025 MP 12 I. Introduction The Supreme Court of the Commonwealth of the...

      Constructive Carriage and the Escape Phase of Robbery: The Tenth Circuit’s
      Expansion of § 924(c) Liability in United States v. McHenry

Constructive Carriage and the Escape Phase of Robbery: The Tenth Circuit’s Expansion of § 924(c) Liability in United States v. McHenry

Date: Dec 14, 2025
Constructive Carriage and the Escape Phase of Robbery: The Tenth Circuit’s Expansion of § 924(c) Liability in United States v. McHenry I. Introduction A. Overview In United States v. McHenry, No....
Detention Orders Need Not Address Each Proposed Release Condition When § 3142(g) Factors Are Fully Analyzed: Commentary on United States v. Valle-Acosta (10th Cir. 2025)

Detention Orders Need Not Address Each Proposed Release Condition When § 3142(g) Factors Are Fully Analyzed: Commentary on United States v. Valle-Acosta (10th Cir. 2025)

Date: Dec 14, 2025
Detention Orders Need Not Address Each Proposed Release Condition When § 3142(g) Factors Are Fully Analyzed: Commentary on United States v. Valle-Acosta (10th Cir. 2025) I. Introduction The Tenth...
United States v. Samilton: Sufficiency of Detention Findings and Use of Unadjudicated Conduct under the Bail Reform Act

United States v. Samilton: Sufficiency of Detention Findings and Use of Unadjudicated Conduct under the Bail Reform Act

Date: Dec 14, 2025
United States v. Samilton: Sufficiency of Detention Findings and Use of Unadjudicated Conduct under the Bail Reform Act I. Introduction The Tenth Circuit’s unpublished order in United States v....
Prospective Defunding, Not Punishment: Planned Parenthood v. Kennedy and the Limits of Bill of Attainder & Unconstitutional-Conditions Challenges

Prospective Defunding, Not Punishment: Planned Parenthood v. Kennedy and the Limits of Bill of Attainder & Unconstitutional-Conditions Challenges

Date: Dec 14, 2025
Prospective Defunding, Not Punishment: Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc. v. Kennedy and the Limits of Bill of Attainder and Unconstitutional‑Conditions Challenges 1. Introduction The...
Targeted Medicaid Defunding, the Bill of Attainder Clause, and “Affiliates”: Commentary on Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc. v. Kennedy

Targeted Medicaid Defunding, the Bill of Attainder Clause, and “Affiliates”: Commentary on Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc. v. Kennedy

Date: Dec 14, 2025
Targeted Medicaid Defunding, the Bill of Attainder Clause, and “Affiliates”: Commentary on Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc. v. Kennedy I. Introduction In Planned Parenthood Federation...
Ambiguity, AEDPA Deference, and Batson/Powers Challenges: A Commentary on Garrey v. Kelly

Ambiguity, AEDPA Deference, and Batson/Powers Challenges: A Commentary on Garrey v. Kelly

Date: Dec 14, 2025
Ambiguity, AEDPA Deference, and Batson/Powers Challenges: A Commentary on Garrey v. Kelly I. Introduction The First Circuit’s decision in Garrey v. Kelly, No. 21‑1197 (1st Cir. Dec. 12, 2025), sits...
Procedural Finality and Categorical Exemptions in Florida Capital Cases: Commentary on Frank A. Walls v. State of Florida & Walls v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Fla. 2025)

Procedural Finality and Categorical Exemptions in Florida Capital Cases: Commentary on Frank A. Walls v. State of Florida & Walls v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Fla. 2025)

Date: Dec 14, 2025
Procedural Finality and Categorical Exemptions in Florida Capital Cases: Commentary on Frank A. Walls v. State of Florida & Walls v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Fla. 2025) I. Introduction...

    Statutory Presumption of Tenancy by the Entireties for Spousal Bank Accounts in Florida:
    Commentary on Linda Loumpos v. Bank One

Statutory Presumption of Tenancy by the Entireties for Spousal Bank Accounts in Florida: Commentary on Linda Loumpos v. Bank One

Date: Dec 14, 2025
Statutory Presumption of Tenancy by the Entireties for Spousal Bank Accounts in Florida: Commentary on Linda Loumpos v. Bank One I. Introduction This commentary examines the Florida Supreme Court’s...
State v. Volle: Limiting Principles in Digital Search Warrants, Inmate Mail Privacy, and the Scope of Felony Murder in Kansas

State v. Volle: Limiting Principles in Digital Search Warrants, Inmate Mail Privacy, and the Scope of Felony Murder in Kansas

Date: Dec 14, 2025
State v. Volle: Limiting Principles in Digital Search Warrants, Inmate Mail Privacy, and the Scope of Felony Murder in Kansas I. Introduction In State v. Volle, No. 127,745 (Kan. Dec. 12, 2025), the...

      State v. McCray: Excluding Third-Party Liability Theories from Out-of-State
      Conviction Comparability Under the Kansas Sentencing Guidelines

State v. McCray: Excluding Third-Party Liability Theories from Out-of-State Conviction Comparability Under the Kansas Sentencing Guidelines

Date: Dec 14, 2025
State v. McCray: Excluding Third-Party Liability Theories from Out-of-State Conviction Comparability Under the Kansas Sentencing Guidelines I. Introduction In State v. McCray, No. 125,798 (Kan. Dec....
Clarifying Sufficiency Review and Immediate Post‑Invocation Interrogation in Arkansas: Commentary on Reggie Matthews v. State

Clarifying Sufficiency Review and Immediate Post‑Invocation Interrogation in Arkansas: Commentary on Reggie Matthews v. State

Date: Dec 14, 2025
Clarifying Sufficiency Review and Immediate Post‑Invocation Interrogation in Arkansas: Commentary on Reggie Matthews v. State, 2025 Ark. 213 I. Introduction The Supreme Court of Arkansas’s decision...
Rehabilitative Use of Child Forensic Interviews and the Limits of Arkansas’s Tender-Years Hearsay Exception: Commentary on Minor Child v. State of Arkansas, 2025 Ark. 210

Rehabilitative Use of Child Forensic Interviews and the Limits of Arkansas’s Tender-Years Hearsay Exception: Commentary on Minor Child v. State of Arkansas, 2025 Ark. 210

Date: Dec 14, 2025
Rehabilitative Use of Child Forensic Interviews and the Limits of Arkansas’s Tender-Years Hearsay Exception: Commentary on Minor Child v. State of Arkansas, 2025 Ark. 210 I. Introduction The Arkansas...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert