Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

view Case Commentaries

Second Circuit Reaffirms No “Prevailing Party” Status After Forum Non Conveniens Dismissal; Rule 41(d) Cost Awards Are Discretionary and Unresolved as to Foreign Dismissals

Second Circuit Reaffirms No “Prevailing Party” Status After Forum Non Conveniens Dismissal; Rule 41(d) Cost Awards Are Discretionary and Unresolved as to Foreign Dismissals

Date: Oct 30, 2025
Second Circuit Reaffirms No “Prevailing Party” Status After Forum Non Conveniens Dismissal; Rule 41(d) Cost Awards Are Discretionary and Unresolved as to Foreign Dismissals Introduction In Paulo v....
United States v. Raniere: Second Circuit Reaffirms Strict Standards for Rule 33 “Newly Discovered Evidence,” No Freestanding Post‑Judgment Discovery Right, and the High Bar for Judicial Recusal

United States v. Raniere: Second Circuit Reaffirms Strict Standards for Rule 33 “Newly Discovered Evidence,” No Freestanding Post‑Judgment Discovery Right, and the High Bar for Judicial Recusal

Date: Oct 30, 2025
United States v. Raniere: Second Circuit Reaffirms Strict Standards for Rule 33 “Newly Discovered Evidence,” No Freestanding Post‑Judgment Discovery Right, and the High Bar for Judicial Recusal...
When a Conspiracy Acquittal Necessarily Rejects the Core Factual Theory, Double Jeopardy Bars Retrial on Substantive Counts — United States v. Cole (2d Cir. 2025)

When a Conspiracy Acquittal Necessarily Rejects the Core Factual Theory, Double Jeopardy Bars Retrial on Substantive Counts — United States v. Cole (2d Cir. 2025)

Date: Oct 30, 2025
When a Conspiracy Acquittal Necessarily Rejects the Core Factual Theory, Double Jeopardy Bars Retrial on Substantive Counts — United States v. Cole (2d Cir. 2025) Introduction In United States v....
Murray v. Miranda: Eleventh Circuit Forecloses Bivens Damages for Federal Prison Medical-Indifference Claims Where BOP Grievance Procedures Exist

Murray v. Miranda: Eleventh Circuit Forecloses Bivens Damages for Federal Prison Medical-Indifference Claims Where BOP Grievance Procedures Exist

Date: Oct 30, 2025
Murray v. Miranda: Eleventh Circuit Forecloses Bivens Damages for Federal Prison Medical-Indifference Claims Where BOP Grievance Procedures Exist Introduction In this unpublished, non-argument...
Ratification, Not Mere Approval: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Monell Pleading Against Florida School Boards and Confirms Supplemental Jurisdiction Discretion After Dismissal (Post‑Royal Canin)

Ratification, Not Mere Approval: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Monell Pleading Against Florida School Boards and Confirms Supplemental Jurisdiction Discretion After Dismissal (Post‑Royal Canin)

Date: Oct 30, 2025
Ratification, Not Mere Approval: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Monell Pleading Against Florida School Boards and Confirms Supplemental Jurisdiction Discretion After Dismissal (Post‑Royal Canin)...
Certified Uncertainties in Florida Proceedings Supplementary: Eleventh Circuit Sends Five Determinative Questions on § 56.29 Remedies, FUFTA Limitations, and Tolling to the Florida Supreme Court

Certified Uncertainties in Florida Proceedings Supplementary: Eleventh Circuit Sends Five Determinative Questions on § 56.29 Remedies, FUFTA Limitations, and Tolling to the Florida Supreme Court

Date: Oct 30, 2025
Certified Uncertainties in Florida Proceedings Supplementary: Eleventh Circuit Sends Five Determinative Questions on § 56.29 Remedies, FUFTA Limitations, and Tolling to the Florida Supreme Court...
Detaining a Probationer on a Post-Bond Hold Without a Prompt Morrissey Hearing Plausibly Violates Due Process; Jail Administrators May Be Liable for Continuing Unlawful Detention (Johnson v. Tims, 7th Cir. 2025)

Detaining a Probationer on a Post-Bond Hold Without a Prompt Morrissey Hearing Plausibly Violates Due Process; Jail Administrators May Be Liable for Continuing Unlawful Detention (Johnson v. Tims, 7th Cir. 2025)

Date: Oct 30, 2025
Detaining a Probationer on a Post-Bond Hold Without a Prompt Morrissey Hearing Plausibly Violates Due Process; Jail Administrators May Be Liable for Continuing Unlawful Detention Nonprecedential...
No “U‑Turns” After 120 Days: First Circuit Holds MSPB Jurisdiction Controls Mixed‑Case Review and Erroneous Agency FADs Cannot Revive Expired Deadlines

No “U‑Turns” After 120 Days: First Circuit Holds MSPB Jurisdiction Controls Mixed‑Case Review and Erroneous Agency FADs Cannot Revive Expired Deadlines

Date: Oct 30, 2025
No “U‑Turns” After 120 Days: First Circuit Holds MSPB Jurisdiction Controls Mixed‑Case Review and Erroneous Agency FADs Cannot Revive Expired Deadlines Introduction In Irizarry Sierra v. Bisignano,...
Absconding Is Not a Waiver of the Presentence Investigation: West Virginia Clarifies Rule 32’s Conjunctive Requirements in State v. DePriest

Absconding Is Not a Waiver of the Presentence Investigation: West Virginia Clarifies Rule 32’s Conjunctive Requirements in State v. DePriest

Date: Oct 30, 2025
Absconding Is Not a Waiver of the Presentence Investigation: West Virginia Clarifies Rule 32’s Conjunctive Requirements in State v. DePriest Court: Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia Date:...
Absconding Does Not Waive the Right to a Presentence Investigation: The Conjunctive Rule 32(b)(1) Mandate in State v. DePriest

Absconding Does Not Waive the Right to a Presentence Investigation: The Conjunctive Rule 32(b)(1) Mandate in State v. DePriest

Date: Oct 30, 2025
Absconding Does Not Waive the Right to a Presentence Investigation: The Conjunctive Rule 32(b)(1) Mandate in State v. DePriest Introduction In State of West Virginia v. James Carroll DePriest, the...
Green Room v. Wyoming: No Private Right Under the 2018 Farm Bill; State Delta‑8/“Psychoactive” Hemp Restrictions Survive Preemption, Dormant Commerce Clause, Takings, and Vagueness Challenges

Green Room v. Wyoming: No Private Right Under the 2018 Farm Bill; State Delta‑8/“Psychoactive” Hemp Restrictions Survive Preemption, Dormant Commerce Clause, Takings, and Vagueness Challenges

Date: Oct 30, 2025
Green Room v. Wyoming: No Private Right Under the 2018 Farm Bill; State Delta‑8/“Psychoactive” Hemp Restrictions Survive Preemption, Dormant Commerce Clause, Takings, and Vagueness Challenges...
Neeley v. Long: Tenth Circuit Reaffirms Rare Availability of Equitable Tolling for AEDPA Timeliness and Declines to Ground COA Denial on Firm-Waiver Rule

Neeley v. Long: Tenth Circuit Reaffirms Rare Availability of Equitable Tolling for AEDPA Timeliness and Declines to Ground COA Denial on Firm-Waiver Rule

Date: Oct 30, 2025
Neeley v. Long: Tenth Circuit Reaffirms Rare Availability of Equitable Tolling for AEDPA Timeliness and Declines to Ground COA Denial on Firm-Waiver Rule Introduction In Neeley v. Long, No. 25-1131...
Tenth Circuit Closes the “Impeachment” Workaround: Rule 412 Bars Using a Child Victim’s Sexualized Online Fantasies for General Credibility Attacks; Constitutional Exception Limited to Bias or Motive

Tenth Circuit Closes the “Impeachment” Workaround: Rule 412 Bars Using a Child Victim’s Sexualized Online Fantasies for General Credibility Attacks; Constitutional Exception Limited to Bias or Motive

Date: Oct 30, 2025
Tenth Circuit Closes the “Impeachment” Workaround: Rule 412 Bars Using a Child Victim’s Sexualized Online Fantasies for General Credibility Attacks; Constitutional Exception Limited to Bias or Motive...
Official Release and Oath Administration for the July 2025 Ohio Bar Examination: Non‑Precedential Administrative Action of the Supreme Court of Ohio

Official Release and Oath Administration for the July 2025 Ohio Bar Examination: Non‑Precedential Administrative Action of the Supreme Court of Ohio

Date: Oct 30, 2025
Official Release and Oath Administration for the July 2025 Ohio Bar Examination: Non‑Precedential Administrative Action of the Supreme Court of Ohio Introduction In 2025-Ohio-4877 (Administrative...
Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia Affirms De Novo Authority Over Stipulated Violations and Clarifies Which Judicial Conduct Rules Apply to Appointive Candidates

Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia Affirms De Novo Authority Over Stipulated Violations and Clarifies Which Judicial Conduct Rules Apply to Appointive Candidates

Date: Oct 30, 2025
Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia Affirms De Novo Authority Over Stipulated Violations and Clarifies Which Judicial Conduct Rules Apply to Appointive Candidates Introduction In In the Matter...
Search-Incident-to-Arrest Valid Despite CAD Timestamp Discrepancy; Suspect-Assisted Retrieval of Concealed Contraband Is Non‑Testimonial

Search-Incident-to-Arrest Valid Despite CAD Timestamp Discrepancy; Suspect-Assisted Retrieval of Concealed Contraband Is Non‑Testimonial

Date: Oct 30, 2025
Search-Incident-to-Arrest Valid Despite CAD Timestamp Discrepancy; Suspect-Assisted Retrieval of Concealed Contraband Is Non‑Testimonial Introduction In State of West Virginia v. Roderick Levi Howard...
De Novo Means De Novo: West Virginia High Court Refuses to Be Bound by Disciplinary Stipulations and Clarifies Status-Specific Reach of Judicial Conduct Rules in In re Boso

De Novo Means De Novo: West Virginia High Court Refuses to Be Bound by Disciplinary Stipulations and Clarifies Status-Specific Reach of Judicial Conduct Rules in In re Boso

Date: Oct 30, 2025
De Novo Means De Novo: West Virginia High Court Refuses to Be Bound by Disciplinary Stipulations and Clarifies Status-Specific Reach of Judicial Conduct Rules in In re Boso Introduction In a...
Deference on Arrest Timing: Officer Testimony May Outweigh CAD Timestamps to Uphold a Search Incident to Arrest

Deference on Arrest Timing: Officer Testimony May Outweigh CAD Timestamps to Uphold a Search Incident to Arrest

Date: Oct 30, 2025
Deference on Arrest Timing: Officer Testimony May Outweigh CAD Timestamps to Uphold a Search Incident to Arrest Introduction In State of West Virginia v. Roderick Levi Howard (No. 24-88), the Supreme...
Confidentiality Breaches Do Not Justify Dismissal in Bar Discipline; Fifth Amendment Adverse Inferences Allowed — In re Discipline of Sandy Van

Confidentiality Breaches Do Not Justify Dismissal in Bar Discipline; Fifth Amendment Adverse Inferences Allowed — In re Discipline of Sandy Van

Date: Oct 30, 2025
Confidentiality Breaches Do Not Justify Dismissal in Bar Discipline; Fifth Amendment Adverse Inferences Allowed — In re Discipline of Sandy Van Introduction In this automatic review of a disciplinary...
After Louisiana’s 2008 Tax Sale Revision, Pre‑Sale Notice Failures Do Not Create Absolute Nullities; Reconventional Nullity Claims in Quiet Title Actions Must Meet Dual Statutory Deadlines

After Louisiana’s 2008 Tax Sale Revision, Pre‑Sale Notice Failures Do Not Create Absolute Nullities; Reconventional Nullity Claims in Quiet Title Actions Must Meet Dual Statutory Deadlines

Date: Oct 30, 2025
After Louisiana’s 2008 Tax Sale Revision, Pre‑Sale Notice Failures Do Not Create Absolute Nullities; Reconventional Nullity Claims in Quiet Title Actions Must Meet Dual Statutory Deadlines Case:...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert