Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

view Case Commentaries

Independent Investigation Breaks the Cat’s Paw: Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms Limits on Mixed‑Motive Title VII Claims in Police Use‑of‑Force Terminations

Independent Investigation Breaks the Cat’s Paw: Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms Limits on Mixed‑Motive Title VII Claims in Police Use‑of‑Force Terminations

Date: Sep 4, 2025
Independent Investigation Breaks the Cat’s Paw: Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms Limits on Mixed‑Motive Title VII Claims in Police Use‑of‑Force Terminations Case: Roger Williams v. Unified Government of...
Harmless-Error Review Governs Early Denials of Compassionate Release Without a Reply; § 3553(a) Discretion Alone Can Sustain Denial

Harmless-Error Review Governs Early Denials of Compassionate Release Without a Reply; § 3553(a) Discretion Alone Can Sustain Denial

Date: Sep 4, 2025
Harmless-Error Review Governs Early Denials of Compassionate Release Without a Reply; § 3553(a) Discretion Alone Can Sustain Denial Introduction In United States v. Fednert Orisnord, No. 24-12776...
Flexible Daubert Gatekeeping and Circumstantial Proof of “Death Results” under § 841: United States v. Jackasal (11th Cir. 2025)

Flexible Daubert Gatekeeping and Circumstantial Proof of “Death Results” under § 841: United States v. Jackasal (11th Cir. 2025)

Date: Sep 4, 2025
Flexible Daubert Gatekeeping and Circumstantial Proof of “Death Results” under § 841: United States v. Jackasal (11th Cir. 2025) Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit (Non-Argument...
Danger Finding Alone Bars Compassionate Release, Despite First Step Act Anti‑Stacking and Concepcion: Eleventh Circuit’s Decision in United States v. Harrell

Danger Finding Alone Bars Compassionate Release, Despite First Step Act Anti‑Stacking and Concepcion: Eleventh Circuit’s Decision in United States v. Harrell

Date: Sep 4, 2025
Danger Finding Alone Bars Compassionate Release, Despite First Step Act Anti‑Stacking and Concepcion: Eleventh Circuit’s Decision in United States v. Harrell Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the...
“More Than Minimal Planning” Includes Coordinated Travel and Instrument Procurement; Upward Variance for “Terroristic” Violence Affirmed — Commentary on United States v. Ruark (11th Cir. 2025)

“More Than Minimal Planning” Includes Coordinated Travel and Instrument Procurement; Upward Variance for “Terroristic” Violence Affirmed — Commentary on United States v. Ruark (11th Cir. 2025)

Date: Sep 4, 2025
“More Than Minimal Planning” Includes Coordinated Travel and Instrument Procurement; Upward Variance for “Terroristic” Violence Affirmed Commentary on United States v. Shawn Ruark, No. 24-11672 (11th...
Post-Ames Uniform Prima Facie Standard Confirmed: Sixth Circuit Affirms Summary Judgment in Howard v. Cherokee Health Systems, Reemphasizing the Honest-Belief Doctrine and Leaving “Selective Favoritism” Under Title VII Unresolved

Post-Ames Uniform Prima Facie Standard Confirmed: Sixth Circuit Affirms Summary Judgment in Howard v. Cherokee Health Systems, Reemphasizing the Honest-Belief Doctrine and Leaving “Selective Favoritism” Under Title VII Unresolved

Date: Sep 4, 2025
Post-Ames Uniform Prima Facie Standard Confirmed: Sixth Circuit Affirms Summary Judgment in Howard v. Cherokee Health Systems, Reemphasizing the Honest-Belief Doctrine and Leaving “Selective...
Collective-Knowledge Reasonable Suspicion and Post-Hearing Clarification of Drug Quantity: Sixth Circuit Affirms Stop, K‑9 Sweep, and Sentencing Findings in United States v. Knuuttila

Collective-Knowledge Reasonable Suspicion and Post-Hearing Clarification of Drug Quantity: Sixth Circuit Affirms Stop, K‑9 Sweep, and Sentencing Findings in United States v. Knuuttila

Date: Sep 4, 2025
Collective-Knowledge Reasonable Suspicion and Post-Hearing Clarification of Drug Quantity: Sixth Circuit Affirms Stop, K‑9 Sweep, and Sentencing Findings in United States v. Knuuttila Introduction...
United States v. Blasdel: Tenth Circuit Clarifies Four-Corners Exclusivity and Denies Good-Faith Reliance for Affidavits Tainted by Pre‑Warrant Searches

United States v. Blasdel: Tenth Circuit Clarifies Four-Corners Exclusivity and Denies Good-Faith Reliance for Affidavits Tainted by Pre‑Warrant Searches

Date: Sep 4, 2025
United States v. Blasdel: Tenth Circuit Clarifies Four-Corners Exclusivity and Denies Good-Faith Reliance for Affidavits Tainted by Pre‑Warrant Searches Introduction In United States v. Blasdel (10th...
Post-Moore Clarification: § 3231 Controls Criminal Tax Jurisdiction; § 7403 Foreclosures Constitute “Seizures Under Title 26” for § 7212(b); Form 4549/SFR Evidence Can Prove § 7201 Liability

Post-Moore Clarification: § 3231 Controls Criminal Tax Jurisdiction; § 7403 Foreclosures Constitute “Seizures Under Title 26” for § 7212(b); Form 4549/SFR Evidence Can Prove § 7201 Liability

Date: Sep 4, 2025
Post-Moore Clarification: § 3231 Controls Criminal Tax Jurisdiction; § 7403 Foreclosures Constitute “Seizures Under Title 26” for § 7212(b); Form 4549/SFR Evidence Can Prove § 7201 Liability Case:...
Klein Conspiracies Require “Deceitful or Dishonest Means” and Advice-of-Counsel Must Be Instructed Across Counts: United States v. Kearney (10th Cir. 2025)

Klein Conspiracies Require “Deceitful or Dishonest Means” and Advice-of-Counsel Must Be Instructed Across Counts: United States v. Kearney (10th Cir. 2025)

Date: Sep 4, 2025
Klein Conspiracies Require “Deceitful or Dishonest Means” and Advice-of-Counsel Must Be Instructed Across Counts: United States v. Kearney (10th Cir. 2025) Introduction In United States v. Kearney,...
Common Use, Not Common Possession: Tenth Circuit Holds Machineguns Fall Outside Second Amendment Protection at Bruen Step One

Common Use, Not Common Possession: Tenth Circuit Holds Machineguns Fall Outside Second Amendment Protection at Bruen Step One

Date: Sep 4, 2025
Common Use, Not Common Possession: Tenth Circuit Holds Machineguns Fall Outside Second Amendment Protection at Bruen Step One Introduction United States v. Morgan (10th Cir. Sept. 2, 2025) confronts...
Eleventh Circuit Upholds ACCA’s Reliance on State Sentencing Maxima Against Fifth Amendment Equal‑Protection Challenge

Eleventh Circuit Upholds ACCA’s Reliance on State Sentencing Maxima Against Fifth Amendment Equal‑Protection Challenge

Date: Sep 4, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Upholds ACCA’s Reliance on State Sentencing Maxima Against Fifth Amendment Equal‑Protection Challenge Case: United States v. Nikequis Lachristopher Green, No. 24-11526 (11th Cir....
“Crowded-and-Confined” Sensitive Places: Seventh Circuit Upholds Illinois’s Transit Firearm Restriction under Bruen

“Crowded-and-Confined” Sensitive Places: Seventh Circuit Upholds Illinois’s Transit Firearm Restriction under Bruen

Date: Sep 4, 2025
“Crowded-and-Confined” Sensitive Places: Seventh Circuit Upholds Illinois’s Transit Firearm Restriction under Bruen Introduction This Seventh Circuit decision addresses whether Illinois may bar...

      “Crowded and Confined” as Sensitive Places: Seventh Circuit Upholds Illinois’s Transit Carry Restriction and Articulates a Five-Factor Limiting Principle under Bruen

“Crowded and Confined” as Sensitive Places: Seventh Circuit Upholds Illinois’s Transit Carry Restriction and Articulates a Five-Factor Limiting Principle under Bruen

Date: Sep 4, 2025
“Crowded and Confined” as Sensitive Places: Seventh Circuit Upholds Illinois’s Transit Carry Restriction and Articulates a Five-Factor Limiting Principle under Bruen Introduction In Benjamin...
Seventh Circuit Draws a Line: In ERISA Disability Appeals, a Fundamentally Inconsistent Onset Date Is a New Claim Requiring Exhaustion

Seventh Circuit Draws a Line: In ERISA Disability Appeals, a Fundamentally Inconsistent Onset Date Is a New Claim Requiring Exhaustion

Date: Sep 4, 2025
Seventh Circuit Draws a Line: In ERISA Disability Appeals, a Fundamentally Inconsistent Onset Date Is a New Claim Requiring Exhaustion Introduction In Karen Moratz v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance...
Context Matters: Seventh Circuit Holds “I think so, yes” Can Be an Unequivocal Assurance of Juror Impartiality; Law‑Enforcement Family Ties Not Per Se Disqualifying

Context Matters: Seventh Circuit Holds “I think so, yes” Can Be an Unequivocal Assurance of Juror Impartiality; Law‑Enforcement Family Ties Not Per Se Disqualifying

Date: Sep 4, 2025
Context Matters: Seventh Circuit Holds “I think so, yes” Can Be an Unequivocal Assurance of Juror Impartiality; Law‑Enforcement Family Ties Not Per Se Disqualifying Introduction In United States v....
“Out-of-Order” Means No Reasonable Expectation of Privacy: Seventh Circuit Clarifies Fourth Amendment Limits in Unlocked, Non‑Functional Public Restrooms

“Out-of-Order” Means No Reasonable Expectation of Privacy: Seventh Circuit Clarifies Fourth Amendment Limits in Unlocked, Non‑Functional Public Restrooms

Date: Sep 4, 2025
“Out-of-Order” Means No Reasonable Expectation of Privacy: Seventh Circuit Clarifies Fourth Amendment Limits in Unlocked, Non‑Functional Public Restrooms Introduction In United States v. Lapierre...
Seventh Circuit Clarifies: “Middlemen” Who Initiate or Conclude Transactions Are “In the Business of Laundering Funds” Under U.S.S.G. §2S1.1(b)(2)(C)

Seventh Circuit Clarifies: “Middlemen” Who Initiate or Conclude Transactions Are “In the Business of Laundering Funds” Under U.S.S.G. §2S1.1(b)(2)(C)

Date: Sep 4, 2025
Seventh Circuit Clarifies: “Middlemen” Who Initiate or Conclude Transactions Are “In the Business of Laundering Funds” Under U.S.S.G. §2S1.1(b)(2)(C) Introduction In United States v. Miguel...
Independent Military Purpose Shields Army CID Investigations from FTCA Liability; Posse Comitatus Not Violated Absent Pervasive Civilian Law-Enforcement Role

Independent Military Purpose Shields Army CID Investigations from FTCA Liability; Posse Comitatus Not Violated Absent Pervasive Civilian Law-Enforcement Role

Date: Sep 4, 2025
Independent Military Purpose Shields Army CID Investigations from FTCA Liability; Posse Comitatus Not Violated Absent Pervasive Civilian Law-Enforcement Role Introduction In Perales-Muñoz v. United...
Gatekeeping, Not Fact‑Finding: Utah Supreme Court Sets Prima Facie Standard for Successive Competency-to-be-Executed Petitions and Bars Execution Warrants While Ford/Madison Proceedings Are Pending

Gatekeeping, Not Fact‑Finding: Utah Supreme Court Sets Prima Facie Standard for Successive Competency-to-be-Executed Petitions and Bars Execution Warrants While Ford/Madison Proceedings Are Pending

Date: Sep 2, 2025
Gatekeeping, Not Fact‑Finding: Utah Supreme Court Sets Prima Facie Standard for Successive Competency-to-be-Executed Petitions and Bars Execution Warrants While Ford/Madison Proceedings Are Pending...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert