Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

view Case Commentaries

Franklin Structures v. Williams: Ratification by Warranty Service Binds Homebuyers to Mediation-First Arbitration; Trial Courts Must Compel Mediation Before Arbitration

Franklin Structures v. Williams: Ratification by Warranty Service Binds Homebuyers to Mediation-First Arbitration; Trial Courts Must Compel Mediation Before Arbitration

Date: Aug 30, 2025
Franklin Structures v. Williams: Ratification by Warranty Service Binds Homebuyers to Mediation-First Arbitration; Trial Courts Must Compel Mediation Before Arbitration Introduction In Franklin...
Absent Transcript, Appellate Deference Controls: Circuit Courts May Not Recalculate Probate Administrator ad Litem Fees on Appeal Under § 12-22-20

Absent Transcript, Appellate Deference Controls: Circuit Courts May Not Recalculate Probate Administrator ad Litem Fees on Appeal Under § 12-22-20

Date: Aug 30, 2025
Absent Transcript, Appellate Deference Controls: Circuit Courts May Not Recalculate Probate Administrator ad Litem Fees on Appeal Under § 12-22-20 Introduction This commentary examines the Alabama...
Relative-Hardship Over Breach: Alabama Supreme Court Clarifies Clean-Hands Limits and Balancing in Restrictive Covenant Injunctions

Relative-Hardship Over Breach: Alabama Supreme Court Clarifies Clean-Hands Limits and Balancing in Restrictive Covenant Injunctions

Date: Aug 30, 2025
Relative-Hardship Over Breach: Alabama Supreme Court Clarifies Clean-Hands Limits and Balancing in Restrictive Covenant Injunctions Case: Rodney G. Englund, Dyann K. Englund, and Georgetown...
Tracing to a “Specific Drug Transaction” Not Required for Currency Forfeiture under Former § 20-2-93; Ore Tenus Deference Reaffirmed — Ex parte State of Alabama ex rel. Broussard (Ala. 2025)

Tracing to a “Specific Drug Transaction” Not Required for Currency Forfeiture under Former § 20-2-93; Ore Tenus Deference Reaffirmed — Ex parte State of Alabama ex rel. Broussard (Ala. 2025)

Date: Aug 30, 2025
Tracing to a “Specific Drug Transaction” Not Required for Currency Forfeiture under Former § 20-2-93; Ore Tenus Deference Reaffirmed Ex parte State of Alabama ex rel. Robert Broussard, District...
No Stand‑Your‑Ground, No Prior‑Crimes: Alabama Supreme Court Limits 404(b) Use To Prove “Unlawful Activity” When Self‑Defense Proceeds Under the Common Law

No Stand‑Your‑Ground, No Prior‑Crimes: Alabama Supreme Court Limits 404(b) Use To Prove “Unlawful Activity” When Self‑Defense Proceeds Under the Common Law

Date: Aug 30, 2025
No Stand‑Your‑Ground, No Prior‑Crimes: Alabama Supreme Court Limits 404(b) Use To Prove “Unlawful Activity” When Self‑Defense Proceeds Under the Common Law Case: Ex parte Corey Lee Walton, Supreme...
Rogers v. Cedar Bluff: Alabama Supreme Court Clarifies Municipal Vicarious Immunity for Volunteer Firefighters and the Status of Municipal Volunteer Fire Departments

Rogers v. Cedar Bluff: Alabama Supreme Court Clarifies Municipal Vicarious Immunity for Volunteer Firefighters and the Status of Municipal Volunteer Fire Departments

Date: Aug 30, 2025
Rogers v. Cedar Bluff: Alabama Supreme Court Clarifies Municipal Vicarious Immunity for Volunteer Firefighters and the Status of Municipal Volunteer Fire Departments Introduction In Carol Rogers, as...
Resisting-Arrest Pleas Do Not Blanket-Authorize Police Force: Third Circuit Requires a Complete Record—Including Bodycam Footage—Before Summary Judgment in Excessive-Force Cases

Resisting-Arrest Pleas Do Not Blanket-Authorize Police Force: Third Circuit Requires a Complete Record—Including Bodycam Footage—Before Summary Judgment in Excessive-Force Cases

Date: Aug 29, 2025
Resisting-Arrest Pleas Do Not Blanket-Authorize Police Force: Third Circuit Requires a Complete Record—Including Bodycam Footage—Before Summary Judgment in Excessive-Force Cases Introduction In...
Third Circuit clarifies de novo review of Rule 60(d)(1) dismissals and reaffirms broad transactional claim preclusion in serial fee litigation

Third Circuit clarifies de novo review of Rule 60(d)(1) dismissals and reaffirms broad transactional claim preclusion in serial fee litigation

Date: Aug 29, 2025
Third Circuit clarifies de novo review of Rule 60(d)(1) dismissals and reaffirms broad transactional claim preclusion in serial fee litigation Case: Law Offices of Bruce J. Chasan, LLC v. John Pierce...
A Two‑Track Roadmap When a Plaintiff Goes Silent: Rule 56 Record Review or Poulis‑Based Rule 41(b) Dismissal—Not “Default” Summary Judgment

A Two‑Track Roadmap When a Plaintiff Goes Silent: Rule 56 Record Review or Poulis‑Based Rule 41(b) Dismissal—Not “Default” Summary Judgment

Date: Aug 29, 2025
A Two‑Track Roadmap When a Plaintiff Goes Silent: Rule 56 Record Review or Poulis‑Based Rule 41(b) Dismissal—Not “Default” Summary Judgment Case: Michael Goodson, Sr. v. City of Philadelphia and...
Subsection 2516(2) Defers to State Law: Third Circuit Confirms State AGs May Delegate Wiretap-Application Authority Without a Federal “Personal Review” Requirement

Subsection 2516(2) Defers to State Law: Third Circuit Confirms State AGs May Delegate Wiretap-Application Authority Without a Federal “Personal Review” Requirement

Date: Aug 29, 2025
Subsection 2516(2) Defers to State Law: Third Circuit Confirms State AGs May Delegate Wiretap-Application Authority Without a Federal “Personal Review” Requirement Introduction In United States v....
No Personal Review Required: Third Circuit Holds State AG’s Delegation of Wiretap Authority Under §2516(2) Is Valid If Authorized by State Law

No Personal Review Required: Third Circuit Holds State AG’s Delegation of Wiretap Authority Under §2516(2) Is Valid If Authorized by State Law

Date: Aug 29, 2025
No Personal Review Required: Third Circuit Holds State AG’s Delegation of Wiretap Authority Under §2516(2) Is Valid If Authorized by State Law Case: United States v. Price Montgomery; United States...
“No Court Shall Have Jurisdiction”: Fifth Circuit Confirms § 1818(i)(1) Explicitly Bars District Court Injunctions Against FDIC Orders—Even for Constitutional Claims

“No Court Shall Have Jurisdiction”: Fifth Circuit Confirms § 1818(i)(1) Explicitly Bars District Court Injunctions Against FDIC Orders—Even for Constitutional Claims

Date: Aug 29, 2025
“No Court Shall Have Jurisdiction”: Fifth Circuit Confirms § 1818(i)(1) Explicitly Bars District Court Injunctions Against FDIC Orders—Even for Constitutional Claims Case: Burgess v. Whang, No....
No Magic Words: Fifth Circuit Holds § 1786(k)(1) Explicitly Bars District Court Pre‑Enforcement Review of NCUA Proceedings

No Magic Words: Fifth Circuit Holds § 1786(k)(1) Explicitly Bars District Court Pre‑Enforcement Review of NCUA Proceedings

Date: Aug 29, 2025
No Magic Words: Fifth Circuit Holds § 1786(k)(1) Explicitly Bars District Court Pre‑Enforcement Review of NCUA Proceedings Introduction In Moats v. National Credit Union Administration Board, the...
When Interdependent SEC Rules Are Adopted Together, the Agency Must Quantify Their Combined Economic Impact

When Interdependent SEC Rules Are Adopted Together, the Agency Must Quantify Their Combined Economic Impact

Date: Aug 29, 2025
When Interdependent SEC Rules Are Adopted Together, the Agency Must Quantify Their Combined Economic Impact Introduction In National Association of Private Fund Managers v. SEC (5th Cir. Aug. 25,...
“Remote Nexus” Meets “Continuing Offense”: Fifth Circuit Affirms § 5K2.21 Upward Departure for Uncharged Failure-to-Register During a § 1326 “Found In” Reentry

“Remote Nexus” Meets “Continuing Offense”: Fifth Circuit Affirms § 5K2.21 Upward Departure for Uncharged Failure-to-Register During a § 1326 “Found In” Reentry

Date: Aug 29, 2025
“Remote Nexus” Meets “Continuing Offense”: Fifth Circuit Affirms § 5K2.21 Upward Departure for Uncharged Failure-to-Register During a § 1326 “Found In” Reentry Introduction In United States v....
No City Permits for State Billboards: Mississippi Supreme Court Reaffirms that Municipal Sign and Zoning Ordinances Do Not Reach State-Owned Property Absent Express Legislative Authorization

No City Permits for State Billboards: Mississippi Supreme Court Reaffirms that Municipal Sign and Zoning Ordinances Do Not Reach State-Owned Property Absent Express Legislative Authorization

Date: Aug 29, 2025
No City Permits for State Billboards: Mississippi Supreme Court Reaffirms that Municipal Sign and Zoning Ordinances Do Not Reach State-Owned Property Absent Express Legislative Authorization Case:...
Ambiguous Lawyer Questions and Non‑Promissory Leniency: Mississippi Supreme Court Clarifies Voluntariness and Miranda in Reyes v. State

Ambiguous Lawyer Questions and Non‑Promissory Leniency: Mississippi Supreme Court Clarifies Voluntariness and Miranda in Reyes v. State

Date: Aug 29, 2025
Ambiguous Lawyer Questions and Non‑Promissory Leniency: Mississippi Supreme Court Clarifies Voluntariness and Miranda in Reyes v. State Introduction In Antonio Sauceda Reyes a/k/a Antonio Reyes v....
Short Terms, Harsh Conditions: Seventh Circuit Holds That Three Months of Solitary in “Disgusting” Conditions Implicates a Liberty Interest, Yet Affirms on Qualified Immunity (Jackson v. Anastacio)

Short Terms, Harsh Conditions: Seventh Circuit Holds That Three Months of Solitary in “Disgusting” Conditions Implicates a Liberty Interest, Yet Affirms on Qualified Immunity (Jackson v. Anastacio)

Date: Aug 28, 2025
Short Terms, Harsh Conditions: Seventh Circuit Holds That Three Months of Solitary in “Disgusting” Conditions Implicates a Liberty Interest, Yet Affirms on Qualified Immunity Introduction This...
Ortiz and McDonnell Douglas Reconciled: Comparator Pay Proof Is Essential in Title VII Pay-Disparity Claims

Ortiz and McDonnell Douglas Reconciled: Comparator Pay Proof Is Essential in Title VII Pay-Disparity Claims

Date: Aug 28, 2025
Ortiz and McDonnell Douglas Reconciled: Comparator Pay Proof Is Essential in Title VII Pay-Disparity Claims Introduction In Frankie Nelson v. County of Cook (No. 24-2123), the Seventh Circuit...
Projected Sold Adjustments Alone Do Not Establish Breach or Support Class Certification: Fourth Circuit Requires Concrete Injury and Individualized Proof of Underpayment in Total-Loss ACV Cases

Projected Sold Adjustments Alone Do Not Establish Breach or Support Class Certification: Fourth Circuit Requires Concrete Injury and Individualized Proof of Underpayment in Total-Loss ACV Cases

Date: Aug 28, 2025
Projected Sold Adjustments Alone Do Not Establish Breach or Support Class Certification: Fourth Circuit Requires Concrete Injury and Individualized Proof of Underpayment in Total-Loss ACV Cases...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert