Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

view Case Commentaries

“Private” Social Media as a Stage Whisper: Seventh Circuit Clarifies Pickering Balancing for Teachers’ Off‑Duty Posts and Rejects the Heckler’s‑Veto Frame

“Private” Social Media as a Stage Whisper: Seventh Circuit Clarifies Pickering Balancing for Teachers’ Off‑Duty Posts and Rejects the Heckler’s‑Veto Frame

Date: Aug 31, 2025
“Private” Social Media as a Stage Whisper: Seventh Circuit Clarifies Pickering Balancing for Teachers’ Off‑Duty Posts and Rejects the Heckler’s‑Veto Frame Case: Jeanne Hedgepeth v. James A. Britton,...
When a State Court Says “No” to Arbitration, Federal Courts Don’t Re‑Ask: Seventh Circuit Enforces Issue Preclusion After a Denial of Arbitration and Subsequent Settlement

When a State Court Says “No” to Arbitration, Federal Courts Don’t Re‑Ask: Seventh Circuit Enforces Issue Preclusion After a Denial of Arbitration and Subsequent Settlement

Date: Aug 31, 2025
When a State Court Says “No” to Arbitration, Federal Courts Don’t Re‑Ask: Seventh Circuit Enforces Issue Preclusion After a Denial of Arbitration and Subsequent Settlement Introduction In Mazen Agha...
Anonymous Tips Are Not Enough: Seventh Circuit Tightens Qualified Immunity Where Officers Fail to Corroborate Animal-Neglect Allegations and Clarifies Federal Malicious Prosecution Pleading

Anonymous Tips Are Not Enough: Seventh Circuit Tightens Qualified Immunity Where Officers Fail to Corroborate Animal-Neglect Allegations and Clarifies Federal Malicious Prosecution Pleading

Date: Aug 31, 2025
Anonymous Tips Are Not Enough: Seventh Circuit Tightens Qualified Immunity Where Officers Fail to Corroborate Animal-Neglect Allegations and Clarifies Federal Malicious Prosecution Pleading...
No RICO for Disputes over Religious Truth; Reliance-Based Tithing Fraud Must Plead Proximate Cause: The Tenth Circuit’s Dual Holding in Gaddy v. COP of the LDS Church

No RICO for Disputes over Religious Truth; Reliance-Based Tithing Fraud Must Plead Proximate Cause: The Tenth Circuit’s Dual Holding in Gaddy v. COP of the LDS Church

Date: Aug 31, 2025
No RICO for Disputes over Religious Truth; Reliance-Based Tithing Fraud Must Plead Proximate Cause: The Tenth Circuit’s Dual Holding in Gaddy v. COP of the LDS Church Introduction In a published...
No Bright-Line Bar to Mixed-Motive Family Nexus: Tenth Circuit Vacates BIA’s “Means-to-an-End” Rule in O.C.V. v. Bondi

No Bright-Line Bar to Mixed-Motive Family Nexus: Tenth Circuit Vacates BIA’s “Means-to-an-End” Rule in O.C.V. v. Bondi

Date: Aug 31, 2025
No Bright-Line Bar to Mixed-Motive Family Nexus: Tenth Circuit Vacates BIA’s “Means-to-an-End” Rule in O.C.V. v. Bondi Introduction In O.C.V. v. Bondi, the Tenth Circuit issued a published decision...
Tenth Circuit Rejects Categorical Approach to Rule 413 and Reaffirms that Prior Prostitution Is Not Probative of Consent: United States v. Clay

Tenth Circuit Rejects Categorical Approach to Rule 413 and Reaffirms that Prior Prostitution Is Not Probative of Consent: United States v. Clay

Date: Aug 31, 2025
Tenth Circuit Rejects Categorical Approach to Rule 413 and Reaffirms that Prior Prostitution Is Not Probative of Consent Comprehensive Commentary on United States v. Clay (10th Cir. 2025)...
Prospective Dangerousness as a Constitutional Principle for Disarmament: Tenth Circuit Remands § 922(g)(3) Marijuana Case for Evidence in United States v. Harrison

Prospective Dangerousness as a Constitutional Principle for Disarmament: Tenth Circuit Remands § 922(g)(3) Marijuana Case for Evidence in United States v. Harrison

Date: Aug 31, 2025
Prospective Dangerousness as a Constitutional Principle for Disarmament: Tenth Circuit Remands § 922(g)(3) Marijuana Case for Evidence in United States v. Harrison Introduction United States v....
Deliberate Interval and Distinct-Injury Test Reaffirmed: Georgia Supreme Court Clarifies Non‑Merger of Aggravated Assault and Malice Murder in Allen v. State

Deliberate Interval and Distinct-Injury Test Reaffirmed: Georgia Supreme Court Clarifies Non‑Merger of Aggravated Assault and Malice Murder in Allen v. State

Date: Aug 31, 2025
Deliberate Interval and Distinct-Injury Test Reaffirmed: Georgia Supreme Court Clarifies Non‑Merger of Aggravated Assault and Malice Murder in Allen v. State Introduction In Allen v. State, the...
Foster v. State: Admissions as Direct Evidence Limit OCGA § 24-14-6; Minimal Corroboration of Confessions and Deference to Continuance Denials

Foster v. State: Admissions as Direct Evidence Limit OCGA § 24-14-6; Minimal Corroboration of Confessions and Deference to Continuance Denials

Date: Aug 31, 2025
Foster v. State: Admissions as Direct Evidence Limit OCGA § 24-14-6; Minimal Corroboration of Confessions and Deference to Continuance Denials Introduction In Foster v. State (Supreme Court of...
Income Approach Restored for LIHTC Valuations: Georgia Supreme Court Overrules Freedom Heights and Clarifies OCGA § 48-5-2(3)(B)(vii)(II)

Income Approach Restored for LIHTC Valuations: Georgia Supreme Court Overrules Freedom Heights and Clarifies OCGA § 48-5-2(3)(B)(vii)(II)

Date: Aug 31, 2025
Income Approach Restored for LIHTC Valuations: Georgia Supreme Court Overrules Freedom Heights and Clarifies OCGA § 48-5-2(3)(B)(vii)(II) Introduction In Gateway Pines Hahira, LP v. Lowndes County...
Hall v. State: Georgia Supreme Court Rejects “Generic Motive to Control” Under Rule 404(b) but Upholds Prior Domestic Violence to Prove Intent and Absence of Accident; Excited Utterances by Non-Eyewitness Child Clarified

Hall v. State: Georgia Supreme Court Rejects “Generic Motive to Control” Under Rule 404(b) but Upholds Prior Domestic Violence to Prove Intent and Absence of Accident; Excited Utterances by Non-Eyewitness Child Clarified

Date: Aug 31, 2025
Hall v. State: Georgia Supreme Court Rejects “Generic Motive to Control” Under Rule 404(b) but Upholds Prior Domestic Violence to Prove Intent and Absence of Accident; Excited Utterances by...
Pursuit Eliminates Justification and Defendant Admissions Defeat Georgia’s Circumstantial Evidence Rule: A Commentary on Mack v. State (Ga. 2025)

Pursuit Eliminates Justification and Defendant Admissions Defeat Georgia’s Circumstantial Evidence Rule: A Commentary on Mack v. State (Ga. 2025)

Date: Aug 31, 2025
Pursuit Eliminates Justification and Defendant Admissions Defeat Georgia’s Circumstantial Evidence Rule: A Commentary on Mack v. State (Ga. 2025) Introduction In Mack v. State, the Supreme Court of...
No Voluntary Manslaughter Charge Without Serious Provocation: Georgia Supreme Court Reaffirms Plain-Error Limits and Strickland Prejudice in Marrow v. State

No Voluntary Manslaughter Charge Without Serious Provocation: Georgia Supreme Court Reaffirms Plain-Error Limits and Strickland Prejudice in Marrow v. State

Date: Aug 31, 2025
No Voluntary Manslaughter Charge Without Serious Provocation: Georgia Supreme Court Reaffirms Plain-Error Limits and Strickland Prejudice in Marrow v. State Introduction In Marrow v. State (Supreme...
Payne v. State: Limiting Debelbot and Clarifying Photo‑Lineup Challenges—Media Exposure Arguments Go to Weight, and “50%” Reasonable‑Doubt Misstatements Are Deficient but Not Automatically Prejudicial

Payne v. State: Limiting Debelbot and Clarifying Photo‑Lineup Challenges—Media Exposure Arguments Go to Weight, and “50%” Reasonable‑Doubt Misstatements Are Deficient but Not Automatically Prejudicial

Date: Aug 31, 2025
Payne v. State: Limiting Debelbot and Clarifying Photo‑Lineup Challenges—Media Exposure Arguments Go to Weight, and “50%” Reasonable‑Doubt Misstatements Are Deficient but Not Automatically...
Limiting the “Bolstering” Harmless-Error Rule: Prior Inconsistent Statements Fall Outside the Exclusion in Georgia

Limiting the “Bolstering” Harmless-Error Rule: Prior Inconsistent Statements Fall Outside the Exclusion in Georgia

Date: Aug 31, 2025
Limiting the “Bolstering” Harmless-Error Rule: Prior Inconsistent Statements Fall Outside the Exclusion in Georgia Introduction In Richardson v. State (Supreme Court of Georgia, Aug. 26, 2025), the...
Scott v. State (Ga. 2025): Independent Evidence Required to Show Prejudice on Ineffective-Assistance Claims Based on Unpursued Delusional-Compulsion Defenses; No Abuse in Denying Serial Continuances

Scott v. State (Ga. 2025): Independent Evidence Required to Show Prejudice on Ineffective-Assistance Claims Based on Unpursued Delusional-Compulsion Defenses; No Abuse in Denying Serial Continuances

Date: Aug 31, 2025
Scott v. State (Ga. 2025): Independent Evidence Required to Show Prejudice on Ineffective-Assistance Claims Based on Unpursued Delusional-Compulsion Defenses; No Abuse in Denying Serial Continuances...
Incremental Tort Reform Survives Equal Protection: Williams v. Regency Hospital Reaffirms Georgia’s Non‑Tolling Rule for Mentally Incompetent Medical‑Malpractice Plaintiffs

Incremental Tort Reform Survives Equal Protection: Williams v. Regency Hospital Reaffirms Georgia’s Non‑Tolling Rule for Mentally Incompetent Medical‑Malpractice Plaintiffs

Date: Aug 31, 2025
Incremental Tort Reform Survives Equal Protection: Williams v. Regency Hospital Reaffirms Georgia’s Non‑Tolling Rule for Mentally Incompetent Medical‑Malpractice Plaintiffs Introduction In Williams...
Walton v. State: Preservation Pitfalls, Plain‑Error Limits, and the Narrow Path for Unpreserved 404(b) Gang Evidence

Walton v. State: Preservation Pitfalls, Plain‑Error Limits, and the Narrow Path for Unpreserved 404(b) Gang Evidence

Date: Aug 31, 2025
Walton v. State: Preservation Pitfalls, Plain‑Error Limits, and the Narrow Path for Unpreserved 404(b) Gang Evidence Introduction In Walton v. State, the Supreme Court of Georgia affirmed Richard...
Record Silence and Personal Waiver Foreclose Ineffective-Assistance Claims About Advice Not to Testify: Woods v. State (Ga. 2025)

Record Silence and Personal Waiver Foreclose Ineffective-Assistance Claims About Advice Not to Testify: Woods v. State (Ga. 2025)

Date: Aug 31, 2025
Record Silence and Personal Waiver Foreclose Ineffective-Assistance Claims About Advice Not to Testify: Woods v. State (Ga. 2025) Introduction In Woods v. State, the Supreme Court of Georgia affirmed...
Municipal Immunity Does Not Automatically Defeat Fraud Claims: Alabama Supreme Court Clarifies § 11-47-190 and Limits Mandamus Review to Preserved Immunity Grounds

Municipal Immunity Does Not Automatically Defeat Fraud Claims: Alabama Supreme Court Clarifies § 11-47-190 and Limits Mandamus Review to Preserved Immunity Grounds

Date: Aug 30, 2025
Municipal Immunity Does Not Automatically Defeat Fraud Claims: Alabama Supreme Court Clarifies § 11-47-190 and Limits Mandamus Review to Preserved Immunity Grounds Introduction In Ex parte City of...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert