Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

11th Circuit Case Commentaries

Eleventh Circuit Holds Court‑Ordered Batterers’ Intervention Programs Are Government Speech, Foreclosing Free Speech and Free Exercise Challenges to State‑Mandated Curricula

Eleventh Circuit Holds Court‑Ordered Batterers’ Intervention Programs Are Government Speech, Foreclosing Free Speech and Free Exercise Challenges to State‑Mandated Curricula

Date: Sep 8, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Holds Court‑Ordered Batterers’ Intervention Programs Are Government Speech, Foreclosing Free Speech and Free Exercise Challenges to State‑Mandated Curricula Introduction In Joseph...
Part‑Specific Proof or No Price Increase: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Supplier Obligations, Upholds Severe Rule 37 Sanctions, and Elevates Settlement Memoranda in Defining Contract Scope

Part‑Specific Proof or No Price Increase: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Supplier Obligations, Upholds Severe Rule 37 Sanctions, and Elevates Settlement Memoranda in Defining Contract Scope

Date: Sep 8, 2025
Part‑Specific Proof or No Price Increase: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Supplier Obligations, Upholds Severe Rule 37 Sanctions, and Elevates Settlement Memoranda in Defining Contract Scope Introduction...
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies ALJ Articulation Duties and Appeals Council’s Materiality Review of New Evidence under the 2017 Regulations

Eleventh Circuit Clarifies ALJ Articulation Duties and Appeals Council’s Materiality Review of New Evidence under the 2017 Regulations

Date: Sep 8, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies ALJ Articulation Duties and Appeals Council’s Materiality Review of New Evidence under the 2017 Regulations Introduction In Bryan Dubose v. Commissioner of Social Security,...
Surplus-or-Standing: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies that a Chapter 7 Debtor’s “Party in Interest” Status Under § 502 Does Not Bypass Article III Redressability

Surplus-or-Standing: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies that a Chapter 7 Debtor’s “Party in Interest” Status Under § 502 Does Not Bypass Article III Redressability

Date: Sep 8, 2025
Surplus-or-Standing: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies that a Chapter 7 Debtor’s “Party in Interest” Status Under § 502 Does Not Bypass Article III Redressability Introduction This commentary analyzes the...
Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms MDLEA Reach into Foreign EEZs, No Nexus Requirement, and Denial of Minor‑Role Reductions for Go‑Fast Crews

Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms MDLEA Reach into Foreign EEZs, No Nexus Requirement, and Denial of Minor‑Role Reductions for Go‑Fast Crews

Date: Sep 8, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms MDLEA Reach into Foreign EEZs, No Nexus Requirement, and Denial of Minor‑Role Reductions for Go‑Fast Crews Introduction This commentary analyzes the Eleventh Circuit’s...
Jones-Stage Objections Preserve Challenges to Supervised-Release Conditions; Minor-Contact Restrictions Upheld in SORNA Failure-to-Register Sentences (United States v. Louis‑Jean, 11th Cir. 2025)

Jones-Stage Objections Preserve Challenges to Supervised-Release Conditions; Minor-Contact Restrictions Upheld in SORNA Failure-to-Register Sentences (United States v. Louis‑Jean, 11th Cir. 2025)

Date: Sep 8, 2025
Jones-Stage Objections Preserve Challenges to Supervised-Release Conditions; Minor-Contact Restrictions Upheld in SORNA Failure-to-Register Sentences Introduction This commentary analyzes the...
EEZ as “High Seas,” No U.S. Nexus Required, and Narrow Minor‑Role Relief for Go‑Fast Crews: Eleventh Circuit’s Consolidated MDLEA Ruling in United States v. Jhon Henry Alvarado‑Valencia (and Codefendants)

EEZ as “High Seas,” No U.S. Nexus Required, and Narrow Minor‑Role Relief for Go‑Fast Crews: Eleventh Circuit’s Consolidated MDLEA Ruling in United States v. Jhon Henry Alvarado‑Valencia (and Codefendants)

Date: Sep 8, 2025
EEZ as “High Seas,” No U.S. Nexus Required, and Narrow Minor‑Role Relief for Go‑Fast Crews: Eleventh Circuit’s Consolidated MDLEA Ruling in United States v. Jhon Henry Alvarado‑Valencia (and...
EEZ-as-High-Seas, No-Nexus Requirement, and a Narrow Minor-Role Inquiry Under the MDLEA: Commentary on United States v. Quijije‑Mero (11th Cir. 2025)

EEZ-as-High-Seas, No-Nexus Requirement, and a Narrow Minor-Role Inquiry Under the MDLEA: Commentary on United States v. Quijije‑Mero (11th Cir. 2025)

Date: Sep 8, 2025
EEZ-as-High-Seas, No-Nexus Requirement, and a Narrow Minor-Role Inquiry Under the MDLEA: Commentary on United States v. Quijije‑Mero (11th Cir. 2025) Introduction In United States v. Jhon Yandry...
EEZ Equals “High Seas” for Felonies Clause: Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms MDLEA’s Extraterritorial Reach and No‑Nexus Rule; Minor‑Role Reductions Narrow for Go‑Fast Couriers

EEZ Equals “High Seas” for Felonies Clause: Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms MDLEA’s Extraterritorial Reach and No‑Nexus Rule; Minor‑Role Reductions Narrow for Go‑Fast Couriers

Date: Sep 8, 2025
EEZ Equals “High Seas” for Felonies Clause: Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms MDLEA’s Extraterritorial Reach and No‑Nexus Rule; Minor‑Role Reductions Narrow for Go‑Fast Couriers Introduction In a...
Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms MDLEA’s Reach Into Foreign EEZs and Rejects Nexus Requirement; Affirms Denial of Minor‑Role Adjustments for Go‑Fast Crew

Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms MDLEA’s Reach Into Foreign EEZs and Rejects Nexus Requirement; Affirms Denial of Minor‑Role Adjustments for Go‑Fast Crew

Date: Sep 8, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms MDLEA’s Reach Into Foreign EEZs and Rejects Nexus Requirement; Affirms Denial of Minor‑Role Adjustments for Go‑Fast Crew Introduction In United States v. Juan Manuel...
EEZ Is “High Seas” for Felonies Clause; No Nexus Requirement Under the MDLEA; and Role Reductions Must Be Gauged Against Relevant Conduct: Commentary on United States v. Lauro Aguilar-Gomez (11th Cir. Sept. 3, 2025)

EEZ Is “High Seas” for Felonies Clause; No Nexus Requirement Under the MDLEA; and Role Reductions Must Be Gauged Against Relevant Conduct: Commentary on United States v. Lauro Aguilar-Gomez (11th Cir. Sept. 3, 2025)

Date: Sep 8, 2025
EEZ Is “High Seas” for Felonies Clause; No Nexus Requirement Under the MDLEA; and Role Reductions Must Be Gauged Against Relevant Conduct Case: United States v. Lauro Aguilar-Gomez (consolidated with...
Uncharged Conduct, Officer Video Identification, and the Departure/Variance Label: Eleventh Circuit Affirms a Major Upward Sentence in United States v. White

Uncharged Conduct, Officer Video Identification, and the Departure/Variance Label: Eleventh Circuit Affirms a Major Upward Sentence in United States v. White

Date: Sep 8, 2025
Uncharged Conduct, Officer Video Identification, and the Departure/Variance Label: Eleventh Circuit Affirms a Major Upward Sentence in United States v. White Introduction In United States v. Narada...
EFIN Responsibility, Circumstantial Mens Rea, and the Zero‑Point Offender Carve‑Out: The Eleventh Circuit Affirms Managerial Role Enhancement and Loss Extrapolation in Tax‑Preparer Fraud

EFIN Responsibility, Circumstantial Mens Rea, and the Zero‑Point Offender Carve‑Out: The Eleventh Circuit Affirms Managerial Role Enhancement and Loss Extrapolation in Tax‑Preparer Fraud

Date: Sep 8, 2025
EFIN Responsibility, Circumstantial Mens Rea, and the Zero‑Point Offender Carve‑Out: The Eleventh Circuit Affirms Managerial Role Enhancement and Loss Extrapolation in Tax‑Preparer Fraud Case: United...
No Mens Rea Required for DEA Registration Revocations Under 21 U.S.C. § 824; Due Process Satisfied by Opportunity for Hearing

No Mens Rea Required for DEA Registration Revocations Under 21 U.S.C. § 824; Due Process Satisfied by Opportunity for Hearing

Date: Sep 8, 2025
No Mens Rea Required for DEA Registration Revocations Under 21 U.S.C. § 824; Due Process Satisfied by Opportunity for Hearing Introduction In Sualeh Kamal Ashraf v. United States Drug Enforcement...
Comparable-Sales Over Speculation: Eleventh Circuit Affirms 40% Penalty Where Tax Court’s Independent Valuation Makes Zoning and §6103 Disputes Irrelevant

Comparable-Sales Over Speculation: Eleventh Circuit Affirms 40% Penalty Where Tax Court’s Independent Valuation Makes Zoning and §6103 Disputes Irrelevant

Date: Sep 4, 2025
Comparable-Sales Over Speculation: Eleventh Circuit Affirms 40% Penalty Where Tax Court’s Independent Valuation Makes Zoning and §6103 Disputes Irrelevant Introduction In Buckelew Farm, LLC (f.k.a....
Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms: Post-Handcuff Strikes Constitute Gratuitous Force; Qualified Immunity Denied

Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms: Post-Handcuff Strikes Constitute Gratuitous Force; Qualified Immunity Denied

Date: Sep 4, 2025
Reaffirming the Limits of Force: No Qualified Immunity for Post-Handcuff Strikes on a Non-Resisting Suspect Case: Albert Lee St. Clair, Jr. v. DeAngelo M. Anthony, et al. (No. 24-11302) Court: U.S....
Reasoned Consideration and Evidentiary Sufficiency at the Reconsideration Stage: Preliminary Diagnoses and Generalized Violence Do Not Establish Prima Facie Relief

Reasoned Consideration and Evidentiary Sufficiency at the Reconsideration Stage: Preliminary Diagnoses and Generalized Violence Do Not Establish Prima Facie Relief

Date: Sep 4, 2025
Reasoned Consideration and Evidentiary Sufficiency at the Reconsideration Stage: Preliminary Diagnoses and Generalized Violence Do Not Establish Prima Facie Relief Introduction In Armando...
No Waiver Without Knowledge: Georgia’s Clear-and-Unmistakable Standard Governs Ownership Conditions in Temporary-Substitute Auto Coverage

No Waiver Without Knowledge: Georgia’s Clear-and-Unmistakable Standard Governs Ownership Conditions in Temporary-Substitute Auto Coverage

Date: Sep 4, 2025
No Waiver Without Knowledge: Georgia’s Clear-and-Unmistakable Standard Governs Ownership Conditions in Temporary-Substitute Auto Coverage Introduction The Eleventh Circuit’s unpublished decision in...
No Prejudice, No Penalty; Months-Long Gaps Break Causation: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies COBRA Penalty Discretion and Title VII Retaliation in Thibodeaux v. City of Atlanta

No Prejudice, No Penalty; Months-Long Gaps Break Causation: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies COBRA Penalty Discretion and Title VII Retaliation in Thibodeaux v. City of Atlanta

Date: Sep 4, 2025
No Prejudice, No Penalty; Months-Long Gaps Break Causation: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies COBRA Penalty Discretion and Title VII Retaliation in Thibodeaux v. City of Atlanta Introduction This commentary...
Independent Investigation Breaks the Cat’s Paw: Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms Limits on Mixed‑Motive Title VII Claims in Police Use‑of‑Force Terminations

Independent Investigation Breaks the Cat’s Paw: Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms Limits on Mixed‑Motive Title VII Claims in Police Use‑of‑Force Terminations

Date: Sep 4, 2025
Independent Investigation Breaks the Cat’s Paw: Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms Limits on Mixed‑Motive Title VII Claims in Police Use‑of‑Force Terminations Case: Roger Williams v. Unified Government of...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert