Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

11th Circuit Case Commentaries

Reasoned Consideration Is Satisfied When the BIA Affirms Dispositive IJ Findings Unchallenged in Substance (Nexus and CAT Acquiescence)

Reasoned Consideration Is Satisfied When the BIA Affirms Dispositive IJ Findings Unchallenged in Substance (Nexus and CAT Acquiescence)

Date: Jan 8, 2026
Reasoned Consideration Is Satisfied When the BIA Affirms Dispositive IJ Findings Unchallenged in Substance (Nexus and CAT Acquiescence) 1. Introduction Case: Edinson Isaias Cruz-Yanes v. U.S....
Compassionate Release: Tapia Does Not Limit § 3582(c)(1)(A) Courts from Considering In-Prison Treatment and Public Safety

Compassionate Release: Tapia Does Not Limit § 3582(c)(1)(A) Courts from Considering In-Prison Treatment and Public Safety

Date: Jan 8, 2026
Compassionate Release: Tapia Does Not Limit § 3582(c)(1)(A) Courts from Considering In-Prison Treatment and Public Safety Case: United States v. Antonio Easterly (11th Cir. Jan. 7, 2026)...
Federal-Sector Title VII Retaliation in the Eleventh Circuit: No Liability Without a “Personnel Action” and a Work Environment That Would Dissuade a Reasonable Worker

Federal-Sector Title VII Retaliation in the Eleventh Circuit: No Liability Without a “Personnel Action” and a Work Environment That Would Dissuade a Reasonable Worker

Date: Jan 8, 2026
Federal-Sector Title VII Retaliation in the Eleventh Circuit: No Liability Without a “Personnel Action” and a Work Environment That Would Dissuade a Reasonable Worker I. Introduction In Bobby Lett v....
U.S.S.G. § 1B1.3(c) Limits Only Acquitted Conduct: Uncharged/Unadjudicated Relevant Conduct May Still Drive RICO Fraud Loss, Restitution, and Forfeiture

U.S.S.G. § 1B1.3(c) Limits Only Acquitted Conduct: Uncharged/Unadjudicated Relevant Conduct May Still Drive RICO Fraud Loss, Restitution, and Forfeiture

Date: Jan 8, 2026
U.S.S.G. § 1B1.3(c) Limits Only Acquitted Conduct: Uncharged/Unadjudicated Relevant Conduct May Still Drive RICO Fraud Loss, Restitution, and Forfeiture I. Introduction In United States v. Phillip...
Meaningful Guideline Consideration as a Substantive-Reasonableness Constraint on Major Upward Variances (United States v. John Lee)

Meaningful Guideline Consideration as a Substantive-Reasonableness Constraint on Major Upward Variances (United States v. John Lee)

Date: Jan 8, 2026
Meaningful Guideline Consideration as a Substantive-Reasonableness Constraint on Major Upward Variances (United States v. John Lee) 1. Introduction In United States v. John Lee (11th Cir. Jan. 6,...
Nonretroactive Guideline Amendments Are Excluded from U.S.S.G. § 1B1.13(b)(6)’s “Change in the Law” Compassionate-Release Path

Nonretroactive Guideline Amendments Are Excluded from U.S.S.G. § 1B1.13(b)(6)’s “Change in the Law” Compassionate-Release Path

Date: Jan 8, 2026
Nonretroactive Guideline Amendments Are Excluded from U.S.S.G. § 1B1.13(b)(6)’s “Change in the Law” Compassionate-Release Path I. Introduction United States v. Jose Romeu (11th Cir. Jan. 6, 2026)...
Ineffective Assistance (Strickland Prejudice) When Uncalled Witness Is Impeachable and the Record Evidence of Guilt Is Overwhelming

Ineffective Assistance (Strickland Prejudice) When Uncalled Witness Is Impeachable and the Record Evidence of Guilt Is Overwhelming

Date: Jan 8, 2026
Ineffective Assistance (Strickland Prejudice) When Uncalled Witness Is Impeachable and the Record Evidence of Guilt Is Overwhelming 1. Introduction In Robert Donelson v. United States (11th Cir. Jan....

      FTC Act Unfairness in the Eleventh Circuit: § 45(n)’s Three-Factor Test Controls and Courts May “Fence In” Hidden-Fee Practices with Unavoidable, Non-Hyperlinked Disclosures and Fee-by-Fee Assent

FTC Act Unfairness in the Eleventh Circuit: § 45(n)’s Three-Factor Test Controls and Courts May “Fence In” Hidden-Fee Practices with Unavoidable, Non-Hyperlinked Disclosures and Fee-by-Fee Assent

Date: Jan 7, 2026
FTC Act Unfairness in the Eleventh Circuit: § 45(n)’s Three-Factor Test Controls and Courts May “Fence In” Hidden-Fee Practices with Unavoidable, Non-Hyperlinked Disclosures and Fee-by-Fee Assent...
Pre-2024 U.S.S.G. § 2B1.1 Requires the Greater of Actual or Intended Loss (and Upholds Upward Variances in Pandemic-Relief Fraud)

Pre-2024 U.S.S.G. § 2B1.1 Requires the Greater of Actual or Intended Loss (and Upholds Upward Variances in Pandemic-Relief Fraud)

Date: Jan 7, 2026
Pre-2024 U.S.S.G. § 2B1.1 Requires the Greater of Actual or Intended Loss (and Upholds Upward Variances in Pandemic-Relief Fraud) Case: United States v. Omar Loaces Gonzalez (11th Cir., Jan. 6, 2026)...
Rooker–Feldman Bars Federal Damages Claims That Depend on Undoing a State Foreclosure Judgment; Futility and Willful Noncompliance Justify Dismissal With Prejudice

Rooker–Feldman Bars Federal Damages Claims That Depend on Undoing a State Foreclosure Judgment; Futility and Willful Noncompliance Justify Dismissal With Prejudice

Date: Jan 7, 2026
Rooker–Feldman Bars Federal Damages Claims That Depend on Undoing a State Foreclosure Judgment; Futility and Willful Noncompliance Justify Dismissal With Prejudice 1. Introduction In Roy Dixon v....
Lozada’s Ineffective-Assistance Framework Survives Loper Bright and Remains Procedurally Mandatory in Immigration Proceedings

Lozada’s Ineffective-Assistance Framework Survives Loper Bright and Remains Procedurally Mandatory in Immigration Proceedings

Date: Jan 7, 2026
Lozada’s Ineffective-Assistance Framework Survives Loper Bright and Remains Procedurally Mandatory in Immigration Proceedings Case: Ginna Alejandra Gutierrez-Mikan v. U.S. Attorney General (11th Cir....
Eleventh Circuit: Appellate Abandonment and Strict Rule 15/Local-Rule Compliance When Attempting Post-Dismissal Amendments

Eleventh Circuit: Appellate Abandonment and Strict Rule 15/Local-Rule Compliance When Attempting Post-Dismissal Amendments

Date: Jan 7, 2026
Eleventh Circuit: Appellate Abandonment and Strict Rule 15/Local-Rule Compliance When Attempting Post-Dismissal Amendments 1. Introduction In Derrick James v. The Geo Group, Inc. (11th Cir. Jan. 2,...
Hobbs Act Robbery Requires Force Before or During the Taking, Not Merely in Escape

Hobbs Act Robbery Requires Force Before or During the Taking, Not Merely in Escape

Date: Jan 6, 2026
Hobbs Act Robbery Requires Force Before or During the Taking, Not Merely in Escape Case: United States v. Jy'Quale Grable (11th Cir. Jan. 5, 2026) Core holding: A taking is not “robbery” under 18...
Pre-Suspension Notice and Opportunity to Contest Suffice for Florida Child-Support-Related License Suspensions; Qualified Immunity Bars § 1983 Claims Against the Program Director

Pre-Suspension Notice and Opportunity to Contest Suffice for Florida Child-Support-Related License Suspensions; Qualified Immunity Bars § 1983 Claims Against the Program Director

Date: Jan 6, 2026
Pre-Suspension Notice and Opportunity to Contest Suffice for Florida Child-Support-Related License Suspensions; Qualified Immunity Bars § 1983 Claims Against the Program Director Case: Kenneth...
Affirming Dismissal With Prejudice for Repeated Shotgun Pleadings After Explicit Repleading Instructions (Even for Pro Se Litigants)

Affirming Dismissal With Prejudice for Repeated Shotgun Pleadings After Explicit Repleading Instructions (Even for Pro Se Litigants)

Date: Jan 6, 2026
Affirming Dismissal With Prejudice for Repeated Shotgun Pleadings After Explicit Repleading Instructions (Even for Pro Se Litigants) Case: Jibrail Muhammad, Sr. v. Dolgencorp, LLC (11th Cir. Jan. 2,...
United States v. Jamar Nattiel (11th Cir. Jan. 5, 2026) — Commentary

United States v. Jamar Nattiel (11th Cir. Jan. 5, 2026) — Commentary

Date: Jan 6, 2026
Rule 29 Specificity as a Gatekeeper: New Emphasis on Plain-Error Review for Unraised Sufficiency/Variance Theories Case: United States v. Jamar Nattiel, No. 24-10954 (11th Cir. Jan. 5, 2026) (per...
Collateral Attacks on Criminal Forfeiture Are Not Cognizable Under Bivens; Failure to Object Waives Appellate Review; Prefiling Injunctions May Be Expanded to Cover Related Forfeiture/Foreclosure Claims

Collateral Attacks on Criminal Forfeiture Are Not Cognizable Under Bivens; Failure to Object Waives Appellate Review; Prefiling Injunctions May Be Expanded to Cover Related Forfeiture/Foreclosure Claims

Date: Jan 2, 2026
Collateral Attacks on Criminal Forfeiture Are Not Cognizable Under Bivens; Failure to Object Waives Appellate Review; Prefiling Injunctions May Be Expanded to Cover Related Forfeiture/Foreclosure...
Federal-Sector Title VII (Religion): Plaintiff Must Show Religion Played “Some Part” in the Personnel Action; Non-Decisionmaker Vaccine Warnings and Performance Disputes Are Insufficient

Federal-Sector Title VII (Religion): Plaintiff Must Show Religion Played “Some Part” in the Personnel Action; Non-Decisionmaker Vaccine Warnings and Performance Disputes Are Insufficient

Date: Jan 2, 2026
Federal-Sector Title VII (Religion): Plaintiff Must Show Religion Played “Some Part” in the Personnel Action; Non-Decisionmaker Vaccine Warnings and Performance Disputes Are Insufficient Case: Andre...
No Plain Error on Excluding Good-Time Credits from U.S.S.G. § 1B1.13(b)(2) “Served Time” Calculations Absent Binding Precedent

No Plain Error on Excluding Good-Time Credits from U.S.S.G. § 1B1.13(b)(2) “Served Time” Calculations Absent Binding Precedent

Date: Jan 2, 2026
No Plain Error on Excluding Good-Time Credits from U.S.S.G. § 1B1.13(b)(2) “Served Time” Calculations Absent Binding Precedent Case: United States v. Eduardo Ortiz-Cervantes (11th Cir. Dec. 31, 2025)...
Bruen and Rahimi Do Not Abrogate Eleventh Circuit Precedent Upholding 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) (Rozier Controls)

Bruen and Rahimi Do Not Abrogate Eleventh Circuit Precedent Upholding 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) (Rozier Controls)

Date: Jan 1, 2026
Bruen and Rahimi Do Not Abrogate Eleventh Circuit Precedent Upholding 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) (Rozier Controls) Introduction In United States v. Brady Castro (11th Cir. Dec. 31, 2025) (unpublished),...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert