Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

11th Circuit Case Commentaries

Esteras Plain-Error Barrier and PSI Admissions at Revocation: The Eleventh Circuit’s Framework in United States v. Higgs

Esteras Plain-Error Barrier and PSI Admissions at Revocation: The Eleventh Circuit’s Framework in United States v. Higgs

Date: Sep 24, 2025
Esteras Plain-Error Barrier and PSI Admissions at Revocation: The Eleventh Circuit’s Framework in United States v. Higgs Introduction In United States v. Zeno Higgs (11th Cir. No. 25-10996, Sept. 22,...
Entwinement Doesn’t Reach Party Identity: Eleventh Circuit Affirms District Courts May Resolve Disputed LLC Membership on a Rule 12(b)(1) Factual Attack to Determine Diversity

Entwinement Doesn’t Reach Party Identity: Eleventh Circuit Affirms District Courts May Resolve Disputed LLC Membership on a Rule 12(b)(1) Factual Attack to Determine Diversity

Date: Sep 24, 2025
Entwinement Doesn’t Reach Party Identity: Eleventh Circuit Affirms District Courts May Resolve Disputed LLC Membership on a Rule 12(b)(1) Factual Attack to Determine Diversity Introduction In...
No Third-Party Dissemination and Self-Imposed Decisions Do Not Create Article III Standing in FCRA Disputes

No Third-Party Dissemination and Self-Imposed Decisions Do Not Create Article III Standing in FCRA Disputes

Date: Sep 24, 2025
No Third-Party Dissemination and Self-Imposed Decisions Do Not Create Article III Standing in FCRA Disputes Introduction In Lashonda Peeples v. National Data Research, Inc. (d.b.a. Integrascan), No....
United States v. Mosley: Post-Esteras boundaries on revocation sentencing—no § 3553(a)(2)(A) retribution, “ballpark” deference, and unified justification for prison and supervision

United States v. Mosley: Post-Esteras boundaries on revocation sentencing—no § 3553(a)(2)(A) retribution, “ballpark” deference, and unified justification for prison and supervision

Date: Sep 13, 2025
United States v. Mosley: Post-Esteras boundaries on revocation sentencing—no § 3553(a)(2)(A) retribution, “ballpark” deference, and unified justification for prison and supervision Introduction In...
No Shortcuts to Finality: Rule 41(a) Cannot Cure the Lack of Rule 54(b) Certification for Partial Summary Judgment

No Shortcuts to Finality: Rule 41(a) Cannot Cure the Lack of Rule 54(b) Certification for Partial Summary Judgment

Date: Sep 13, 2025
No Shortcuts to Finality: Rule 41(a) Cannot Cure the Lack of Rule 54(b) Certification for Partial Summary Judgment Introduction In CMYK Enterprises, Inc. v. Advanced Print Technologies, LLC, the...
No “Drive Home” Safe Harbor: Eleventh Circuit Upholds K-9 Deployment Where Motorist Fails to Promptly Stop and Resists Commands

No “Drive Home” Safe Harbor: Eleventh Circuit Upholds K-9 Deployment Where Motorist Fails to Promptly Stop and Resists Commands

Date: Sep 13, 2025
No “Drive Home” Safe Harbor: Eleventh Circuit Upholds K-9 Deployment Where Motorist Fails to Promptly Stop and Resists Commands Case: Martinezz Bowman v. David Harvey Court: United States Court of...
Offense Seriousness May Predominate: Eleventh Circuit Affirms 110-Year, Within-Guidelines Sentence for Child-Exploitation Production as Substantively Reasonable

Offense Seriousness May Predominate: Eleventh Circuit Affirms 110-Year, Within-Guidelines Sentence for Child-Exploitation Production as Substantively Reasonable

Date: Sep 12, 2025
Offense Seriousness May Predominate: Eleventh Circuit Affirms 110-Year, Within-Guidelines Sentence for Child-Exploitation Production as Substantively Reasonable Introduction This unpublished, per...
Approving the Grievance Undercuts Retaliation; Eighteen Days Without a Mattress Is Not “Objectively Serious” Under the Eighth Amendment

Approving the Grievance Undercuts Retaliation; Eighteen Days Without a Mattress Is Not “Objectively Serious” Under the Eighth Amendment

Date: Sep 12, 2025
Approving the Grievance Undercuts Retaliation; Eighteen Days Without a Mattress Is Not “Objectively Serious” Under the Eighth Amendment Introduction In Eddie James Moultrie v. G. Edwards (11th Cir....
Approving a Prisoner’s Grievances Undercuts Retaliation Claims; Eighteen Days Without a Mattress Is Not “Objectively” Cruel and Unusual in the Eleventh Circuit

Approving a Prisoner’s Grievances Undercuts Retaliation Claims; Eighteen Days Without a Mattress Is Not “Objectively” Cruel and Unusual in the Eleventh Circuit

Date: Sep 12, 2025
Approving a Prisoner’s Grievances Undercuts Retaliation Claims; Eighteen Days Without a Mattress Is Not “Objectively” Cruel and Unusual in the Eleventh Circuit Introduction In Eddie James Moultrie v....
Counting Pre‑Cooperation Buyers and Prior Suppliers as “Participants” Under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.1(b): United States v. Monroe (11th Cir. 2025)

Counting Pre‑Cooperation Buyers and Prior Suppliers as “Participants” Under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.1(b): United States v. Monroe (11th Cir. 2025)

Date: Sep 11, 2025
Counting Pre‑Cooperation Buyers and Prior Suppliers as “Participants” Under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.1(b): United States v. Monroe (11th Cir. 2025) Introduction In United States v. Lennard Rashard Monroe, a...
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies PLRA “Three-Strikes”: Jurisdictional Dismissals and Prior § 1915(g) Dismissals Do Not Count Absent an Express Failure-to-State-a-Claim Basis

Eleventh Circuit Clarifies PLRA “Three-Strikes”: Jurisdictional Dismissals and Prior § 1915(g) Dismissals Do Not Count Absent an Express Failure-to-State-a-Claim Basis

Date: Sep 11, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies PLRA “Three-Strikes”: Jurisdictional Dismissals and Prior § 1915(g) Dismissals Do Not Count Absent an Express Failure-to-State-a-Claim Basis Case: George Walter Brewster,...
Affirmance on Alternative Merits Grounds and Strict Limits on Pro Se Repleading: No First Amendment Bivens and WPA Applies Only to Federal Employees

Affirmance on Alternative Merits Grounds and Strict Limits on Pro Se Repleading: No First Amendment Bivens and WPA Applies Only to Federal Employees

Date: Sep 11, 2025
Affirmance on Alternative Merits Grounds and Strict Limits on Pro Se Repleading: No First Amendment Bivens and WPA Applies Only to Federal Employees Introduction In Jean Guillaume v. United States...
Finality First: Second-in-Time §2255 Filings During a Pending Appeal Are “Second or Successive”; District Courts Must Consider §3553(a) When Asked to Modify Supervised-Release Conditions

Finality First: Second-in-Time §2255 Filings During a Pending Appeal Are “Second or Successive”; District Courts Must Consider §3553(a) When Asked to Modify Supervised-Release Conditions

Date: Sep 11, 2025
Finality First: Second-in-Time §2255 Filings During a Pending Appeal Are “Second or Successive”; District Courts Must Consider §3553(a) When Asked to Modify Supervised-Release Conditions Introduction...
Eleventh Circuit Adopts Defendant‑Specific Reading of § 922(g)(1) and Limits “Imprisonment” to Actual Incarceration

Eleventh Circuit Adopts Defendant‑Specific Reading of § 922(g)(1) and Limits “Imprisonment” to Actual Incarceration

Date: Sep 11, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Adopts Defendant‑Specific Reading of § 922(g)(1) and Limits “Imprisonment” to Actual Incarceration Introduction In United States v. Joshua Eugene Gaines, the Eleventh Circuit vacated...
Diagnosis-Based Exclusions for Gender-Affirming Surgery Are Not Facially Sex Discrimination Under Title VII: The Eleventh Circuit’s En Banc Decision in Lange v. Houston County

Diagnosis-Based Exclusions for Gender-Affirming Surgery Are Not Facially Sex Discrimination Under Title VII: The Eleventh Circuit’s En Banc Decision in Lange v. Houston County

Date: Sep 10, 2025
Diagnosis-Based Exclusions for Gender-Affirming Surgery Are Not Facially Sex Discrimination Under Title VII: The Eleventh Circuit’s En Banc Decision in Lange v. Houston County Introduction This en...
No §1681i Liability Where Plaintiff’s Own Credit Report Refutes Inaccuracy: Exhibits Control Over Contrary Allegations in FCRA Pleadings

No §1681i Liability Where Plaintiff’s Own Credit Report Refutes Inaccuracy: Exhibits Control Over Contrary Allegations in FCRA Pleadings

Date: Sep 10, 2025
No §1681i Liability Where Plaintiff’s Own Credit Report Refutes Inaccuracy: Exhibits Control Over Contrary Allegations in FCRA Pleadings Introduction This commentary analyzes the Eleventh Circuit’s...
Commissary Purchases as Evidence of Sincerity: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Qualified Immunity for Removing Inmate from Religious Vegan Diet; Denial of Vegan Shoes/Commissary Not a RLUIPA “Substantial Burden”; Reenrollment Moors Injunctive Relief

Commissary Purchases as Evidence of Sincerity: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Qualified Immunity for Removing Inmate from Religious Vegan Diet; Denial of Vegan Shoes/Commissary Not a RLUIPA “Substantial Burden”; Reenrollment Moors Injunctive Relief

Date: Sep 10, 2025
Commissary Purchases as Evidence of Sincerity: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Qualified Immunity for Removing Inmate from Religious Vegan Diet; Denial of Vegan Shoes/Commissary Not a RLUIPA “Substantial...
Invited Error Bars Challenge to Mislabeling a Georgia First Offender Disposition; Prior Methamphetamine Possession Admissible Under Rule 404(b) to Prove Intent

Invited Error Bars Challenge to Mislabeling a Georgia First Offender Disposition; Prior Methamphetamine Possession Admissible Under Rule 404(b) to Prove Intent

Date: Sep 9, 2025
Invited Error Bars Challenge to Mislabeling a Georgia First Offender Disposition; Prior Methamphetamine Possession Admissible Under Rule 404(b) to Prove Intent Case: United States v. Jorge Rodriguez...
De Novo Review of Equitable Tolling Diligence and No Tolling for Pending Rehearing/Certiorari in Immigration Motions to Reopen

De Novo Review of Equitable Tolling Diligence and No Tolling for Pending Rehearing/Certiorari in Immigration Motions to Reopen

Date: Sep 8, 2025
De Novo Review of Equitable Tolling Diligence and No Tolling for Pending Rehearing/Certiorari in Immigration Motions to Reopen Introduction In Sylvestre Esteeven Point du Jour v. U.S. Attorney...
Extending the Collective-Knowledge Doctrine to Sworn 911 Dispatchers: Arguable Probable Cause and Qualified Immunity in 911 Misuse Arrests

Extending the Collective-Knowledge Doctrine to Sworn 911 Dispatchers: Arguable Probable Cause and Qualified Immunity in 911 Misuse Arrests

Date: Sep 8, 2025
Extending the Collective-Knowledge Doctrine to Sworn 911 Dispatchers: Arguable Probable Cause and Qualified Immunity in 911 Misuse Arrests Case: Emma Jane Prospero v. Deputy Ryan Sullivan; Lt....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert