Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

11th Circuit Case Commentaries

Invited-Error Bar to “Rehabilitation-Based Imprisonment” Challenges in Federal Sentencing

Invited-Error Bar to “Rehabilitation-Based Imprisonment” Challenges in Federal Sentencing

Date: Jan 10, 2026
Invited-Error Bar to “Rehabilitation-Based Imprisonment” Challenges in Federal Sentencing Case: United States v. Brian Joseph McKay (11th Cir. Jan. 9, 2026) (unpublished, “Not for Publication”)...
Generic National Sentencing Statistics Do Not Prove “Unwarranted Disparity” Without Apples-to-Apples Comparability

Generic National Sentencing Statistics Do Not Prove “Unwarranted Disparity” Without Apples-to-Apples Comparability

Date: Jan 10, 2026
Generic National Sentencing Statistics Do Not Prove “Unwarranted Disparity” Without Apples-to-Apples Comparability Introduction In United States v. Oscar Pena-Sanregre (11th Cir. Jan. 9, 2026) (per...
Self-Representation Requires a Knowing Waiver and Courtroom Decorum: Disruptive “Sovereign Citizen” Conduct Permits Counsel Appointment and Trial in the Defendant’s Absence

Self-Representation Requires a Knowing Waiver and Courtroom Decorum: Disruptive “Sovereign Citizen” Conduct Permits Counsel Appointment and Trial in the Defendant’s Absence

Date: Jan 10, 2026
Self-Representation Requires a Knowing Waiver and Courtroom Decorum: Disruptive “Sovereign Citizen” Conduct Permits Counsel Appointment and Trial in the Defendant’s Absence Introduction United States...
Conspiracy Acquittal Does Not Undermine Anti‑Kickback Substantive Convictions; Supervisory Role Bars §4C1.1 Zero‑Point Offender Relief

Conspiracy Acquittal Does Not Undermine Anti‑Kickback Substantive Convictions; Supervisory Role Bars §4C1.1 Zero‑Point Offender Relief

Date: Jan 10, 2026
Conspiracy Acquittal Does Not Undermine Anti‑Kickback Substantive Convictions; Supervisory Role Bars §4C1.1 Zero‑Point Offender Relief Case: United States v. David Byron Copeland (11th Cir. Jan. 9,...
Subjective Recklessness as the Decisive Gatekeeper: Deliberate-Indifference, Prison Diet Claims, and Conclusory “Policy” Pleading in § 1983/RLUIPA Litigation

Subjective Recklessness as the Decisive Gatekeeper: Deliberate-Indifference, Prison Diet Claims, and Conclusory “Policy” Pleading in § 1983/RLUIPA Litigation

Date: Jan 10, 2026
Subjective Recklessness as the Decisive Gatekeeper: Deliberate-Indifference, Prison Diet Claims, and Conclusory “Policy” Pleading in § 1983/RLUIPA Litigation Introduction In Nyka O'Connor v. Barry...
Upward Variances May Rest on Guideline-Accounted Facts, and Disparity Claims Require “Apples-to-Apples” Comparators — United States v. Anna Michelle La Rue

Upward Variances May Rest on Guideline-Accounted Facts, and Disparity Claims Require “Apples-to-Apples” Comparators — United States v. Anna Michelle La Rue

Date: Jan 10, 2026
Upward Variances May Rest on Guideline-Accounted Facts, and Disparity Claims Require “Apples-to-Apples” Comparators — United States v. Anna Michelle La Rue (11th Cir. 2026) 1. Introduction In United...
Section 1367(b) Does Not Bar Defendants’ Counterclaims/Third-Party Claims Against a Nondiverse Subsidiary; Realignment Requires a “Collision of Interests”

Section 1367(b) Does Not Bar Defendants’ Counterclaims/Third-Party Claims Against a Nondiverse Subsidiary; Realignment Requires a “Collision of Interests”

Date: Jan 10, 2026
Section 1367(b) Does Not Bar Defendants’ Counterclaims/Third-Party Claims Against a Nondiverse Subsidiary; Realignment Requires a “Collision of Interests” Case: EPI-USE Systems Limited v. BI Brainz,...
Eleventh Circuit: § 922(g)(1) As-Applied Second Amendment Challenges by Nonviolent Felons Remain Foreclosed

Eleventh Circuit: § 922(g)(1) As-Applied Second Amendment Challenges by Nonviolent Felons Remain Foreclosed

Date: Jan 9, 2026
Eleventh Circuit Rule: Nonviolent-Felon As-Applied Second Amendment Challenges to 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) Are Foreclosed by Rozier and Dubois II Despite Bondi and Florida Commissioner Introduction In...
Post-Bruen/Rehimi Felon-in-Possession Challenges Remain Foreclosed in the Eleventh Circuit; Brief § 3553(c)(2) Variance Explanations Suffice When the Record Is Clear

Post-Bruen/Rehimi Felon-in-Possession Challenges Remain Foreclosed in the Eleventh Circuit; Brief § 3553(c)(2) Variance Explanations Suffice When the Record Is Clear

Date: Jan 9, 2026
Post-Bruen/Rahimi Felon-in-Possession Challenges Remain Foreclosed in the Eleventh Circuit; Brief § 3553(c)(2) Variance Explanations Suffice When the Record Is Clear Case: United States v. Randall...
Autobiographical “Fiction” as Intrinsic Evidence “Necessary to Complete the Story” of a Drug Conspiracy

Autobiographical “Fiction” as Intrinsic Evidence “Necessary to Complete the Story” of a Drug Conspiracy

Date: Jan 9, 2026
Autobiographical “Fiction” as Intrinsic Evidence “Necessary to Complete the Story” of a Drug Conspiracy Introduction In United States v. Kenneth Pertillo (11th Cir. Jan. 8, 2026) (unpublished), the...
§ 3582(c)(2) Amendment 821 Reductions: Prior § 3553(a) Variances Cannot Expand the § 1B1.10(b)(2)(B) Substantial-Assistance Exception

§ 3582(c)(2) Amendment 821 Reductions: Prior § 3553(a) Variances Cannot Expand the § 1B1.10(b)(2)(B) Substantial-Assistance Exception

Date: Jan 9, 2026
§ 3582(c)(2) Amendment 821 Reductions: Prior § 3553(a) Variances Cannot Expand the § 1B1.10(b)(2)(B) Substantial-Assistance Exception Introduction In United States v. Wayne Duke (11th Cir. Jan. 7,...
MDLEA Jurisdiction in Foreign EEZs: EEZ Treated as “High Seas,” Broad Stateless-Vessel Definition, and No U.S. Nexus Requirement

MDLEA Jurisdiction in Foreign EEZs: EEZ Treated as “High Seas,” Broad Stateless-Vessel Definition, and No U.S. Nexus Requirement

Date: Jan 9, 2026
MDLEA Jurisdiction in Foreign EEZs: EEZ Treated as “High Seas,” Broad Stateless-Vessel Definition, and No U.S. Nexus Requirement Case: United States v. Ronald Arregoces Barros (11th Cir. Jan. 7,...
U.S.S.G. § 1B1.3(c) Limits Only Acquitted-Conduct Use: Relevant Conduct Beyond the Plea Remains Proper (United States v. Phillip Howard)

U.S.S.G. § 1B1.3(c) Limits Only Acquitted-Conduct Use: Relevant Conduct Beyond the Plea Remains Proper (United States v. Phillip Howard)

Date: Jan 9, 2026
U.S.S.G. § 1B1.3(c) Limits Only Acquitted-Conduct Use: Relevant Conduct Beyond the Plea Remains Proper Case: United States v. Phillip Howard (11th Cir., Jan. 7, 2026) (per curiam) (not for...
“In Connection With” Under U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(6)(B): Constructive Facilitation and the Presumption from Knowing Possession During an Armed Robbery

“In Connection With” Under U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(6)(B): Constructive Facilitation and the Presumption from Knowing Possession During an Armed Robbery

Date: Jan 9, 2026
“In Connection With” Under U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(6)(B): Constructive Facilitation and the Presumption from Knowing Possession During an Armed Robbery Introduction In United States v. Demarion Nelson...
Third-Party Notice May Be “On the Insured’s Behalf,” But Timeliness Is Measured From the Insured’s Occurrence-Based Duty

Third-Party Notice May Be “On the Insured’s Behalf,” But Timeliness Is Measured From the Insured’s Occurrence-Based Duty

Date: Jan 8, 2026
Third-Party Notice May Be “On the Insured’s Behalf,” But Timeliness Is Measured From the Insured’s Occurrence-Based Duty Introduction In A. B. v. David Jacobs Barrow (11th Cir. Jan. 7, 2026), the...
DMCA § 512(c) Safe Harbor: Hash-Matching Outputs and Algorithmic Curation Do Not Create “Red Flag” Knowledge or “Right and Ability to Control” Without Specific Infringement and Substantial Influence

DMCA § 512(c) Safe Harbor: Hash-Matching Outputs and Algorithmic Curation Do Not Create “Red Flag” Knowledge or “Right and Ability to Control” Without Specific Infringement and Substantial Influence

Date: Jan 8, 2026
DMCA § 512(c) Safe Harbor: Hash-Matching Outputs and Algorithmic Curation Do Not Create “Red Flag” Knowledge or “Right and Ability to Control” Without Specific Infringement and Substantial Influence...
Conspiracy Is Not Automatically Coextensive with “Jointly Undertaken Criminal Activity” for Loss and Restitution

Conspiracy Is Not Automatically Coextensive with “Jointly Undertaken Criminal Activity” for Loss and Restitution

Date: Jan 8, 2026
Conspiracy Is Not Automatically Coextensive with “Jointly Undertaken Criminal Activity” for Loss and Restitution Case: United States v. Abdoulaye Barry (11th Cir. Jan. 7, 2026) | Court: United States...
Reasoned Consideration Is Satisfied When the BIA Affirms Dispositive IJ Findings Unchallenged in Substance (Nexus and CAT Acquiescence)

Reasoned Consideration Is Satisfied When the BIA Affirms Dispositive IJ Findings Unchallenged in Substance (Nexus and CAT Acquiescence)

Date: Jan 8, 2026
Reasoned Consideration Is Satisfied When the BIA Affirms Dispositive IJ Findings Unchallenged in Substance (Nexus and CAT Acquiescence) 1. Introduction Case: Edinson Isaias Cruz-Yanes v. U.S....
Compassionate Release: Tapia Does Not Limit § 3582(c)(1)(A) Courts from Considering In-Prison Treatment and Public Safety

Compassionate Release: Tapia Does Not Limit § 3582(c)(1)(A) Courts from Considering In-Prison Treatment and Public Safety

Date: Jan 8, 2026
Compassionate Release: Tapia Does Not Limit § 3582(c)(1)(A) Courts from Considering In-Prison Treatment and Public Safety Case: United States v. Antonio Easterly (11th Cir. Jan. 7, 2026)...
Federal-Sector Title VII Retaliation in the Eleventh Circuit: No Liability Without a “Personnel Action” and a Work Environment That Would Dissuade a Reasonable Worker

Federal-Sector Title VII Retaliation in the Eleventh Circuit: No Liability Without a “Personnel Action” and a Work Environment That Would Dissuade a Reasonable Worker

Date: Jan 8, 2026
Federal-Sector Title VII Retaliation in the Eleventh Circuit: No Liability Without a “Personnel Action” and a Work Environment That Would Dissuade a Reasonable Worker I. Introduction In Bobby Lett v....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert