Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

11th Circuit Case Commentaries

No Thirteenth Amendment Claim for Routine Prison Labor; Due Process Requires “Atypical and Significant Hardship” — Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms Omasta and Applies Sandin in Greene v. Secretary, FDOC

No Thirteenth Amendment Claim for Routine Prison Labor; Due Process Requires “Atypical and Significant Hardship” — Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms Omasta and Applies Sandin in Greene v. Secretary, FDOC

Date: Sep 26, 2025
No Thirteenth Amendment Claim for Routine Prison Labor; Due Process Requires “Atypical and Significant Hardship” — Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms Omasta and Applies Sandin in Greene v. Secretary, FDOC...
EEZ Counts as “High Seas,” and a Claim of Nationality Triggers Statelessness Under the MDLEA: The Eleventh Circuit’s Summary Affirmance in United States v. Rai Martinez

EEZ Counts as “High Seas,” and a Claim of Nationality Triggers Statelessness Under the MDLEA: The Eleventh Circuit’s Summary Affirmance in United States v. Rai Martinez

Date: Sep 26, 2025
EEZ Counts as “High Seas,” and a Claim of Nationality Triggers Statelessness Under the MDLEA: The Eleventh Circuit’s Summary Affirmance in United States v. Rai Martinez Introduction In a...
Eleventh Circuit reaffirms inherent authority to dismiss patently frivolous pro se Bivens claims and confirms abandonment of default arguments raised only in reply

Eleventh Circuit reaffirms inherent authority to dismiss patently frivolous pro se Bivens claims and confirms abandonment of default arguments raised only in reply

Date: Sep 26, 2025
Eleventh Circuit reaffirms inherent authority to dismiss patently frivolous pro se Bivens claims and confirms abandonment of default arguments raised only in reply Introduction This commentary...
EEZ as “High Seas,” Validity of “Neither Confirm Nor Deny” Statelessness, and No Nexus Requirement Under the MDLEA: Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms Foundational Limits on Constitutional Challenges

EEZ as “High Seas,” Validity of “Neither Confirm Nor Deny” Statelessness, and No Nexus Requirement Under the MDLEA: Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms Foundational Limits on Constitutional Challenges

Date: Sep 26, 2025
EEZ as “High Seas,” Validity of “Neither Confirm Nor Deny” Statelessness, and No Nexus Requirement Under the MDLEA: Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms Foundational Limits on Constitutional Challenges...
Eleventh Circuit: Sentencing May Weigh Overdose-Related Investigation Context Without Proving Causation

Eleventh Circuit: Sentencing May Weigh Overdose-Related Investigation Context Without Proving Causation

Date: Sep 26, 2025
Eleventh Circuit: Sentencing May Weigh Overdose-Related Investigation Context Without Proving Causation Case: United States v. Sudiata Neket Zanja Stinson, No. 24-11993 (11th Cir. Sept. 25, 2025)...
“High Seas” Includes Foreign Contiguous Zones: Eleventh Circuit Confirms MDLEA Jurisdiction Over Stateless Vessels Interdicted Beyond Territorial Seas

“High Seas” Includes Foreign Contiguous Zones: Eleventh Circuit Confirms MDLEA Jurisdiction Over Stateless Vessels Interdicted Beyond Territorial Seas

Date: Sep 26, 2025
“High Seas” Includes Foreign Contiguous Zones: Eleventh Circuit Confirms MDLEA Jurisdiction Over Stateless Vessels Interdicted Beyond Territorial Seas Case Overview Case: United States v. Cristian...
Recklessness Suffices for § 875(c) “True Threats”; Rule 106 Context Is Narrow; Keene Alternative-Sentence Harmlessness Reaffirmed

Recklessness Suffices for § 875(c) “True Threats”; Rule 106 Context Is Narrow; Keene Alternative-Sentence Harmlessness Reaffirmed

Date: Sep 26, 2025
Recklessness Suffices for § 875(c) “True Threats”; Rule 106 Context Is Narrow; Keene Alternative-Sentence Harmlessness Reaffirmed Introduction In United States v. Cloepha Franks, No. 24-11546 (11th...
Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms MDLEA Jurisdiction in Foreign EEZs and “Non‑Affirmation” Statelessness; Confirms No Nexus Requirement; Courier Minor‑Role Denial Upheld

Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms MDLEA Jurisdiction in Foreign EEZs and “Non‑Affirmation” Statelessness; Confirms No Nexus Requirement; Courier Minor‑Role Denial Upheld

Date: Sep 26, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms MDLEA Jurisdiction in Foreign EEZs and “Non‑Affirmation” Statelessness; Confirms No Nexus Requirement; Courier Minor‑Role Denial Upheld Commentary on United States v....
EEZs Are “High Seas,” Nationality Equals Registry Under the MDLEA, and No Nexus Is Required: Eleventh Circuit’s Summary Affirmance in United States v. Puello

EEZs Are “High Seas,” Nationality Equals Registry Under the MDLEA, and No Nexus Is Required: Eleventh Circuit’s Summary Affirmance in United States v. Puello

Date: Sep 26, 2025
EEZs Are “High Seas,” Nationality Equals Registry Under the MDLEA, and No Nexus Is Required: Eleventh Circuit’s Summary Affirmance in United States v. Puello Introduction This commentary analyzes the...
Erlinger’s Admission Exception in Practice: Eleventh Circuit Holds Plea Admissions to “Separate Occasions” Sustain ACCA and § 841 Enhancements (United States v. Scott)

Erlinger’s Admission Exception in Practice: Eleventh Circuit Holds Plea Admissions to “Separate Occasions” Sustain ACCA and § 841 Enhancements (United States v. Scott)

Date: Sep 26, 2025
Erlinger’s Admission Exception in Practice: Plea Admissions to “Separate Occasions” Sustain ACCA and § 841 Enhancements Case: United States v. Hiawatha Laquinta Scott, III, No. 24-11045 (11th Cir....
“Touching the Vehicle Touches the Person”: The Eleventh Circuit Holds That Shooting and Striking a Car Seizes Its Driver, and Treats Gunfire-Initiated Stops as Arrests (Watkins v. Davis)

“Touching the Vehicle Touches the Person”: The Eleventh Circuit Holds That Shooting and Striking a Car Seizes Its Driver, and Treats Gunfire-Initiated Stops as Arrests (Watkins v. Davis)

Date: Sep 26, 2025
“Touching the Vehicle Touches the Person”: The Eleventh Circuit Holds That Shooting and Striking a Car Seizes Its Driver, and Treats Gunfire-Initiated Stops as Arrests Introduction In a published...
“Because of” in § 245(b)(2)(B) Means But‑For Causation; Racially Motivated Road Violence Is a Badge of Slavery Congress May Prohibit Under the Thirteenth Amendment

“Because of” in § 245(b)(2)(B) Means But‑For Causation; Racially Motivated Road Violence Is a Badge of Slavery Congress May Prohibit Under the Thirteenth Amendment

Date: Sep 26, 2025
“Because of” in § 245(b)(2)(B) Means But‑For Causation; Racially Motivated Road Violence Is a Badge of Slavery Congress May Prohibit Under the Thirteenth Amendment Introduction In United States v....
Eleventh Circuit: No Clearly Established Ban on Using Commissary Records to Gauge Religious Sincerity; Appellants Who Do Not Brief Qualified Immunity Abandon Their Appeal

Eleventh Circuit: No Clearly Established Ban on Using Commissary Records to Gauge Religious Sincerity; Appellants Who Do Not Brief Qualified Immunity Abandon Their Appeal

Date: Sep 25, 2025
Eleventh Circuit: No Clearly Established Ban on Using Commissary Records to Gauge Religious Sincerity; Appellants Who Do Not Brief Qualified Immunity Abandon Their Appeal Introduction In Cantrell...
Eleventh Circuit Applies Substantial-Evidence Review to § 1229b(b)(1)(D) and Reaffirms the Two‑Part Health‑Hardship Test (Matter of J‑J‑G‑) in Cancellation Cases

Eleventh Circuit Applies Substantial-Evidence Review to § 1229b(b)(1)(D) and Reaffirms the Two‑Part Health‑Hardship Test (Matter of J‑J‑G‑) in Cancellation Cases

Date: Sep 25, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Applies Substantial-Evidence Review to § 1229b(b)(1)(D) and Reaffirms the Two‑Part Health‑Hardship Test (Matter of J‑J‑G‑) in Cancellation Cases Case: Maria Virginia Rodriguez Robles...
Eleventh Circuit solidifies substantial-evidence review of §1229b(b)(1)(D) hardship and endorses J-J-G-’s two-part health-care test

Eleventh Circuit solidifies substantial-evidence review of §1229b(b)(1)(D) hardship and endorses J-J-G-’s two-part health-care test

Date: Sep 25, 2025
Eleventh Circuit solidifies substantial-evidence review of §1229b(b)(1)(D) hardship and endorses J-J-G-’s two-part health-care test Introduction In this consolidated, unpublished decision, the U.S....
Forgoing a Suppression Motion Is Not Ineffective Assistance When Reasonable Suspicion to Prolong a Traffic Stop Is At Least Debatable

Forgoing a Suppression Motion Is Not Ineffective Assistance When Reasonable Suspicion to Prolong a Traffic Stop Is At Least Debatable

Date: Sep 25, 2025
Forgoing a Suppression Motion Is Not Ineffective Assistance When Reasonable Suspicion to Prolong a Traffic Stop Is At Least Debatable Introduction In Richard Norris v. United States, No. 24-13306...
Bad Faith Requires More Than Negligence: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Rule 56’s Demands, Coverage-Investigation Leeway, and Global-Settlement Strategy in Florida Third-Party Claims

Bad Faith Requires More Than Negligence: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Rule 56’s Demands, Coverage-Investigation Leeway, and Global-Settlement Strategy in Florida Third-Party Claims

Date: Sep 25, 2025
Bad Faith Requires More Than Negligence: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Rule 56’s Demands, Coverage-Investigation Leeway, and Global-Settlement Strategy in Florida Third-Party Claims Introduction In a...
Eleventh Circuit Carves a Redressability Window for Closed Adult Businesses and Reaffirms Secondary-Effects Analysis Post‑Reed

Eleventh Circuit Carves a Redressability Window for Closed Adult Businesses and Reaffirms Secondary-Effects Analysis Post‑Reed

Date: Sep 25, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Carves a Redressability Window for Closed Adult Businesses and Reaffirms Secondary-Effects Analysis Post‑Reed Introduction In WBY, Inc. v. City of Chamblee, Georgia, the United...
Misdescribed Bills of Lading Do Not Prevent Risk-of-Loss Transfer Under Shipment Contracts When the Buyer Hires the Carrier

Misdescribed Bills of Lading Do Not Prevent Risk-of-Loss Transfer Under Shipment Contracts When the Buyer Hires the Carrier

Date: Sep 24, 2025
Misdescribed Bills of Lading Do Not Prevent Risk-of-Loss Transfer Under Shipment Contracts When the Buyer Hires the Carrier Introduction In Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s London v. Scents...
No Retroactivity Where Offense Period Includes Post-Scheduling Conduct; Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms Time-of-Conviction Comparison for § 1182(a)(2)(A)(i)(II)

No Retroactivity Where Offense Period Includes Post-Scheduling Conduct; Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms Time-of-Conviction Comparison for § 1182(a)(2)(A)(i)(II)

Date: Sep 24, 2025
No Retroactivity Where Offense Period Includes Post-Scheduling Conduct; Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms Time-of-Conviction Comparison for § 1182(a)(2)(A)(i)(II) Case: Md Zaberul Hasan v. U.S. Attorney...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert