Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

11th Circuit Case Commentaries

Beyond Dollars: Eleventh Circuit Endorses Upward Variances for Cyberfraud Based on Non‑Economic Harms and Extraterritorial Conduct — United States v. Ayeni

Beyond Dollars: Eleventh Circuit Endorses Upward Variances for Cyberfraud Based on Non‑Economic Harms and Extraterritorial Conduct — United States v. Ayeni

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Beyond Dollars: Eleventh Circuit Endorses Upward Variances for Cyberfraud Based on Non‑Economic Harms and Extraterritorial Conduct — United States v. Ayeni Introduction In United States v. Babatunde...
Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms: Successive Reconsideration Motions Do Not Extend the 90-Day Appeal Period from Tax Court Decisions; Actual Receipt of a Deficiency Notice Obviates Proof of Certified Mailing

Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms: Successive Reconsideration Motions Do Not Extend the 90-Day Appeal Period from Tax Court Decisions; Actual Receipt of a Deficiency Notice Obviates Proof of Certified Mailing

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms: Successive Reconsideration Motions Do Not Extend the 90-Day Appeal Period from Tax Court Decisions; Actual Receipt of a Deficiency Notice Obviates Proof of Certified...
Breach-of-Trust, Not Double Counting: The Eleventh Circuit affirms consecutive, within-Guidelines revocation sentences despite an upward variance on the new offense (United States v. Foley)

Breach-of-Trust, Not Double Counting: The Eleventh Circuit affirms consecutive, within-Guidelines revocation sentences despite an upward variance on the new offense (United States v. Foley)

Date: Sep 30, 2025
Breach-of-Trust, Not Double Counting: The Eleventh Circuit affirms consecutive, within-Guidelines revocation sentences despite an upward variance on the new offense Introduction In United States v....
Nebraska Failure‑to‑Warn Law Clarified: Learned Intermediary Extends to Proximate Cause and Supports Merging Negligence and Strict Liability Claims

Nebraska Failure‑to‑Warn Law Clarified: Learned Intermediary Extends to Proximate Cause and Supports Merging Negligence and Strict Liability Claims

Date: Sep 30, 2025
Nebraska Failure‑to‑Warn Law Clarified: Learned Intermediary Extends to Proximate Cause and Supports Merging Negligence and Strict Liability Claims Introduction In Jeffrey Thelen v. Somatics, LLC,...
EEZs Count as “High Seas,” MDLEA’s Stateless-Vessel Rule Stands, and No U.S. Nexus Is Required: Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms in United States v. Juan De Leon Berroa

EEZs Count as “High Seas,” MDLEA’s Stateless-Vessel Rule Stands, and No U.S. Nexus Is Required: Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms in United States v. Juan De Leon Berroa

Date: Sep 30, 2025
EEZs Count as “High Seas,” MDLEA’s Stateless-Vessel Rule Stands, and No U.S. Nexus Is Required: Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms in United States v. Juan De Leon Berroa Introduction In United States v....
Post‑Abitron, Narrowing an Injunction Does Not Strip Prevailing‑Party Status or Preclude Exceptional‑Case Fees Under § 1117(a)

Post‑Abitron, Narrowing an Injunction Does Not Strip Prevailing‑Party Status or Preclude Exceptional‑Case Fees Under § 1117(a)

Date: Sep 30, 2025
Post‑Abitron, Narrowing an Injunction Does Not Strip Prevailing‑Party Status or Preclude Exceptional‑Case Fees Under § 1117(a) Introduction In this unpublished per curiam decision, the Eleventh...
Remote Work for In‑Person K‑12 Teaching Requires Plausible, Specific ADA Pleadings; Denial of Accommodation Alone Is Not a Retaliatory Adverse Action

Remote Work for In‑Person K‑12 Teaching Requires Plausible, Specific ADA Pleadings; Denial of Accommodation Alone Is Not a Retaliatory Adverse Action

Date: Sep 27, 2025
Remote Work for In‑Person K‑12 Teaching Requires Plausible, Specific ADA Pleadings; Denial of Accommodation Alone Is Not a Retaliatory Adverse Action Introduction In Bodie-Jernigan v. School Board of...
Actual Reliance and Invited Error: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Challenges to Sentences Based on Disputed PSI Facts

Actual Reliance and Invited Error: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Challenges to Sentences Based on Disputed PSI Facts

Date: Sep 27, 2025
Actual Reliance and Invited Error: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Challenges to Sentences Based on Disputed PSI Facts Introduction In United States v. Jacob Elijah Groover, No. 24-13068 (11th Cir. Sept....
Reaffirming the High Bar for Post‑Judgment Relief: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies that Alleged Opponent‑Induced Attorney Conflicts and Summary‑Judgment Misstatements Do Not Constitute Rule 60 Fraud or “Exceptional Circumstances” Without Clear, Prejudicial Proof

Reaffirming the High Bar for Post‑Judgment Relief: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies that Alleged Opponent‑Induced Attorney Conflicts and Summary‑Judgment Misstatements Do Not Constitute Rule 60 Fraud or “Exceptional Circumstances” Without Clear, Prejudicial Proof

Date: Sep 27, 2025
Reaffirming the High Bar for Post‑Judgment Relief: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies that Alleged Opponent‑Induced Attorney Conflicts and Summary‑Judgment Misstatements Do Not Constitute Rule 60 Fraud or...
Circumstantial Evidence and Motive Can Sustain Sentencing Fact-Finding; Unpreserved Procedural Claims Face Plain-Error Hurdle — United States v. Meyers (11th Cir. 2025)

Circumstantial Evidence and Motive Can Sustain Sentencing Fact-Finding; Unpreserved Procedural Claims Face Plain-Error Hurdle — United States v. Meyers (11th Cir. 2025)

Date: Sep 27, 2025
Circumstantial Evidence and Motive Can Sustain Sentencing Fact-Finding; Unpreserved Procedural Claims Face Plain-Error Hurdle Case: United States v. Leslie Meyers, No. 24-12915 (11th Cir. Sept. 26,...
No Post‑Judgment Conversion to Concurrency: Eleventh Circuit Affirms That Only Statutory Mechanisms Permit Changing a Federal Sentence to Run Concurrently with a Later‑Imposed State Term

No Post‑Judgment Conversion to Concurrency: Eleventh Circuit Affirms That Only Statutory Mechanisms Permit Changing a Federal Sentence to Run Concurrently with a Later‑Imposed State Term

Date: Sep 27, 2025
No Post‑Judgment Conversion to Concurrency: Eleventh Circuit Affirms That Only Statutory Mechanisms Permit Changing a Federal Sentence to Run Concurrently with a Later‑Imposed State Term Introduction...
Post-Wade Deliberate Indifference: Knowingly Ineffective Treatment and Cancellation of IV Antibiotics Can Establish Subjective Recklessness — Commentary on Canyon Moye v. Pouparinas (11th Cir. 2025)

Post-Wade Deliberate Indifference: Knowingly Ineffective Treatment and Cancellation of IV Antibiotics Can Establish Subjective Recklessness — Commentary on Canyon Moye v. Pouparinas (11th Cir. 2025)

Date: Sep 27, 2025
Post-Wade Deliberate Indifference: Knowingly Ineffective Treatment and Cancellation of IV Antibiotics Can Establish Subjective Recklessness Case: Canyon Duff Moye v. Manuel Pouparinas Court: U.S....
Signing ICC Terms of Reference as “Clear and Unmistakable” Delegation of Arbitrability: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Confirmation Against a Non‑Signatory Under the New York Convention

Signing ICC Terms of Reference as “Clear and Unmistakable” Delegation of Arbitrability: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Confirmation Against a Non‑Signatory Under the New York Convention

Date: Sep 26, 2025
Signing ICC Terms of Reference as “Clear and Unmistakable” Delegation of Arbitrability: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Confirmation Against a Non‑Signatory Under the New York Convention Introduction This...
No Industry Standard, No Immunity: Eleventh Circuit Holds Standard of Care and Causation Are Jury Questions in Negligent-Work Exclusion vs. “Equipment Breakdown” Coverage Disputes

No Industry Standard, No Immunity: Eleventh Circuit Holds Standard of Care and Causation Are Jury Questions in Negligent-Work Exclusion vs. “Equipment Breakdown” Coverage Disputes

Date: Sep 26, 2025
No Industry Standard, No Immunity: Eleventh Circuit Holds Standard of Care and Causation Are Jury Questions in Negligent-Work Exclusion vs. “Equipment Breakdown” Coverage Disputes Introduction This...
EEZs Are Part of the “High Seas” and Congress May Define “Stateless” Broadly Under the MDLEA: Eleventh Circuit Affirms in United States v. Guzman‑Javier

EEZs Are Part of the “High Seas” and Congress May Define “Stateless” Broadly Under the MDLEA: Eleventh Circuit Affirms in United States v. Guzman‑Javier

Date: Sep 26, 2025
EEZs Are Part of the “High Seas” and Congress May Define “Stateless” Broadly Under the MDLEA United States v. Carlos Guzman‑Javier (and Consolidated Appeals) Introduction In this unpublished,...
Probable Cause Does Not Automatically Trigger Miranda Custody; Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms § 922(g)(1)’s Constitutionality After Bruen and Rahimi

Probable Cause Does Not Automatically Trigger Miranda Custody; Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms § 922(g)(1)’s Constitutionality After Bruen and Rahimi

Date: Sep 26, 2025
Probable Cause Does Not Automatically Trigger Miranda Custody; Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms § 922(g)(1)’s Constitutionality After Bruen and Rahimi Introduction In United States v. Ernell Shaw, No....
EEZs Count as “High Seas,” and Congress May Define “Vessels Without Nationality” for MDLEA Purposes: Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms MDLEA Jurisdiction and No‑Nexus Rule in United States v. Cueto‑Sanchez

EEZs Count as “High Seas,” and Congress May Define “Vessels Without Nationality” for MDLEA Purposes: Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms MDLEA Jurisdiction and No‑Nexus Rule in United States v. Cueto‑Sanchez

Date: Sep 26, 2025
EEZs Count as “High Seas,” and Congress May Define “Vessels Without Nationality” for MDLEA Purposes: Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms MDLEA Jurisdiction and No‑Nexus Rule in United States v. Cueto‑Sanchez...
EEZs Are “High Seas” Under the Felonies Clause; MDLEA’s Expanded “Vessel Without Nationality” Definition and No‑Nexus Rule Reaffirmed

EEZs Are “High Seas” Under the Felonies Clause; MDLEA’s Expanded “Vessel Without Nationality” Definition and No‑Nexus Rule Reaffirmed

Date: Sep 26, 2025
EEZs Are “High Seas” Under the Felonies Clause; MDLEA’s Expanded “Vessel Without Nationality” Definition and No‑Nexus Rule Reaffirmed Introduction In this consolidated, unpublished per curiam...
Control and Knowledge as Gatekeepers: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies That Staffing Firms Have No Standalone Duty to Investigate Client Motives Under Title VII

Control and Knowledge as Gatekeepers: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies That Staffing Firms Have No Standalone Duty to Investigate Client Motives Under Title VII

Date: Sep 26, 2025
Control and Knowledge as Gatekeepers: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies That Staffing Firms Have No Standalone Duty to Investigate Client Motives Under Title VII Introduction In Emily Vincent v. ATI...
EEZ-as-“High Seas,” Congress’s MDLEA Statelessness Definition, and No-Nexus Requirement Reaffirmed; Minor-Role Denial for High-Quantity Courier — United States v. Vasquez (11th Cir. 2025)

EEZ-as-“High Seas,” Congress’s MDLEA Statelessness Definition, and No-Nexus Requirement Reaffirmed; Minor-Role Denial for High-Quantity Courier — United States v. Vasquez (11th Cir. 2025)

Date: Sep 26, 2025
EEZ-as-“High Seas,” Congress’s MDLEA Statelessness Definition, and No-Nexus Requirement Reaffirmed; Minor-Role Denial for High-Quantity Courier — United States v. Vasquez (11th Cir. 2025)...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert