Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

11th Circuit Case Commentaries

Post‑Counterman Bomb‑Threat Prosecutions: Eleventh Circuit Confirms that “Willfully” in 18 U.S.C. § 844(e) and the Pattern “Serious Threat” Instruction Satisfy the First Amendment

Post‑Counterman Bomb‑Threat Prosecutions: Eleventh Circuit Confirms that “Willfully” in 18 U.S.C. § 844(e) and the Pattern “Serious Threat” Instruction Satisfy the First Amendment

Date: Oct 9, 2025
Post‑Counterman Bomb‑Threat Prosecutions: Eleventh Circuit Confirms that “Willfully” in 18 U.S.C. § 844(e) and the Pattern “Serious Threat” Instruction Satisfy the First Amendment Case: United States...
Persistent Assertions of Innocence Defeat Plea-Stage Prejudice: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies When § 2255 Petitioners Get an Evidentiary Hearing

Persistent Assertions of Innocence Defeat Plea-Stage Prejudice: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies When § 2255 Petitioners Get an Evidentiary Hearing

Date: Oct 9, 2025
Persistent Assertions of Innocence Defeat Plea-Stage Prejudice: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies When § 2255 Petitioners Get an Evidentiary Hearing Introduction In Catrell Ivory v. United States (11th Cir....
Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms: “Wasted Time” and Attorney Consultation Alone Are Self‑Imposed Harms Insufficient for Article III Standing in FDCPA/FCCPA Suits

Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms: “Wasted Time” and Attorney Consultation Alone Are Self‑Imposed Harms Insufficient for Article III Standing in FDCPA/FCCPA Suits

Date: Oct 9, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms: “Wasted Time” and Attorney Consultation Alone Are Self‑Imposed Harms Insufficient for Article III Standing in FDCPA/FCCPA Suits Case: Alex El Bachiri v. Medicredit, Inc....
Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms State-Schedule Approach and Georgia Aggravated Assault as “Crime of Violence” for §2K2.1 Enhancements: United States v. Morris

Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms State-Schedule Approach and Georgia Aggravated Assault as “Crime of Violence” for §2K2.1 Enhancements: United States v. Morris

Date: Oct 9, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms State-Schedule Approach and Georgia Aggravated Assault as “Crime of Violence” for §2K2.1 Enhancements Introduction In United States v. Devontae Jammell Morris (No....
No Obligation to Reweigh § 3553(a) in Light of Intervening Law: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Denial of Compassionate Release in United States v. Cruz

No Obligation to Reweigh § 3553(a) in Light of Intervening Law: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Denial of Compassionate Release in United States v. Cruz

Date: Oct 9, 2025
No Obligation to Reweigh § 3553(a) in Light of Intervening Law: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Denial of Compassionate Release in United States v. Cruz Introduction In an unpublished, per curiam decision,...
Keene Harmless-Error Shield Applies Even When the Alternative Sentence Is Prompted by the Government: United States v. Parks (11th Cir. 2025)

Keene Harmless-Error Shield Applies Even When the Alternative Sentence Is Prompted by the Government: United States v. Parks (11th Cir. 2025)

Date: Oct 9, 2025
Keene Harmless-Error Shield Applies Even When the Alternative Sentence Is Prompted by the Government: United States v. Parks (11th Cir. 2025) Introduction In United States v. Santino Demarco Parks,...
A New Interpretation on Appeal Is a Forfeited Issue: The Eleventh Circuit Clarifies the Issue–Argument Divide in Gould v. Interface

A New Interpretation on Appeal Is a Forfeited Issue: The Eleventh Circuit Clarifies the Issue–Argument Divide in Gould v. Interface

Date: Oct 9, 2025
A New Interpretation on Appeal Is a Forfeited Issue: The Eleventh Circuit Clarifies the Issue–Argument Divide in Gould v. Interface Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Date: October...
Affirmance on Alternative Grounds: No State Action Under § 1983, Time-Barred Claims, and Kentucky Venue Control Despite Rooker-Feldman Misstep

Affirmance on Alternative Grounds: No State Action Under § 1983, Time-Barred Claims, and Kentucky Venue Control Despite Rooker-Feldman Misstep

Date: Oct 2, 2025
Affirmance on Alternative Grounds: No State Action Under § 1983, Time-Barred Claims, and Kentucky Venue Control Despite Rooker-Feldman Misstep Introduction In Alan Boyd Curtis v. Robyn Pauline...
Post–Loper Bright in the Eleventh Circuit: Perez‑Zenteno Factors Govern “Particular Social Group”; No Unsettled‑Caselaw Exception to Exhaustion for NTA Defects

Post–Loper Bright in the Eleventh Circuit: Perez‑Zenteno Factors Govern “Particular Social Group”; No Unsettled‑Caselaw Exception to Exhaustion for NTA Defects

Date: Oct 2, 2025
Post–Loper Bright in the Eleventh Circuit: Perez‑Zenteno Factors Govern “Particular Social Group”; No Unsettled‑Caselaw Exception to Exhaustion for NTA Defects Introduction In Esperanza Francisca...
Reaffirming the Discretionary Nature of §5K1.1 and the High Bar for Withdrawing Guilty Pleas After a Proper Rule 11 Colloquy

Reaffirming the Discretionary Nature of §5K1.1 and the High Bar for Withdrawing Guilty Pleas After a Proper Rule 11 Colloquy

Date: Oct 2, 2025
Reaffirming the Discretionary Nature of §5K1.1 and the High Bar for Withdrawing Guilty Pleas After a Proper Rule 11 Colloquy Introduction In United States v. Latrel Jackson (No. 24-12863), the...
Voluntary Dismissal Is Not Automatically a Bona Fide Termination: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Early Disposition of Florida Malicious Prosecution Claims and Upholds Rule 11 Sanctions Where Affiliate Joined Post‑Filing

Voluntary Dismissal Is Not Automatically a Bona Fide Termination: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Early Disposition of Florida Malicious Prosecution Claims and Upholds Rule 11 Sanctions Where Affiliate Joined Post‑Filing

Date: Oct 2, 2025
Voluntary Dismissal Is Not Automatically a Bona Fide Termination: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Early Disposition of Florida Malicious Prosecution Claims and Upholds Rule 11 Sanctions Where Affiliate...
Bona Fide Termination Requires More Than a Voluntary Dismissal; Naming Non‑Initiators in Malicious Prosecution Can Warrant Rule 11 Sanctions

Bona Fide Termination Requires More Than a Voluntary Dismissal; Naming Non‑Initiators in Malicious Prosecution Can Warrant Rule 11 Sanctions

Date: Oct 2, 2025
Bona Fide Termination Requires More Than a Voluntary Dismissal; Naming Non‑Initiators in Malicious Prosecution Can Warrant Rule 11 Sanctions Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh...
Causation-by-Solicitation Confirmed: Eleventh Circuit Applies §2G2.1 Cross-Reference to a Buyer Who Prompted New Production; Harmless-Error Where Statutory Maximum Caps the Guidelines Range

Causation-by-Solicitation Confirmed: Eleventh Circuit Applies §2G2.1 Cross-Reference to a Buyer Who Prompted New Production; Harmless-Error Where Statutory Maximum Caps the Guidelines Range

Date: Oct 2, 2025
Causation-by-Solicitation Confirmed: Eleventh Circuit Applies §2G2.1 Cross-Reference to a Buyer Who Prompted New Production; Harmless-Error Where Statutory Maximum Caps the Guidelines Range...
Pending State Charges and Pretrial Misconduct Can Justify Major Upward Variances in Illegal Reentry Sentences; No Continuance Absent Specific, Non‑Speculative Prejudice

Pending State Charges and Pretrial Misconduct Can Justify Major Upward Variances in Illegal Reentry Sentences; No Continuance Absent Specific, Non‑Speculative Prejudice

Date: Oct 2, 2025
Pending State Charges and Pretrial Misconduct Can Justify Major Upward Variances in Illegal Reentry Sentences; No Continuance Absent Specific, Non‑Speculative Prejudice Case: United States v. Jorge...
No Unwarranted Disparity Shown by Aggregate Statistics: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Statutory-Maximum Upward Variance and Consecutive Revocation Term for Immediate Recidivism in Child-Pornography Case

No Unwarranted Disparity Shown by Aggregate Statistics: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Statutory-Maximum Upward Variance and Consecutive Revocation Term for Immediate Recidivism in Child-Pornography Case

Date: Oct 1, 2025
No Unwarranted Disparity Shown by Aggregate Statistics: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Statutory-Maximum Upward Variance and Consecutive Revocation Term for Immediate Recidivism in Child-Pornography Case...
Eleventh Circuit: Sentencing Statistics Alone Do Not Prove § 3553(a)(6) Disparity; Statutory-Max Upward Variance and Consecutive Revocation Term Upheld for Child-Pornography Recidivist

Eleventh Circuit: Sentencing Statistics Alone Do Not Prove § 3553(a)(6) Disparity; Statutory-Max Upward Variance and Consecutive Revocation Term Upheld for Child-Pornography Recidivist

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Eleventh Circuit: Sentencing Statistics Alone Do Not Prove § 3553(a)(6) Disparity; Statutory-Max Upward Variance and Consecutive Revocation Term Upheld for Child-Pornography Recidivist Introduction...
No Bruen Abrogation of § 922(g)(1) in the Eleventh Circuit; Harmlessness via Keene Where District Court Announces Identical Alternative Sentence

No Bruen Abrogation of § 922(g)(1) in the Eleventh Circuit; Harmlessness via Keene Where District Court Announces Identical Alternative Sentence

Date: Oct 1, 2025
No Bruen Abrogation of § 922(g)(1) in the Eleventh Circuit; Harmlessness via Keene Where District Court Announces Identical Alternative Sentence Commentary on United States v. Roderick Farrier, No....
Strong DNA on Trigger and Grip, Coupled with Access and Furtive Movements, Is Sufficient to Prove Knowing Possession Under § 922(g) Even When the Gun Is in a Passenger’s Purse

Strong DNA on Trigger and Grip, Coupled with Access and Furtive Movements, Is Sufficient to Prove Knowing Possession Under § 922(g) Even When the Gun Is in a Passenger’s Purse

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Strong DNA on Trigger and Grip, Coupled with Access and Furtive Movements, Is Sufficient to Prove Knowing Possession Under § 922(g) Even When the Gun Is in a Passenger’s Purse Introduction This...
Outrageous-Conduct Claims, Brady Duties on Confidential Informants, and No Confrontation Right to Compel Informant Testimony Absent Testimonial Statements — United States v. Marcus D. Flintroy (11th Cir. 2025)

Outrageous-Conduct Claims, Brady Duties on Confidential Informants, and No Confrontation Right to Compel Informant Testimony Absent Testimonial Statements — United States v. Marcus D. Flintroy (11th Cir. 2025)

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Outrageous-Conduct Claims, Brady Duties on Confidential Informants, and No Confrontation Right to Compel Informant Testimony Absent Testimonial Statements — United States v. Marcus D. Flintroy (11th...
Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms: Successive Reconsideration Motions Do Not Toll Tax Court Appeal Deadlines; Actual Receipt of a Deficiency Notice Suffices Without Certified‑Mail Proof

Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms: Successive Reconsideration Motions Do Not Toll Tax Court Appeal Deadlines; Actual Receipt of a Deficiency Notice Suffices Without Certified‑Mail Proof

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms: Successive Reconsideration Motions Do Not Toll Tax Court Appeal Deadlines; Actual Receipt of a Deficiency Notice Suffices Without Certified‑Mail Proof Case: Joseph Belcik...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert