Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

11th Circuit Case Commentaries


    “The Family Time Doctrine”: Eleventh Circuit Holds that Alleged Post-Service Damage
    Does Not Defeat a Maritime Lien and Confirms Expedited Sale Power after Owner’s Delay

“The Family Time Doctrine”: Eleventh Circuit Holds that Alleged Post-Service Damage Does Not Defeat a Maritime Lien and Confirms Expedited Sale Power after Owner’s Delay

Date: Jun 30, 2025
“The Family Time Doctrine”: Eleventh Circuit Holds that Alleged Post-Service Damage Does Not Defeat a Maritime Lien and Confirms Expedited Sale Power after Owner’s Delay Introduction In Naval...
United States v. Chandler and the Eleventh Circuit’s Post-Loper Bright Endorsement of Kisor Deference to Sentencing-Guidelines Commentary

United States v. Chandler and the Eleventh Circuit’s Post-Loper Bright Endorsement of Kisor Deference to Sentencing-Guidelines Commentary

Date: Jun 30, 2025
United States v. Chandler and the Eleventh Circuit’s Post-Loper Bright Endorsement of Kisor Deference to Sentencing-Guidelines Commentary Introduction In United States v. Gregory Chandler, Jr., Nos....
Reaffirming Kisor Deference and the 75-to-1 Video-Image Ratio under U.S.S.G. §2G2.2: A Commentary on United States v. Gregory Chandler, Jr.

Reaffirming Kisor Deference and the 75-to-1 Video-Image Ratio under U.S.S.G. §2G2.2: A Commentary on United States v. Gregory Chandler, Jr.

Date: Jun 30, 2025
Reaffirming Kisor Deference and the 75-to-1 Video-Image Ratio under U.S.S.G. § 2G2.2 – Commentary on United States v. Gregory Chandler, Jr. 1. Introduction In United States v. Gregory Chandler, Jr.,...
United States v. Lawson: Clarifying “Reasonable Delay” for Digital-Device Search Warrants in Complex Fraud Investigations

United States v. Lawson: Clarifying “Reasonable Delay” for Digital-Device Search Warrants in Complex Fraud Investigations

Date: Jun 30, 2025
United States v. Lawson: Clarifying “Reasonable Delay” for Digital-Device Search Warrants in Complex Fraud Investigations 1. Introduction The Eleventh Circuit’s unpublished decision in United States...
United States v. Kelvontae Brown: Eleventh Circuit Re-Affirms the Presumptive Constitutionality of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) After Bruen and Rahimi

United States v. Kelvontae Brown: Eleventh Circuit Re-Affirms the Presumptive Constitutionality of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) After Bruen and Rahimi

Date: Jun 30, 2025
United States v. Kelvontae Brown: Eleventh Circuit Re-Affirms the Presumptive Constitutionality of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) After Bruen and Rahimi 1. Introduction United States v. Kelvontae Brown, No....
Reasonable-Bank Rule: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Good-Faith Discretion for Financial Institutions Facing Suspected Fraud

Reasonable-Bank Rule: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Good-Faith Discretion for Financial Institutions Facing Suspected Fraud

Date: Jun 23, 2025
Reasonable-Bank Rule: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Good-Faith Discretion for Financial Institutions Facing Suspected Fraud 1. Introduction In Gent Row, LLC v. Truist Financial Corporation, No. 24-10387...
United States v. Shavers & Jones – Voluntary Admission of PSR Facts as a Cure for Erlinger Error under the ACCA

United States v. Shavers & Jones – Voluntary Admission of PSR Facts as a Cure for Erlinger Error under the ACCA

Date: Jun 23, 2025
United States v. Alfred Lamar Shavers & Tyrone James Jones Voluntary Admission of PSR Facts as a Cure for Erlinger Error under the ACCA 1. Introduction On 20 June 2025 the Eleventh Circuit, sitting...
Expanding the High Seas: Eleventh Circuit Confirms Exclusive Economic Zone as “High Seas” Under the Felonies Clause – United States v. Lopez-Padilla

Expanding the High Seas: Eleventh Circuit Confirms Exclusive Economic Zone as “High Seas” Under the Felonies Clause – United States v. Lopez-Padilla

Date: Jun 23, 2025
Expanding the High Seas: Eleventh Circuit Confirms Exclusive Economic Zone as “High Seas” Under the Felonies Clause – United States v. Lopez-Padilla Introduction In United States v. Belarminio...
Reaffirming the “Time-of-Conviction” Standard for Career-Offender Predicate Controlled-Substance Offenses: A Commentary on United States v. Enrique Diaz (11th Cir. 2025)

Reaffirming the “Time-of-Conviction” Standard for Career-Offender Predicate Controlled-Substance Offenses: A Commentary on United States v. Enrique Diaz (11th Cir. 2025)

Date: Jun 23, 2025
Reaffirming the “Time-of-Conviction” Standard for Career-Offender Predicate Controlled-Substance Offenses Commentary on United States v. Enrique Diaz, No. 22-13149 (11th Cir. June 20, 2025)...
“Reaffirming Rozier” – The Eleventh Circuit Declares that Bruen and Rahimi Do Not Displace the Federal Felon-in-Possession Ban (18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1))

“Reaffirming Rozier” – The Eleventh Circuit Declares that Bruen and Rahimi Do Not Displace the Federal Felon-in-Possession Ban (18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1))

Date: Jun 23, 2025
“Reaffirming Rozier” – The Eleventh Circuit Declares that Bruen and Rahimi Do Not Displace the Federal Felon-in-Possession Ban (18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1)) 1. Introduction The decision in United States v....
“From Gate-Pass to Scope of Employment” – The Eleventh Circuit’s New Guidance on When a Commute Ends for Vicarious-Liability Purposes

“From Gate-Pass to Scope of Employment” – The Eleventh Circuit’s New Guidance on When a Commute Ends for Vicarious-Liability Purposes

Date: Jun 20, 2025
“From Gate-Pass to Scope of Employment” – The Eleventh Circuit’s New Guidance on When a Commute Ends for Vicarious-Liability Purposes Case Commented: Richard Hicks v. Gregory Middleton, et al. Court:...
“One Worksite, One Employer”:  The Eleventh Circuit Defines Single-Employer Liability and the Secretary’s Burden of Proving Economic Feasibility under OSHA’s General Duty Clause

“One Worksite, One Employer”: The Eleventh Circuit Defines Single-Employer Liability and the Secretary’s Burden of Proving Economic Feasibility under OSHA’s General Duty Clause

Date: Jun 20, 2025
“One Worksite, One Employer”: The Eleventh Circuit Defines Single-Employer Liability and the Secretary’s Burden of Proving Economic Feasibility under OSHA’s General Duty Clause Introduction UHS of...
When Flight and Vehicle Dominion Suffice: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Threshold for Knowledge in Constructive Possession of Narcotics (United States v. Youngblood, 2025)

When Flight and Vehicle Dominion Suffice: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Threshold for Knowledge in Constructive Possession of Narcotics (United States v. Youngblood, 2025)

Date: Jun 20, 2025
When Flight and Vehicle Dominion Suffice: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Threshold for Knowledge in Constructive Possession of Narcotics Commentary on United States v. Emmanuel Youngblood, No. 24-12647...
No Duty Without Particularized Notice – The Eleventh Circuit Narrows Cruise-Line Liability for Passenger-on-Passenger Assaults

No Duty Without Particularized Notice – The Eleventh Circuit Narrows Cruise-Line Liability for Passenger-on-Passenger Assaults

Date: Jun 20, 2025
No Duty Without Particularized Notice – The Eleventh Circuit Narrows Cruise-Line Liability for Passenger-on-Passenger Assaults Introduction In J.F. v. Carnival Corporation, the U.S. Court of Appeals...
“No Second-Class Litigants”: The Eleventh Circuit Confirms That Pro Se Status Does Not Shield Parties from Rule 41(b) Dismissal — A Commentary on Dewitt Coates v. Lyft, Inc.

“No Second-Class Litigants”: The Eleventh Circuit Confirms That Pro Se Status Does Not Shield Parties from Rule 41(b) Dismissal — A Commentary on Dewitt Coates v. Lyft, Inc.

Date: Jun 18, 2025
“No Second-Class Litigants”: The Eleventh Circuit Confirms That Pro Se Status Does Not Shield Parties from Rule 41(b) Dismissal — A Commentary on Dewitt Coates v. Lyft, Inc. Introduction The United...
Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms § 922(g)(1) Felon-in-Possession Ban After Bruen and Rahimi

Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms § 922(g)(1) Felon-in-Possession Ban After Bruen and Rahimi

Date: Jun 18, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms § 922(g)(1) Felon-in-Possession Ban After Bruen and Rahimi Introduction United States v. Kenya Miguel Johnson, No. 23-10642 (11th Cir. June 16, 2025) is an unpublished but...
Reaffirming the Presumptive Lawfulness of Felon-in-Possession Statutes after Bruen and Rahimi – A Commentary on United States v. Walter Rider

Reaffirming the Presumptive Lawfulness of Felon-in-Possession Statutes after Bruen and Rahimi – A Commentary on United States v. Walter Rider

Date: Jun 18, 2025
Reaffirming the Presumptive Lawfulness of Felon-in-Possession Statutes after Bruen and Rahimi A Comprehensive Commentary on United States v. Walter Rider, 23-13043 (11th Cir. 2025) I. Introduction In...
Acosta v. Acting Commissioner of Social Security: Curtailing Post-Hearing Job-Numbers Challenges and Clarifying Harmless Error for DOT Conflicts

Acosta v. Acting Commissioner of Social Security: Curtailing Post-Hearing Job-Numbers Challenges and Clarifying Harmless Error for DOT Conflicts

Date: Jun 18, 2025
Acosta v. Acting Commissioner of Social Security: Curtailing Post-Hearing Job-Numbers Challenges and Clarifying Harmless Error for DOT Conflicts Introduction In Dorys Acosta v. Acting Commissioner of...
Restitution Orders as Prima Facie Proof of the $10,000-Loss Threshold in Aggravated-Felony Removal Cases: Comment on Manuel Labrada v. U.S. Attorney General (11th Cir. 2025)

Restitution Orders as Prima Facie Proof of the $10,000-Loss Threshold in Aggravated-Felony Removal Cases: Comment on Manuel Labrada v. U.S. Attorney General (11th Cir. 2025)

Date: Jun 18, 2025
Restitution Orders as Prima Facie Proof of the $10,000-Loss Threshold in Aggravated-Felony Removal Cases Commentary on Manuel Labrada v. U.S. Attorney General, 11th Cir., 13 June 2025 1. Introduction...

        “Made-In” Markings as Independent Proof of Interstate Nexus & Flexible Rule-16 Sanctions – Commentary on United States v. Isaac Alvarez (11th Cir. 2025)

“Made-In” Markings as Independent Proof of Interstate Nexus & Flexible Rule-16 Sanctions – Commentary on United States v. Isaac Alvarez (11th Cir. 2025)

Date: Jun 18, 2025
“Made-In” Markings as Independent Proof of Interstate Nexus & Flexible Rule-16 Sanctions Commentary on United States v. Isaac Alvarez, No. 23-12286 (11th Cir. June 13, 2025) (unpublished) 1....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert