Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

11th Circuit Case Commentaries

Short Orders, Broad Discretion: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Denial of Amendment 821 “Zero‑Point Offender” Reductions Based on § 3553(a) Factors

Short Orders, Broad Discretion: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Denial of Amendment 821 “Zero‑Point Offender” Reductions Based on § 3553(a) Factors

Date: Oct 11, 2025
Short Orders, Broad Discretion: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Denial of Amendment 821 “Zero‑Point Offender” Reductions Based on § 3553(a) Factors Introduction In United States v. Jose Rogelio...
Harmless Beyond a Reasonable Doubt: Eleventh Circuit Permits Sua Sponte Harmless-Error Review of Erlinger “Different Occasions” Violations

Harmless Beyond a Reasonable Doubt: Eleventh Circuit Permits Sua Sponte Harmless-Error Review of Erlinger “Different Occasions” Violations

Date: Oct 10, 2025
Harmless Beyond a Reasonable Doubt: Eleventh Circuit Permits Sua Sponte Harmless-Error Review of Erlinger “Different Occasions” Violations Introduction In United States v. Samuel Storey (11th Cir....
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies: Post-Representation Privacy Torts Are Outside Narrow Retainer Arbitration Clauses; “Confidential Arbitration” Is Not a Duty of Confidentiality

Eleventh Circuit Clarifies: Post-Representation Privacy Torts Are Outside Narrow Retainer Arbitration Clauses; “Confidential Arbitration” Is Not a Duty of Confidentiality

Date: Oct 10, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies: Post-Representation Privacy Torts Are Outside Narrow Retainer Arbitration Clauses; “Confidential Arbitration” Is Not a Duty of Confidentiality Introduction In Janet L....
§ 46504 Requires Only General Intent: Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms No Need to Prove Intent to Intimidate or to Interfere, and Clarifies that “Knowingly” Attaches to Conduct (United States v. Olvera)

§ 46504 Requires Only General Intent: Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms No Need to Prove Intent to Intimidate or to Interfere, and Clarifies that “Knowingly” Attaches to Conduct (United States v. Olvera)

Date: Oct 10, 2025
§ 46504 Requires Only General Intent: Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms No Need to Prove Intent to Intimidate or to Interfere, and Clarifies that “Knowingly” Attaches to Conduct (United States v. Olvera)...
EEZ Equals “High Seas” for MDLEA; § 70502(d)(1)(C) Constitutional; No Nexus Requirement: Eleventh Circuit Summarily Affirms in United States v. Feyber De Avila (Consolidated)

EEZ Equals “High Seas” for MDLEA; § 70502(d)(1)(C) Constitutional; No Nexus Requirement: Eleventh Circuit Summarily Affirms in United States v. Feyber De Avila (Consolidated)

Date: Oct 10, 2025
EEZ Equals “High Seas” for MDLEA; § 70502(d)(1)(C) Constitutional; No Nexus Requirement: Eleventh Circuit Summarily Affirms in United States v. Feyber De Avila (Consolidated) Introduction In a...
EEZ Counts as “High Seas,” MDLEA Needs No U.S. Nexus, and “Stateless Vessel” Definition Is Not Cabined by International Law: Eleventh Circuit’s Summary Affirmance in United States v. Santiago, De Avila, and Ulloa

EEZ Counts as “High Seas,” MDLEA Needs No U.S. Nexus, and “Stateless Vessel” Definition Is Not Cabined by International Law: Eleventh Circuit’s Summary Affirmance in United States v. Santiago, De Avila, and Ulloa

Date: Oct 10, 2025
EEZ Counts as “High Seas,” MDLEA Needs No U.S. Nexus, and “Stateless Vessel” Definition Is Not Cabined by International Law: Eleventh Circuit’s Summary Affirmance in United States v. Santiago, De...
EEZs Are “High Seas” for Felonies Clause; MDLEA’s Stateless‑Vessel Definition Upheld; No Nexus Requirement: Eleventh Circuit’s Summary Affirmance in United States v. Wallyst Rochist Ulloa (consol. with Santiago & De Avila)

EEZs Are “High Seas” for Felonies Clause; MDLEA’s Stateless‑Vessel Definition Upheld; No Nexus Requirement: Eleventh Circuit’s Summary Affirmance in United States v. Wallyst Rochist Ulloa (consol. with Santiago & De Avila)

Date: Oct 10, 2025
EEZs Are “High Seas” for Felonies Clause; MDLEA’s Stateless‑Vessel Definition Upheld; No Nexus Requirement Case: United States v. Wallyst Rochist Ulloa (consolidated with United States v. Ramon...
Bad‑Faith, Post‑Auction Chapter 13 Filings Can Justify Retroactive Annulment of the Automatic Stay: Eleventh Circuit’s Clarification in Smith v. Shoma Homes

Bad‑Faith, Post‑Auction Chapter 13 Filings Can Justify Retroactive Annulment of the Automatic Stay: Eleventh Circuit’s Clarification in Smith v. Shoma Homes

Date: Oct 10, 2025
Bad‑Faith, Post‑Auction Chapter 13 Filings Can Justify Retroactive Annulment of the Automatic Stay: Eleventh Circuit’s Clarification in Smith v. Shoma Homes Case: Marisa Smith v. Shoma Homes at...
Guilty Plea Is Not Enough: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Denial of §3E1.1 Acceptance Reduction Where Post‑Plea Conduct Undermines Responsibility (United States v. Leszczynski)

Guilty Plea Is Not Enough: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Denial of §3E1.1 Acceptance Reduction Where Post‑Plea Conduct Undermines Responsibility (United States v. Leszczynski)

Date: Oct 10, 2025
Guilty Plea Is Not Enough: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Denial of §3E1.1 Acceptance Reduction Where Post‑Plea Conduct Undermines Responsibility Introduction In United States v. Alexander Leszczynski...
Rule 11 Colloquy Cures Counsel’s Sentencing Misadvice: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Denial of Plea Withdrawal in United States v. Walden

Rule 11 Colloquy Cures Counsel’s Sentencing Misadvice: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Denial of Plea Withdrawal in United States v. Walden

Date: Oct 10, 2025
Rule 11 Colloquy Cures Counsel’s Sentencing Misadvice: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Denial of Plea Withdrawal in United States v. Walden Introduction In United States v. Walden (11th Cir. Oct. 6, 2025)...
Dealer Noncompliance Is Irrelevant to § 922(a)(6); Serial-Number Enhancement Requires No Knowledge: United States v. Woozencroft (11th Cir. 2025)

Dealer Noncompliance Is Irrelevant to § 922(a)(6); Serial-Number Enhancement Requires No Knowledge: United States v. Woozencroft (11th Cir. 2025)

Date: Oct 10, 2025
Dealer Noncompliance Is Irrelevant to § 922(a)(6); Serial-Number Enhancement Requires No Knowledge: United States v. Woozencroft (11th Cir. 2025) Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit...
Broad “In Connection With” Nexus and Fraud-Related Character of § 843(a)(3) Drug Diversion Trigger Mandatory Exclusion Under 42 U.S.C. § 1320a‑7(a)(3)

Broad “In Connection With” Nexus and Fraud-Related Character of § 843(a)(3) Drug Diversion Trigger Mandatory Exclusion Under 42 U.S.C. § 1320a‑7(a)(3)

Date: Oct 10, 2025
Broad “In Connection With” Nexus and Fraud-Related Character of § 843(a)(3) Drug Diversion Trigger Mandatory Exclusion Under 42 U.S.C. § 1320a‑7(a)(3) Court: United States Court of Appeals for the...
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies: After One Instructed Repleader and Explicit Warnings, Pro Se Shotgun Pleadings May Be Dismissed With Prejudice Under Rule 41(b)

Eleventh Circuit Clarifies: After One Instructed Repleader and Explicit Warnings, Pro Se Shotgun Pleadings May Be Dismissed With Prejudice Under Rule 41(b)

Date: Oct 9, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies: After One Instructed Repleader and Explicit Warnings, Pro Se Shotgun Pleadings May Be Dismissed With Prejudice Under Rule 41(b) Introduction In this unpublished, per...
Conditional Intent, Short Stays, and Tourist Visas: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Habitual Residence and Harmless-Error Review in ICARA Cases

Conditional Intent, Short Stays, and Tourist Visas: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Habitual Residence and Harmless-Error Review in ICARA Cases

Date: Oct 9, 2025
Conditional Intent, Short Stays, and Tourist Visas: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Habitual Residence and Harmless-Error Review in ICARA Cases Introduction In Forest Lee v. Tiffany Curcio, No. 25-11835...
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies FDCPA Limits: State‑Mandated Nonjudicial Foreclosure Notices Do Not Create “Debt Collector” Status; § 1692f(6) Requires Absence of a Present Right to Possession

Eleventh Circuit Clarifies FDCPA Limits: State‑Mandated Nonjudicial Foreclosure Notices Do Not Create “Debt Collector” Status; § 1692f(6) Requires Absence of a Present Right to Possession

Date: Oct 9, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies FDCPA Limits: State‑Mandated Nonjudicial Foreclosure Notices Do Not Create “Debt Collector” Status; § 1692f(6) Requires Absence of a Present Right to Possession...
“Play ALJ, Not Doctor”: Eleventh Circuit Affirms ALJ’s Authority Under Post‑2017 SSA Regulations to Reject Medical Opinion Limitations Based on Supportability and Consistency

“Play ALJ, Not Doctor”: Eleventh Circuit Affirms ALJ’s Authority Under Post‑2017 SSA Regulations to Reject Medical Opinion Limitations Based on Supportability and Consistency

Date: Oct 9, 2025
“Play ALJ, Not Doctor”: Eleventh Circuit Affirms ALJ’s Authority Under Post‑2017 SSA Regulations to Reject Medical Opinion Limitations Based on Supportability and Consistency Case: Marta Rivera v....
Independent Obligations Under California Law Do Not Excuse Self‑Help Termination; Good‑Faith Amount‑in‑Controversy Pleading Controls Diversity Jurisdiction

Independent Obligations Under California Law Do Not Excuse Self‑Help Termination; Good‑Faith Amount‑in‑Controversy Pleading Controls Diversity Jurisdiction

Date: Oct 9, 2025
Independent Obligations Under California Law Do Not Excuse Self‑Help Termination; Good‑Faith Amount‑in‑Controversy Pleading Controls Diversity Jurisdiction Case: Music Royalty Consulting, Inc. v....
Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms Two Gatekeepers: Specific, Merits-Based Grounds Are Required to Withdraw Rule 36 Admissions, and FCRA §1681s‑2(b) Claims Fail Absent Proof of Inaccuracy—No Right to an Oral Hearing on Summary Judgment

Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms Two Gatekeepers: Specific, Merits-Based Grounds Are Required to Withdraw Rule 36 Admissions, and FCRA §1681s‑2(b) Claims Fail Absent Proof of Inaccuracy—No Right to an Oral Hearing on Summary Judgment

Date: Oct 9, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms Two Gatekeepers: Specific, Merits-Based Grounds Are Required to Withdraw Rule 36 Admissions, and FCRA §1681s‑2(b) Claims Fail Absent Proof of Inaccuracy—No Right to an Oral...
No Plain Error in Dual Lay–Expert Agent Narrative; Express Assent Invokes Invited-Error Bar to Modified Allen Charge — United States v. Kentrail Brown (11th Cir. 2025)

No Plain Error in Dual Lay–Expert Agent Narrative; Express Assent Invokes Invited-Error Bar to Modified Allen Charge — United States v. Kentrail Brown (11th Cir. 2025)

Date: Oct 9, 2025
No Plain Error in Dual Lay–Expert Agent Narrative; Express Assent Invokes Invited-Error Bar to Modified Allen Charge — United States v. Kentrail Brown (11th Cir. 2025) Introduction In United States...
Appeal Waivers Enforced, Rule 11 Factual-Basis Challenges Allowed, and “Protective” Gun Possession Suffices for § 924(c)’s “In Furtherance” Element: Commentary on United States v. Elbert (11th Cir. 2025)

Appeal Waivers Enforced, Rule 11 Factual-Basis Challenges Allowed, and “Protective” Gun Possession Suffices for § 924(c)’s “In Furtherance” Element: Commentary on United States v. Elbert (11th Cir. 2025)

Date: Oct 9, 2025
Appeal Waivers Enforced, Rule 11 Factual-Basis Challenges Allowed, and “Protective” Gun Possession Suffices for § 924(c)’s “In Furtherance” Element Commentary on United States v. Mario Lenard Elbert,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert