Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

11th Circuit Case Commentaries

Eleventh Circuit Clarifies that Unvaccinated Status Is Not a “Perceived Disability” and Neutral COVID-19 Safety Protocols Do Not Constitute Religious Discrimination

Eleventh Circuit Clarifies that Unvaccinated Status Is Not a “Perceived Disability” and Neutral COVID-19 Safety Protocols Do Not Constitute Religious Discrimination

Date: Jul 3, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies that Unvaccinated Status Is Not a “Perceived Disability” and Neutral COVID-19 Safety Protocols Do Not Constitute Religious Discrimination Introduction In Seth Schmidt v....
Pajer-Cribb-Gibbons-Schmidt v. Disney (11th Cir. 2025): 
           Unvaccinated Status Is Not a “Regarded-As” Disability and Neutral COVID-19 Safety Protocols Do Not Trigger a Religious-Accommodation Duty

Pajer-Cribb-Gibbons-Schmidt v. Disney (11th Cir. 2025): Unvaccinated Status Is Not a “Regarded-As” Disability and Neutral COVID-19 Safety Protocols Do Not Trigger a Religious-Accommodation Duty

Date: Jul 3, 2025
Unvaccinated Status Is Not a “Regarded-As” Disability and Neutral COVID-19 Safety Protocols Do Not Trigger a Religious-Accommodation Duty Commentary on Pajer, Cribb, Gibbons & Schmidt v. Disney...
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies that Unvaccinated Status Is Not a “Regarded-As” Disability and that Post-Mandate COVID-19 Protocols Do Not Trigger Religious-Accommodation Duties

Eleventh Circuit Clarifies that Unvaccinated Status Is Not a “Regarded-As” Disability and that Post-Mandate COVID-19 Protocols Do Not Trigger Religious-Accommodation Duties

Date: Jul 3, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies that Unvaccinated Status Is Not a “Regarded-As” Disability and that Post-Mandate COVID-19 Protocols Do Not Trigger Religious-Accommodation Duties Introduction In Steven...
“Overwhelming Evidence” and the Harmless-Error Shield:  An Analysis of United States v. Belas Rosier (11th Cir. 2025)

“Overwhelming Evidence” and the Harmless-Error Shield: An Analysis of United States v. Belas Rosier (11th Cir. 2025)

Date: Jul 3, 2025
“Overwhelming Evidence” and the Harmless-Error Shield: United States v. Belas Rosier, No. 23-14234 (11th Cir. July 2, 2025) Introduction United States v. Belas Rosier is an unpublished Eleventh...
“Strict Limits on Post-Sentencing Modification of Mandatory Restitution” – A Commentary on United States v. Donald Mathias (11th Cir. 2025)

“Strict Limits on Post-Sentencing Modification of Mandatory Restitution” – A Commentary on United States v. Donald Mathias (11th Cir. 2025)

Date: Jul 3, 2025
Strict Limits on Post-Sentencing Modification of Mandatory Restitution: A Detailed Commentary on United States v. Donald Mathias, 23-14211 (11th Cir. July 2, 2025) 1. Introduction United States v....
Harmless-Error Review for “Different Occasions” Findings after Erlinger – A Commentary on United States v. Jameel Williams (11th Cir. 2025)

Harmless-Error Review for “Different Occasions” Findings after Erlinger – A Commentary on United States v. Jameel Williams (11th Cir. 2025)

Date: Jul 3, 2025
Harmless-Error Review for “Different Occasions” Findings after Erlinger A Comprehensive Commentary on United States v. Jameel Williams (11th Cir. 2025) 1. Introduction In United States v. Jameel...

        Eleventh Circuit Re-Affirms § 922(g)(1) after Bruen/Rahimi and Clarifies
        “In-Connection-With” Enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(6)(B)

Eleventh Circuit Re-Affirms § 922(g)(1) after Bruen/Rahimi and Clarifies “In-Connection-With” Enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(6)(B)

Date: Jul 3, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Re-Affirms § 922(g)(1) after Bruen/Rahimi and Clarifies “In-Connection-With” Enhancement under § 2K2.1(b)(6)(B) – Commentary on United States v. Thomas Youngblood, No. 24-10053 (11th...

    Medical Bills Covered by Workers’ Compensation Are “Consumer Debts” – Narrowing the Bona-Fide-Error Defense
    (Commentary on Abdul Crawford v. North American Credit Services, Inc., 11th Cir. 2025)

Medical Bills Covered by Workers’ Compensation Are “Consumer Debts” – Narrowing the Bona-Fide-Error Defense (Commentary on Abdul Crawford v. North American Credit Services, Inc., 11th Cir. 2025)

Date: Jul 3, 2025
Medical Bills Covered by Workers’ Compensation Are “Consumer Debts” – Narrowing the Bona-Fide-Error Defense Comprehensive Commentary on Abdul Crawford v. North American Credit Services, Inc., No....

Re-affirming the Anti-Circularity Rule for “Particular Social Groups” and the Consequences of Waiver under CAT: A Comprehensive Commentary on
Aleyda Evelyn Vanegas Hernandez v. U.S. Attorney General (11th Cir. 2025)

Re-affirming the Anti-Circularity Rule for “Particular Social Groups” and the Consequences of Waiver under CAT: A Comprehensive Commentary on Aleyda Evelyn Vanegas Hernandez v. U.S. Attorney General (11th Cir. 2025)

Date: Jul 3, 2025
Re-affirming the Anti-Circularity Rule for “Particular Social Groups” and the Consequences of Waiver under CAT: Commentary on Vanegas Hernandez v. U.S. Attorney General Introduction The Eleventh...
“Good-Cause Flexibility” & Res Judicata Reinforced: A Commentary on Saunders v. Neighborhood Restaurant Partners, LLC

“Good-Cause Flexibility” & Res Judicata Reinforced: A Commentary on Saunders v. Neighborhood Restaurant Partners, LLC

Date: Jul 3, 2025
“Good-Cause Flexibility” & Res Judicata Reinforced: A Comprehensive Commentary on Charmaine Saunders v. Neighborhood Restaurant Partners, LLC (11th Cir. 2025) 1. Introduction In Saunders v....

        Fannies Cabaret v. City of South Fulton (11th Cir. 2025):
        Re-affirming the Secondary-Effects Doctrine and
        Tightening the Irreparable-Harm Gate for First-Amendment Injunctions

Fannies Cabaret v. City of South Fulton (11th Cir. 2025): Re-affirming the Secondary-Effects Doctrine and Tightening the Irreparable-Harm Gate for First-Amendment Injunctions

Date: Jul 3, 2025
Fannies Cabaret v. City of South Fulton (11th Cir. 2025): Re-affirming the Secondary-Effects Doctrine and Tightening the Irreparable-Harm Gate for First-Amendment Injunctions Introduction In Fannies...
MidAmerica C2L Inc. v. Siemens Energy Inc. – Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Warranty-Disclaimer Enforceability and the Scope of Florida’s Independent Tort Doctrine

MidAmerica C2L Inc. v. Siemens Energy Inc. – Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Warranty-Disclaimer Enforceability and the Scope of Florida’s Independent Tort Doctrine

Date: Jul 3, 2025
MidAmerica C2L Inc. v. Siemens Energy Inc. Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Warranty-Disclaimer Enforceability and the Scope of Florida’s Independent Tort Doctrine 1. Introduction This decision, the third...
The “Single-New-Judgment” Doctrine: Resentencing on Any Count Restarts AEDPA’s Limitation Period for the Entire Conviction

The “Single-New-Judgment” Doctrine: Resentencing on Any Count Restarts AEDPA’s Limitation Period for the Entire Conviction

Date: Jul 3, 2025
The “Single-New-Judgment” Doctrine Resentencing on Any Count Restarts AEDPA’s Limitation Period for the Entire Conviction Introduction In Robert Kleckley v. State of Florida, No. 23-10887 (11th Cir....

        United States v. Sandiford: Post-Plea Misconduct as “Adverse Information”—
        Eleventh Circuit Holds Government May Revoke Acceptance-of-Responsibility
        Recommendations Without Breaching Plea Agreements

United States v. Sandiford: Post-Plea Misconduct as “Adverse Information”— Eleventh Circuit Holds Government May Revoke Acceptance-of-Responsibility Recommendations Without Breaching Plea Agreements

Date: Jul 3, 2025
United States v. Sandiford: Post-Plea Misconduct as “Adverse Information” — Eleventh Circuit Holds Government May Revoke Acceptance-of-Responsibility Recommendations Without Breaching Plea Agreements...
Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms the Constitutionality of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) Post-Bruen and Rahimi

Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms the Constitutionality of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) Post-Bruen and Rahimi

Date: Jul 3, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms the Constitutionality of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) Post-Bruen and Rahimi: United States v. Eric Dennard Parker (2025) Introduction In United States v. Eric Dennard Parker, the...
Brito-Arroyo v. United States: Eleventh Circuit Narrows Access to Evidentiary Hearings for Plea-Rejection Ineffective-Assistance Claims

Brito-Arroyo v. United States: Eleventh Circuit Narrows Access to Evidentiary Hearings for Plea-Rejection Ineffective-Assistance Claims

Date: Jul 3, 2025
Brito-Arroyo v. United States: Eleventh Circuit Narrows Access to Evidentiary Hearings for Plea-Rejection Ineffective-Assistance Claims Introduction Case: Zury Brito-Arroyo v. United States, No....
Reaffirming the Limits of Martinez: Procedural Default Not Excused for Unbriefed IAC Claims on Post-Conviction Appeal

Reaffirming the Limits of Martinez: Procedural Default Not Excused for Unbriefed IAC Claims on Post-Conviction Appeal

Date: Jul 3, 2025
Reaffirming the Limits of Martinez: Procedural Default Not Excused for Unbriefed Ineffective-Assistance Claims on Post-Conviction Appeal Introduction In Christopher Watts v. Secretary, Florida...
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies the Limits of Non-Signatory Enforcement of Arbitration Clauses under Florida Law – Commentary on Jesus Santiago, Jr. v. Neno Research LLC

Eleventh Circuit Clarifies the Limits of Non-Signatory Enforcement of Arbitration Clauses under Florida Law – Commentary on Jesus Santiago, Jr. v. Neno Research LLC

Date: Jul 3, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies the Limits of Non-Signatory Enforcement of Arbitration Clauses under Florida Law Introduction In Jesus Santiago, Jr. v. Neno Research LLC, the United States Court of...
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Timeliness Standard for Claim-Processing Objections to Defective NTAs

Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Timeliness Standard for Claim-Processing Objections to Defective NTAs

Date: Jul 3, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Timeliness Standard for Claim-Processing Objections to Defective NTAs Introduction Case Name: Sara Ordoñez-Vasquez v. U.S. Attorney General Court & Date: United States...
United States v. Pineda: Clarifying the Non-Jurisdictional Nature of MDLEA Vessel Status and the Breadth of Sentence-Appeal Waivers

United States v. Pineda: Clarifying the Non-Jurisdictional Nature of MDLEA Vessel Status and the Breadth of Sentence-Appeal Waivers

Date: Jul 3, 2025
United States v. Pineda: Clarifying the Non-Jurisdictional Nature of MDLEA Vessel Status and the Breadth of Sentence-Appeal Waivers Introduction In United States v. Braudimil Pineda, No. 22-13661...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert