Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

11th Circuit Case Commentaries

Rejecting “Presidential Tolling” and Weaponized Shotgun Pleadings: The Eleventh Circuit’s Decision in Trump v. Clinton / Habba v. Dolan

Rejecting “Presidential Tolling” and Weaponized Shotgun Pleadings: The Eleventh Circuit’s Decision in Trump v. Clinton / Habba v. Dolan

Date: Dec 1, 2025
Rejecting “Presidential Tolling” and Weaponized Shotgun Pleadings: The Eleventh Circuit’s Decision in Trump v. Clinton / Habba v. Dolan I. Introduction This consolidated Eleventh Circuit opinion,...
Trump v. Clinton (11th Cir. 2025): No Special Tolling for Sitting Presidents and Robust Sanctions for Abusive Political Litigation

Trump v. Clinton (11th Cir. 2025): No Special Tolling for Sitting Presidents and Robust Sanctions for Abusive Political Litigation

Date: Dec 1, 2025
Trump v. Clinton (11th Cir. 2025): No Special Tolling for Sitting Presidents and Robust Sanctions for Abusive Political Litigation I. Introduction This consolidated appeal from the Eleventh Circuit...
Rejecting “Presidential Tolling” and Sanctioning Politicized Shotgun Pleadings: Commentary on Donald J. Trump v. Hillary R. Clinton (11th Cir. 2025)

Rejecting “Presidential Tolling” and Sanctioning Politicized Shotgun Pleadings: Commentary on Donald J. Trump v. Hillary R. Clinton (11th Cir. 2025)

Date: Dec 1, 2025
Rejecting “Presidential Tolling” and Sanctioning Politicized Shotgun Pleadings: Commentary on Donald J. Trump v. Hillary R. Clinton (11th Cir. 2025) I. Introduction This Eleventh Circuit decision...
No “Presidential Tolling,” Shotgun Pleadings, and Sanctions for Political Litigation: Commentary on Trump v. Clinton (11th Cir. 2025)

No “Presidential Tolling,” Shotgun Pleadings, and Sanctions for Political Litigation: Commentary on Trump v. Clinton (11th Cir. 2025)

Date: Dec 1, 2025
No “Presidential Tolling,” Shotgun Pleadings, and Sanctions for Political Litigation: Commentary on Trump v. Clinton (11th Cir. 2025) Introduction This commentary analyzes the Eleventh Circuit’s...
Professional Judgment, Deliberate Indifference, and Harmless Error in Civil Detainee Medical-Care Claims: Commentary on Nealy v. Masters (11th Cir. 2025)

Professional Judgment, Deliberate Indifference, and Harmless Error in Civil Detainee Medical-Care Claims: Commentary on Nealy v. Masters (11th Cir. 2025)

Date: Dec 1, 2025
Professional Judgment, Deliberate Indifference, and Harmless Error in Civil Detainee Medical-Care Claims: Commentary on Nealy v. Masters, No. 24‑13002 (11th Cir. Nov. 26, 2025) I. Introduction This...
No Presumption of Vindictiveness from a Higher Guidelines Range Without an Increased Aggregate Sentence: Commentary on United States v. Camacho (11th Cir. 2025)

No Presumption of Vindictiveness from a Higher Guidelines Range Without an Increased Aggregate Sentence: Commentary on United States v. Camacho (11th Cir. 2025)

Date: Dec 1, 2025
No Presumption of Vindictiveness from a Higher Guidelines Range Without an Increased Aggregate Sentence: Commentary on United States v. Camacho (11th Cir. 2025) I. Introduction United States v....
Honest Belief and Protected Activity in Title VII Retaliation: Commentary on Louissaint v. Miami-Dade County

Honest Belief and Protected Activity in Title VII Retaliation: Commentary on Louissaint v. Miami-Dade County

Date: Dec 1, 2025
Honest Belief and Protected Activity in Title VII Retaliation: Commentary on Louissaint v. Miami-Dade County I. Introduction This Eleventh Circuit decision, Debbie Louissaint v. Miami-Dade County,...
Aligning the CGL Employer’s Liability Exclusion with Alabama Workers’ Compensation Standards: Commentary on Amanali Babwari v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co.

Aligning the CGL Employer’s Liability Exclusion with Alabama Workers’ Compensation Standards: Commentary on Amanali Babwari v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co.

Date: Dec 1, 2025
Aligning the CGL Employer’s Liability Exclusion with Alabama Workers’ Compensation Standards: Commentary on Amanali Babwari v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. I. Introduction The Eleventh Circuit’s...
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Limits on School Liability for Student-on-Student Hazing and Reaffirms Robust Qualified and State-Agent Immunity

Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Limits on School Liability for Student-on-Student Hazing and Reaffirms Robust Qualified and State-Agent Immunity

Date: Dec 1, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Limits on School Liability for Student-on-Student Hazing and Reaffirms Robust Qualified and State-Agent Immunity I. Introduction The Eleventh Circuit’s decision in Rodney...
Stermer v. Old Republic: Reasonably Equivalent Value, Contingent Interests, and Strict Limits on Successor Liability in Bankruptcy Fraudulent Transfer Litigation

Stermer v. Old Republic: Reasonably Equivalent Value, Contingent Interests, and Strict Limits on Successor Liability in Bankruptcy Fraudulent Transfer Litigation

Date: Nov 29, 2025
Stermer v. Old Republic: Reasonably Equivalent Value, Contingent Interests, and Strict Limits on Successor Liability in Bankruptcy Fraudulent Transfer Litigation I. Introduction The Eleventh...
Extending the Pioneer “Excusable Neglect” Standard to Criminal Rule 45 Motions: A Commentary on United States v. Beaufils

Extending the Pioneer “Excusable Neglect” Standard to Criminal Rule 45 Motions: A Commentary on United States v. Beaufils

Date: Nov 29, 2025
Extending the Pioneer “Excusable Neglect” Standard to Criminal Rule 45 Motions: A Commentary on United States v. Beaufils I. Introduction The Eleventh Circuit’s published decision in United States v....
No Second Bite at the Apple: Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms Broad Discretion to Deny Post‑Judgment Amendments that Unduly Prejudice Defendants

No Second Bite at the Apple: Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms Broad Discretion to Deny Post‑Judgment Amendments that Unduly Prejudice Defendants

Date: Nov 28, 2025
No Second Bite at the Apple: Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms Broad Discretion to Deny Post‑Judgment Amendments that Unduly Prejudice Defendants I. Introduction This commentary examines the Eleventh...

    Clarifying Federal-Sector Title VII and COVID-19 Mask Accommodations 
    under the Rehabilitation Act: Commentary on 
    Laura Dang v. Postmaster General (11th Cir. 2025)

Clarifying Federal-Sector Title VII and COVID-19 Mask Accommodations under the Rehabilitation Act: Commentary on Laura Dang v. Postmaster General (11th Cir. 2025)

Date: Nov 28, 2025
Clarifying Federal-Sector Title VII and COVID-19 Mask Accommodations under the Rehabilitation Act: Commentary on Laura Dang v. Postmaster General (11th Cir. 2025) I. Introduction This unpublished,...

      Reaffirming the Admissibility of Prior Failure‑to‑Register Convictions and
      Intrinsic Flight Evidence in SORNA Prosecutions: Commentary on United States v. Fuertes

Reaffirming the Admissibility of Prior Failure‑to‑Register Convictions and Intrinsic Flight Evidence in SORNA Prosecutions: Commentary on United States v. Fuertes

Date: Nov 28, 2025
Reaffirming the Admissibility of Prior Failure‑to‑Register Convictions and Intrinsic Flight Evidence in SORNA Prosecutions: A Comprehensive Commentary on United States v. Fuertes (11th Cir. Nov. 24,...
United States v. Lara: District Court Discretion to Deny Amendment 821 “Zero‑Point Offender” Reductions on § 3553(a) Grounds Alone

United States v. Lara: District Court Discretion to Deny Amendment 821 “Zero‑Point Offender” Reductions on § 3553(a) Grounds Alone

Date: Nov 28, 2025
United States v. Lara: District Court Discretion to Deny Amendment 821 “Zero‑Point Offender” Reductions on § 3553(a) Grounds Alone I. Introduction The Eleventh Circuit’s unpublished decision in...
Independent State Actors, Municipal Garbage-Fee Prosecutions, and the Limits of Monell and RICO Liability: Commentary on Santori Little v. City of Valley

Independent State Actors, Municipal Garbage-Fee Prosecutions, and the Limits of Monell and RICO Liability: Commentary on Santori Little v. City of Valley

Date: Nov 28, 2025
Independent State Actors, Municipal Garbage-Fee Prosecutions, and the Limits of Monell and RICO Liability Commentary on Santori Little v. The City of Valley, Alabama, No. 24‑10120 (11th Cir. Nov. 25,...
Plain Error, Prior Offenses, and Felon Disarmament after Bruen: Commentary on United States v. Murray (11th Cir. 2025)

Plain Error, Prior Offenses, and Felon Disarmament after Bruen: Commentary on United States v. Murray (11th Cir. 2025)

Date: Nov 23, 2025
Plain-Error Limits on Erlinger-Based ACCA Challenges and the Continued Validity of Felon Disarmament in the Eleventh Circuit: A Commentary on United States v. Murray I. Introduction This commentary...
Interlocutory Appeals, Drug Quantity Proof, and Sentencing Records in Federal Drug Cases: A Commentary on United States v. Marc (11th Cir. 2025)

Interlocutory Appeals, Drug Quantity Proof, and Sentencing Records in Federal Drug Cases: A Commentary on United States v. Marc (11th Cir. 2025)

Date: Nov 23, 2025
Interlocutory Appeals, Drug Quantity Proof, and Sentencing Records in Federal Drug Cases: A Commentary on United States v. Marc (11th Cir. 2025) I. Introduction This commentary examines the...
Intent Matters: The Eleventh Circuit Narrows ERISA “Preexisting Condition” Exclusions in Johnson v. Reliance Standard

Intent Matters: The Eleventh Circuit Narrows ERISA “Preexisting Condition” Exclusions in Johnson v. Reliance Standard

Date: Nov 23, 2025
Intent Matters: The Eleventh Circuit Narrows ERISA “Preexisting Condition” Exclusions in Johnson v. Reliance Standard I. Introduction In Cheriese D. Johnson v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance...
“All Means All” Under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii): The Eleventh Circuit’s Strict Finality Doctrine in Curlee v. AT&T Mobility Services

“All Means All” Under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii): The Eleventh Circuit’s Strict Finality Doctrine in Curlee v. AT&T Mobility Services

Date: Nov 23, 2025
“All Means All” Under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii): The Eleventh Circuit’s Strict Finality Doctrine in Curlee v. AT&T Mobility Services I. Introduction In Amanda Curlee v. AT&T Mobility Services, LLC, an...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert