Log In
  • India
  • US
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Commentaries
    United Kingdom
    England and Wales
    Scotland
    Northern Ireland
    Ireland
Log In Sign Up UK Judgments
  • India
  • US

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

11th Circuit Case Commentaries

Elevating Indirect and Psychological Harm: The Eleventh Circuit’s Expanded Interpretation of the “Grave-Risk” Defense under the Hague Convention

Elevating Indirect and Psychological Harm: The Eleventh Circuit’s Expanded Interpretation of the “Grave-Risk” Defense under the Hague Convention

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Elevating Indirect and Psychological Harm: The Eleventh Circuit’s Expanded Interpretation of the “Grave-Risk” Defense under the Hague Convention Introduction In Israel Bassat v. Sapir Swissa Dana,...
“From Ancient Warrants to Modern Torture Claims” – The Eleventh Circuit Clarifies the Evidentiary Threshold for CAT Protection When Persecution Occurred Decades Ago

“From Ancient Warrants to Modern Torture Claims” – The Eleventh Circuit Clarifies the Evidentiary Threshold for CAT Protection When Persecution Occurred Decades Ago

Date: Aug 13, 2025
“From Ancient Warrants to Modern Torture Claims” – The Eleventh Circuit Clarifies the Evidentiary Threshold for CAT Protection When Persecution Occurred Decades Ago Introduction In Olakunle A. Oshodi...
United States v. Jones (11th Cir. 2025): Reinforcing the Oral-Pronouncement Rule for Standard Conditions of Supervised Release and the Mandatory “Jones Colloquy”

United States v. Jones (11th Cir. 2025): Reinforcing the Oral-Pronouncement Rule for Standard Conditions of Supervised Release and the Mandatory “Jones Colloquy”

Date: Aug 13, 2025
United States v. Jones (11th Cir. 2025): Reinforcing the Oral-Pronouncement Rule for Standard Conditions of Supervised Release and the Mandatory “Jones Colloquy” 1. Introduction In United States v....
“Still Presumptively Lawful” – Eleventh Circuit’s Post-Rahimi Endorsement of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) in United States v. Williams

“Still Presumptively Lawful” – Eleventh Circuit’s Post-Rahimi Endorsement of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) in United States v. Williams

Date: Aug 13, 2025
“Still Presumptively Lawful” – Eleventh Circuit’s Post-Rahimi Endorsement of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) in United States v. Williams Introduction Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit...
Concurrent-Sentence Doctrine Shields Guideline Miscalculations in Supervised-Release Revocations – A Commentary on United States v. Lawrence Braswell, Jr. (11th Cir. 2025)

Concurrent-Sentence Doctrine Shields Guideline Miscalculations in Supervised-Release Revocations – A Commentary on United States v. Lawrence Braswell, Jr. (11th Cir. 2025)

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Concurrent-Sentence Doctrine Shields Guideline Miscalculations in Supervised-Release Revocations – A Commentary on United States v. Lawrence Braswell, Jr. (11th Cir. 2025) Introduction In United...
United States v. Batista: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Evidentiary Threshold and Fact-Finding Duty for §3C1.1 Obstruction Enhancements

United States v. Batista: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Evidentiary Threshold and Fact-Finding Duty for §3C1.1 Obstruction Enhancements

Date: Aug 13, 2025
United States v. Batista: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Evidentiary Threshold and Fact-Finding Duty for §3C1.1 Obstruction Enhancements 1. Introduction In United States v. Roberto Batista Jean Francois...
“Presumed Jury Prejudice ≠ Presumed Ineffective Assistance” – A Commentary on Michael & Stewart Parnell v. United States (11th Cir. 2025)

“Presumed Jury Prejudice ≠ Presumed Ineffective Assistance” – A Commentary on Michael & Stewart Parnell v. United States (11th Cir. 2025)

Date: Aug 13, 2025
“Presumed Jury Prejudice ≠ Presumed Ineffective Assistance” – Commentary on Parnell v. United States, 79 F.4th ____ (11th Cir. 2025) Introduction The consolidated appeal of Stewart Parnell and...
“The Parnell Doctrine” – Why a Skilling Presumption of Jury Prejudice Does NOT Dispense with Strickland’s Performance Prong

“The Parnell Doctrine” – Why a Skilling Presumption of Jury Prejudice Does NOT Dispense with Strickland’s Performance Prong

Date: Aug 13, 2025
“The Parnell Doctrine” – Why a Skilling Presumption of Jury Prejudice Does NOT Dispense with Strickland’s Performance Prong 1. Introduction Stewart and Michael Parnell, former executives of Peanut...
Eleventh Circuit Re-Affirms that Bankruptcy Rule 4007(c) Cannot Be Equitably Tolled: Actual Notice Alone Triggers the Creditor’s Duty to Act

Eleventh Circuit Re-Affirms that Bankruptcy Rule 4007(c) Cannot Be Equitably Tolled: Actual Notice Alone Triggers the Creditor’s Duty to Act

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Re-Affirms that Bankruptcy Rule 4007(c) Cannot Be Equitably Tolled: Actual Notice Alone Triggers the Creditor’s Duty to Act 1. Introduction In TL90108 LLC v. Joseph Louis Ford, III,...
Clarifying Waiver of Speedy-Trial Act Rights and the Effect of COVID-19 Delays – Commentary on United States v. Francisco Louis

Clarifying Waiver of Speedy-Trial Act Rights and the Effect of COVID-19 Delays – Commentary on United States v. Francisco Louis

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Clarifying Waiver of Speedy-Trial Act Rights and the Validity of Pandemic-Related Delays – A Commentary on United States v. Francisco Louis (11th Cir. 2025) 1. Introduction The Eleventh Circuit’s...
“Continuing-Conspiracy” Doctrine Reaffirmed: Post-Arrest Co-Conspirator Statements Admissible under Rule 801(d)(2)(E) — Commentary on United States v. Diego Fagundez, 11th Cir. (2025)

“Continuing-Conspiracy” Doctrine Reaffirmed: Post-Arrest Co-Conspirator Statements Admissible under Rule 801(d)(2)(E) — Commentary on United States v. Diego Fagundez, 11th Cir. (2025)

Date: Aug 13, 2025
“Continuing-Conspiracy” Doctrine Reaffirmed: Post-Arrest Co-Conspirator Statements Admissible under Rule 801(d)(2)(E) Comprehensive Commentary on United States v. Diego Fagundez (11th Cir. 2025) I....
Mandatory FMLA Medical Certification as an ADA “Inquiry” – A Comprehensive Commentary on Mullin v. Secretary, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs

Mandatory FMLA Medical Certification as an ADA “Inquiry” – A Comprehensive Commentary on Mullin v. Secretary, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Mandatory FMLA Medical Certification as an ADA “Inquiry” – A Comprehensive Commentary on Mullin v. Secretary, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs 1. Introduction Case: Aileen Mullin v. Secretary,...
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Non-Jurisdictional Nature of Interstate-Commerce Element in Child-Sex-Trafficking Prosecutions

Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Non-Jurisdictional Nature of Interstate-Commerce Element in Child-Sex-Trafficking Prosecutions

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Non-Jurisdictional Nature of Interstate-Commerce Element in Child-Sex-Trafficking Prosecutions Introduction In United States v. Ralph Kevin Tovar, No. 23-10755 (11th Cir....
“Every Person” Still Means “State Actor” – The Eleventh Circuit Re-Affirms the State-Action Requirement in § 1983 Suits

“Every Person” Still Means “State Actor” – The Eleventh Circuit Re-Affirms the State-Action Requirement in § 1983 Suits

Date: Aug 13, 2025
“Every Person” Still Means “State Actor” – The Eleventh Circuit Re-Affirms the State-Action Requirement in § 1983 Suits Introduction In Albert Clayton Simmons, II v. American Institute of Certified...
Peterka v. FDOC: Eleventh Circuit Confirms Minimal-Notice, Three-Step Grievance Suffices for Prison Email Censorship

Peterka v. FDOC: Eleventh Circuit Confirms Minimal-Notice, Three-Step Grievance Suffices for Prison Email Censorship

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Peterka v. FDOC: Eleventh Circuit Confirms Minimal-Notice, Three-Step Grievance Suffices for Prison Email Censorship Introduction In Daniel Jon Peterka v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections...

        Eleventh Circuit Clarifies View-Point Neutrality in Limited Public Forums:
        Habersham County’s “Impertinent or Derogatory Remarks” Rule Held
        Constitutionally Suspect

Eleventh Circuit Clarifies View-Point Neutrality in Limited Public Forums: Habersham County’s “Impertinent or Derogatory Remarks” Rule Held Constitutionally Suspect

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies View-Point Neutrality in Limited Public Forums: Habersham County’s “Impertinent or Derogatory Remarks” Rule Held Constitutionally Suspect 1. Introduction In Elena Lyadina...
Lopez v. Costco: Treating Physicians & Rule 26 Reports—Retroactive Force of Cedant and the Revived Duty to Issue Conditional New-Trial Rulings under Rule 50(c)(1)

Lopez v. Costco: Treating Physicians & Rule 26 Reports—Retroactive Force of Cedant and the Revived Duty to Issue Conditional New-Trial Rulings under Rule 50(c)(1)

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Lopez v. Costco: Treating Physicians & Rule 26 Reports—Retroactive Force of Cedant and the Revived Duty to Issue Conditional New-Trial Rulings under Rule 50(c)(1) 1. Introduction Tania Maria Lopez, a...
United States v. Brown: Clarifying the “Imminence” Test for §2K2.1(b)(6)(B) Firearm-in-Connection Enhancements

United States v. Brown: Clarifying the “Imminence” Test for §2K2.1(b)(6)(B) Firearm-in-Connection Enhancements

Date: Aug 13, 2025
United States v. Brown: Clarifying the “Imminence” Test for §2K2.1(b)(6)(B) Firearm-in-Connection Enhancements Introduction In United States v. Gabriel Brown, No. 23-13804 (11th Cir. Aug. 7, 2025)...
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies that Non-Retroactive Amendment 709 Cannot Be Used to Achieve “Zero-Point Offender” Relief Under Retroactive Amendment 821

Eleventh Circuit Clarifies that Non-Retroactive Amendment 709 Cannot Be Used to Achieve “Zero-Point Offender” Relief Under Retroactive Amendment 821

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies that Non-Retroactive Amendment 709 Cannot Be Used to Achieve “Zero-Point Offender” Relief Under Retroactive Amendment 821 Introduction United States v. Lawrence Lombardi,...
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies: No Heightened Pleading Standard for Breach-of-Contract Claims under Rule 8(a)

Eleventh Circuit Clarifies: No Heightened Pleading Standard for Breach-of-Contract Claims under Rule 8(a)

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies: No Heightened Pleading Standard for Breach-of-Contract Claims under Rule 8(a) Introduction In Caterpillar Financial Services Corp. v. Venequip Machinery Sales Corp., No....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert

We use cookies to improve your experience

You can accept all cookies or turn off analytical ones.