Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

11th Circuit Case Commentaries

Eleventh Circuit Demands Offence-Specific § 3292 Tolling:  A Deep Dive into United States v. Mark Gyetvay

Eleventh Circuit Demands Offence-Specific § 3292 Tolling: A Deep Dive into United States v. Mark Gyetvay

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Demands Offence-Specific § 3292 Tolling: A Deep Dive into United States v. Mark Gyetvay 1. Introduction The Eleventh Circuit’s published opinion in United States v. Mark Gyetvay,...
Eleventh Circuit Demands Offence-Specific §3292 Tolling Applications: A Commentary on United States v. Mark Gyetvay

Eleventh Circuit Demands Offence-Specific §3292 Tolling Applications: A Commentary on United States v. Mark Gyetvay

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Demands Offence-Specific § 3292 Tolling Applications: A Commentary on United States v. Mark Gyetvay Introduction On 7 August 2025 the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh...
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies ADEA Prima Facie Proof: Replacement by a Younger Employee Is Enough — Commentary on Gallimore v. City of Opa-Locka

Eleventh Circuit Clarifies ADEA Prima Facie Proof: Replacement by a Younger Employee Is Enough — Commentary on Gallimore v. City of Opa-Locka

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies ADEA Prima Facie Proof: Replacement by a Younger Employee Is Enough In-Depth Commentary on Sharon Gallimore v. City of Opa-Locka, No. 23-12241 (11th Cir. Aug. 6, 2025) 1....
United States v. Petersen (11th Cir. 2025):  A Clearer Timeliness Standard for Successive Coram Nobis Petitions

United States v. Petersen (11th Cir. 2025): A Clearer Timeliness Standard for Successive Coram Nobis Petitions

Date: Aug 13, 2025
United States v. Petersen (11th Cir. 2025): A Clearer Timeliness Standard for Successive Coram Nobis Petitions Introduction In United States v. David Petersen, the Eleventh Circuit again confronted...
“When Futility Trumps the Right to Amend” – Eleventh Circuit Harmonises Rule 15(a)(1) with § 1915(e)(2) Screening in Willy Toussaint v. U.S. Attorney’s Office

“When Futility Trumps the Right to Amend” – Eleventh Circuit Harmonises Rule 15(a)(1) with § 1915(e)(2) Screening in Willy Toussaint v. U.S. Attorney’s Office

Date: Aug 13, 2025
“When Futility Trumps the Right to Amend” – Eleventh Circuit Harmonises Rule 15(a)(1) with § 1915(e)(2) Screening in Willy Toussaint v. U.S. Attorney’s Office 1. Introduction The unpublished decision...
“From Clear Error to Substantial Evidence” – The Eleventh Circuit Sets the Standard for Reviewing Exceptional-and-Extremely-Unusual-Hardship Findings

“From Clear Error to Substantial Evidence” – The Eleventh Circuit Sets the Standard for Reviewing Exceptional-and-Extremely-Unusual-Hardship Findings

Date: Aug 13, 2025
“From Clear Error to Substantial Evidence” – The Eleventh Circuit Sets the Standard for Reviewing Exceptional-and-Extremely-Unusual-Hardship Findings Introduction In Isaac Lopez-Martinez & Martha...
“Substantial Evidence” Takes Centre Stage: Eleventh Circuit Sets the Review Standard for Exceptional-and-Extremely-Unusual-Hardship Determinations

“Substantial Evidence” Takes Centre Stage: Eleventh Circuit Sets the Review Standard for Exceptional-and-Extremely-Unusual-Hardship Determinations

Date: Aug 13, 2025
“Substantial Evidence” Takes Centre Stage: Eleventh Circuit Sets the Review Standard for Exceptional-and-Extremely-Unusual-Hardship Determinations 1. Introduction In Isaac Lopez-Martinez & Martha...
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies that Prisoners Exhaust Remedies When They Properly Mail a BP-11: McGuire-Mollica v. Griffin

Eleventh Circuit Clarifies that Prisoners Exhaust Remedies When They Properly Mail a BP-11: McGuire-Mollica v. Griffin

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies that Prisoners Exhaust Remedies When They Properly Mail a BP-11 Form: McGuire-Mollica v. Griffin 1. Introduction The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh...
Higgins v. SSA: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies ALJ Discretion in Quantifying Off-Task Limits and Assessing Fibromyalgia Claims Under SSR 12-2p

Higgins v. SSA: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies ALJ Discretion in Quantifying Off-Task Limits and Assessing Fibromyalgia Claims Under SSR 12-2p

Date: Aug 7, 2025
Higgins v. Commissioner of Social Security Eleventh Circuit (2025) Introduction The Eleventh Circuit’s non-published decision in Melanie Higgins v. Commissioner of Social Security ushers in a...
Eleventh Circuit Mandates Strict Particularity in Medicare Appeals Council Requests for Review under 42 C.F.R. § 405.1112(b)

Eleventh Circuit Mandates Strict Particularity in Medicare Appeals Council Requests for Review under 42 C.F.R. § 405.1112(b)

Date: Aug 7, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Mandates Strict Particularity in Medicare Appeals Council Requests for Review under 42 C.F.R. § 405.1112(b) Introduction In Rehabilitation Hospital of Phenix City, LLC v. Secretary,...
The “Jackson Investigation Doctrine” – When an Employer’s Good-Faith, Employee-Requested Investigation Defeats Retaliation Claims

The “Jackson Investigation Doctrine” – When an Employer’s Good-Faith, Employee-Requested Investigation Defeats Retaliation Claims

Date: Aug 7, 2025
The “Jackson Investigation Doctrine” Eleventh Circuit clarifies that discipline flowing from an employee-requested, good-faith investigation constitutes a legitimate, non-retaliatory basis for...
Sterling BV v. Cadillac Products Packaging Co.: Price-Quotes as Offers and the Enforceability of Consequential-Damage Waivers under the California UCC

Sterling BV v. Cadillac Products Packaging Co.: Price-Quotes as Offers and the Enforceability of Consequential-Damage Waivers under the California UCC

Date: Aug 6, 2025
Sterling BV, Inc. v. Cadillac Products Packaging Co. Price-Quotes as Offers and the Enforceability of Consequential-Damage Waivers under the California UCC Introduction What began in 2017 as an...
Intrinsic Evidence & Georgia Cocaine Convictions: United States v. Daise as a Dual-Holding on Rule 404(b) and Career-Offender Predicate Status

Intrinsic Evidence & Georgia Cocaine Convictions: United States v. Daise as a Dual-Holding on Rule 404(b) and Career-Offender Predicate Status

Date: Aug 6, 2025
Intrinsic Evidence & Georgia Cocaine Convictions: United States v. Daise as a Dual-Holding on Rule 404(b) and Career-Offender Predicate Status Introduction United States v. Barry Kiya Daise, No....
“Intent to Confine” Suffices: Eleventh Circuit Holds False-Imprisonment Judgments Are Nondischargeable under § 523(a)(6) Despite Debtor’s Good-Faith Belief

“Intent to Confine” Suffices: Eleventh Circuit Holds False-Imprisonment Judgments Are Nondischargeable under § 523(a)(6) Despite Debtor’s Good-Faith Belief

Date: Aug 6, 2025
“Intent to Confine” Suffices: Eleventh Circuit Holds False-Imprisonment Judgments Are Nondischargeable under § 523(a)(6) Despite Debtor’s Good-Faith Belief 1. Introduction The Court of Appeals for...
When Consumer-Protection Claims “Sound in Fraud”: Eleventh Circuit Requires Rule 9(b) Particularity for FDUTPA Allegations

When Consumer-Protection Claims “Sound in Fraud”: Eleventh Circuit Requires Rule 9(b) Particularity for FDUTPA Allegations

Date: Aug 6, 2025
When Consumer-Protection Claims “Sound in Fraud”: Eleventh Circuit Requires Rule 9(b) Particularity for FDUTPA Allegations 1. Introduction In Alin Pop v. LuliFama.com LLC, No. 24-11048 (11th Cir....
Partial-Withdrawal Credits Must Be Applied at “Step Two” of the MPPAA Formula – 
            Commentary on Perfection Bakeries Inc. v. Retail, Wholesale & Department Store Int’l Union Pension Fund

Partial-Withdrawal Credits Must Be Applied at “Step Two” of the MPPAA Formula – Commentary on Perfection Bakeries Inc. v. Retail, Wholesale & Department Store Int’l Union Pension Fund

Date: Aug 6, 2025
Partial-Withdrawal Credits Must Be Applied at “Step Two” of the MPPAA Formula (Perfection Bakeries Inc. v. Retail, Wholesale & Department Store International Union Pension Fund, 11th Cir., 2025)...
Clarifying Medical-Necessity & Qualified-Immunity Standards in Transgender Inmate Care: Bayse v. Philbin (11th Cir. 2025)

Clarifying Medical-Necessity & Qualified-Immunity Standards in Transgender Inmate Care: Bayse v. Philbin (11th Cir. 2025)

Date: Aug 6, 2025
Clarifying Medical-Necessity & Qualified-Immunity Standards in Transgender Inmate Care: Bayse v. Philbin (11th Cir. 2025) Introduction In Bayse v. Philbin, No. 24-11299 (11th Cir. Aug. 1, 2025), the...
“Contextual Conduct Comparator Doctrine” – Mann v. Koch Foods of Ashland LLC (11th Cir. 2025)

“Contextual Conduct Comparator Doctrine” – Mann v. Koch Foods of Ashland LLC (11th Cir. 2025)

Date: Aug 6, 2025
“Contextual Conduct Comparator Doctrine” – Mann v. Koch Foods of Ashland LLC (11th Cir. 2025) Introduction In Belinda Mann v. Koch Foods of Ashland LLC, No. 24-10709 (11th Cir. Aug. 1, 2025), the...
Eleventh Circuit Affirms Broad Judicial Discretion to Deny §1329 Modifications Seeking Post-Petition Personal-Injury Proceeds

Eleventh Circuit Affirms Broad Judicial Discretion to Deny §1329 Modifications Seeking Post-Petition Personal-Injury Proceeds

Date: Aug 6, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Affirms Broad Judicial Discretion to Deny §1329 Modifications Seeking Post-Petition Personal-Injury Proceeds Introduction On 1 August 2025 the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Discretion Re-Affirmed: Post-Petition Personal-Injury Proceeds Need Not Trigger Chapter 13 Plan Modification – Commentary on Christopher Conte v. Peggy Proffitt (11th Cir. 2025)

Discretion Re-Affirmed: Post-Petition Personal-Injury Proceeds Need Not Trigger Chapter 13 Plan Modification – Commentary on Christopher Conte v. Peggy Proffitt (11th Cir. 2025)

Date: Aug 6, 2025
Discretion Re-Affirmed: Post-Petition Personal-Injury Proceeds Need Not Trigger Chapter 13 Plan Modification – Commentary on Christopher Conte v. Peggy Proffitt (11th Cir. 2025) 1. Introduction This...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert