Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

11th Circuit Case Commentaries

Bank Fraud and PPP Loans: When Government-Backed Funds Are Still “Bank Property” — Commentary on United States v. Couch (11th Cir. 2025)

Bank Fraud and PPP Loans: When Government-Backed Funds Are Still “Bank Property” — Commentary on United States v. Couch (11th Cir. 2025)

Date: Nov 20, 2025
Bank Fraud and PPP Loans: When Government-Backed Funds Are Still “Bank Property” — Commentary on United States v. Zsa Zsa Bouvier Couch (11th Cir. 2025) I. Introduction This commentary analyzes the...
Political Epithets as Protected Opinion: The Eleventh Circuit’s Treatment of “The Big Lie” in Trump v. CNN

Political Epithets as Protected Opinion: The Eleventh Circuit’s Treatment of “The Big Lie” in Trump v. CNN

Date: Nov 20, 2025
Political Epithets as Protected Opinion: The Eleventh Circuit’s Treatment of “The Big Lie” in Trump v. Cable News Network, Inc. I. Introduction This commentary analyzes the Eleventh Circuit’s...
Minton v. SSA and the Materiality of New Evidence Before the Appeals Council

Minton v. SSA and the Materiality of New Evidence Before the Appeals Council

Date: Nov 20, 2025
Minton v. Commissioner of Social Security: Materiality, Chenery, and the Appeals Council’s Treatment of New Evidence I. Introduction This commentary examines the Eleventh Circuit’s unpublished, per...
Pretext, Replacement Hiring, and FCA Retaliation: Commentary on Ramnarine Boodoo v. Alabama Psychiatry LLC

Pretext, Replacement Hiring, and FCA Retaliation: Commentary on Ramnarine Boodoo v. Alabama Psychiatry LLC

Date: Nov 20, 2025
Pretext, Replacement Hiring, and FCA Retaliation: Commentary on Ramnarine Boodoo v. Alabama Psychiatry LLC I. Introduction This commentary analyzes the Eleventh Circuit’s unpublished per curiam...
Natural Lands, LLC v. City of Boca Raton: Florida Certiorari as an “Adequate State Remedy” Bars Federal Procedural Due Process Claims in Biased Land‑Use Hearings

Natural Lands, LLC v. City of Boca Raton: Florida Certiorari as an “Adequate State Remedy” Bars Federal Procedural Due Process Claims in Biased Land‑Use Hearings

Date: Nov 20, 2025
Natural Lands, LLC v. City of Boca Raton: Florida Certiorari as an “Adequate State Remedy” Bars Federal Procedural Due Process Claims in Biased Land‑Use Hearings I. Introduction The Eleventh...
Interlocutory Appeals, Arbitration, and Transportation-Worker CBAs: The Eleventh Circuit’s Jurisdictional Limits in APM Terminals Mobile, LLC v. ILA Local 1410

Interlocutory Appeals, Arbitration, and Transportation-Worker CBAs: The Eleventh Circuit’s Jurisdictional Limits in APM Terminals Mobile, LLC v. ILA Local 1410

Date: Nov 20, 2025
Interlocutory Appeals, Arbitration, and Transportation-Worker CBAs: The Eleventh Circuit’s Jurisdictional Limits in APM Terminals Mobile, LLC v. ILA Local 1410 I. Introduction The Eleventh Circuit’s...
Parent Ownership and the "Stranger" Doctrine: The Eleventh Circuit’s Strict Application of Florida Tortious Interference Law in Al Rushaid v. Siemens Energy

Parent Ownership and the "Stranger" Doctrine: The Eleventh Circuit’s Strict Application of Florida Tortious Interference Law in Al Rushaid v. Siemens Energy

Date: Nov 20, 2025
Parent Ownership and the "Stranger" Doctrine: The Eleventh Circuit’s Strict Application of Florida Tortious Interference Law in Al Rushaid Petroleum Investment Co. v. Siemens Energy Inc. 1....

    Conditional Partial Voluntary Dismissals and Context Evidence in Prison Excessive‑Force Trials: Commentary on Jackson v. Catanzariti

Conditional Partial Voluntary Dismissals and Context Evidence in Prison Excessive‑Force Trials: Commentary on Jackson v. Catanzariti

Date: Nov 20, 2025
Conditional Partial Voluntary Dismissals and Context Evidence in Prison Excessive‑Force Trials: Commentary on Jackson v. Catanzariti I. Introduction This published Eleventh Circuit decision, Miguel...
Repeal of 12 U.S.C. § 1441a Does Not Terminate RTC Affordable-Housing Contracts: Eleventh Circuit Confirms FDIC and Its Agents Can Enforce RTC Agreements by Contract and Under 12 U.S.C. § 1831q(n)(4)

Repeal of 12 U.S.C. § 1441a Does Not Terminate RTC Affordable-Housing Contracts: Eleventh Circuit Confirms FDIC and Its Agents Can Enforce RTC Agreements by Contract and Under 12 U.S.C. § 1831q(n)(4)

Date: Nov 18, 2025
Repeal of 12 U.S.C. § 1441a Does Not Terminate RTC Affordable-Housing Contracts: Eleventh Circuit Confirms FDIC and Its Agents Can Enforce RTC Agreements by Contract and Under 12 U.S.C. § 1831q(n)(4)...
Excess Judgment Is for Damages, Not Liability: Eleventh Circuit Limits Use of UM Verdicts in Florida First‑Party Bad Faith Trials

Excess Judgment Is for Damages, Not Liability: Eleventh Circuit Limits Use of UM Verdicts in Florida First‑Party Bad Faith Trials

Date: Nov 18, 2025
Excess Judgment Is for Damages, Not Liability: Eleventh Circuit Limits Use of UM Verdicts in Florida First‑Party Bad Faith Trials Case: Lauren Woods v. Progressive American Insurance Company Court:...
No Emergency Exception to the Takings Clause: Eleventh Circuit Holds Pandemic Closure of Private Beaches Is a Per Se Physical Taking Requiring Just Compensation

No Emergency Exception to the Takings Clause: Eleventh Circuit Holds Pandemic Closure of Private Beaches Is a Per Se Physical Taking Requiring Just Compensation

Date: Nov 18, 2025
No Emergency Exception to the Takings Clause: Eleventh Circuit Holds Pandemic Closure of Private Beaches Is a Per Se Physical Taking Requiring Just Compensation Introduction This published decision...
No Standing to Attack Permit and Discretionary Sign Rules When Denial Rests on an Unchallenged Billboard Ban — Commentary on New South Media Group, LLC v. Rainbow City, Alabama (11th Cir. Nov. 14, 2025)

No Standing to Attack Permit and Discretionary Sign Rules When Denial Rests on an Unchallenged Billboard Ban — Commentary on New South Media Group, LLC v. Rainbow City, Alabama (11th Cir. Nov. 14, 2025)

Date: Nov 16, 2025
No Standing to Attack Permit and Discretionary Sign Rules When Denial Rests on an Unchallenged Billboard Ban Commentary on New South Media Group, LLC v. City of Rainbow City, Alabama, No. 24-10895...
Automobiles as Per Se Instrumentalities of Interstate Commerce and “Provided or Administered” Roads Under § 245: The Eleventh Circuit’s Decision in United States v. William Bryan

Automobiles as Per Se Instrumentalities of Interstate Commerce and “Provided or Administered” Roads Under § 245: The Eleventh Circuit’s Decision in United States v. William Bryan

Date: Nov 16, 2025
Automobiles as Per Se Instrumentalities of Interstate Commerce and “Provided or Administered” Roads Under § 245: The Eleventh Circuit’s Decision in United States v. William Bryan Court: United States...
Paused-Clock Timeliness After Reopening and Strict Pleading Standards in Meme-Stock RICO/Antitrust Suits: Donnahue George v. Ken Griffin (11th Cir. 2025)

Paused-Clock Timeliness After Reopening and Strict Pleading Standards in Meme-Stock RICO/Antitrust Suits: Donnahue George v. Ken Griffin (11th Cir. 2025)

Date: Nov 16, 2025
Paused-Clock Timeliness After Reopening and Strict Pleading Standards in Meme-Stock RICO/Antitrust Suits: Donnahue George v. Ken Griffin (11th Cir. 2025) Introduction In an unpublished, per curiam...
Community-Protection Inferences from Repeated Drug Use Permissibly Support Revocation Sentences: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Within-Guidelines Term After Esteras

Community-Protection Inferences from Repeated Drug Use Permissibly Support Revocation Sentences: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Within-Guidelines Term After Esteras

Date: Nov 16, 2025
Community-Protection Inferences from Repeated Drug Use Permissibly Support Revocation Sentences: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Within-Guidelines Term After Esteras Introduction In United States v. Edward...
No Standing to Challenge Search of a Companion Vehicle; Unbriefed Good-Faith Reliance Waives Probable-Cause Attacks; Upward Variance Above a Statutory-Minimum Guideline Term Upheld — United States v. Michael Joe Green, II (11th Cir. 2025)

No Standing to Challenge Search of a Companion Vehicle; Unbriefed Good-Faith Reliance Waives Probable-Cause Attacks; Upward Variance Above a Statutory-Minimum Guideline Term Upheld — United States v. Michael Joe Green, II (11th Cir. 2025)

Date: Nov 16, 2025
No Standing to Challenge Search of a Companion Vehicle; Unbriefed Good-Faith Reliance Waives Probable-Cause Attacks; Upward Variance Above a Statutory-Minimum Guideline Term Upheld United States v....
Exploiting a Power Imbalance: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Hobbs Act Convictions Without Explicit Threat or Proven Actual Power (United States v. Sharon Barnes Sutton)

Exploiting a Power Imbalance: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Hobbs Act Convictions Without Explicit Threat or Proven Actual Power (United States v. Sharon Barnes Sutton)

Date: Nov 16, 2025
Exploiting a Power Imbalance: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Hobbs Act Convictions Without Explicit Threat or Proven Actual Power Introduction In United States v. Sharon Barnes Sutton, No. 23-10669 (11th...
TSOs Are “Investigative or Law Enforcement Officers” Under the FTCA’s Law-Enforcement Proviso: Eleventh Circuit Aligns with National Consensus

TSOs Are “Investigative or Law Enforcement Officers” Under the FTCA’s Law-Enforcement Proviso: Eleventh Circuit Aligns with National Consensus

Date: Nov 15, 2025
TSOs Are “Investigative or Law Enforcement Officers” Under the FTCA’s Law-Enforcement Proviso: Eleventh Circuit Aligns with National Consensus Introduction This published decision from the U.S. Court...
Counsel Need Not “Shop” for Experts: Eleventh Circuit Upholds Phone-Based Expert Vetting and Cross-Examination Strategy Under AEDPA’s Double Deference

Counsel Need Not “Shop” for Experts: Eleventh Circuit Upholds Phone-Based Expert Vetting and Cross-Examination Strategy Under AEDPA’s Double Deference

Date: Nov 11, 2025
Counsel Need Not “Shop” for Experts: Eleventh Circuit Upholds Phone-Based Expert Vetting and Cross-Examination Strategy Under AEDPA’s Double Deference Introduction In Clark Mackendrick v. Secretary,...
Consent to Marketing ≠ Consent to Arbitrate: Eleventh Circuit Demands Conspicuous Terms and Explicit Assent for Online Arbitration Agreements

Consent to Marketing ≠ Consent to Arbitrate: Eleventh Circuit Demands Conspicuous Terms and Explicit Assent for Online Arbitration Agreements

Date: Nov 11, 2025
Consent to Marketing ≠ Consent to Arbitrate: Eleventh Circuit Demands Conspicuous Terms and Explicit Assent for Online Arbitration Agreements Introduction In Heriberto Valiente v. NexGen Global, LLC...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert