Log In
  • India
  • US
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Commentaries
    United Kingdom
    England and Wales
    Scotland
    Northern Ireland
    Ireland
Log In Sign Up UK Judgments
  • India
  • US

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

11th Circuit Case Commentaries

Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Limits on Dismissing “Shotgun Pleadings” with Prejudice: Re-Emphasising the Futility Standard for Pro Se Litigants

Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Limits on Dismissing “Shotgun Pleadings” with Prejudice: Re-Emphasising the Futility Standard for Pro Se Litigants

Date: Jul 30, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Limits on Dismissing “Shotgun Pleadings” with Prejudice: Re-Emphasising the Futility Standard for Pro Se Litigants Introduction In Marc Dulcio v. Arcadis U.S. Inc., Nos....
“Generosity in Futility”: The Eleventh Circuit Narrows Dismissals-With-Prejudice After a Shotgun Pleading Finding

“Generosity in Futility”: The Eleventh Circuit Narrows Dismissals-With-Prejudice After a Shotgun Pleading Finding

Date: Jul 30, 2025
“Generosity in Futility” Eleventh Circuit Clarifies the Limits on Dismissing Claims With Prejudice After Finding a Shotgun Pleading Introduction The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh...
Finder’s Fee Exception Clarified: Eleventh Circuit Confirms Mere Introductions Do Not Trigger Broker Registration Requirements

Finder’s Fee Exception Clarified: Eleventh Circuit Confirms Mere Introductions Do Not Trigger Broker Registration Requirements

Date: Jul 30, 2025
Finder’s Fee Exception Clarified: Eleventh Circuit Confirms Mere Introductions Do Not Trigger Broker Registration Requirements Introduction Matthew Hayden v. Steven F. Urvan (11th Cir. July 28, 2025,...
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies the “Material-Misrepresentation” Standard for Voiding Home-Owner Policies – Commentary on Riddle v. Heritage

Eleventh Circuit Clarifies the “Material-Misrepresentation” Standard for Voiding Home-Owner Policies – Commentary on Riddle v. Heritage

Date: Jul 30, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies the “Material-Misrepresentation” Standard for Voiding Home-Owner Policies Comprehensive Commentary on Travis Riddle v. Heritage Property & Casualty Insurance Co., Eleventh...
United States v. Crystal Orr: Written Plea Agreements as a Cure for Rule 11 Omissions under Plain-Error Review

United States v. Crystal Orr: Written Plea Agreements as a Cure for Rule 11 Omissions under Plain-Error Review

Date: Jul 30, 2025
United States v. Crystal Orr: Written Plea Agreements as a Cure for Rule 11 Omissions under Plain-Error Review Introduction In United States v. Crystal Hali Orr, No. 24-13983 (11th Cir. July 28,...

        “Emotional Reassurance as ‘Benefit’: The Eleventh Circuit’s Expansive Reading of
        the Federal Kidnapping Statute in United States v. Marques Deon Jones”

“Emotional Reassurance as ‘Benefit’: The Eleventh Circuit’s Expansive Reading of the Federal Kidnapping Statute in United States v. Marques Deon Jones”

Date: Jul 30, 2025
“Emotional Reassurance as ‘Benefit’: The Eleventh Circuit’s Expansive Reading of the Federal Kidnapping Statute in United States v. Marques Deon Jones Introduction On 28 July 2025, the Eleventh...
United States v. Maldonado-Arce: Clarifying Plain-Error Vacatur When Sentencing Relies on Chronologically Impossible Facts

United States v. Maldonado-Arce: Clarifying Plain-Error Vacatur When Sentencing Relies on Chronologically Impossible Facts

Date: Jul 30, 2025
United States v. Maldonado-Arce: Clarifying Plain-Error Vacatur When Sentencing Relies on Chronologically Impossible Facts Introduction United States v. Rodrigo Maldonado-Arce, No. 24-12306 (11th...

        Eleventh Circuit Clarifies the Ineffectiveness of Incomplete Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) Stipulations 
        and Affirms District Courts’ Power to Convert Them into Rule 41(a)(2) Dismissals

Eleventh Circuit Clarifies the Ineffectiveness of Incomplete Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) Stipulations and Affirms District Courts’ Power to Convert Them into Rule 41(a)(2) Dismissals

Date: Jul 30, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies the Ineffectiveness of Incomplete Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) Stipulations and Affirms District Courts’ Power to Convert Them into Rule 41(a)(2) Dismissals Introduction In Wendall...
Extending “Internet Solutions” to Copyright: Actual Florida Access Now Required for Long-Arm Jurisdiction – Commentary on World Media Alliance Label, Inc. v. Believe SAS

Extending “Internet Solutions” to Copyright: Actual Florida Access Now Required for Long-Arm Jurisdiction – Commentary on World Media Alliance Label, Inc. v. Believe SAS

Date: Jul 30, 2025
Extending “Internet Solutions” to Copyright: Actual Florida Access Now Required for Long-Arm Jurisdiction – Commentary on World Media Alliance Label, Inc. v. Believe SAS 1. Introduction On 28 July...
United States v. Harbuck: Eleventh Circuit Confirms South Carolina “Assault with Intent to Kill” Is an ACCA Violent Felony and Re-Affirms the Elements Clause’s Constitutional Certainty

United States v. Harbuck: Eleventh Circuit Confirms South Carolina “Assault with Intent to Kill” Is an ACCA Violent Felony and Re-Affirms the Elements Clause’s Constitutional Certainty

Date: Jul 30, 2025
United States v. Harbuck: Eleventh Circuit Confirms South Carolina “Assault with Intent to Kill” Is an ACCA Violent Felony and Re-Affirms the Elements Clause’s Constitutional Certainty 1....
“Velasquez v. U.S. Attorney General”:  The Eleventh Circuit Confirms that the INA’s 30-Day Review Period Is a Waivable Claim-Processing Rule

“Velasquez v. U.S. Attorney General”: The Eleventh Circuit Confirms that the INA’s 30-Day Review Period Is a Waivable Claim-Processing Rule

Date: Jul 30, 2025
“Velasquez v. U.S. Attorney General”: The Eleventh Circuit Confirms that the INA’s 30-Day Review Period Is a Waivable Claim-Processing Rule 1. Introduction In Pablo Velasquez v. U.S. Attorney...
Eleventh Circuit Reinforces the APA Duty to Update Economic Analyses and Give Reasoned Explanations for Cost-Allocation Shifts – Commentary on American Securities Association v. SEC (2025)

Eleventh Circuit Reinforces the APA Duty to Update Economic Analyses and Give Reasoned Explanations for Cost-Allocation Shifts – Commentary on American Securities Association v. SEC (2025)

Date: Jul 30, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Reinforces the APA Duty to Update Economic Analyses and Give Reasoned Explanations for Cost-Allocation Shifts Commentary on American Securities Association & Citadel Securities LLC...
Extending Rule 41(a): Eleventh Circuit Authorises Voluntary Dismissal of Individual Plaintiffs in Multi-Plaintiff Actions

Extending Rule 41(a): Eleventh Circuit Authorises Voluntary Dismissal of Individual Plaintiffs in Multi-Plaintiff Actions

Date: Jul 30, 2025
Extending Rule 41(a): Eleventh Circuit Authorises Voluntary Dismissal of Individual Plaintiffs in Multi-Plaintiff Actions Introduction Jeanne Weinstein v. 440 Corp. marks a significant procedural...
Discovery-Informed Pleading Survives: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies that Rule 9(b) Does Not Bar Use of Discovery-Derived Allegations at the Motion-to-Dismiss Stage

Discovery-Informed Pleading Survives: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies that Rule 9(b) Does Not Bar Use of Discovery-Derived Allegations at the Motion-to-Dismiss Stage

Date: Jul 30, 2025
Discovery-Informed Pleading Survives: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies that Rule 9(b) Does Not Bar Use of Discovery-Derived Allegations at the Motion-to-Dismiss Stage Introduction The United States Court...
The “Johnny Appleseed” Myth Debunked:
Eleventh Circuit Affirms that Free Transfers of Drugs Are “Distribution” under 21 U.S.C. § 841 and Re-validates Georgia Burglary as an ACCA Predicate

The “Johnny Appleseed” Myth Debunked: Eleventh Circuit Affirms that Free Transfers of Drugs Are “Distribution” under 21 U.S.C. § 841 and Re-validates Georgia Burglary as an ACCA Predicate

Date: Jul 30, 2025
The “Johnny Appleseed” Myth Debunked: Eleventh Circuit Affirms that Free Transfers of Drugs Are “Distribution” under 21 U.S.C. § 841 and Re-validates Georgia Burglary as an ACCA Predicate 1....
No Shortcuts Around Medicare’s Administrative Review Scheme: The Eleventh Circuit Fortifies § 405(g) Exclusivity in Bishins v. HHS

No Shortcuts Around Medicare’s Administrative Review Scheme: The Eleventh Circuit Fortifies § 405(g) Exclusivity in Bishins v. HHS

Date: Jul 26, 2025
No Shortcuts Around Medicare’s Administrative Review Scheme: The Eleventh Circuit Fortifies § 405(g) Exclusivity in Bishins v. HHS 1. Introduction Larry V. Bishins, a Medicare beneficiary and...
Exclusive Economic Zones Are “High Seas” for MDLEA Purposes: United States v. Quijije Mero, 22-11929 (11th Cir. 2025)

Exclusive Economic Zones Are “High Seas” for MDLEA Purposes: United States v. Quijije Mero, 22-11929 (11th Cir. 2025)

Date: Jul 26, 2025
Exclusive Economic Zones Are “High Seas” for MDLEA Purposes: United States v. Quijije Mero, 22-11929 (11th Cir. 2025) Introduction In United States v. Nilson Olaya Grueso, José Junior Bailon Franco,...
“High-Seas” Jurisdiction Embraces the Exclusive Economic Zone: A Commentary on United States v. Jose Junior Bailon Franco (11th Cir. 2025)

“High-Seas” Jurisdiction Embraces the Exclusive Economic Zone: A Commentary on United States v. Jose Junior Bailon Franco (11th Cir. 2025)

Date: Jul 25, 2025
“High-Seas” Jurisdiction Embraces the Exclusive Economic Zone: A Comprehensive Commentary on United States v. Jose Junior Bailon Franco (11th Cir. 2025) 1. Introduction United States v. Jose Junior...
“EEZ = High Seas”: The Eleventh Circuit’s Unpublished Re-affirmation of Congress’s Plenary Power under the MDLEA

“EEZ = High Seas”: The Eleventh Circuit’s Unpublished Re-affirmation of Congress’s Plenary Power under the MDLEA

Date: Jul 25, 2025
“EEZ = High Seas”: The Eleventh Circuit’s Unpublished Re-affirmation of Congress’s Plenary Power under the MDLEA 1. Introduction United States v. Nilson Olaya Grueso, Nos. 22-11929, 22-11932,...
Lozman III – Tidal Influence as a Stand-Alone Test for Navigability under the Rivers & Harbors Act

Lozman III – Tidal Influence as a Stand-Alone Test for Navigability under the Rivers & Harbors Act

Date: Jul 24, 2025
Lozman III – Tidal Influence as a Stand-Alone Test for Navigability under the Rivers & Harbors Act Introduction In United States v. Fane Lozman, No. 24-11477 (11th Cir. 2025), the Eleventh Circuit...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert

We use cookies to improve your experience

You can accept all cookies or turn off analytical ones.