Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

11th Circuit Case Commentaries

United States v. Franco-Constante: Appellate Confirmation of Broad District Court Discretion to Withhold § 5K1.1 Departures in Retroactive Amendment 821 Proceedings

United States v. Franco-Constante: Appellate Confirmation of Broad District Court Discretion to Withhold § 5K1.1 Departures in Retroactive Amendment 821 Proceedings

Date: Jul 24, 2025
United States v. Franco-Constante: Appellate Confirmation of Broad District Court Discretion to Withhold § 5K1.1 Departures in Retroactive Amendment 821 Proceedings Introduction The Eleventh...
Eleventh Circuit Bars Unjust-Enrichment Claims Where Disability Policy Governs: A Cautionary Tale on Drafting Claw-Back Provisions

Eleventh Circuit Bars Unjust-Enrichment Claims Where Disability Policy Governs: A Cautionary Tale on Drafting Claw-Back Provisions

Date: Jul 24, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Bars Unjust-Enrichment Claims Where Disability Policy Governs: MONY Life Insurance Co. v. Perez (2025) Introduction This appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for the...

        Inflation-Adjusted Replacement-Cost Damages Plus Pre-Judgment Interest Do
        Not Constitute Double Recovery – 11th Cir. Clarifies Waiver and Damage
        Principles in Central Baptist Church v. Church Mutual (2025)

Inflation-Adjusted Replacement-Cost Damages Plus Pre-Judgment Interest Do Not Constitute Double Recovery – 11th Cir. Clarifies Waiver and Damage Principles in Central Baptist Church v. Church Mutual (2025)

Date: Jul 24, 2025
Inflation-Adjusted Replacement-Cost Damages Plus Pre-Judgment Interest Do Not Constitute Double Recovery Central Baptist Church of Albany, Georgia Inc. v. Church Mutual Insurance Co., 22-11082 (11th...

Eleventh Circuit Clarifies “Scrivener’s Error,” Continuing-Violation Limits, and Comparator Standards in Federal Employment Litigation – Commentary on Joseph Jimenez v. Acting U.S. Attorney General

Eleventh Circuit Clarifies “Scrivener’s Error,” Continuing-Violation Limits, and Comparator Standards in Federal Employment Litigation – Commentary on Joseph Jimenez v. Acting U.S. Attorney General

Date: Jul 24, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies “Scrivener’s Error,” Continuing-Violation Limits, and Comparator Standards in Federal Employment Litigation Commentary on Joseph Jimenez v. Acting U.S. Attorney General,...
Self-Inflicted Compliance Costs Are Not “Concrete Injuries”: Nelson v. Experian and the Eleventh Circuit’s New Limitation on Article III Standing under the FCRA

Self-Inflicted Compliance Costs Are Not “Concrete Injuries”: Nelson v. Experian and the Eleventh Circuit’s New Limitation on Article III Standing under the FCRA

Date: Jul 24, 2025
Self-Inflicted Compliance Costs Are Not “Concrete Injuries”: The Eleventh Circuit Redefines Article III Standing for Undisclosed Credit-File Errors in Jessica Nelson v. Experian Information Solutions...
Brooks v. U.S. Attorney General (11th Cir. 2025): Re-affirming the Exhaustion Mandate and Clarifying “Particularly Serious Crime” Analysis in Immigration Proceedings

Brooks v. U.S. Attorney General (11th Cir. 2025): Re-affirming the Exhaustion Mandate and Clarifying “Particularly Serious Crime” Analysis in Immigration Proceedings

Date: Jul 23, 2025
Brooks v. U.S. Attorney General (11th Cir. 2025): Re-affirming the Exhaustion Mandate and Clarifying “Particularly Serious Crime” Analysis in Immigration Proceedings Introduction Ricardo Brooks, a...
Austin v. Mullins: Eleventh Circuit’s Robust Re-affirmation of Absolute Judicial Immunity in State Child-Support Proceedings

Austin v. Mullins: Eleventh Circuit’s Robust Re-affirmation of Absolute Judicial Immunity in State Child-Support Proceedings

Date: Jul 23, 2025
Austin v. Mullins: Eleventh Circuit’s Robust Re-affirmation of Absolute Judicial Immunity in State Child-Support Proceedings Introduction The case of Robert Austin v. Leatha Mullins presented the...
Deception Without Financial Loss: The Eleventh Circuit Clarifies “Intent to Defraud” under 18 U.S.C. § 1029(a)(1)

Deception Without Financial Loss: The Eleventh Circuit Clarifies “Intent to Defraud” under 18 U.S.C. § 1029(a)(1)

Date: Jul 23, 2025
Deception Without Financial Loss: The Eleventh Circuit Clarifies “Intent to Defraud” under 18 U.S.C. § 1029(a)(1) Introduction In United States v. Alfred Davis, the Eleventh Circuit confronted a...
“File It or Lose It” – Fuller v. Carollo Establishes a Bright-Line Duty to File a Post-Judgment Notice of Appeal in the Eleventh Circuit

“File It or Lose It” – Fuller v. Carollo Establishes a Bright-Line Duty to File a Post-Judgment Notice of Appeal in the Eleventh Circuit

Date: Jul 23, 2025
“File It or Lose It” – Fuller v. Carollo Establishes a Bright-Line Duty to File a Post-Judgment Notice of Appeal in the Eleventh Circuit 1. Introduction In William O. Fuller & Martin A. Pinilla, II...
“The Senters Clarification”: Specificized Pleading of Medical-Necessity Falsity under the False Claims Act in the Eleventh Circuit

“The Senters Clarification”: Specificized Pleading of Medical-Necessity Falsity under the False Claims Act in the Eleventh Circuit

Date: Jul 23, 2025
“The Senters Clarification”: Specificized Pleading of Medical-Necessity Falsity under the False Claims Act in the Eleventh Circuit Introduction Barbara Senters v. Quest Diagnostics, Inc., No....
“Competency-Aware” Enforcement of Appeal Waivers –  The Legacy of United States v. Tenzin Orgil

“Competency-Aware” Enforcement of Appeal Waivers – The Legacy of United States v. Tenzin Orgil

Date: Jul 23, 2025
“Competency-Aware” Enforcement of Appeal Waivers – The Legacy of United States v. Tenzin Orgil Introduction On 16 July 2025, the Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit handed down its...
Eleventh Circuit Validates “Good-Cause” Tenure for Administrative Law Judges – Commentary on Walmart, Inc. v. King (2025)

Eleventh Circuit Validates “Good-Cause” Tenure for Administrative Law Judges – Commentary on Walmart, Inc. v. King (2025)

Date: Jul 17, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Validates “Good-Cause” Tenure for Administrative Law Judges A Commentary on Walmart, Inc. v. Chief ALJ (OCAHO), 24-11733 (11th Cir. 2025) 1. Introduction In Walmart, Inc. v. King,...
United States v. Mikkelson: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Harmless-Error Treatment of Criminal-History Miscalculations and Re-affirms Broad Judicial Discretion for Upward Variances in Violent RICO Sentencings

United States v. Mikkelson: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Harmless-Error Treatment of Criminal-History Miscalculations and Re-affirms Broad Judicial Discretion for Upward Variances in Violent RICO Sentencings

Date: Jul 16, 2025
United States v. Mikkelson: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Harmless-Error Treatment of Criminal-History Miscalculations and Re-affirms Broad Judicial Discretion for Upward Variances in Violent RICO...
Eleventh Circuit Upholds Continuing Ancillary Jurisdiction to Enforce Restitution After Probation – A Commentary on United States v. Mikel Mims (2025)

Eleventh Circuit Upholds Continuing Ancillary Jurisdiction to Enforce Restitution After Probation – A Commentary on United States v. Mikel Mims (2025)

Date: Jul 16, 2025
Continuing Ancillary Jurisdiction to Enforce Restitution Orders After Completion of Probation: United States v. Mikel Mims (11th Cir. 2025) 1. Introduction In United States v. Mikel Mims, the...
When State Law Speaks, Federal Panels Must Listen: United States v. Rowe and the Supremacy of Intervening State-Court Interpretations in Federal Sentencing Analysis

When State Law Speaks, Federal Panels Must Listen: United States v. Rowe and the Supremacy of Intervening State-Court Interpretations in Federal Sentencing Analysis

Date: Jul 16, 2025
When State Law Speaks, Federal Panels Must Listen: United States v. Rowe and the Supremacy of Intervening State-Court Interpretations in Federal Sentencing Analysis Introduction United States v....

      No Duty to Warn of “Open-and-Obvious” Fuel-Fire Risks and the
      “High-Probability” Threshold for Reckless Design:
      A Commentary on Anthony Leslie v. Daimler Trucks North America LLC

No Duty to Warn of “Open-and-Obvious” Fuel-Fire Risks and the “High-Probability” Threshold for Reckless Design: A Commentary on Anthony Leslie v. Daimler Trucks North America LLC

Date: Jul 16, 2025
No Duty to Warn of “Open-and-Obvious” Fuel-Fire Risks and the “High-Probability” Threshold for Reckless Design: Commentary on Anthony Leslie v. Daimler Trucks North America LLC 1. Introduction In...
Tug Master’s Non-Delegable Duty to Verify Tow Clearance: A Comment on Jersey Shore Boat Towing & Salvage, Inc. v. Abdel-Illah Zidal (11th Cir. 2025)

Tug Master’s Non-Delegable Duty to Verify Tow Clearance: A Comment on Jersey Shore Boat Towing & Salvage, Inc. v. Abdel-Illah Zidal (11th Cir. 2025)

Date: Jul 16, 2025
Tug Master’s Non-Delegable Duty to Verify Tow Clearance before Passing Fixed Obstructions Jersey Shore Boat Towing & Salvage, Inc. v. Abdel-Illah Zidal, 24-13009 (11th Cir. July 15 2025) 1....
“No Participation, No Privilege”: The Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Standing for Interlocutory Appeals Based on Legislative Privilege

“No Participation, No Privilege”: The Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Standing for Interlocutory Appeals Based on Legislative Privilege

Date: Jul 16, 2025
“No Participation, No Privilege”: The Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Standing for Interlocutory Appeals Based on Legislative Privilege Introduction In Pen American Center, Inc. v. Escambia County School...
Gray v. Birchfield & Koch Foods: Recognising Multiple Prevailing Parties in Multi-Defendant Litigation

Gray v. Birchfield & Koch Foods: Recognising Multiple Prevailing Parties in Multi-Defendant Litigation

Date: Jul 16, 2025
Gray v. Birchfield & Koch Foods: The Eleventh Circuit Confirms that More Than One “Prevailing Party” May Exist When a Single Plaintiff Sues Multiple Defendants 1. Introduction Ka’Toria Gray, a nurse...
United States v. Collins (11th Cir. 2025): Post-Bruen Endorsement of § 5861(d) and the Limits of Plain-Error Second-Amendment Challenges

United States v. Collins (11th Cir. 2025): Post-Bruen Endorsement of § 5861(d) and the Limits of Plain-Error Second-Amendment Challenges

Date: Jul 15, 2025
United States v. Collins (11th Cir. 2025): Post-Bruen Endorsement of § 5861(d) and the Limits of Plain-Error Second-Amendment Challenges Introduction United States v. Sidney Rashard Collins,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert