Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

11th Circuit Case Commentaries

No Limitations Period for Denaturalization; Non‑Shepard Evidence May Establish Statutory‑Period Timing

No Limitations Period for Denaturalization; Non‑Shepard Evidence May Establish Statutory‑Period Timing

Date: Nov 7, 2025
No Limitations Period for Denaturalization; Non‑Shepard Evidence May Establish Statutory‑Period Timing Introduction In United States v. Lazaro Prat, the Eleventh Circuit affirmed a district court...
Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms: No § 3582(c)(2) Reduction Below the Amended Guideline Range Absent Substantial Assistance; Non‑Binding Rule 11(c)(1)(B) Recommendations Do Not Control Retroactive Guideline Calculations

Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms: No § 3582(c)(2) Reduction Below the Amended Guideline Range Absent Substantial Assistance; Non‑Binding Rule 11(c)(1)(B) Recommendations Do Not Control Retroactive Guideline Calculations

Date: Nov 7, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms: No § 3582(c)(2) Reduction Below the Amended Guideline Range Absent Substantial Assistance; Non‑Binding Rule 11(c)(1)(B) Recommendations Do Not Control Retroactive...
Sham Latent‑Print Verification as Fabrication: Eleventh Circuit Denies Qualified Immunity to Forensic Examiner, Rejects a Clearly Established Right to an “Exhaustive” Investigation

Sham Latent‑Print Verification as Fabrication: Eleventh Circuit Denies Qualified Immunity to Forensic Examiner, Rejects a Clearly Established Right to an “Exhaustive” Investigation

Date: Nov 7, 2025
Sham Latent‑Print Verification as Fabrication: Eleventh Circuit Denies Qualified Immunity to Forensic Examiner, Rejects a Clearly Established Right to an “Exhaustive” Investigation Introduction This...
Laches Bars Belated Rule 41(g) Claims to Cryptocurrency Keys on Destroyed Devices: United States v. Prime (11th Cir. 2025)

Laches Bars Belated Rule 41(g) Claims to Cryptocurrency Keys on Destroyed Devices: United States v. Prime (11th Cir. 2025)

Date: Nov 7, 2025
Laches Bars Belated Rule 41(g) Claims to Cryptocurrency Keys on Destroyed Devices: United States v. Prime (11th Cir. 2025) Introduction In United States v. Prime, the Eleventh Circuit confronted a...
Reviving Terrace and Rational-Basis Review for Alienage-Based Real-Property Rules: Eleventh Circuit Narrows Challenges to Florida’s SB 264 in Shen v. Commissioner

Reviving Terrace and Rational-Basis Review for Alienage-Based Real-Property Rules: Eleventh Circuit Narrows Challenges to Florida’s SB 264 in Shen v. Commissioner

Date: Nov 7, 2025
Reviving Terrace and Rational-Basis Review for Alienage-Based Real-Property Rules: Eleventh Circuit Narrows Challenges to Florida’s SB 264 Introduction In Shen v. Commissioner, Florida Department of...
Incarceration Does Not Preclude a §3B1.1 Leadership Enhancement; Guidelines Counsel Consecutive Sentences for In‑Custody Offenses

Incarceration Does Not Preclude a §3B1.1 Leadership Enhancement; Guidelines Counsel Consecutive Sentences for In‑Custody Offenses

Date: Nov 5, 2025
Incarceration Does Not Preclude a §3B1.1 Leadership Enhancement; Guidelines Counsel Consecutive Sentences for In‑Custody Offenses Case: United States v. Antoine D. Wilson Court: U.S. Court of Appeals...
Eleventh Circuit: Mental Illness Does Not Preclude an Upward Variance for Deterrence and Public Protection; Mere Reference to Pending State Charges Is Not Procedural Error When Disclaimed

Eleventh Circuit: Mental Illness Does Not Preclude an Upward Variance for Deterrence and Public Protection; Mere Reference to Pending State Charges Is Not Procedural Error When Disclaimed

Date: Nov 2, 2025
Eleventh Circuit: Mental Illness Does Not Preclude an Upward Variance for Deterrence and Public Protection; Mere Reference to Pending State Charges Is Not Procedural Error When Disclaimed Case:...
Venue Errors Do Not Defeat Judicial Immunity: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Transfer and Dismissal in Ibhar Al Mheid v. Minchew

Venue Errors Do Not Defeat Judicial Immunity: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Transfer and Dismissal in Ibhar Al Mheid v. Minchew

Date: Nov 1, 2025
Venue Errors Do Not Defeat Judicial Immunity: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Transfer and Dismissal in Ibhar Al Mheid v. Minchew Introduction In Ibhar Al Mheid v. Katy Minchew et al., No. 24-11930 (11th...
Waiver Under Rule 72(a) Bars Appellate Review; “Stray Remarks” and Non‑Comparable Exchanges Do Not Sustain § 1981 Retail Discrimination Claims — Harris v. Bath & Body Works (11th Cir. 2025)

Waiver Under Rule 72(a) Bars Appellate Review; “Stray Remarks” and Non‑Comparable Exchanges Do Not Sustain § 1981 Retail Discrimination Claims — Harris v. Bath & Body Works (11th Cir. 2025)

Date: Nov 1, 2025
Waiver Under Rule 72(a) Bars Appellate Review; “Stray Remarks” and Non‑Comparable Exchanges Do Not Sustain § 1981 Retail Discrimination Claims — Harris v. Bath & Body Works (11th Cir. 2025) Court:...
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies: Misadvice on Supervised-Release Maximum at Revocation Is Not Plain Error Absent Prejudice; District Courts May Weigh Context of Dismissed Violations When Varying Upward

Eleventh Circuit Clarifies: Misadvice on Supervised-Release Maximum at Revocation Is Not Plain Error Absent Prejudice; District Courts May Weigh Context of Dismissed Violations When Varying Upward

Date: Nov 1, 2025
Misadvice at Supervised-Release Revocation Is Not Plain Error Without Prejudice; Broad Sentencing Latitude Under § 3583(e) Confirmed Case: United States v. Clonet Junior Charmant, No. 25-10202 (11th...
Recharacterization Without Notice Violates Due Process; Murder Cross‑Reference Does Not Defeat First Step Act Eligibility

Recharacterization Without Notice Violates Due Process; Murder Cross‑Reference Does Not Defeat First Step Act Eligibility

Date: Nov 1, 2025
Recharacterization Without Notice Violates Due Process; Murder Cross‑Reference Does Not Defeat First Step Act Eligibility Introduction This commentary analyzes the Eleventh Circuit’s unpublished, per...
Erlinger Claims Are Waivable: Eleventh Circuit Enforces Appeal Waiver and Upholds Georgia Marijuana PWID as an ACCA “Serious Drug Offense”

Erlinger Claims Are Waivable: Eleventh Circuit Enforces Appeal Waiver and Upholds Georgia Marijuana PWID as an ACCA “Serious Drug Offense”

Date: Nov 1, 2025
Erlinger Claims Are Waivable: Eleventh Circuit Enforces Appeal Waiver and Upholds Georgia Marijuana PWID as an ACCA “Serious Drug Offense” Introduction In United States v. Orlando Paradise (No....
Eleventh Circuit (post–Loper Bright) holds Florida “culpable negligence” child‑neglect convictions categorically qualify as a deportable “crime of child neglect” under INA § 1227(a)(2)(E)(i); Chevron‑era Pierre still exerts precedential force

Eleventh Circuit (post–Loper Bright) holds Florida “culpable negligence” child‑neglect convictions categorically qualify as a deportable “crime of child neglect” under INA § 1227(a)(2)(E)(i); Chevron‑era Pierre still exerts precedential force

Date: Nov 1, 2025
Post–Loper Bright framework: Florida “culpable negligence” child‑neglect is a categorical “crime of child neglect” under INA § 1227(a)(2)(E)(i), and Chevron‑era Pierre remains operative (for now)...
Reese v. SSA: Post-Dated Mental-Health Reports Are Not Chronologically Relevant Without Pre-Decision Corroboration; De Novo Review Permits Courts to Reach Materiality Not Addressed by the Appeals Council

Reese v. SSA: Post-Dated Mental-Health Reports Are Not Chronologically Relevant Without Pre-Decision Corroboration; De Novo Review Permits Courts to Reach Materiality Not Addressed by the Appeals Council

Date: Nov 1, 2025
Reese v. SSA: Post-Dated Mental-Health Reports Are Not Chronologically Relevant Without Pre-Decision Corroboration; De Novo Review Permits Courts to Reach Materiality Not Addressed by the Appeals...
No Backdoor via Rule 60(b)(4): Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms Law‑of‑the‑Case Limits and Imposes Rule 38 Sanctions in Foley v. Orange County

No Backdoor via Rule 60(b)(4): Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms Law‑of‑the‑Case Limits and Imposes Rule 38 Sanctions in Foley v. Orange County

Date: Nov 1, 2025
No Backdoor via Rule 60(b)(4): Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms Law‑of‑the‑Case Limits and Imposes Rule 38 Sanctions in Foley v. Orange County Introduction In this unpublished, per curiam opinion, the U.S....
From FCHR “No Cause” to Federal Preclusion: Eleventh Circuit Bars § 1981 Claims and Reaffirms Strict Title VII Timeliness and Plausibility Requirements

From FCHR “No Cause” to Federal Preclusion: Eleventh Circuit Bars § 1981 Claims and Reaffirms Strict Title VII Timeliness and Plausibility Requirements

Date: Nov 1, 2025
From FCHR “No Cause” to Federal Preclusion: Eleventh Circuit Bars § 1981 Claims and Reaffirms Strict Title VII Timeliness and Plausibility Requirements Introduction In Elias Makere v. Allstate...
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Rule 60(b)(3)’s One‑Year Clock Runs from Entry of the “Order,” Not Delayed by Rule 58’s Separate-Document Requirement; Reaffirms Exacting Standard for “Fraud on the Court” under Rule 60(d)(3)

Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Rule 60(b)(3)’s One‑Year Clock Runs from Entry of the “Order,” Not Delayed by Rule 58’s Separate-Document Requirement; Reaffirms Exacting Standard for “Fraud on the Court” under Rule 60(d)(3)

Date: Nov 1, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Rule 60(b)(3)’s One‑Year Clock Runs from Entry of the “Order,” Not Delayed by Rule 58’s Separate-Document Requirement; Reaffirms Exacting Standard for “Fraud on the Court”...
Prior Prostitution Does Not Defeat Enticement or Undue-Influence Findings: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Broad Aiding-and-Abetting Liability in Minor Sex-Trafficking Cases

Prior Prostitution Does Not Defeat Enticement or Undue-Influence Findings: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Broad Aiding-and-Abetting Liability in Minor Sex-Trafficking Cases

Date: Nov 1, 2025
Prior Prostitution Does Not Defeat Enticement or Undue-Influence Findings: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Broad Aiding-and-Abetting Liability in Minor Sex-Trafficking Cases Introduction This non-argument,...
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Limits on Ancillary Enforcement: No Rule 69/Section 56.29 Constructive-Trust Proceedings Against Non‑Judgment Debtors

Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Limits on Ancillary Enforcement: No Rule 69/Section 56.29 Constructive-Trust Proceedings Against Non‑Judgment Debtors

Date: Nov 1, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Limits on Ancillary Enforcement: No Rule 69/Section 56.29 Constructive-Trust Proceedings Against Non‑Judgment Debtors Introduction This appeal arises at the intersection of...
Intervening Misconduct Severs Retaliation Causation and Threadbare § 1981 Pleadings Fail: A Commentary on Goolsby v. City of Monroe (11th Cir.)

Intervening Misconduct Severs Retaliation Causation and Threadbare § 1981 Pleadings Fail: A Commentary on Goolsby v. City of Monroe (11th Cir.)

Date: Oct 30, 2025
Intervening Misconduct Severs Retaliation Causation and Threadbare § 1981 Pleadings Fail: Eleventh Circuit in Goolsby v. City of Monroe Introduction In Alicia Goolsby v. City of Monroe, the Eleventh...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert