Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

state Case Commentaries

No Blanket Consent Searches as a Standard Probation Term: First Department Requires an Individualized, Offense-Related Nexus (People v. Andrus, 2025)

No Blanket Consent Searches as a Standard Probation Term: First Department Requires an Individualized, Offense-Related Nexus (People v. Andrus, 2025)

Date: Sep 2, 2025
No Blanket Consent Searches as a Standard Probation Term: First Department Requires an Individualized, Offense-Related Nexus (People v. Andrus, 2025) Introduction In People v. Andrus (2025 NY Slip Op...
Veil Piercing Without Fraud: New York First Department Holds Daily Cash Sweeps and Post‑Suit Dissolution Constitute “Wrong” for Alter‑Ego Liability

Veil Piercing Without Fraud: New York First Department Holds Daily Cash Sweeps and Post‑Suit Dissolution Constitute “Wrong” for Alter‑Ego Liability

Date: Sep 2, 2025
Veil Piercing Without Fraud: New York First Department Holds Daily Cash Sweeps and Post‑Suit Dissolution Constitute “Wrong” for Alter‑Ego Liability Case: Rich v. J.A. Madison, LLC, 2025 NY Slip Op...
Preponderance Standard Governs LUC Boundary Interpretations; Declaratory Orders Limited to Resolving Map Uncertainty

Preponderance Standard Governs LUC Boundary Interpretations; Declaratory Orders Limited to Resolving Map Uncertainty

Date: Sep 2, 2025
Preponderance Standard Governs LUC Boundary Interpretations; Declaratory Orders Limited to Resolving Map Uncertainty Introduction In Honoipu Hideaway, LLC v. State (Supreme Court of Hawaiʻi, August...
“Private Place” Need Not Be Defined in the Indictment; Courts May Consider Extrinsic Information to Assess Notice on Timely Challenges — State v. Kaakimaka (Haw. 2025)

“Private Place” Need Not Be Defined in the Indictment; Courts May Consider Extrinsic Information to Assess Notice on Timely Challenges — State v. Kaakimaka (Haw. 2025)

Date: Sep 2, 2025
“Private Place” Need Not Be Defined in the Indictment; Courts May Consider Extrinsic Information to Assess Notice on Timely Challenges — State v. Kaakimaka (Haw. 2025) Introduction In State v....
Non‑Delegable Oversight of IOLA Escrow Accounts: Public Censure for Rolling Shortage Despite Bank Error and No Venal Intent

Non‑Delegable Oversight of IOLA Escrow Accounts: Public Censure for Rolling Shortage Despite Bank Error and No Venal Intent

Date: Sep 2, 2025
Non‑Delegable Oversight of IOLA Escrow Accounts: Public Censure for Rolling Shortage Despite Bank Error and No Venal Intent Introduction In Matter of Bains (2025 NY Slip Op 04783), the Appellate...
No-Remittal After Partial Annulment of Duplicative Specification in Civil Service Law § 75 Discipline: Fabian v. Westchester County

No-Remittal After Partial Annulment of Duplicative Specification in Civil Service Law § 75 Discipline: Fabian v. Westchester County

Date: Sep 2, 2025
No-Remittal After Partial Annulment of Duplicative Specification in Civil Service Law § 75 Discipline Commentary on Matter of Fabian v. Westchester County (2025 NY Slip Op 04784, App Div 2d Dept,...
Presence of a Minor Passenger and Crash Elevates a First-Offense DWI to Suspension-Level Misconduct in Attorney Discipline

Presence of a Minor Passenger and Crash Elevates a First-Offense DWI to Suspension-Level Misconduct in Attorney Discipline

Date: Sep 2, 2025
Presence of a Minor Passenger and Crash Elevates a First-Offense DWI to Suspension-Level Misconduct in Attorney Discipline Introduction In Matter of Furber (2025 NY Slip Op 04786), the Appellate...
No-Content Defense Rejected for Digital Spoliation; Unauthorized Share Issuances Are a Nullity Absent Clear Shareholder Override — Commentary on Matter of Loreti v. 1466 E. Gun Hill Rd. Corp. (2025 NY Slip Op 04787)

No-Content Defense Rejected for Digital Spoliation; Unauthorized Share Issuances Are a Nullity Absent Clear Shareholder Override — Commentary on Matter of Loreti v. 1466 E. Gun Hill Rd. Corp. (2025 NY Slip Op 04787)

Date: Sep 2, 2025
No-Content Defense Rejected for Digital Spoliation; Unauthorized Share Issuances Are a Nullity Absent Clear Shareholder Override Comprehensive Commentary on Matter of Loreti v. 1466 E. Gun Hill Rd....
Loreti v. JJL Realty: Second Department affirms strict limits on authorized shares, sets aside unapproved self-dealing management agreement under BCL §713, and upholds broad spoliation preclusion for deleted QuickBooks files

Loreti v. JJL Realty: Second Department affirms strict limits on authorized shares, sets aside unapproved self-dealing management agreement under BCL §713, and upholds broad spoliation preclusion for deleted QuickBooks files

Date: Sep 2, 2025
Strict Charter Caps on Shares, No Ratification Without Disclosure, and Robust E‑Discovery Sanctions: The Second Department’s Guideposts in Matter of Loreti v. JJL Realty Corp. of N.Y. Court:...
Overissued Shares Are a Nullity Absent a Clear Shareholder Override; Unapproved Interested-Director Contracts Are Voidable Unless Proven Fair; Broad Preclusion Permitted for Destroyed ESI (Matter of Loreti v. Lorcress Enters., Inc.)

Overissued Shares Are a Nullity Absent a Clear Shareholder Override; Unapproved Interested-Director Contracts Are Voidable Unless Proven Fair; Broad Preclusion Permitted for Destroyed ESI (Matter of Loreti v. Lorcress Enters., Inc.)

Date: Sep 2, 2025
Overissued Shares Are a Nullity Absent a Clear Shareholder Override; Unapproved Interested-Director Contracts Are Voidable Unless Proven Fair; Broad Preclusion Permitted for Destroyed ESI...
Translating Out‑of‑State Public Reprimands into New York Public Censure: The Appellate Division’s Deference in Reciprocal Discipline (Matter of Pantiliat, 2025)

Translating Out‑of‑State Public Reprimands into New York Public Censure: The Appellate Division’s Deference in Reciprocal Discipline (Matter of Pantiliat, 2025)

Date: Sep 2, 2025
Translating Out‑of‑State Public Reprimands into New York Public Censure: The Appellate Division’s Deference in Reciprocal Discipline Commentary on: Matter of Pantiliat, 2025 NY Slip Op 04791...
Necessary-Party Joinder in Article 78 Challenges to Village Fire Department Appointments: Appointee and Fire Department Council Must Be Joined Before Merits Are Reached

Necessary-Party Joinder in Article 78 Challenges to Village Fire Department Appointments: Appointee and Fire Department Council Must Be Joined Before Merits Are Reached

Date: Sep 2, 2025
Necessary-Party Joinder in Article 78 Challenges to Village Fire Department Appointments: Appointee and Fire Department Council Must Be Joined Before Merits Are Reached Case: Matter of Riverside Hose...
Mandatory ABP Recalculation for Post–Taxable Status Demolition in Special Assessing Units: National Grid Generation, LLC v. Nassau County

Mandatory ABP Recalculation for Post–Taxable Status Demolition in Special Assessing Units: National Grid Generation, LLC v. Nassau County

Date: Sep 2, 2025
Mandatory ABP Recalculation for Post–Taxable Status Demolition in Special Assessing Units: National Grid Generation, LLC v. Nassau County Introduction This appellate decision from the New York...
LinkedIn Is a “Public Forum” Under New York’s Anti‑SLAPP Law; “Supports Neo‑Nazi Causes” Is Actionable Mixed Opinion — Commentary on Stiloski v. Wingate (2025 NY Slip Op 04803)

LinkedIn Is a “Public Forum” Under New York’s Anti‑SLAPP Law; “Supports Neo‑Nazi Causes” Is Actionable Mixed Opinion — Commentary on Stiloski v. Wingate (2025 NY Slip Op 04803)

Date: Sep 2, 2025
LinkedIn Is a “Public Forum” Under New York’s Anti‑SLAPP Law; “Supports Neo‑Nazi Causes” Is Actionable Mixed Opinion — Commentary on Stiloski v. Wingate Introduction In Stiloski v. Wingate (2025 NY...
Ordinary Diligence Defeats Fraud-Based Attacks on Broad Employment Releases: Trepeta v. Mobiquity Technologies, Inc.

Ordinary Diligence Defeats Fraud-Based Attacks on Broad Employment Releases: Trepeta v. Mobiquity Technologies, Inc.

Date: Sep 2, 2025
Ordinary Diligence Defeats Fraud-Based Attacks on Broad Employment Releases: Trepeta v. Mobiquity Technologies, Inc. Introduction This commentary analyzes the Appellate Division, Second Department’s...
FAPA as a Change in Law: Voluntary Discontinuance Cannot De‑Accelerate a Mortgage; Renewal Granted and Foreclosure Claims Time‑Barred — Commentary on U.S. Bank N.A. v. Mongru (2025 NY Slip Op 04807)

FAPA as a Change in Law: Voluntary Discontinuance Cannot De‑Accelerate a Mortgage; Renewal Granted and Foreclosure Claims Time‑Barred — Commentary on U.S. Bank N.A. v. Mongru (2025 NY Slip Op 04807)

Date: Sep 2, 2025
FAPA as a Change in Law: Voluntary Discontinuance Cannot De‑Accelerate a Mortgage; Renewal Granted and Foreclosure Claims Time‑Barred — U.S. Bank N.A. v. Mongru (App Div 2d Dept, 2025) Introduction...
Future Pain-and-Suffering Damages Do Not Require a “Permanent Injury” Finding; Unsafe Backing Under VTL § 1211(a) Is Negligence Per Se — A Second Department Benchmark on Remittitur for Post-Spinal-Surgery Claims

Future Pain-and-Suffering Damages Do Not Require a “Permanent Injury” Finding; Unsafe Backing Under VTL § 1211(a) Is Negligence Per Se — A Second Department Benchmark on Remittitur for Post-Spinal-Surgery Claims

Date: Sep 2, 2025
Future Pain-and-Suffering Damages Do Not Require a “Permanent Injury” Finding; Unsafe Backing Under VTL § 1211(a) Is Negligence Per Se — A Second Department Benchmark on Remittitur for...
Nebraska adopts “credible threat” pre‑enforcement standing; organizations must plead representative authority to sue for members

Nebraska adopts “credible threat” pre‑enforcement standing; organizations must plead representative authority to sue for members

Date: Sep 1, 2025
Nebraska adopts the “credible threat” standard for pre‑enforcement standing; organizations must plead representative authority to sue for members Case: Nebraska Firearms Owners Assn. v. City of...
Due-Weight Rule in Post-Termination Placements: Nevada Supreme Court Reaffirms Courts Must Consider, Not Defer to, DFS Placement Preferences

Due-Weight Rule in Post-Termination Placements: Nevada Supreme Court Reaffirms Courts Must Consider, Not Defer to, DFS Placement Preferences

Date: Aug 31, 2025
Due-Weight Rule in Post-Termination Placements: Nevada Supreme Court Reaffirms Courts Must Consider, Not Defer to, DFS Placement Preferences Case: Destin v. District Court (Handwerker-LaMaster)...
Flat Fees Are Not Earned Upon Receipt in Nevada: Trust-Account Treatment and Termination Duties for Limited-Scope Engagements

Flat Fees Are Not Earned Upon Receipt in Nevada: Trust-Account Treatment and Termination Duties for Limited-Scope Engagements

Date: Aug 31, 2025
Flat Fees Are Not Earned Upon Receipt in Nevada: Trust-Account Treatment and Termination Duties for Limited-Scope Engagements Introduction In In re: Discipline of Hardeep Sull (141 Nev., Advance...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert