Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

reaffirmation-of-strict-liability-in-manufacturers&amp Case Commentaries

Post-Habeas Removal of Illegal Restitution Is Not a Resentencing: The Oral–Written Sentence Rule Does Not Apply — Woods v. Wead (Mont. 2025)

Post-Habeas Removal of Illegal Restitution Is Not a Resentencing: The Oral–Written Sentence Rule Does Not Apply — Woods v. Wead (Mont. 2025)

Date: Oct 10, 2025
Post-Habeas Removal of Illegal Restitution Is Not a Resentencing: The Oral–Written Sentence Rule Does Not Apply — Woods v. Wead (Mont. 2025) Introduction In Woods v. Wead (Mont. Oct. 7, 2025), the...
Misaligned Debtor–Trustee Interests Preclude Res Judicata Against Chapter 7 Trustees; Claim Objections Under Rule 3007 Are Timely Absent Court-Set Deadlines

Misaligned Debtor–Trustee Interests Preclude Res Judicata Against Chapter 7 Trustees; Claim Objections Under Rule 3007 Are Timely Absent Court-Set Deadlines

Date: Oct 10, 2025
Misaligned Debtor–Trustee Interests Preclude Res Judicata Against Chapter 7 Trustees; Claim Objections Under Rule 3007 Are Timely Absent Court-Set Deadlines Commentary on Myer's Lawn Care Services,...
Second Circuit Confirms Special-Needs Authority to Search a Parolee’s Cellphone, Distinguishing Riley When the Device Is Unauthorized

Second Circuit Confirms Special-Needs Authority to Search a Parolee’s Cellphone, Distinguishing Riley When the Device Is Unauthorized

Date: Oct 10, 2025
Second Circuit Confirms Special-Needs Authority to Search a Parolee’s Cellphone, Distinguishing Riley When the Device Is Unauthorized Introduction In United States v. Smurphat (No. 24-1707, 2d Cir....
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies: Post-Representation Privacy Torts Are Outside Narrow Retainer Arbitration Clauses; “Confidential Arbitration” Is Not a Duty of Confidentiality

Eleventh Circuit Clarifies: Post-Representation Privacy Torts Are Outside Narrow Retainer Arbitration Clauses; “Confidential Arbitration” Is Not a Duty of Confidentiality

Date: Oct 10, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies: Post-Representation Privacy Torts Are Outside Narrow Retainer Arbitration Clauses; “Confidential Arbitration” Is Not a Duty of Confidentiality Introduction In Janet L....
§ 46504 Requires Only General Intent: Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms No Need to Prove Intent to Intimidate or to Interfere, and Clarifies that “Knowingly” Attaches to Conduct (United States v. Olvera)

§ 46504 Requires Only General Intent: Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms No Need to Prove Intent to Intimidate or to Interfere, and Clarifies that “Knowingly” Attaches to Conduct (United States v. Olvera)

Date: Oct 10, 2025
§ 46504 Requires Only General Intent: Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms No Need to Prove Intent to Intimidate or to Interfere, and Clarifies that “Knowingly” Attaches to Conduct (United States v. Olvera)...
EEZ Equals “High Seas” for MDLEA; § 70502(d)(1)(C) Constitutional; No Nexus Requirement: Eleventh Circuit Summarily Affirms in United States v. Feyber De Avila (Consolidated)

EEZ Equals “High Seas” for MDLEA; § 70502(d)(1)(C) Constitutional; No Nexus Requirement: Eleventh Circuit Summarily Affirms in United States v. Feyber De Avila (Consolidated)

Date: Oct 10, 2025
EEZ Equals “High Seas” for MDLEA; § 70502(d)(1)(C) Constitutional; No Nexus Requirement: Eleventh Circuit Summarily Affirms in United States v. Feyber De Avila (Consolidated) Introduction In a...
EEZ Counts as “High Seas,” MDLEA Needs No U.S. Nexus, and “Stateless Vessel” Definition Is Not Cabined by International Law: Eleventh Circuit’s Summary Affirmance in United States v. Santiago, De Avila, and Ulloa

EEZ Counts as “High Seas,” MDLEA Needs No U.S. Nexus, and “Stateless Vessel” Definition Is Not Cabined by International Law: Eleventh Circuit’s Summary Affirmance in United States v. Santiago, De Avila, and Ulloa

Date: Oct 10, 2025
EEZ Counts as “High Seas,” MDLEA Needs No U.S. Nexus, and “Stateless Vessel” Definition Is Not Cabined by International Law: Eleventh Circuit’s Summary Affirmance in United States v. Santiago, De...
EEZs Are “High Seas” for Felonies Clause; MDLEA’s Stateless‑Vessel Definition Upheld; No Nexus Requirement: Eleventh Circuit’s Summary Affirmance in United States v. Wallyst Rochist Ulloa (consol. with Santiago & De Avila)

EEZs Are “High Seas” for Felonies Clause; MDLEA’s Stateless‑Vessel Definition Upheld; No Nexus Requirement: Eleventh Circuit’s Summary Affirmance in United States v. Wallyst Rochist Ulloa (consol. with Santiago & De Avila)

Date: Oct 10, 2025
EEZs Are “High Seas” for Felonies Clause; MDLEA’s Stateless‑Vessel Definition Upheld; No Nexus Requirement Case: United States v. Wallyst Rochist Ulloa (consolidated with United States v. Ramon...
No Nexus for Intrafamilial Land Disputes: Sixth Circuit Reaffirms Personal-Motive Bar and Treats Nexus as a Factual Finding in Asylum Claims

No Nexus for Intrafamilial Land Disputes: Sixth Circuit Reaffirms Personal-Motive Bar and Treats Nexus as a Factual Finding in Asylum Claims

Date: Oct 10, 2025
No Nexus for Intrafamilial Land Disputes: Sixth Circuit Reaffirms Personal-Motive Bar and Treats Nexus as a Factual Finding in Asylum Claims Introduction In Masud Ahmed v. Pamela Bondi, the United...
Acceptance Means More Than a Plea: Sixth Circuit Authorizes Use of Post‑Indictment Jailhouse Drug Misconduct and False Denials to Defeat §3E1.1—Even If Not §1B1.3 Relevant Conduct; Explicit Bostic Concurrence Invokes Invited Error

Acceptance Means More Than a Plea: Sixth Circuit Authorizes Use of Post‑Indictment Jailhouse Drug Misconduct and False Denials to Defeat §3E1.1—Even If Not §1B1.3 Relevant Conduct; Explicit Bostic Concurrence Invokes Invited Error

Date: Oct 10, 2025
Acceptance Means More Than a Plea: Sixth Circuit Authorizes Use of Post‑Indictment Jailhouse Drug Misconduct and False Denials to Defeat §3E1.1—Even If Not §1B1.3 Relevant Conduct; Explicit Bostic...
No Automatic Liberal Construction for Legally Trained Pro Se Litigants; Rule 41(b) Dismissal Affirmed Under Ehrenhaus After Failure to Cure Pleading Defects

No Automatic Liberal Construction for Legally Trained Pro Se Litigants; Rule 41(b) Dismissal Affirmed Under Ehrenhaus After Failure to Cure Pleading Defects

Date: Oct 10, 2025
No Automatic Liberal Construction for Legally Trained Pro Se Litigants; Rule 41(b) Dismissal Affirmed Under Ehrenhaus After Failure to Cure Pleading Defects Introduction In Cohen v. Hartman, No....
Centrality of Motive and the Reporting Requirement: The Tenth Circuit’s Published Clarification on Nexus, State Protection, and Internal Relocation in Mixed‑Motive Asylum Claims (Jimenez v. Bondi)

Centrality of Motive and the Reporting Requirement: The Tenth Circuit’s Published Clarification on Nexus, State Protection, and Internal Relocation in Mixed‑Motive Asylum Claims (Jimenez v. Bondi)

Date: Oct 10, 2025
Centrality of Motive and the Reporting Requirement: The Tenth Circuit’s Published Clarification on Nexus, State Protection, and Internal Relocation in Mixed‑Motive Asylum Claims Introduction In...
No Plain-Error Duty to Advise Juveniles of Murphy’s “Appreciable Period” Requirement for § 1201 Kidnapping

No Plain-Error Duty to Advise Juveniles of Murphy’s “Appreciable Period” Requirement for § 1201 Kidnapping

Date: Oct 10, 2025
No Plain-Error Duty to Advise Juveniles of Murphy’s “Appreciable Period” Requirement for § 1201 Kidnapping Case: United States v. Doe, No. 25-9902 (10th Cir. Oct. 7, 2025) Court: United States Court...
Record-Based Justification Suffices: Tenth Circuit Affirms Alcohol-Abstinence and Bar-Restriction Conditions Under Plain-Error Review Even Without On-the-Record Reasons

Record-Based Justification Suffices: Tenth Circuit Affirms Alcohol-Abstinence and Bar-Restriction Conditions Under Plain-Error Review Even Without On-the-Record Reasons

Date: Oct 10, 2025
Record-Based Justification Suffices: Tenth Circuit Affirms Alcohol-Abstinence and Bar-Restriction Conditions Under Plain-Error Review Even Without On-the-Record Reasons Introduction In United States...
Attorney General’s Authority to Represent the State and State Officers in Post‑Conviction Proceedings Clarified; “Technical Failure” Discretion Applied — State v. Antoinette Frank (La. 2025)

Attorney General’s Authority to Represent the State and State Officers in Post‑Conviction Proceedings Clarified; “Technical Failure” Discretion Applied — State v. Antoinette Frank (La. 2025)

Date: Oct 10, 2025
Attorney General’s Authority to Represent the State and State Officers in Post‑Conviction Proceedings Clarified; “Technical Failure” Discretion Applied — State v. Antoinette Frank (La. 2025)...
Hadley v. City of South Bend: No Takings Clause Compensation for Police-Caused Damage During Execution of a Valid Search Warrant

Hadley v. City of South Bend: No Takings Clause Compensation for Police-Caused Damage During Execution of a Valid Search Warrant

Date: Oct 10, 2025
Hadley v. City of South Bend: No Takings Clause Compensation for Police-Caused Damage During Execution of a Valid Search Warrant Introduction In Amy Hadley v. City of South Bend, Indiana, the U.S....
ALJ Discretion to Limit VE Cross-Examination and Acceptance of SkillTRAN Job Browser Pro, with SSRs as an Independent Step-Five Backstop

ALJ Discretion to Limit VE Cross-Examination and Acceptance of SkillTRAN Job Browser Pro, with SSRs as an Independent Step-Five Backstop

Date: Oct 10, 2025
ALJ Discretion to Limit VE Cross-Examination and Acceptance of SkillTRAN Job Browser Pro, with SSRs as an Independent Step-Five Backstop Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit...
“Need to Come Inside” Is Not Per Se Coercive: Seventh Circuit Affirms Third‑Party Consent and Defines Scope During Domestic‑Violence Welfare Checks

“Need to Come Inside” Is Not Per Se Coercive: Seventh Circuit Affirms Third‑Party Consent and Defines Scope During Domestic‑Violence Welfare Checks

Date: Oct 10, 2025
“Need to Come Inside” Is Not Per Se Coercive: Seventh Circuit Affirms Third‑Party Consent and Defines Scope During Domestic‑Violence Welfare Checks Introduction In United States v. Jaison L. Coleman,...
Rule 35(b) in the CNMI: Motions to Reduce Sentence Are Pleas for Leniency, Not Legal Corrections

Rule 35(b) in the CNMI: Motions to Reduce Sentence Are Pleas for Leniency, Not Legal Corrections

Date: Oct 10, 2025
Rule 35(b) in the CNMI: Motions to Reduce Sentence Are Pleas for Leniency, Not Legal Corrections Introduction In Commonwealth v. Rios, 2025 MP 7 (Supreme Court of the Commonwealth of the Northern...
Tribal Bar Admission Is Not “Admission in a State, Territory, or D.C.” Under SCR 40.04(1); Exam-Eligibility Denials Are Reviewable Under the Court’s Supervisory Authority

Tribal Bar Admission Is Not “Admission in a State, Territory, or D.C.” Under SCR 40.04(1); Exam-Eligibility Denials Are Reviewable Under the Court’s Supervisory Authority

Date: Oct 10, 2025
Tribal Bar Admission Is Not “Admission in a State, Territory, or D.C.” Under SCR 40.04(1); Exam-Eligibility Denials Are Reviewable Under the Court’s Supervisory Authority Introduction In Joy Morris...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert