Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

reaffirmation-of-strict-liability-in-manufacturers& Case Commentaries

Strict PLRA Exhaustion Through SOIGA and Rule 21 Dismissal of Unidentified Defendants: Commentary on Johnson v. Bienkowski (3d Cir. 2025)

Strict PLRA Exhaustion Through SOIGA and Rule 21 Dismissal of Unidentified Defendants: Commentary on Johnson v. Bienkowski (3d Cir. 2025)

Date: Sep 8, 2025
Strict PLRA Exhaustion Through SOIGA and Rule 21 Dismissal of Unidentified Defendants: Commentary on Johnson v. Bienkowski (3d Cir. 2025) Introduction This commentary examines the Third Circuit’s...
No Exhaustion, No Case: Third Circuit Reaffirms Strict PLRA Compliance and Permits Dismissal of Unidentified Defendants under Rule 21

No Exhaustion, No Case: Third Circuit Reaffirms Strict PLRA Compliance and Permits Dismissal of Unidentified Defendants under Rule 21

Date: Sep 8, 2025
No Exhaustion, No Case: Third Circuit Reaffirms Strict PLRA Compliance and Permits Dismissal of Unidentified Defendants under Rule 21 Introduction In Armoni Johnson v. Bienkoski, Nos. 24-1049 &...
Civil-Rights Removal Revisited: Invoking 28 U.S.C. § 1443 Permits Full Appellate Review of Remand Orders, but ADA-Based Arguments Do Not Qualify

Civil-Rights Removal Revisited: Invoking 28 U.S.C. § 1443 Permits Full Appellate Review of Remand Orders, but ADA-Based Arguments Do Not Qualify

Date: Sep 8, 2025
Civil-Rights Removal Revisited: Invoking 28 U.S.C. § 1443 Permits Full Appellate Review of Remand Orders, but ADA-Based Arguments Do Not Qualify Introduction This commentary analyzes the Third...
Standing Orders Are Not Enough: Fifth Circuit Requires Oral Pronouncement of All Special Conditions of Supervised Release

Standing Orders Are Not Enough: Fifth Circuit Requires Oral Pronouncement of All Special Conditions of Supervised Release

Date: Sep 8, 2025
Standing Orders Are Not Enough: Fifth Circuit Requires Oral Pronouncement of All Special Conditions of Supervised Release Case: United States v. Osorio-Avelar, No. 24-20393 (5th Cir. Sept. 2, 2025)...
Defining “Invasion” and “Predatory Incursion” Under the Alien Enemies Act: Fifth Circuit Polices Statutory Preconditions and Grants Classwide Preliminary Relief; Seven‑Day Notice Tentatively Upheld

Defining “Invasion” and “Predatory Incursion” Under the Alien Enemies Act: Fifth Circuit Polices Statutory Preconditions and Grants Classwide Preliminary Relief; Seven‑Day Notice Tentatively Upheld

Date: Sep 8, 2025
Defining “Invasion” and “Predatory Incursion” Under the Alien Enemies Act: Fifth Circuit Polices Statutory Preconditions and Grants Classwide Preliminary Relief; Seven‑Day Notice Tentatively Upheld...
Material Support Means Substantial Aid to Terrorist Activities: Fourth Circuit Narrows INA Bar; Forced Cooking for Captors Is Not “Material Support”

Material Support Means Substantial Aid to Terrorist Activities: Fourth Circuit Narrows INA Bar; Forced Cooking for Captors Is Not “Material Support”

Date: Sep 8, 2025
Material Support Means Substantial Aid to Terrorist Activities: Fourth Circuit Narrows INA Bar; Forced Cooking for Captors Is Not “Material Support” Introduction This published decision from the...
Residency‑Neutral, In‑State Educational Criteria in Cannabis Social‑Equity Licensing Do Not Discriminate Under the Dormant Commerce Clause: Jensen v. Maryland Cannabis Administration (4th Cir. 2025)

Residency‑Neutral, In‑State Educational Criteria in Cannabis Social‑Equity Licensing Do Not Discriminate Under the Dormant Commerce Clause: Jensen v. Maryland Cannabis Administration (4th Cir. 2025)

Date: Sep 8, 2025
Residency‑Neutral, In‑State Educational Criteria in Cannabis Social‑Equity Licensing Do Not Discriminate Under the Dormant Commerce Clause Commentary on Justyna Jensen v. Maryland Cannabis...
Clear Ownership or No Injunction: Fourth Circuit Reaffirms Priority-of-Use for Unregistered Marks and Tightens UDTPA Use in Employer–Employee Branding Disputes

Clear Ownership or No Injunction: Fourth Circuit Reaffirms Priority-of-Use for Unregistered Marks and Tightens UDTPA Use in Employer–Employee Branding Disputes

Date: Sep 8, 2025
Clear Ownership or No Injunction: Fourth Circuit Reaffirms Priority-of-Use for Unregistered Marks and Tightens UDTPA Use in Employer–Employee Branding Disputes Introduction This commentary analyzes...
Reliability Without Revealing the Algorithm: Vermont Affirms V.R.E. 702 Admission of Proprietary Practice-Valuation Methods and Discounts Professional Goodwill Absent a Noncompete

Reliability Without Revealing the Algorithm: Vermont Affirms V.R.E. 702 Admission of Proprietary Practice-Valuation Methods and Discounts Professional Goodwill Absent a Noncompete

Date: Sep 6, 2025
Reliability Without Revealing the Algorithm: Vermont Affirms V.R.E. 702 Admission of Proprietary Practice-Valuation Methods and Discounts Professional Goodwill Absent a Noncompete Introduction In...
Clarifying § 1103(a)(9) and Rule 26.1(c) in Delaware TPR Appeals: Medical Examiner Evidence Can Establish “Unexplained Death or Serious Injury,” and Documentation Gaps Sustain “Failure to Plan”

Clarifying § 1103(a)(9) and Rule 26.1(c) in Delaware TPR Appeals: Medical Examiner Evidence Can Establish “Unexplained Death or Serious Injury,” and Documentation Gaps Sustain “Failure to Plan”

Date: Sep 6, 2025
Clarifying § 1103(a)(9) and Rule 26.1(c) in Delaware TPR Appeals: Medical Examiner Evidence Can Establish “Unexplained Death or Serious Injury,” and Documentation Gaps Sustain “Failure to Plan”...
Vermont Reaffirms the Narrow Scope of Sentence Reconsideration: No Hearing or COVID-Specific Findings Required

Vermont Reaffirms the Narrow Scope of Sentence Reconsideration: No Hearing or COVID-Specific Findings Required

Date: Sep 6, 2025
Vermont Reaffirms the Narrow Scope of Sentence Reconsideration: No Hearing or COVID-Specific Findings Required Introduction In State v. Walter Taylor, III (Vt. Sept. 5, 2025), a three-justice panel...
Deviation Over Threshold: Vermont Affirms Zero‑Support/Private‑School‑Tuition Arrangement and Time‑Bars Post‑Judgment Child Tax Credit Reallocation

Deviation Over Threshold: Vermont Affirms Zero‑Support/Private‑School‑Tuition Arrangement and Time‑Bars Post‑Judgment Child Tax Credit Reallocation

Date: Sep 6, 2025
Deviation Over Threshold: Vermont Affirms Zero‑Support/Private‑School‑Tuition Arrangement and Time‑Bars Post‑Judgment Child Tax Credit Reallocation Case: Catherine Hutchings v. Justin Bramhall...
State v. Prue: Vermont Supreme Court Reaffirms That a Guilty Plea Requires a Personal, Theory‑Specific Factual Basis Under Rule 11(f), Reviewed Under Bridger on Direct Appeal

State v. Prue: Vermont Supreme Court Reaffirms That a Guilty Plea Requires a Personal, Theory‑Specific Factual Basis Under Rule 11(f), Reviewed Under Bridger on Direct Appeal

Date: Sep 6, 2025
State v. Prue: Vermont Supreme Court Reaffirms That a Guilty Plea Requires a Personal, Theory‑Specific Factual Basis Under Rule 11(f), Reviewed Under Bridger on Direct Appeal Court: Vermont Supreme...
CHINS-B Reversal Does Not Preclude DCF Physical-Abuse Substantiation: Distinct Causes and Issues Clarified by the Vermont Supreme Court

CHINS-B Reversal Does Not Preclude DCF Physical-Abuse Substantiation: Distinct Causes and Issues Clarified by the Vermont Supreme Court

Date: Sep 6, 2025
CHINS-B Reversal Does Not Preclude DCF Physical-Abuse Substantiation: Distinct Causes and Issues Clarified by the Vermont Supreme Court Note on precedential weight: This was an entry order by a...
Adequate Findings Over Form: Vermont Supreme Court Affirms Termination Without a Standalone “Stagnation” Section and Confirms Waiver of Child-Testimony Claim

Adequate Findings Over Form: Vermont Supreme Court Affirms Termination Without a Standalone “Stagnation” Section and Confirms Waiver of Child-Testimony Claim

Date: Sep 6, 2025
Adequate Findings Over Form: Vermont Supreme Court Affirms Termination Without a Standalone “Stagnation” Section and Confirms Waiver of Child-Testimony Claim Introduction This commentary examines the...
Qualified Immunity Shields Police in Landlord–Tenant Disputes When Abandonment Under 9 V.S.A. § 4462 Is Not Clearly Established

Qualified Immunity Shields Police in Landlord–Tenant Disputes When Abandonment Under 9 V.S.A. § 4462 Is Not Clearly Established

Date: Sep 6, 2025
Qualified Immunity Shields Police in Landlord–Tenant Disputes When Abandonment Under 9 V.S.A. § 4462 Is Not Clearly Established Court: Supreme Court of Vermont (Three-Justice Panel Entry Order) Case:...
Maher v. Maher: Vermont Supreme Court Affirms Trial-Court Discretion to Confine Long‑Weekend Parenting Time to the Child’s Residence and to Prioritize Primary‑Caregiver and Community‑Continuity Factors Under 15 V.S.A. § 665

Maher v. Maher: Vermont Supreme Court Affirms Trial-Court Discretion to Confine Long‑Weekend Parenting Time to the Child’s Residence and to Prioritize Primary‑Caregiver and Community‑Continuity Factors Under 15 V.S.A. § 665

Date: Sep 6, 2025
Maher v. Maher: Vermont Supreme Court Affirms Trial-Court Discretion to Confine Long‑Weekend Parenting Time to the Child’s Residence and to Prioritize Primary‑Caregiver and Community‑Continuity...
No Immunity Without Compliance: Vermont Affirms Tow-Company Duty of Care and Sufficiency of Owner Testimony for Missing Vehicle Contents

No Immunity Without Compliance: Vermont Affirms Tow-Company Duty of Care and Sufficiency of Owner Testimony for Missing Vehicle Contents

Date: Sep 6, 2025
No Immunity Without Compliance: Vermont Affirms Tow-Company Duty of Care and Sufficiency of Owner Testimony for Missing Vehicle Contents Grey Barreda v. Handy's Service Center, Vermont Supreme Court,...
Easements Run With the Dominant Estate They Are Granted To: No Expansion to After-Acquired Parcels Absent Express Grant or Necessity

Easements Run With the Dominant Estate They Are Granted To: No Expansion to After-Acquired Parcels Absent Express Grant or Necessity

Date: Sep 6, 2025
Easements Run With the Dominant Estate They Are Granted To: No Expansion to After-Acquired Parcels Absent Express Grant or Necessity Introduction This commentary examines the Vermont Supreme Court’s...
Row v. State: Shinn Is Not a Trigger for Successive State Post‑Conviction Relief and Rule 44.2 Does Not Create a Right to Effective Post‑Conviction Counsel

Row v. State: Shinn Is Not a Trigger for Successive State Post‑Conviction Relief and Rule 44.2 Does Not Create a Right to Effective Post‑Conviction Counsel

Date: Sep 5, 2025
Row v. State: Shinn Is Not a Trigger for Successive State Post‑Conviction Relief and Rule 44.2 Does Not Create a Right to Effective Post‑Conviction Counsel Introduction In Row v. State, the Idaho...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert