Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

battery-claims-excluded-under-ftca& Case Commentaries

Guideline Invariance Does Not Defeat Plea-Bargaining Prejudice: Third Circuit Requires § 2255 Hearing on Alleged “Career Offender” Misadvice

Guideline Invariance Does Not Defeat Plea-Bargaining Prejudice: Third Circuit Requires § 2255 Hearing on Alleged “Career Offender” Misadvice

Date: Oct 17, 2025
Guideline Invariance Does Not Defeat Plea-Bargaining Prejudice: Third Circuit Requires § 2255 Hearing on Alleged “Career Offender” Misadvice Introduction In United States v. Reginald Stephens, the...
Belief vs. Practice: Fifth Circuit Clarifies Title VII Religion Claims, Tightens RLA Access, and Polices Injunctions and Civil Contempt

Belief vs. Practice: Fifth Circuit Clarifies Title VII Religion Claims, Tightens RLA Access, and Polices Injunctions and Civil Contempt

Date: Oct 17, 2025
Belief vs. Practice: Fifth Circuit Clarifies Title VII Religion Claims, Tightens RLA Access, and Polices Injunctions and Civil Contempt Introduction Carter v. Local 556 (5th Cir. 2025) arises from...
Carter v. Southwest Airlines: The Fifth Circuit Draws a Bright Line Between Belief- and Practice-Based Title VII Claims, Clarifies Union Liability for “Attempting to Cause” Discrimination, Narrows Post-Certification RLA Suits, and Polices Overbroad Injunctions and Punitive Civil Contempt

Carter v. Southwest Airlines: The Fifth Circuit Draws a Bright Line Between Belief- and Practice-Based Title VII Claims, Clarifies Union Liability for “Attempting to Cause” Discrimination, Narrows Post-Certification RLA Suits, and Polices Overbroad Injunctions and Punitive Civil Contempt

Date: Oct 17, 2025
Carter v. Southwest Airlines: The Fifth Circuit Draws a Bright Line Between Belief- and Practice-Based Title VII Claims, Clarifies Union Liability for “Attempting to Cause” Discrimination, Narrows...
Belief vs. Practice: Fifth Circuit Clarifies Title VII Religion Doctrine, Affirms Groff Without Retrial, and Vacates “Obey‑the‑Law” Injunctions in Carter v. Southwest

Belief vs. Practice: Fifth Circuit Clarifies Title VII Religion Doctrine, Affirms Groff Without Retrial, and Vacates “Obey‑the‑Law” Injunctions in Carter v. Southwest

Date: Oct 17, 2025
Belief vs. Practice: Fifth Circuit Clarifies Title VII Religion Doctrine, Affirms Groff Without Retrial, and Vacates “Obey‑the‑Law” Injunctions in Carter v. Southwest Introduction In a sweeping...
Lay-Opinion Market-Rate Testimony Rejected and Pro Rata Setoff Allowed in Corporate Wind-Up: Fourth Circuit Affirms in All American Black Car Service, Inc. v. Gondal

Lay-Opinion Market-Rate Testimony Rejected and Pro Rata Setoff Allowed in Corporate Wind-Up: Fourth Circuit Affirms in All American Black Car Service, Inc. v. Gondal

Date: Oct 17, 2025
Lay-Opinion Market-Rate Testimony Rejected and Pro Rata Setoff Allowed in Corporate Wind-Up: Fourth Circuit Affirms in All American Black Car Service, Inc. v. Gondal Court: United States Court of...
Clarifying Rule 701’s Limits, Rejecting Ratification-by-Tax-Return, and Allowing Equity Setoff in Corporate Wind-Downs

Clarifying Rule 701’s Limits, Rejecting Ratification-by-Tax-Return, and Allowing Equity Setoff in Corporate Wind-Downs

Date: Oct 17, 2025
Clarifying Rule 701’s Limits, Rejecting Ratification-by-Tax-Return, and Allowing Equity Setoff in Corporate Wind-Downs Case: All American Black Car Service, Inc. v. Gondal (consolidated appeals Nos....
Good‑Faith Misinterpretation of Unsettled State Law Does Not Trigger § 1983 Liability: Fourth Circuit in Swart v. Miyares Channels Overdetention Claims to the Fourteenth Amendment

Good‑Faith Misinterpretation of Unsettled State Law Does Not Trigger § 1983 Liability: Fourth Circuit in Swart v. Miyares Channels Overdetention Claims to the Fourteenth Amendment

Date: Oct 17, 2025
Good‑Faith Misinterpretation of Unsettled State Law Does Not Trigger § 1983 Liability: Fourth Circuit in Swart v. Miyares Channels Overdetention Claims to the Fourteenth Amendment Introduction In...
Victim Identification Plus Corroborating Circumstances Suffice for Probable Cause; Unknown Omissions Do Not Vitiate Warrants — The Fourth Circuit’s Clarification in Moretti v. Thorsdottir

Victim Identification Plus Corroborating Circumstances Suffice for Probable Cause; Unknown Omissions Do Not Vitiate Warrants — The Fourth Circuit’s Clarification in Moretti v. Thorsdottir

Date: Oct 17, 2025
Victim Identification Plus Corroborating Circumstances Suffice for Probable Cause; Unknown Omissions Do Not Vitiate Warrants — The Fourth Circuit’s Clarification in Moretti v. Thorsdottir...
Forfeiture of Unraised Rule 11 Challenges and Harmless-Error Review for Plea Colloquy Omissions: United States v. Robert Smith, Jr. (4th Cir. 2025)

Forfeiture of Unraised Rule 11 Challenges and Harmless-Error Review for Plea Colloquy Omissions: United States v. Robert Smith, Jr. (4th Cir. 2025)

Date: Oct 17, 2025
Forfeiture of Unraised Rule 11 Challenges and Harmless-Error Review for Plea Colloquy Omissions: United States v. Robert Smith, Jr. (4th Cir. 2025) Introduction In United States v. Robert Smith, Jr.,...
When the BIA Misapplies Clear-Error Review, the Tenth Circuit May Reinstate an IJ’s Asylum Grant Without Remand

When the BIA Misapplies Clear-Error Review, the Tenth Circuit May Reinstate an IJ’s Asylum Grant Without Remand

Date: Oct 17, 2025
When the BIA Misapplies Clear-Error Review, the Tenth Circuit May Reinstate an IJ’s Asylum Grant Without Remand Introduction In Ramos v. Bondi, the Tenth Circuit issued a precedential opinion that...
Futility Trumps the Ordinary-Remand Rule: Tenth Circuit Polices BIA’s Clear-Error Review and Orders Reinstatement of Asylum

Futility Trumps the Ordinary-Remand Rule: Tenth Circuit Polices BIA’s Clear-Error Review and Orders Reinstatement of Asylum

Date: Oct 17, 2025
Futility Trumps the Ordinary-Remand Rule: Tenth Circuit Polices BIA’s Clear-Error Review and Orders Reinstatement of Asylum Introduction Ramos v. Bondi is a published decision of the U.S. Court of...
No Appeal, No Exhaustion: The Tenth Circuit Confirms Postage Receipts Don’t Prove PLRA Exhaustion in Wiggins v. Hatch

No Appeal, No Exhaustion: The Tenth Circuit Confirms Postage Receipts Don’t Prove PLRA Exhaustion in Wiggins v. Hatch

Date: Oct 17, 2025
No Appeal, No Exhaustion: The Tenth Circuit Confirms Postage Receipts Don’t Prove PLRA Exhaustion in Wiggins v. Hatch Introduction In Wiggins v. Hatch, Nos. 24-2159 & 24-2160 (10th Cir. Oct. 15,...
Wiggins v. Hatch: Proof of PLRA Exhaustion Requires Documented Grievance Appeals—Generic Postage Charges Are Insufficient

Wiggins v. Hatch: Proof of PLRA Exhaustion Requires Documented Grievance Appeals—Generic Postage Charges Are Insufficient

Date: Oct 17, 2025
Wiggins v. Hatch: Proof of PLRA Exhaustion Requires Documented Grievance Appeals—Generic Postage Charges Are Insufficient Introduction In Wiggins v. Hatch, the Tenth Circuit affirmed a district...
Ohio Supreme Court Caps Clerk Technology Fee at $1 Total Per Service for “Complete Record” Charges, Not Per Page

Ohio Supreme Court Caps Clerk Technology Fee at $1 Total Per Service for “Complete Record” Charges, Not Per Page

Date: Oct 17, 2025
Ohio Supreme Court Caps Clerk Technology Fee at $1 Total Per Service for “Complete Record” Charges, Not Per Page Case: State ex rel. Gault v. Medina County Court of Common Pleas Clerk, Slip Opinion...
Timeliness Is for the Arbitrator: Ohio Supreme Court Bars Employer Self‑Help on Arbitration Deadlines and Requires SERB to Explain ULP Dismissals

Timeliness Is for the Arbitrator: Ohio Supreme Court Bars Employer Self‑Help on Arbitration Deadlines and Requires SERB to Explain ULP Dismissals

Date: Oct 17, 2025
Timeliness Is for the Arbitrator: Ohio Supreme Court Bars Employer Self‑Help on Arbitration Deadlines and Requires SERB to Explain ULP Dismissals Introduction In State ex rel. Staple v. State...
Privilege Follows the Reporting: Montana High Court Holds Place of Newsgathering Governs Media-Subpoena Privileges

Privilege Follows the Reporting: Montana High Court Holds Place of Newsgathering Governs Media-Subpoena Privileges

Date: Oct 17, 2025
Privilege Follows the Reporting: Montana High Court Holds Place of Newsgathering Governs Media-Subpoena Privileges Introduction In EQT CHAP LLC v. Environmental Health Sciences, 2025 MT 237, the...
Interpreter Ambiguity, Written Translations, and Anders/Rule 26(c) Review Clarified: Muniz‑Rodriguez v. State

Interpreter Ambiguity, Written Translations, and Anders/Rule 26(c) Review Clarified: Muniz‑Rodriguez v. State

Date: Oct 17, 2025
Interpreter Ambiguity, Written Translations, and Anders/Rule 26(c) Review Clarified: Muniz‑Rodriguez v. State Introduction In Muniz‑Rodriguez v. State, No. 120, 2025 (Del. Oct. 14, 2025), the...
Disqualifying Faction Counsel from Representing the Entity in Control Disputes; Injunction Undertakings Must Be Tied to Non‑Speculative Damages

Disqualifying Faction Counsel from Representing the Entity in Control Disputes; Injunction Undertakings Must Be Tied to Non‑Speculative Damages

Date: Oct 17, 2025
Disqualifying Faction Counsel from Representing the Entity in Control Disputes; Injunction Undertakings Must Be Tied to Non‑Speculative Damages Introduction In Congregation Erech Shai Bais Yosef,...
Second Department Confirms Retroactive Reach of FAPA: Voluntary Discontinuance Cannot De‑Accelerate or Reset the Mortgage Foreclosure Limitations Period

Second Department Confirms Retroactive Reach of FAPA: Voluntary Discontinuance Cannot De‑Accelerate or Reset the Mortgage Foreclosure Limitations Period

Date: Oct 17, 2025
Second Department Confirms Retroactive Reach of FAPA: Voluntary Discontinuance Cannot De‑Accelerate or Reset the Mortgage Foreclosure Limitations Period Introduction In GITSIT Solutions, LLC v....
CVA Revival Upheld; Negligent Supervision and IIED Claims Against Institutions May Proceed While Vicarious Liability for Sexual Assault Is Dismissed: Georgiou v. St. Irene Monastery

CVA Revival Upheld; Negligent Supervision and IIED Claims Against Institutions May Proceed While Vicarious Liability for Sexual Assault Is Dismissed: Georgiou v. St. Irene Monastery

Date: Oct 17, 2025
CVA Revival Upheld; Negligent Supervision and IIED Claims Against Institutions May Proceed While Vicarious Liability for Sexual Assault Is Dismissed: Georgiou v. St. Irene Monastery Introduction In...
Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert