Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

battery-claims-excluded-under-ftca& Case Commentaries

Forbearance of Divorce as Valid Consideration, Yet Oral Promises to Convey Realty Remain Unenforceable Against Subsequent Purchasers Absent Writing or “Unequivocally Referable” Part Performance — Makransky v. Makransky (2d Dep’t 2025)

Forbearance of Divorce as Valid Consideration, Yet Oral Promises to Convey Realty Remain Unenforceable Against Subsequent Purchasers Absent Writing or “Unequivocally Referable” Part Performance — Makransky v. Makransky (2d Dep’t 2025)

Date: Oct 17, 2025
Forbearance of Divorce as Valid Consideration, Yet Oral Promises to Convey Realty Remain Unenforceable Against Subsequent Purchasers Absent Writing or “Unequivocally Referable” Part Performance —...
Firmly Affixed Allonges and First‑Hand Mailing Proof as Nonnegotiable Conditions Precedent in New York Foreclosures: Onewest Bank FSB v. Thomas

Firmly Affixed Allonges and First‑Hand Mailing Proof as Nonnegotiable Conditions Precedent in New York Foreclosures: Onewest Bank FSB v. Thomas

Date: Oct 17, 2025
Firmly Affixed Allonges and First‑Hand Mailing Proof as Nonnegotiable Conditions Precedent in New York Foreclosures: Onewest Bank FSB v. Thomas Introduction In Onewest Bank FSB v. Thomas, 2025 NY...
Canon 3(C) Clarified: No Misconduct Where a Judge Promptly Invokes Article 154’s Ad Hoc Recusal Procedure; Thirty‑Day Suspension for Injudicious Demeanor

Canon 3(C) Clarified: No Misconduct Where a Judge Promptly Invokes Article 154’s Ad Hoc Recusal Procedure; Thirty‑Day Suspension for Injudicious Demeanor

Date: Oct 17, 2025
Canon 3(C) Clarified: No Misconduct Where a Judge Promptly Invokes Article 154’s Ad Hoc Recusal Procedure; Thirty‑Day Suspension for Injudicious Demeanor Introduction The Supreme Court of Louisiana’s...
Per-Unit Statute of Repose Under OCGA § 51-1-11(b)(2): Georgia Supreme Court Holds Repose Runs From the First Sale of Each Unit, Not From a Plaintiff’s Earliest Purchase

Per-Unit Statute of Repose Under OCGA § 51-1-11(b)(2): Georgia Supreme Court Holds Repose Runs From the First Sale of Each Unit, Not From a Plaintiff’s Earliest Purchase

Date: Oct 17, 2025
Per-Unit Statute of Repose Under OCGA § 51-1-11(b)(2): Georgia Supreme Court Holds Repose Runs From the First Sale of Each Unit, Not From a Plaintiff’s Earliest Purchase Introduction In Burroughs v....

      Georgia Supreme Court Bars Use of Arrest Warrants and Indictments for Impeachment Under OCGA § 24-6-609; Ineffective-Assistance Claims Fail Absent Prejudice — Commentary on Copney v. State (Ga. 2025)

Georgia Supreme Court Bars Use of Arrest Warrants and Indictments for Impeachment Under OCGA § 24-6-609; Ineffective-Assistance Claims Fail Absent Prejudice — Commentary on Copney v. State (Ga. 2025)

Date: Oct 17, 2025
Georgia Supreme Court Bars Use of Arrest Warrants and Indictments for Impeachment Under OCGA § 24-6-609; Ineffective-Assistance Claims Fail Absent Prejudice Introduction In Copney v. State, S25A0877...
Stormwater Utility Charges Are Fees, Not Taxes: Georgia Supreme Court Reaffirms Homewood I and Clarifies Takings Doctrine After Sheetz

Stormwater Utility Charges Are Fees, Not Taxes: Georgia Supreme Court Reaffirms Homewood I and Clarifies Takings Doctrine After Sheetz

Date: Oct 17, 2025
Stormwater Utility Charges Are Fees, Not Taxes: Georgia Supreme Court Reaffirms Homewood I and Clarifies Takings Doctrine After Sheetz Introduction In Homewood Associates, Inc. et al. v. Unified...
Legitimation Against the Marital Presumption: Georgia Supreme Court Leaves Best‑Interests Framework Intact and Calls for Legislative Clarification

Legitimation Against the Marital Presumption: Georgia Supreme Court Leaves Best‑Interests Framework Intact and Calls for Legislative Clarification

Date: Oct 17, 2025
Legitimation Against the Marital Presumption: Georgia Supreme Court Leaves Best‑Interests Framework Intact and Calls for Legislative Clarification Introduction In Marquez v. Aguirre, Case No....
Moss v. State: Ambiguous Self-Referential Statements Do Not Clearly Trigger Georgia’s Confession-Corroboration Rule; Unsettled Status of Offense Captions as Factual Allegations; Particularity of Cell-Phone Warrants Reaffirmed Through Pugh/Wilson Framework

Moss v. State: Ambiguous Self-Referential Statements Do Not Clearly Trigger Georgia’s Confession-Corroboration Rule; Unsettled Status of Offense Captions as Factual Allegations; Particularity of Cell-Phone Warrants Reaffirmed Through Pugh/Wilson Framework

Date: Oct 17, 2025
Moss v. State: Ambiguous Self-Referential Statements Do Not Clearly Trigger Georgia’s Confession-Corroboration Rule; Unsettled Status of Offense Captions as Factual Allegations; Particularity of...
Redressability at the Core of Georgia’s Actual-Controversy Requirement: Plaintiffs Must Sue the Actor Causing the Injury

Redressability at the Core of Georgia’s Actual-Controversy Requirement: Plaintiffs Must Sue the Actor Causing the Injury

Date: Oct 17, 2025
Redressability at the Core of Georgia’s Actual-Controversy Requirement: Plaintiffs Must Sue the Actor Causing the Injury Introduction This commentary examines the Supreme Court of Georgia’s decision...
Plain Error at the Time of Appeal—With a Prospective Caveat: Georgia High Court Holds Daubert Inapplicable to Pre‑2022 Criminal Trials and Reaffirms Harper/Belton for Footwear Testimony

Plain Error at the Time of Appeal—With a Prospective Caveat: Georgia High Court Holds Daubert Inapplicable to Pre‑2022 Criminal Trials and Reaffirms Harper/Belton for Footwear Testimony

Date: Oct 17, 2025
Plain Error at the Time of Appeal—With a Prospective Caveat: Georgia High Court Holds Daubert Inapplicable to Pre‑2022 Criminal Trials and Reaffirms Harper/Belton for Footwear Testimony Introduction...
Actual Knowledge Is Awareness of the Hazard Itself, Not Its Precise Location: Georgia Supreme Court Clarifies “Specific Hazard” and Limits Constructive-Knowledge Principles in Premises Liability

Actual Knowledge Is Awareness of the Hazard Itself, Not Its Precise Location: Georgia Supreme Court Clarifies “Specific Hazard” and Limits Constructive-Knowledge Principles in Premises Liability

Date: Oct 17, 2025
Actual Knowledge Is Awareness of the Hazard Itself, Not Its Precise Location: Georgia Supreme Court Clarifies “Specific Hazard” and Limits Constructive-Knowledge Principles in Premises Liability...
Smith v. State: Clarifying the Timberlake Framework for Extraordinary Motions Based on New Expert Scientific Analysis

Smith v. State: Clarifying the Timberlake Framework for Extraordinary Motions Based on New Expert Scientific Analysis

Date: Oct 17, 2025
Smith v. State: Clarifying the Timberlake Framework for Extraordinary Motions Based on New Expert Scientific Analysis Court: Supreme Court of Georgia Date: October 15, 2025 Citation: S25A0548 Author:...
No “Basic Fairness” Shortcut: Georgia Supreme Court Requires Explicit Rule 401/403 Analysis Before Excluding Social-Media Gang Evidence (State v. Sims)

No “Basic Fairness” Shortcut: Georgia Supreme Court Requires Explicit Rule 401/403 Analysis Before Excluding Social-Media Gang Evidence (State v. Sims)

Date: Oct 17, 2025
No “Basic Fairness” Shortcut: Georgia Supreme Court Requires Explicit Rule 401/403 Analysis Before Excluding Social-Media Gang Evidence Commentary on State v. Sims, Supreme Court of Georgia (Oct. 15,...
Taylor v. State: Unpreserved Fourth Amendment Attacks on Social Media and Cell-Phone Warrants Face Plain-Error Review; Cumulative Digital Communications Render Any Error Harmless

Taylor v. State: Unpreserved Fourth Amendment Attacks on Social Media and Cell-Phone Warrants Face Plain-Error Review; Cumulative Digital Communications Render Any Error Harmless

Date: Oct 17, 2025
Taylor v. State: Unpreserved Fourth Amendment Attacks on Social Media and Cell-Phone Warrants Face Plain-Error Review; Cumulative Digital Communications Render Any Error Harmless Introduction In...
Voluntary Intoxication Instructions in Georgia Must Include “Permanent Brain Function Alteration” Limitation; Intoxication Alone Does Not Render a Confession Involuntary Absent Police Coercion

Voluntary Intoxication Instructions in Georgia Must Include “Permanent Brain Function Alteration” Limitation; Intoxication Alone Does Not Render a Confession Involuntary Absent Police Coercion

Date: Oct 17, 2025
Voluntary Intoxication Instructions in Georgia Must Include “Permanent Brain Function Alteration” Limitation; Intoxication Alone Does Not Render a Confession Involuntary Absent Police Coercion...
Baseless Damages Theories and Bad-Faith Settlement Tactics Can Render a Lanham Act Case “Exceptional” and Support § 1927 Sanctions: Second Circuit Affirms Fee Award and Joint-and-Several Liability Without a Hearing

Baseless Damages Theories and Bad-Faith Settlement Tactics Can Render a Lanham Act Case “Exceptional” and Support § 1927 Sanctions: Second Circuit Affirms Fee Award and Joint-and-Several Liability Without a Hearing

Date: Oct 17, 2025
Baseless Damages Theories and Bad-Faith Settlement Tactics Can Render a Lanham Act Case “Exceptional” and Support § 1927 Sanctions: Second Circuit Affirms Fee Award and Joint-and-Several Liability...
Basra v. Bondi: Reaffirming Strict Limits on Untimely, Number‑Barred Motions to Reopen—No Changed‑Conditions Reopening Without Credibility Rehabilitation; Equitable Tolling Requires Diligence

Basra v. Bondi: Reaffirming Strict Limits on Untimely, Number‑Barred Motions to Reopen—No Changed‑Conditions Reopening Without Credibility Rehabilitation; Equitable Tolling Requires Diligence

Date: Oct 17, 2025
Basra v. Bondi: Reaffirming Strict Limits on Untimely, Number‑Barred Motions to Reopen—No Changed‑Conditions Reopening Without Credibility Rehabilitation; Equitable Tolling Requires Diligence...
Unlicensed Home Health Aides Are Not Covered: Second Circuit’s Nonprecedential Clarification of Brighthouse’s Home Health Care Benefits

Unlicensed Home Health Aides Are Not Covered: Second Circuit’s Nonprecedential Clarification of Brighthouse’s Home Health Care Benefits

Date: Oct 17, 2025
Unlicensed Home Health Aides Are Not Covered: Second Circuit’s Nonprecedential Clarification of Brighthouse’s Home Health Care Benefits Case: Jackling v. Brighthouse Life Insurance Company (No....
Misconduct Is Not Disability Discrimination: Second Circuit Reaffirms that the ADA Does Not Require Excusing Disruptive Conduct and Demands Plausible Causation for Discrimination, Accommodation, and Retaliation Claims in Youth Sports Settings

Misconduct Is Not Disability Discrimination: Second Circuit Reaffirms that the ADA Does Not Require Excusing Disruptive Conduct and Demands Plausible Causation for Discrimination, Accommodation, and Retaliation Claims in Youth Sports Settings

Date: Oct 17, 2025
Misconduct Is Not Disability Discrimination: Second Circuit Reaffirms that the ADA Does Not Require Excusing Disruptive Conduct and Demands Plausible Causation for Discrimination, Accommodation, and...
Foreseeability and Realistic Opportunity to Intervene: Second Circuit Reaffirms Deliberate Indifference Pleading Standards and Duplicative Official-Capacity Claims in Montgomery v. Orange County

Foreseeability and Realistic Opportunity to Intervene: Second Circuit Reaffirms Deliberate Indifference Pleading Standards and Duplicative Official-Capacity Claims in Montgomery v. Orange County

Date: Oct 17, 2025
Foreseeability and Realistic Opportunity to Intervene: Second Circuit Reaffirms Deliberate Indifference Pleading Standards and Duplicative Official-Capacity Claims in Montgomery v. Orange County...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert