Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

10th Circuit Case Commentaries

“The Peck Rule”: When a Third-Party’s State-Law Title Trumps Federal Relation-Back in Criminal Forfeiture

“The Peck Rule”: When a Third-Party’s State-Law Title Trumps Federal Relation-Back in Criminal Forfeiture

Date: Jun 11, 2025
“The Peck Rule” – A Tenth Circuit Blueprint for Ancillary Proceedings: State-Law Superior Interests Defeat Federal Forfeiture Even Where “Tainted” Funds Enhanced the Property 1. Introduction United...
Priority of State-Law Ownership over Federal Forfeiture: A Commentary on United States v. Peck (10th Cir. 2025)

Priority of State-Law Ownership over Federal Forfeiture: A Commentary on United States v. Peck (10th Cir. 2025)

Date: Jun 11, 2025
Priority of State-Law Ownership over Federal Forfeiture: A Commentary on United States v. Peck (10th Cir. 2025) 1. Introduction In United States v. Peck, the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Certificate of Appealability Required for Habeas Challenges to Interstate Custody Transfers under 18 U.S.C. § 3623

Certificate of Appealability Required for Habeas Challenges to Interstate Custody Transfers under 18 U.S.C. § 3623

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Certificate of Appealability Required for Habeas Challenges to Interstate Custody Transfers under 18 U.S.C. § 3623 Introduction In Hanson v. Quick, the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth...
Ensuring Mutual Assent in Arbitration: Parisi v. GreenSky Clarifies Contract Formation

Ensuring Mutual Assent in Arbitration: Parisi v. GreenSky Clarifies Contract Formation

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Ensuring Mutual Assent in Arbitration: Parisi v. GreenSky Clarifies Contract Formation Introduction The Tenth Circuit’s decision in Parisi v. GreenSky (10th Cir. 2025) addresses a fundamental...
Arbitration Requires a Validly Formed Contract: Mutual Assent on Essential Terms

Arbitration Requires a Validly Formed Contract: Mutual Assent on Essential Terms

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Arbitration Requires a Validly Formed Contract: Mutual Assent on Essential Terms Introduction This commentary examines the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit decision in Parisi v....
Angarita-Quezada v. Garland: Clarifying Persecution and Government Protection Standards in LGBTQ Asylum Claims

Angarita-Quezada v. Garland: Clarifying Persecution and Government Protection Standards in LGBTQ Asylum Claims

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Angarita-Quezada v. Garland: Clarifying Persecution and Government Protection Standards in LGBTQ Asylum Claims Introduction This case involves Diana Fernanda Angarita-Quezada, a Colombian national,...
Mutual Assent and Arbitration: Parisi v. GreenSky Clarifies Formation of Valid Arbitration Agreements

Mutual Assent and Arbitration: Parisi v. GreenSky Clarifies Formation of Valid Arbitration Agreements

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Mutual Assent and Arbitration: Parisi v. GreenSky Clarifies Formation of Valid Arbitration Agreements Introduction Parisi v. GreenSky, LLC et al., decided June 6, 2025 by the United States Court of...
Life Sentencing Beyond the Guidelines for Second-Degree Murder in Indian Country:  Clarifying the Role of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) in United States v. Washington

Life Sentencing Beyond the Guidelines for Second-Degree Murder in Indian Country: Clarifying the Role of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) in United States v. Washington

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Life Sentencing Beyond the Guidelines for Second-Degree Murder in Indian Country: Clarifying the Role of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) in United States v. Washington Introduction United States v. Washington,...
Restricting Federal Habeas Relief Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 to Underlying Conviction Challenges: Excluding Post-Conviction Procedural Claims

Restricting Federal Habeas Relief Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 to Underlying Conviction Challenges: Excluding Post-Conviction Procedural Claims

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Restricting Federal Habeas Relief Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 to Underlying Conviction Challenges: Excluding Post-Conviction Procedural Claims Introduction Williams v. Bridges, No. 25-6025 (10th Cir. June...
Clarifying the “Exceptional and Extremely Unusual Hardship” Standard Under 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(1)(D): Hermosillo-Robles v. Bondi

Clarifying the “Exceptional and Extremely Unusual Hardship” Standard Under 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(1)(D): Hermosillo-Robles v. Bondi

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Clarifying the “Exceptional and Extremely Unusually Hardship” Standard Under 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(1)(D) Introduction In Hermosillo-Robles v. Bondi, 10th Cir. No. 24-9552 (June 4, 2025), the United...
Clarifying U.S.S.G. §2L1.2 Enhancement: “Sentence Imposed” and Adequacy of Within-Guidelines Explanations

Clarifying U.S.S.G. §2L1.2 Enhancement: “Sentence Imposed” and Adequacy of Within-Guidelines Explanations

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Clarifying U.S.S.G. §2L1.2 Enhancement: “Sentence Imposed” and Adequacy of Within-Guidelines Explanations Introduction In United States v. Carvajal-Andujar, the Tenth Circuit addressed two recurring...
Appellate Waiver Enforcement and Its Exceptions: Clarifying the Hahn Test in United States v. Vessell

Appellate Waiver Enforcement and Its Exceptions: Clarifying the Hahn Test in United States v. Vessell

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Appellate Waiver Enforcement and Its Exceptions: Clarifying the Hahn Test in United States v. Vessell Introduction United States v. Vessell (10th Cir. June 4, 2025) addresses the enforceability of a...
Judicial Restraint in Extending Bivens to Eighth Amendment Claims for Unsanitary Prison Conditions

Judicial Restraint in Extending Bivens to Eighth Amendment Claims for Unsanitary Prison Conditions

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Judicial Restraint in Extending Bivens to Eighth Amendment Claims for Unsanitary Prison Conditions Introduction Walker v. Hudson, decided June 4, 2025 by the Tenth Circuit, illustrates the federal...
Crayton v. Bank of America: Stringent Requirements for Pleading Fraudulent Concealment Tolling

Crayton v. Bank of America: Stringent Requirements for Pleading Fraudulent Concealment Tolling

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Crayton v. Bank of America: Stringent Requirements for Pleading Fraudulent Concealment Tolling Introduction In Crayton v. Bank of America, 25-3058 (10th Cir. June 3, 2025), the United States Court of...
Restricting §2241 Habeas Claims for Unauthorized Successive §2254 Petitions: Eaves v. Stancil

Restricting §2241 Habeas Claims for Unauthorized Successive §2254 Petitions: Eaves v. Stancil

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Restricting §2241 Habeas Claims for Unauthorized Successive §2254 Petitions: Eaves v. Stancil Introduction In Eaves v. Stancil, the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied a...
Miranda Custody Threshold in Law Enforcement Vehicles: A Totality of Circumstances Approach

Miranda Custody Threshold in Law Enforcement Vehicles: A Totality of Circumstances Approach

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Miranda Custody Threshold in Law Enforcement Vehicles: A Totality of Circumstances Approach Introduction The case of United States v. Nahkai presents a nuanced examination of the “custodial...
Standards for Counsel Appointment and §3582(c)(1)(A) Compassionate Release in the Tenth Circuit: United States v. Read-Forbes

Standards for Counsel Appointment and §3582(c)(1)(A) Compassionate Release in the Tenth Circuit: United States v. Read-Forbes

Date: Jun 3, 2025
Standards for Counsel Appointment and §3582(c)(1)(A) Compassionate Release in the Tenth Circuit: United States v. Read-Forbes Introduction This commentary examines the Tenth Circuit’s June 2, 2025...
Clarifying the Limits of Bivens and Section 1985(3) Private Entity Liability Absent State Action

Clarifying the Limits of Bivens and Section 1985(3) Private Entity Liability Absent State Action

Date: Jun 3, 2025
Clarifying the Limits of Bivens and Section 1985(3) Private Entity Liability Absent State Action Introduction Fernandez v. Greyhound Lines, Inc. is a June 2, 2025 decision of the United States Court...
Clarifying the Constructive Amendment Doctrine and Post-Expiration Supervised Release Revocation under 18 U.S.C. § 3583(i)

Clarifying the Constructive Amendment Doctrine and Post-Expiration Supervised Release Revocation under 18 U.S.C. § 3583(i)

Date: May 31, 2025
Clarifying the Constructive Amendment Doctrine and Post-Expiration Supervised Release Revocation under 18 U.S.C. § 3583(i) Introduction United States v. Peppers, Nos. 23-3112 & 23-3113 (10th Cir. May...
Schwartz v. Gentempo: Arbitrary Force on Pretrial Detainees Clearly Unlawful Under the Fourteenth Amendment

Schwartz v. Gentempo: Arbitrary Force on Pretrial Detainees Clearly Unlawful Under the Fourteenth Amendment

Date: May 31, 2025
Schwartz v. Gentempo: Arbitrary Force on Pretrial Detainees Clearly Unlawful Under the Fourteenth Amendment 1. Introduction In Schwartz v. Gentempo, 10th Cir. No. 23-1393 (May 30, 2025), the United...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert