Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

10th Circuit Case Commentaries

No Automatic Liberal Construction for Legally Trained Pro Se Litigants; Rule 41(b) Dismissal Affirmed Under Ehrenhaus After Failure to Cure Pleading Defects

No Automatic Liberal Construction for Legally Trained Pro Se Litigants; Rule 41(b) Dismissal Affirmed Under Ehrenhaus After Failure to Cure Pleading Defects

Date: Oct 10, 2025
No Automatic Liberal Construction for Legally Trained Pro Se Litigants; Rule 41(b) Dismissal Affirmed Under Ehrenhaus After Failure to Cure Pleading Defects Introduction In Cohen v. Hartman, No....
Centrality of Motive and the Reporting Requirement: The Tenth Circuit’s Published Clarification on Nexus, State Protection, and Internal Relocation in Mixed‑Motive Asylum Claims (Jimenez v. Bondi)

Centrality of Motive and the Reporting Requirement: The Tenth Circuit’s Published Clarification on Nexus, State Protection, and Internal Relocation in Mixed‑Motive Asylum Claims (Jimenez v. Bondi)

Date: Oct 10, 2025
Centrality of Motive and the Reporting Requirement: The Tenth Circuit’s Published Clarification on Nexus, State Protection, and Internal Relocation in Mixed‑Motive Asylum Claims Introduction In...
No Plain-Error Duty to Advise Juveniles of Murphy’s “Appreciable Period” Requirement for § 1201 Kidnapping

No Plain-Error Duty to Advise Juveniles of Murphy’s “Appreciable Period” Requirement for § 1201 Kidnapping

Date: Oct 10, 2025
No Plain-Error Duty to Advise Juveniles of Murphy’s “Appreciable Period” Requirement for § 1201 Kidnapping Case: United States v. Doe, No. 25-9902 (10th Cir. Oct. 7, 2025) Court: United States Court...
Record-Based Justification Suffices: Tenth Circuit Affirms Alcohol-Abstinence and Bar-Restriction Conditions Under Plain-Error Review Even Without On-the-Record Reasons

Record-Based Justification Suffices: Tenth Circuit Affirms Alcohol-Abstinence and Bar-Restriction Conditions Under Plain-Error Review Even Without On-the-Record Reasons

Date: Oct 10, 2025
Record-Based Justification Suffices: Tenth Circuit Affirms Alcohol-Abstinence and Bar-Restriction Conditions Under Plain-Error Review Even Without On-the-Record Reasons Introduction In United States...
Tenth Circuit Clarifies Evidence Required to Prove Government “Unable or Unwilling” in Failure‑to‑Report Asylum Claims: Rosas‑Garcia v. Bondi

Tenth Circuit Clarifies Evidence Required to Prove Government “Unable or Unwilling” in Failure‑to‑Report Asylum Claims: Rosas‑Garcia v. Bondi

Date: Oct 10, 2025
Tenth Circuit Clarifies Evidence Required to Prove Government “Unable or Unwilling” in Failure‑to‑Report Asylum Claims: Rosas‑Garcia v. Bondi Introduction This commentary examines the Tenth Circuit’s...
No §1983 End‑Run Around Habeas for McGirt‑Based Jurisdictional Challenges; Prospective Relief Against Judges Requires Ongoing Injury

No §1983 End‑Run Around Habeas for McGirt‑Based Jurisdictional Challenges; Prospective Relief Against Judges Requires Ongoing Injury

Date: Oct 5, 2025
No §1983 End‑Run Around Habeas for McGirt‑Based Jurisdictional Challenges; Prospective Relief Against Judges Requires Ongoing Injury Introduction In Davison v. Smith, No. 24-6256 (10th Cir. Oct. 3,...
Gatekeeping, Not Merits: The Tenth Circuit Reaffirms Burns/Dodson Limits on Habeas Review of Nonunanimous Court‑Martial Verdicts and Rejects “Missing Transcript” Attacks

Gatekeeping, Not Merits: The Tenth Circuit Reaffirms Burns/Dodson Limits on Habeas Review of Nonunanimous Court‑Martial Verdicts and Rejects “Missing Transcript” Attacks

Date: Oct 5, 2025
Gatekeeping, Not Merits: The Tenth Circuit Reaffirms Burns/Dodson Limits on Habeas Review of Nonunanimous Court‑Martial Verdicts and Rejects “Missing Transcript” Attacks Introduction In Livingston v....
Modoc Nation v. Shah: Collateral-Order Review of Denials of Tribal and State-Law Immunities; No Tribal Sovereign Immunity in Individual-Capacity Suits Against Tribal Officials

Modoc Nation v. Shah: Collateral-Order Review of Denials of Tribal and State-Law Immunities; No Tribal Sovereign Immunity in Individual-Capacity Suits Against Tribal Officials

Date: Oct 5, 2025
Modoc Nation v. Shah: Collateral-Order Review of Denials of Tribal and State-Law Immunities; No Tribal Sovereign Immunity in Individual-Capacity Suits Against Tribal Officials Court: United States...
Intoxication-Like Symptoms Are Not an “Obvious” Medical Risk: Tenth Circuit Affirms DUI Probable Cause and Rejects Deliberate-Indifference and Monell Claims in Waters v. City of Altus

Intoxication-Like Symptoms Are Not an “Obvious” Medical Risk: Tenth Circuit Affirms DUI Probable Cause and Rejects Deliberate-Indifference and Monell Claims in Waters v. City of Altus

Date: Oct 5, 2025
Intoxication-Like Symptoms Are Not an “Obvious” Medical Risk: Tenth Circuit Affirms DUI Probable Cause and Rejects Deliberate-Indifference and Monell Claims in Waters v. City of Altus Introduction In...
Affirming Major Upward Variances to the Statutory Maximum: Deference to § 3553(a) Balancing and No Duty to Address Hypothetical Guideline Ranges for Dismissed Counts

Affirming Major Upward Variances to the Statutory Maximum: Deference to § 3553(a) Balancing and No Duty to Address Hypothetical Guideline Ranges for Dismissed Counts

Date: Oct 4, 2025
Affirming Major Upward Variances to the Statutory Maximum: Deference to § 3553(a) Balancing and No Duty to Address Hypothetical Guideline Ranges for Dismissed Counts Introduction In United States v....
Pleading-Stage Statute-of-Limitations Dismissals and No Tolling by Kansas § 12-105b for § 1983 Claims: Boldridge v. City of Atchison (10th Cir. 2025)

Pleading-Stage Statute-of-Limitations Dismissals and No Tolling by Kansas § 12-105b for § 1983 Claims: Boldridge v. City of Atchison (10th Cir. 2025)

Date: Oct 4, 2025
Pleading-Stage Statute-of-Limitations Dismissals and No Tolling by Kansas § 12-105b for § 1983 Claims: Boldridge v. City of Atchison (10th Cir. 2025) Court: United States Court of Appeals for the...
No Standing Without Specific Plans and Redressability Amid Overlapping Firearm Bans: The Tenth Circuit’s Guidance in Springer v. Grisham

No Standing Without Specific Plans and Redressability Amid Overlapping Firearm Bans: The Tenth Circuit’s Guidance in Springer v. Grisham

Date: Oct 4, 2025
No Standing Without Specific Plans and Redressability Amid Overlapping Firearm Bans: The Tenth Circuit’s Guidance in Springer v. Grisham Springer v. Grisham, Nos. 23-2192 & 23-2194 (10th Cir. Oct. 1,...
Concrete Plans and Overlapping Laws: Tenth Circuit Tightens Pre‑Enforcement Standing in Second Amendment Challenges

Concrete Plans and Overlapping Laws: Tenth Circuit Tightens Pre‑Enforcement Standing in Second Amendment Challenges

Date: Oct 4, 2025
Concrete Plans and Overlapping Laws: Tenth Circuit Tightens Pre‑Enforcement Standing in Second Amendment Challenges Introduction In Springer v. Grisham, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth...
Intrinsic Evidence and VICAR Motive: The Tenth Circuit’s DeLeon Decision Clarifies Preservation Duties, Admissibility of Gang-Violence Context, and Reviewability of Rule 37 Denials

Intrinsic Evidence and VICAR Motive: The Tenth Circuit’s DeLeon Decision Clarifies Preservation Duties, Admissibility of Gang-Violence Context, and Reviewability of Rule 37 Denials

Date: Oct 4, 2025
Intrinsic Evidence and VICAR Motive: The Tenth Circuit’s DeLeon Decision Clarifies Preservation Duties, Admissibility of Gang-Violence Context, and Reviewability of Rule 37 Denials Introduction In...
No Free Appellate Stay: Tenth Circuit BAP Affirms Conversion Where Chapter 11 Was Used to Avoid a Supersedeas Bond Absent Immediate Financial Distress

No Free Appellate Stay: Tenth Circuit BAP Affirms Conversion Where Chapter 11 Was Used to Avoid a Supersedeas Bond Absent Immediate Financial Distress

Date: Oct 2, 2025
No Free Appellate Stay: Tenth Circuit BAP Affirms Conversion Where Chapter 11 Was Used to Avoid a Supersedeas Bond Absent Immediate Financial Distress Introduction This commentary examines the Tenth...
Ivey v. Tuggle: State‑Law Attacks on Prison Administrative Reclassification and 85% Credit Eligibility Are Not Cognizable Under § 2241

Ivey v. Tuggle: State‑Law Attacks on Prison Administrative Reclassification and 85% Credit Eligibility Are Not Cognizable Under § 2241

Date: Oct 2, 2025
Ivey v. Tuggle: State‑Law Attacks on Prison Administrative Reclassification and 85% Credit Eligibility Are Not Cognizable Under § 2241 Introduction In Ivey v. Tuggle, No. 25-7049 (10th Cir. Sept. 30,...
Private Resort to Courts Is Not “State Action”: Tenth Circuit Affirms § 1983 Dismissal and Clarifies Post–Rule 59(e) Appellate Requirements in Pollak v. Strong

Private Resort to Courts Is Not “State Action”: Tenth Circuit Affirms § 1983 Dismissal and Clarifies Post–Rule 59(e) Appellate Requirements in Pollak v. Strong

Date: Oct 2, 2025
Private Resort to Courts Is Not “State Action”: Tenth Circuit Affirms § 1983 Dismissal and Clarifies Post–Rule 59(e) Appellate Requirements in Pollak v. Strong Court: United States Court of Appeals...
Neutral, Generally Applicable Funding Conditions: Tenth Circuit Upholds Colorado’s UPK Nondiscrimination Rule and Limits Expressive Association in Preschool Admissions

Neutral, Generally Applicable Funding Conditions: Tenth Circuit Upholds Colorado’s UPK Nondiscrimination Rule and Limits Expressive Association in Preschool Admissions

Date: Oct 2, 2025
Neutral, Generally Applicable Funding Conditions: Tenth Circuit Upholds Colorado’s UPK Nondiscrimination Rule and Limits Expressive Association in Preschool Admissions Introduction In St. Mary...
Reckless-Force Robbery and the ACCA: Tenth Circuit Declares Oklahoma Armed Robbery Not a “Violent Felony” Under § 924(e)(2)(B)(i)

Reckless-Force Robbery and the ACCA: Tenth Circuit Declares Oklahoma Armed Robbery Not a “Violent Felony” Under § 924(e)(2)(B)(i)

Date: Oct 2, 2025
Reckless-Force Robbery and the ACCA: Tenth Circuit Declares Oklahoma Armed Robbery Not a “Violent Felony” Under § 924(e)(2)(B)(i) Introduction In United States v. Campbell (10th Cir. Sept. 30, 2025),...
McCane Still Controls After Rahimi: Tenth Circuit Reaffirms § 922(g)(1)’s Constitutionality and Clarifies Preservation When the District Court Acts Sua Sponte

McCane Still Controls After Rahimi: Tenth Circuit Reaffirms § 922(g)(1)’s Constitutionality and Clarifies Preservation When the District Court Acts Sua Sponte

Date: Oct 2, 2025
McCane Still Controls After Rahimi: Tenth Circuit Reaffirms § 922(g)(1)’s Constitutionality and Clarifies Preservation When the District Court Acts Sua Sponte Introduction In United States v. Forbis...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert