Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

10th Circuit Case Commentaries

Gross Receipts Plus Silence: Tenth Circuit Adopts Tax-Style Burden of Production for Expenses in SSA Disability-Fraud and Expands Loss to Foreseeable Dependent and Post-Period Benefits

Gross Receipts Plus Silence: Tenth Circuit Adopts Tax-Style Burden of Production for Expenses in SSA Disability-Fraud and Expands Loss to Foreseeable Dependent and Post-Period Benefits

Date: Oct 2, 2025
Gross Receipts Plus Silence: Tenth Circuit Adopts Tax-Style Burden of Production for Expenses in SSA Disability-Fraud and Expands Loss to Foreseeable Dependent and Post-Period Benefits Introduction...
United States v. Sisney (10th Cir. 2025): Strict Enforcement of Plain-Error Briefing for Unpreserved Challenges to Supervised-Release Conditions

United States v. Sisney (10th Cir. 2025): Strict Enforcement of Plain-Error Briefing for Unpreserved Challenges to Supervised-Release Conditions

Date: Oct 2, 2025
United States v. Sisney (10th Cir. 2025): Strict Enforcement of Plain-Error Briefing for Unpreserved Challenges to Supervised-Release Conditions Introduction This commentary analyzes the Tenth...
Post-Rahimi Reaffirmation in the Tenth Circuit: § 922(g)(1) Remains Valid Against Nonviolent Felons; Sua Sponte Rulings Preserve Issues for Appeal

Post-Rahimi Reaffirmation in the Tenth Circuit: § 922(g)(1) Remains Valid Against Nonviolent Felons; Sua Sponte Rulings Preserve Issues for Appeal

Date: Oct 2, 2025
Post-Rahimi Reaffirmation in the Tenth Circuit: § 922(g)(1) Remains Valid Against Nonviolent Felons; Sua Sponte Rulings Preserve Issues for Appeal Introduction In this consolidated order and...
Tenth Circuit Adopts a Case-Specific Reading of 18 U.S.C. § 3283: Extended Limitations for Child Sexual Abuse Apply Without the Categorical Approach

Tenth Circuit Adopts a Case-Specific Reading of 18 U.S.C. § 3283: Extended Limitations for Child Sexual Abuse Apply Without the Categorical Approach

Date: Oct 2, 2025
Tenth Circuit Adopts a Case-Specific Reading of 18 U.S.C. § 3283: Extended Limitations for Child Sexual Abuse Apply Without the Categorical Approach Introduction In United States v. Tso, the Tenth...
Concrete Plans and Overlapping Bans: Tenth Circuit Clarifies Standing for Pre‑Enforcement Second Amendment “Sensitive Places” Challenges

Concrete Plans and Overlapping Bans: Tenth Circuit Clarifies Standing for Pre‑Enforcement Second Amendment “Sensitive Places” Challenges

Date: Oct 2, 2025
Concrete Plans and Overlapping Bans: Tenth Circuit Clarifies Standing for Pre‑Enforcement Second Amendment “Sensitive Places” Challenges Introduction In Springer v. Grisham, Nos. 23‑2192 & 23‑2194...
Tenth Circuit Clarifies that Broad Habitability Exclusions Defeat the Duty to Defend Even When Claims Are Pleaded as Negligence

Tenth Circuit Clarifies that Broad Habitability Exclusions Defeat the Duty to Defend Even When Claims Are Pleaded as Negligence

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Tenth Circuit Clarifies that Broad Habitability Exclusions Defeat the Duty to Defend Even When Claims Are Pleaded as Negligence Case: Atain Specialty Insurance Company v. Eagle's Pointe, LLC, No....
Time-of-Decision Controls Qualifying-Child Status Under § 1229b(b)(1)(D); Post-Loper Bright, No Agency Deference; BIA’s Waiver Determinations Constrained by 8 C.F.R. § 1003.3(b)

Time-of-Decision Controls Qualifying-Child Status Under § 1229b(b)(1)(D); Post-Loper Bright, No Agency Deference; BIA’s Waiver Determinations Constrained by 8 C.F.R. § 1003.3(b)

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Time-of-Decision Controls Qualifying-Child Status Under § 1229b(b)(1)(D); Post-Loper Bright, No Agency Deference; BIA’s Waiver Determinations Constrained by 8 C.F.R. § 1003.3(b) Introduction In...
Failure to Attend Successor Onboarding Is Not an Adverse Action by the Outgoing Employer: The Tenth Circuit’s ADA Baseline in Swepson v. Aimbridge

Failure to Attend Successor Onboarding Is Not an Adverse Action by the Outgoing Employer: The Tenth Circuit’s ADA Baseline in Swepson v. Aimbridge

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Failure to Attend Successor Onboarding Is Not an Adverse Action by the Outgoing Employer: The Tenth Circuit’s ADA Baseline in Swepson v. Aimbridge Introduction In Swepson v. Aimbridge Employee...
Tenth Circuit Confirms Materiality of Form 4473 Indictment Question: § 922(a)(6) Convictions Stand Because § 922(n) Is Facially Constitutional (United States v. Peavler)

Tenth Circuit Confirms Materiality of Form 4473 Indictment Question: § 922(a)(6) Convictions Stand Because § 922(n) Is Facially Constitutional (United States v. Peavler)

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Tenth Circuit Confirms Materiality of Form 4473 Indictment Question: § 922(a)(6) Convictions Stand Because § 922(n) Is Facially Constitutional (United States v. Peavler) Note: This Order and Judgment...
No Right to Nullify Materiality: Tenth Circuit Holds False Denial of Felony Indictment on Form 4473 Is Actionable Because § 922(n) Is Facially Valid

No Right to Nullify Materiality: Tenth Circuit Holds False Denial of Felony Indictment on Form 4473 Is Actionable Because § 922(n) Is Facially Valid

Date: Oct 1, 2025
No Right to Nullify Materiality: Tenth Circuit Holds False Denial of Felony Indictment on Form 4473 Is Actionable Because § 922(n) Is Facially Valid Introduction In United States v. Reilly...
After Rahimi, McCane Still Rules: Tenth Circuit Reaffirms § 922(g)(1) Against Nonviolent-Felon As-Applied Challenges (United States v. Forbis & Smith)

After Rahimi, McCane Still Rules: Tenth Circuit Reaffirms § 922(g)(1) Against Nonviolent-Felon As-Applied Challenges (United States v. Forbis & Smith)

Date: Oct 1, 2025
After Rahimi, McCane Still Rules: Tenth Circuit Reaffirms § 922(g)(1) Against Nonviolent-Felon As-Applied Challenges (United States v. Forbis & Smith) Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth...
Lying About Indictment Status on Form 4473 Is “Material” Under § 922(a)(6) Where § 922(n) Is Facially Valid: Commentary on United States v. Reilly (10th Cir. 2025)

Lying About Indictment Status on Form 4473 Is “Material” Under § 922(a)(6) Where § 922(n) Is Facially Valid: Commentary on United States v. Reilly (10th Cir. 2025)

Date: Sep 30, 2025
Lying About Indictment Status on Form 4473 Is “Material” Under § 922(a)(6) Where § 922(n) Is Facially Valid: Commentary on United States v. Reilly (10th Cir. 2025) Introduction In United States v....
Mandamus Is Not a Vehicle to Challenge § 636(b) Referrals or Routine Case-Management Orders: In re Huber (10th Cir. 2025)

Mandamus Is Not a Vehicle to Challenge § 636(b) Referrals or Routine Case-Management Orders: In re Huber (10th Cir. 2025)

Date: Sep 28, 2025
Mandamus Is Not a Vehicle to Challenge § 636(b) Referrals or Routine Case-Management Orders: In re Huber (10th Cir. 2025) Introduction In In re Huber, No. 25-4109 (10th Cir. Sept. 26, 2025), the...
“Found In” Means Each Discovery Is a Separate § 1326 Offense—No Intervening Removal Required (United States v. Herrera‑Salazar, 10th Cir. 2025)

“Found In” Means Each Discovery Is a Separate § 1326 Offense—No Intervening Removal Required (United States v. Herrera‑Salazar, 10th Cir. 2025)

Date: Sep 28, 2025
“Found In” Means Each Discovery Is a Separate § 1326 Offense—No Intervening Removal Required Case: United States v. Herrera‑Salazar, No. 24‑7029 (10th Cir. Sept. 26, 2025) (nonprecedential Order and...
United States v. Stacy: Tenth Circuit Opens §1292(a)(1) Path to Enjoin DOJ Spending Under the Medical Marijuana Appropriations Rider and Limits Protection to At Least Substantial Compliance with State Law

United States v. Stacy: Tenth Circuit Opens §1292(a)(1) Path to Enjoin DOJ Spending Under the Medical Marijuana Appropriations Rider and Limits Protection to At Least Substantial Compliance with State Law

Date: Sep 28, 2025
United States v. Stacy: Tenth Circuit Opens §1292(a)(1) Path to Enjoin DOJ Spending Under the Medical Marijuana Appropriations Rider and Limits Protection to At Least Substantial Compliance with...
Davis v. Curtis: Tenth Circuit Reaffirms Continuing Court‑Martial Jurisdiction After ETS and Strict “Full and Fair Consideration” Limits on § 2241 Review

Davis v. Curtis: Tenth Circuit Reaffirms Continuing Court‑Martial Jurisdiction After ETS and Strict “Full and Fair Consideration” Limits on § 2241 Review

Date: Sep 27, 2025
Continuing Court‑Martial Jurisdiction After ETS and the Strict Dodson Gatekeeper for Military Habeas Review: Commentary on Davis v. Curtis (10th Cir. Sept. 25, 2025) Introduction In Davis v. Curtis,...
No Interlocutory Appeal From Denial of Motion to Dismiss Criminal Contempt: Tenth Circuit Reaffirms “Substance Over Form” and the Narrow Reach of the Collateral-Order Doctrine and 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)

No Interlocutory Appeal From Denial of Motion to Dismiss Criminal Contempt: Tenth Circuit Reaffirms “Substance Over Form” and the Narrow Reach of the Collateral-Order Doctrine and 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)

Date: Sep 27, 2025
No Interlocutory Appeal From Denial of Motion to Dismiss Criminal Contempt: Tenth Circuit Reaffirms “Substance Over Form” and the Narrow Reach of the Collateral-Order Doctrine and 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)...
Financing Is Not “Labor or Material” Under Subcontract Payment Bonds; Oklahoma’s Parol‑Evidence Stranger Exception Applies; Prevailing Defendants May Recover Fees Under § 936 Based on the Suit’s Gravamen

Financing Is Not “Labor or Material” Under Subcontract Payment Bonds; Oklahoma’s Parol‑Evidence Stranger Exception Applies; Prevailing Defendants May Recover Fees Under § 936 Based on the Suit’s Gravamen

Date: Sep 27, 2025
Financing Is Not “Labor or Material” Under Subcontract Payment Bonds; Oklahoma’s Parol‑Evidence Stranger Exception Applies; Prevailing Defendants May Recover Fees Under § 936 Based on the Suit’s...
Failure to Argue Plain Error Waives New Appellate Issues—Even for Pro Se Prisoners: A Tenth Circuit Reaffirmation in Rhodes v. Wyoming Department of Corrections

Failure to Argue Plain Error Waives New Appellate Issues—Even for Pro Se Prisoners: A Tenth Circuit Reaffirmation in Rhodes v. Wyoming Department of Corrections

Date: Sep 26, 2025
Failure to Argue Plain Error Waives New Appellate Issues—Even for Pro Se Prisoners: A Tenth Circuit Reaffirmation in Rhodes v. Wyoming Department of Corrections Introduction This commentary analyzes...
No Bond Coverage for Financing Disguised as Sale–Leaseback; Surety May Invoke Parol Evidence as a “Stranger”; Prevailing Defendants Can Recover § 936 Fees Based on Suit’s Gravamen

No Bond Coverage for Financing Disguised as Sale–Leaseback; Surety May Invoke Parol Evidence as a “Stranger”; Prevailing Defendants Can Recover § 936 Fees Based on Suit’s Gravamen

Date: Sep 26, 2025
No Bond Coverage for Financing Disguised as Sale–Leaseback; Surety May Invoke Parol Evidence as a “Stranger”; Prevailing Defendants Can Recover § 936 Fees Based on Suit’s Gravamen Introduction In...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert