Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

protected-advice-at-life’s-end:-seventh-circuit-holds-indiana’s-funeral-licensing-ban-on-death-doula-counseling-fails-even-under-intermediate-scrutiny—and-consent-orders-don’t-waive-federal-rights Case Commentaries

Arraignment as a Substitution Deadline: Pre‑Arraignment Motions to Substitute Are Timely in Montana Criminal Cases

Arraignment as a Substitution Deadline: Pre‑Arraignment Motions to Substitute Are Timely in Montana Criminal Cases

Date: Jan 7, 2026
Arraignment as a Substitution Deadline: Pre‑Arraignment Motions to Substitute Are Timely in Montana Criminal Cases 1. Introduction In S.L. v. MONTANA FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, MISSOULA COUNTY,...
Separate-Vote Rule Bars “Single-Target” Initiatives that Revoke and Regrant Broad Constitutional Powers

Separate-Vote Rule Bars “Single-Target” Initiatives that Revoke and Regrant Broad Constitutional Powers

Date: Jan 7, 2026
Separate-Vote Rule Bars “Single-Target” Initiatives that Revoke and Regrant Broad Constitutional Powers Introduction In T.E.I. v. Knudsen (2026 MT 2), the Montana Supreme Court, exercising original...
TEDRA Grants District Courts Broad Subject-Matter Jurisdiction to Decide Declaratory Rights in Estate Assets Despite Ongoing Probate

TEDRA Grants District Courts Broad Subject-Matter Jurisdiction to Decide Declaratory Rights in Estate Assets Despite Ongoing Probate

Date: Jan 7, 2026
TEDRA Grants District Courts Broad Subject-Matter Jurisdiction to Decide Declaratory Rights in Estate Assets Despite Ongoing Probate Introduction Nelson v. Wylie (Idaho Supreme Court, January 6,...
Wyoming Article 1, § 38 Protects Abortion as a Fundamental Health Care Decision; Strict Scrutiny Applies; Salerno “No-Set-of-Circumstances” Facial-Challenge Standard Rejected

Wyoming Article 1, § 38 Protects Abortion as a Fundamental Health Care Decision; Strict Scrutiny Applies; Salerno “No-Set-of-Circumstances” Facial-Challenge Standard Rejected

Date: Jan 7, 2026
Wyoming Article 1, § 38 Protects Abortion as a Fundamental Health Care Decision; Strict Scrutiny Applies; Salerno “No-Set-of-Circumstances” Facial-Challenge Standard Rejected Case: State of Wyoming;...
Nonclient Deposits into Attorney Escrow Do Not Create a Fiduciary Duty Absent an Escrow Agreement; Aiding-and-Abetting Fraud Requires Proof of Actual Knowledge

Nonclient Deposits into Attorney Escrow Do Not Create a Fiduciary Duty Absent an Escrow Agreement; Aiding-and-Abetting Fraud Requires Proof of Actual Knowledge

Date: Jan 7, 2026
Nonclient Deposits into Attorney Escrow Do Not Create a Fiduciary Duty Absent an Escrow Agreement; Aiding-and-Abetting Fraud Requires Proof of Actual Knowledge Introduction In Groisman v. Jeffrey...
Pre-2024 U.S.S.G. § 2B1.1 Requires the Greater of Actual or Intended Loss (and Upholds Upward Variances in Pandemic-Relief Fraud)

Pre-2024 U.S.S.G. § 2B1.1 Requires the Greater of Actual or Intended Loss (and Upholds Upward Variances in Pandemic-Relief Fraud)

Date: Jan 7, 2026
Pre-2024 U.S.S.G. § 2B1.1 Requires the Greater of Actual or Intended Loss (and Upholds Upward Variances in Pandemic-Relief Fraud) Case: United States v. Omar Loaces Gonzalez (11th Cir., Jan. 6, 2026)...
Harmless-Error Affirmance Despite § 875(c) Indictment Omitting Subjective Mens Rea When the Record Establishes Recklessness/Knowledge and a “True Threat” in Context

Harmless-Error Affirmance Despite § 875(c) Indictment Omitting Subjective Mens Rea When the Record Establishes Recklessness/Knowledge and a “True Threat” in Context

Date: Jan 7, 2026
Harmless-Error Affirmance Despite § 875(c) Indictment Omitting Subjective Mens Rea When the Record Establishes Recklessness/Knowledge and a “True Threat” in Context I. Introduction Case: United...
Exterior Camera Surveillance at a Storage Facility Is Not a Fourth Amendment Search Absent Trespass or a Reasonable Expectation of Privacy

Exterior Camera Surveillance at a Storage Facility Is Not a Fourth Amendment Search Absent Trespass or a Reasonable Expectation of Privacy

Date: Jan 7, 2026
Exterior Camera Surveillance at a Storage Facility Is Not a Fourth Amendment Search Absent Trespass or a Reasonable Expectation of Privacy Case: United States v. Orlando Bernard Easter (6th Cir. Jan....
Minimal-Nexus Good Faith: Reliance on a Warrant to Search a Home When the Suspect’s Crime-Related Vehicle Is Parked There

Minimal-Nexus Good Faith: Reliance on a Warrant to Search a Home When the Suspect’s Crime-Related Vehicle Is Parked There

Date: Jan 7, 2026
Minimal-Nexus Good Faith: Reliance on a Warrant to Search a Home When the Suspect’s Crime-Related Vehicle Is Parked There Introduction In United States v. Williams (10th Cir. Jan. 2, 2026)...
NIH Cannot Impose an Across-the-Board Indirect-Cost Cap by “Guidance” Where an Appropriations Rider and HHS Regulations Preserve Negotiated Rates

NIH Cannot Impose an Across-the-Board Indirect-Cost Cap by “Guidance” Where an Appropriations Rider and HHS Regulations Preserve Negotiated Rates

Date: Jan 7, 2026
NIH Cannot Impose an Across-the-Board Indirect-Cost Cap by “Guidance” Where an Appropriations Rider and HHS Regulations Preserve Negotiated Rates 1. Introduction In Association of American...
Rooker–Feldman Bars Federal Damages Claims That Depend on Undoing a State Foreclosure Judgment; Futility and Willful Noncompliance Justify Dismissal With Prejudice

Rooker–Feldman Bars Federal Damages Claims That Depend on Undoing a State Foreclosure Judgment; Futility and Willful Noncompliance Justify Dismissal With Prejudice

Date: Jan 7, 2026
Rooker–Feldman Bars Federal Damages Claims That Depend on Undoing a State Foreclosure Judgment; Futility and Willful Noncompliance Justify Dismissal With Prejudice 1. Introduction In Roy Dixon v....
Above-Guidelines Variances: Serious Uncharged Conduct Can Supply a Sufficiently Compelling Justification Without a Numerical “Variance Math” Explanation

Above-Guidelines Variances: Serious Uncharged Conduct Can Supply a Sufficiently Compelling Justification Without a Numerical “Variance Math” Explanation

Date: Jan 7, 2026
Above-Guidelines Variances: Serious Uncharged Conduct Can Supply a Sufficiently Compelling Justification Without a Numerical “Variance Math” Explanation Introduction United States v. Jerry J. Jones...
Termination for Timekeeping Discrepancies Is Not an ADA “Failure to Accommodate” Absent a Denied Accommodation, and Pretext Fails Under the Honest-Belief Rule

Termination for Timekeeping Discrepancies Is Not an ADA “Failure to Accommodate” Absent a Denied Accommodation, and Pretext Fails Under the Honest-Belief Rule

Date: Jan 7, 2026
Termination for Timekeeping Discrepancies Is Not an ADA “Failure to Accommodate” Absent a Denied Accommodation, and Pretext Fails Under the Honest-Belief Rule I. Introduction In William Shears v....
United States v. David Johnson: Admitting “Secondary-Evidence” Summary Slides and Treating Written Summary Contempt Orders as Immediately Appealable Final Judgments

United States v. David Johnson: Admitting “Secondary-Evidence” Summary Slides and Treating Written Summary Contempt Orders as Immediately Appealable Final Judgments

Date: Jan 7, 2026
United States v. David Johnson: Admitting “Secondary-Evidence” Summary Slides and Treating Written Summary Contempt Orders as Immediately Appealable Final Judgments Court: Court of Appeals for the...
United States v. Johnson — Contempt Orders Are Immediately Appealable; Expert PowerPoint Slides May Be Admitted as Secondary-Evidence Summaries

United States v. Johnson — Contempt Orders Are Immediately Appealable; Expert PowerPoint Slides May Be Admitted as Secondary-Evidence Summaries

Date: Jan 7, 2026
United States v. Johnson: Criminal Contempt Orders Are Immediately Appealable (14-Day Deadline), and Expert PowerPoint Slides May Be Admitted as “Secondary-Evidence Summaries” When Backed by Admitted...
Rule 60(b)(5) Vacatur of § 1988 Fees After Jurisdictional Vacatur of Merits Relief (No Separate Fee Appeal Required)

Rule 60(b)(5) Vacatur of § 1988 Fees After Jurisdictional Vacatur of Merits Relief (No Separate Fee Appeal Required)

Date: Jan 7, 2026
Rule 60(b)(5) Vacatur of § 1988 Fees After Jurisdictional Vacatur of Merits Relief (No Separate Fee Appeal Required) Case: Pool v. City of Houston, No. 24-20138 (5th Cir. Jan. 2, 2026) Court: United...
Biweekly Predetermined Pay with Hourly “Accounting” Satisfies § 541.602(a): Fourth Circuit Clarifies Salary-Basis for Highly Compensated Fire Chiefs

Biweekly Predetermined Pay with Hourly “Accounting” Satisfies § 541.602(a): Fourth Circuit Clarifies Salary-Basis for Highly Compensated Fire Chiefs

Date: Jan 7, 2026
Biweekly Predetermined Pay with Hourly “Accounting” Satisfies § 541.602(a): Fourth Circuit Clarifies Salary-Basis for Highly Compensated Fire Chiefs 1. Introduction In Anthony Kelly v. City of...
KTCA Discretionary-Function Immunity Bars Negligent-Supervision Claims Attacking Patient-Protection Policies (Hennessey v. University of Kansas Hospital Authority)

KTCA Discretionary-Function Immunity Bars Negligent-Supervision Claims Attacking Patient-Protection Policies (Hennessey v. University of Kansas Hospital Authority)

Date: Jan 7, 2026
KTCA Discretionary-Function Immunity Bars Negligent-Supervision Claims Attacking Patient-Protection Policies (Hennessey v. University of Kansas Hospital Authority) Introduction In Hennessey v....
Tasby v. The State: Stereotype- and Class-Coded Rationales as Pretext in Reverse Batson Challenges

Tasby v. The State: Stereotype- and Class-Coded Rationales as Pretext in Reverse Batson Challenges

Date: Jan 7, 2026
Tasby v. The State: Stereotype- and Class-Coded Rationales as Pretext in Reverse Batson Challenges Introduction In Tasby v. The State (A25A0067, Court of Appeals of Georgia, May 29, 2025) (not...
NIH May Not Impose an Across-the-Board Indirect-Cost Cap by “Guidance” Under the Appropriations Rider and HHS Deviation Regulations

NIH May Not Impose an Across-the-Board Indirect-Cost Cap by “Guidance” Under the Appropriations Rider and HHS Deviation Regulations

Date: Jan 7, 2026
NIH May Not Impose an Across-the-Board Indirect-Cost Cap by “Guidance” Under the Appropriations Rider and HHS Deviation Regulations Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit (Rikelman,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert