Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

protected-advice-at-life’s-end:-seventh-circuit-holds-indiana’s-funeral-licensing-ban-on-death-doula-counseling-fails-even-under-intermediate-scrutiny—and-consent-orders-don’t-waive-federal-rights Case Commentaries

State Law at the Time of the Prior Conviction Controls: Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms Dubois Rule for Guidelines “Controlled Substance Offense” Predicates

State Law at the Time of the Prior Conviction Controls: Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms Dubois Rule for Guidelines “Controlled Substance Offense” Predicates

Date: Nov 9, 2025
State Law at the Time of the Prior Conviction Controls: Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms Dubois Rule for Guidelines “Controlled Substance Offense” Predicates Introduction In United States v. Jacklin...
Divisibility of N.J. § 2C:14‑2c and Predicate “Sex Offense Conviction” Status under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.5(a): Eleventh Circuit’s Analysis in United States v. Hass

Divisibility of N.J. § 2C:14‑2c and Predicate “Sex Offense Conviction” Status under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.5(a): Eleventh Circuit’s Analysis in United States v. Hass

Date: Nov 9, 2025
Divisibility of N.J. § 2C:14‑2c and Predicate “Sex Offense Conviction” Status under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.5(a): Eleventh Circuit’s Analysis in United States v. Hass Introduction In United States v. Hass...
United States v. Hill: Timeliness and Materiality as Gatekeepers—No Brady Duty for State-Held Evidence and No CI Disclosure When Informant Is Peripheral

United States v. Hill: Timeliness and Materiality as Gatekeepers—No Brady Duty for State-Held Evidence and No CI Disclosure When Informant Is Peripheral

Date: Nov 9, 2025
United States v. Hill: Timeliness and Materiality as Gatekeepers—No Brady Duty for State-Held Evidence and No CI Disclosure When Informant Is Peripheral Introduction In this unpublished, per curiam...
United States v. Lagary Williams: Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms No-Notice Rule for Upward Variances and Permits Use of Uncharged Overdose Death Under § 3553(a)

United States v. Lagary Williams: Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms No-Notice Rule for Upward Variances and Permits Use of Uncharged Overdose Death Under § 3553(a)

Date: Nov 9, 2025
United States v. Lagary Williams: Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms No-Notice Rule for Upward Variances and Permits Use of Uncharged Overdose Death Under § 3553(a) Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the...
No Bona Fide Doubt, No Hearing: Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms Trial-Court Discretion to Decline Mid‑Trial Competency Re‑Evaluation and to Impose an Upward § 3553(a) Variance

No Bona Fide Doubt, No Hearing: Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms Trial-Court Discretion to Decline Mid‑Trial Competency Re‑Evaluation and to Impose an Upward § 3553(a) Variance

Date: Nov 9, 2025
No Bona Fide Doubt, No Hearing: Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms Trial-Court Discretion to Decline Mid‑Trial Competency Re‑Evaluation and to Impose an Upward § 3553(a) Variance Case: United States v....
Sixth Circuit Clarifies: Complete Denial of Union Intervention Is Immediately Appealable; Police Union May Intervene as of Right at the Liability Stage When Monell Claims Target CBA-Rooted Policies

Sixth Circuit Clarifies: Complete Denial of Union Intervention Is Immediately Appealable; Police Union May Intervene as of Right at the Liability Stage When Monell Claims Target CBA-Rooted Policies

Date: Nov 9, 2025
Sixth Circuit Clarifies: Complete Denial of Union Intervention Is Immediately Appealable; Police Union May Intervene as of Right at the Liability Stage When Monell Claims Target CBA-Rooted Policies...
Night Blindness Can Qualify as an ADA Disability: Sixth Circuit Affirms Broad ADAAA Standard and Protects Good‑Faith Accommodation Requests

Night Blindness Can Qualify as an ADA Disability: Sixth Circuit Affirms Broad ADAAA Standard and Protects Good‑Faith Accommodation Requests

Date: Nov 9, 2025
Night Blindness Can Qualify as an ADA Disability: Sixth Circuit Affirms Broad ADAAA Standard and Protects Good‑Faith Accommodation Requests Introduction In Rebecca Edwards v. Shelby County, Tennessee...
Tenth Circuit Clarifies: Requests to Reply to a Magistrate’s R&R Do Not Toll the Appeal Deadline; Finality Assessed on the Face of the Judgment

Tenth Circuit Clarifies: Requests to Reply to a Magistrate’s R&R Do Not Toll the Appeal Deadline; Finality Assessed on the Face of the Judgment

Date: Nov 9, 2025
Tenth Circuit Clarifies: Requests to Reply to a Magistrate’s R&R Do Not Toll the Appeal Deadline; Finality Assessed on the Face of the Judgment Introduction In MacIntyre v. Supreme Court of Colorado,...
Tenth Circuit Confirms: § 1983 Injunctive/Declaratory Relief Requires Official-Capacity Suits; New Mexico Civil Rights Act Does Not Waive Eleventh Amendment Immunity in Federal Court

Tenth Circuit Confirms: § 1983 Injunctive/Declaratory Relief Requires Official-Capacity Suits; New Mexico Civil Rights Act Does Not Waive Eleventh Amendment Immunity in Federal Court

Date: Nov 9, 2025
Tenth Circuit Confirms: § 1983 Injunctive/Declaratory Relief Requires Official-Capacity Suits; New Mexico Civil Rights Act Does Not Waive Eleventh Amendment Immunity in Federal Court Introduction In...
When Video Shows Ongoing Resistance, K‑9 Force to Secure Handcuffs Is Not “Malicious and Sadistic” Under the Eighth Amendment

When Video Shows Ongoing Resistance, K‑9 Force to Secure Handcuffs Is Not “Malicious and Sadistic” Under the Eighth Amendment

Date: Nov 9, 2025
When Video Shows Ongoing Resistance, K‑9 Force to Secure Handcuffs Is Not “Malicious and Sadistic” Under the Eighth Amendment Introduction This commentary examines the Seventh Circuit’s...
UAGPPJA Is the Exclusive Basis for Adult Guardianship Jurisdiction in New Hampshire; “Home State” Is Determined by Physical Presence and a Respondent’s Objection Defeats Significant‑Connection Jurisdiction

UAGPPJA Is the Exclusive Basis for Adult Guardianship Jurisdiction in New Hampshire; “Home State” Is Determined by Physical Presence and a Respondent’s Objection Defeats Significant‑Connection Jurisdiction

Date: Nov 9, 2025
UAGPPJA Is the Exclusive Basis for Adult Guardianship Jurisdiction in New Hampshire; “Home State” Is Determined by Physical Presence and a Respondent’s Objection Defeats Significant‑Connection...
All TERC Appellants Bear Dual Burdens; Verified Actual Rents Are Permissible in the Mass‑Appraisal Income Approach

All TERC Appellants Bear Dual Burdens; Verified Actual Rents Are Permissible in the Mass‑Appraisal Income Approach

Date: Nov 9, 2025
All TERC Appellants Bear Dual Burdens; Verified Actual Rents Are Permissible in the Mass‑Appraisal Income Approach Introduction In Pinnacle Enterprises, Inc., and Midland Heights Apartments, L.L.C....
Physical Dispossession Is “Direct Physical Loss,” and “Accident” Is Viewed From the Insured’s Perspective Under All‑Perils Policies

Physical Dispossession Is “Direct Physical Loss,” and “Accident” Is Viewed From the Insured’s Perspective Under All‑Perils Policies

Date: Nov 9, 2025
Physical Dispossession Is “Direct Physical Loss,” and “Accident” Is Viewed From the Insured’s Perspective Under All‑Perils Policies Case: U.S. Specialty Insurance Co. v. D S Avionics Unlimited LLC,...

      Ordinary-Meaning Rule Defines “Trade or Craft” as Manual/Artistic Skill and Limits ERISA Deference to the Administrator’s Stated Reasons

Ordinary-Meaning Rule Defines “Trade or Craft” as Manual/Artistic Skill and Limits ERISA Deference to the Administrator’s Stated Reasons

Date: Nov 8, 2025
Ordinary-Meaning Rule Defines “Trade or Craft” as Manual/Artistic Skill and Limits ERISA Deference to the Administrator’s Stated Reasons Introduction In Clyde Rombach, III v. Plumbers Local Union No....
Contemporaneous Falsity and Strategic-Review Disclosures Defeat Omission-Based Securities Claims

Contemporaneous Falsity and Strategic-Review Disclosures Defeat Omission-Based Securities Claims

Date: Nov 8, 2025
Contemporaneous Falsity and Strategic-Review Disclosures Defeat Omission-Based Securities Claims Introduction In a non-precedential but instructive decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third...
United States v. Marc Anthony: Third Circuit clarifies that mental impairment and low Miranda-comprehension testing do not, without police coercion, invalidate a Miranda waiver; “knowing and intelligent” appeal carveouts construed to encompass voluntariness

United States v. Marc Anthony: Third Circuit clarifies that mental impairment and low Miranda-comprehension testing do not, without police coercion, invalidate a Miranda waiver; “knowing and intelligent” appeal carveouts construed to encompass voluntariness

Date: Nov 8, 2025
United States v. Marc Anthony: Third Circuit clarifies that mental impairment and low Miranda-comprehension testing do not, without police coercion, invalidate a Miranda waiver; “knowing and...
Credible Testimony Is Not Enough: Fifth Circuit Confirms IJs May Demand Reasonably Obtainable Corroboration for VAWA Cancellation and Enforces Exhaustion of Niz‑Chavez Stop‑Time Claims

Credible Testimony Is Not Enough: Fifth Circuit Confirms IJs May Demand Reasonably Obtainable Corroboration for VAWA Cancellation and Enforces Exhaustion of Niz‑Chavez Stop‑Time Claims

Date: Nov 8, 2025
Credible Testimony Is Not Enough: Fifth Circuit Confirms IJs May Demand Reasonably Obtainable Corroboration for VAWA Cancellation and Enforces Exhaustion of Niz‑Chavez Stop‑Time Claims Introduction...
Additional Straight‑Time Pay Does Not Defeat the HCE Salary‑Basis Test; Magistrate Judges May Tax Costs Under Rule 54(d)(1): Commentary on Descant v. CTCI Americas (5th Cir. 2025)

Additional Straight‑Time Pay Does Not Defeat the HCE Salary‑Basis Test; Magistrate Judges May Tax Costs Under Rule 54(d)(1): Commentary on Descant v. CTCI Americas (5th Cir. 2025)

Date: Nov 8, 2025
Additional Straight‑Time Pay Does Not Defeat the HCE Salary‑Basis Test; Magistrate Judges May Tax Costs Under Rule 54(d)(1) Introduction In Descant v. CTCI Americas, No. 25‑40112 (5th Cir. Nov. 6,...
Fifth Circuit Holds Unrebutted, Defendant‑Specific Forfeiture Orders Can Establish the $10,000 Threshold for Aggravated‑Felony Money‑Laundering Determinations

Fifth Circuit Holds Unrebutted, Defendant‑Specific Forfeiture Orders Can Establish the $10,000 Threshold for Aggravated‑Felony Money‑Laundering Determinations

Date: Nov 8, 2025
Fifth Circuit Holds Unrebutted, Defendant‑Specific Forfeiture Orders Can Establish the $10,000 Threshold for Aggravated‑Felony Money‑Laundering Determinations Introduction In Dominguez Reyes v....
“Melting Ice Is Not Enough”: Fifth Circuit Refines Creation and Temporal Proof Under Louisiana’s Merchant Liability Act

“Melting Ice Is Not Enough”: Fifth Circuit Refines Creation and Temporal Proof Under Louisiana’s Merchant Liability Act

Date: Nov 8, 2025
“Melting Ice Is Not Enough”: Fifth Circuit Refines Creation and Temporal Proof Under Louisiana’s Merchant Liability Act Introduction In Howard v. Brookshire Grocery Company (Super 1 Foods), No....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert