Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

protected-advice-at-life’s-end:-seventh-circuit-holds-indiana’s-funeral-licensing-ban-on-death-doula-counseling-fails-even-under-intermediate-scrutiny—and-consent-orders-don’t-waive-federal-rights Case Commentaries

Tenth Circuit: No Presumed Lanham Act Injury Without Proof of a “Two Significant Participants” Market; Actual Injury Requires Evidence of Ad Exposure and Causation

Tenth Circuit: No Presumed Lanham Act Injury Without Proof of a “Two Significant Participants” Market; Actual Injury Requires Evidence of Ad Exposure and Causation

Date: Jan 8, 2026
Tenth Circuit: No Presumed Lanham Act Injury Without Proof of a “Two Significant Participants” Market; Actual Injury Requires Evidence of Ad Exposure and Causation Introduction In Kesters...
Quiet Title in Delaware: “Clear and Convincing” for Title Strength, but “Preponderance” for Lineage Facts; Laches Requires Prejudice

Quiet Title in Delaware: “Clear and Convincing” for Title Strength, but “Preponderance” for Lineage Facts; Laches Requires Prejudice

Date: Jan 8, 2026
Quiet Title in Delaware: “Clear and Convincing” for Title Strength, but “Preponderance” for Lineage Facts; Laches Requires Prejudice 1. Introduction In Chavez T. Williams v. Cynthia H. Hall (Del....
Recorded “Context-Only” Informant Statements Do Not Trigger Confrontation; § 1001 Venue Lies Where the Lie Naturally Tends to Influence Decisionmaking

Recorded “Context-Only” Informant Statements Do Not Trigger Confrontation; § 1001 Venue Lies Where the Lie Naturally Tends to Influence Decisionmaking

Date: Jan 8, 2026
Recorded “Context-Only” Informant Statements Do Not Trigger Confrontation; § 1001 Venue Lies Where the Lie Naturally Tends to Influence Decisionmaking Case: United States v. Whitehead, No. 24-1769-cr...
Nonretroactive Guideline Amendments Are Excluded from U.S.S.G. § 1B1.13(b)(6)’s “Change in the Law” Compassionate-Release Path

Nonretroactive Guideline Amendments Are Excluded from U.S.S.G. § 1B1.13(b)(6)’s “Change in the Law” Compassionate-Release Path

Date: Jan 8, 2026
Nonretroactive Guideline Amendments Are Excluded from U.S.S.G. § 1B1.13(b)(6)’s “Change in the Law” Compassionate-Release Path I. Introduction United States v. Jose Romeu (11th Cir. Jan. 6, 2026)...
Ineffective Assistance (Strickland Prejudice) When Uncalled Witness Is Impeachable and the Record Evidence of Guilt Is Overwhelming

Ineffective Assistance (Strickland Prejudice) When Uncalled Witness Is Impeachable and the Record Evidence of Guilt Is Overwhelming

Date: Jan 8, 2026
Ineffective Assistance (Strickland Prejudice) When Uncalled Witness Is Impeachable and the Record Evidence of Guilt Is Overwhelming 1. Introduction In Robert Donelson v. United States (11th Cir. Jan....
Vacatur-and-Replacement Judgments Reset the Appeal Clock (Not a Rule 60(a) Correction) — Frey v. Health Mgmt Systems

Vacatur-and-Replacement Judgments Reset the Appeal Clock (Not a Rule 60(a) Correction) — Frey v. Health Mgmt Systems

Date: Jan 8, 2026
Vacatur-and-Replacement Judgments Reset the Appeal Clock (Not a Rule 60(a) Correction) — Frey v. Health Mgmt Systems I. Introduction Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Date:...
Clinical Remediation and Truthful Medical-Board Reporting, Without Concrete Harm, Do Not Supply an “Adverse Employment Action” or Retaliation Under Title VII

Clinical Remediation and Truthful Medical-Board Reporting, Without Concrete Harm, Do Not Supply an “Adverse Employment Action” or Retaliation Under Title VII

Date: Jan 8, 2026
Clinical Remediation and Truthful Medical-Board Reporting, Without Concrete Harm, Do Not Supply an “Adverse Employment Action” or Retaliation Under Title VII I. Introduction In Judy Pan v. Temple...
Georgia Attorney Discipline: Nunc Pro Tunc Suspension Tied to Verified Cessation of Practice—Inactive Status Date as a Supported Anchor

Georgia Attorney Discipline: Nunc Pro Tunc Suspension Tied to Verified Cessation of Practice—Inactive Status Date as a Supported Anchor

Date: Jan 8, 2026
Georgia Attorney Discipline: Nunc Pro Tunc Suspension Tied to Verified Cessation of Practice—Inactive Status Date as a Supported Anchor Case: In the Matter of Stephanie Dianne Woodard Court: Supreme...
UPSHAW v. THE STATE (Three Cases): Prior Drug Offenses Qualify as “Criminal Gang Activity” Admissible Under OCGA § 24-4-418 Without a Gang-Nexus Showing

UPSHAW v. THE STATE (Three Cases): Prior Drug Offenses Qualify as “Criminal Gang Activity” Admissible Under OCGA § 24-4-418 Without a Gang-Nexus Showing

Date: Jan 8, 2026
Prior Drug Offenses Qualify as “Criminal Gang Activity” Admissible Under OCGA § 24-4-418 Without a Gang-Nexus Showing 1. Introduction In UPSHAW v. THE STATE (consolidated with GLANTON v. THE STATE...
Written Findings Are Mandatory to Seal Civil Dockets and Complaints in Hawaiʻi; Mandamus Lies to Unseal Absent Rogan Findings

Written Findings Are Mandatory to Seal Civil Dockets and Complaints in Hawaiʻi; Mandamus Lies to Unseal Absent Rogan Findings

Date: Jan 8, 2026
Written Findings Are Mandatory to Seal Civil Dockets and Complaints in Hawaiʻi; Mandamus Lies to Unseal Absent Rogan Findings 1. Introduction In Civil Beat Law Center for Public Interest v. Kawashima...
Rhode Island Supreme Court’s 2026 Appellate Rule Reforms: Standardized Appendices, Enforceable Filing Defaults, and Structured Emergency/Extension Practice

Rhode Island Supreme Court’s 2026 Appellate Rule Reforms: Standardized Appendices, Enforceable Filing Defaults, and Structured Emergency/Extension Practice

Date: Jan 8, 2026
Rhode Island Supreme Court’s 2026 Appellate Rule Reforms: Standardized Appendices, Enforceable Filing Defaults, and Structured Emergency/Extension Practice 1. Introduction On January 6, 2026, the...
Procedural Precedent: Michigan Supreme Court Confirms Discretion to Grant Second Extensions and Deem Late Answers Timely if Filed by a Court-Set Date

Procedural Precedent: Michigan Supreme Court Confirms Discretion to Grant Second Extensions and Deem Late Answers Timely if Filed by a Court-Set Date

Date: Jan 8, 2026
Procedural Precedent: Michigan Supreme Court Confirms Discretion to Grant Second Extensions and Deem Late Answers Timely if Filed by a Court-Set Date Case: Jerome Dubrulle v. Great Lakes Water...
Sanchez-Cabrera v. Bondi: Generalized Emotional/Economic Hardship and Unproven Medical/Education Barriers Do Not Meet “Exceptional and Extremely Unusual Hardship” Under Deferential Post-Wilkinson Review

Sanchez-Cabrera v. Bondi: Generalized Emotional/Economic Hardship and Unproven Medical/Education Barriers Do Not Meet “Exceptional and Extremely Unusual Hardship” Under Deferential Post-Wilkinson Review

Date: Jan 8, 2026
Sanchez-Cabrera v. Bondi: Generalized Emotional/Economic Hardship and Unproven Medical/Education Barriers Do Not Meet “Exceptional and Extremely Unusual Hardship” Under Deferential Post-Wilkinson...
Funti v Andrews: Neutral-Principles Proof of Religious “Solemnization” Required for No-License Marriages Under DRL § 12

Funti v Andrews: Neutral-Principles Proof of Religious “Solemnization” Required for No-License Marriages Under DRL § 12

Date: Jan 8, 2026
Funti v Andrews: Neutral-Principles Proof of Religious “Solemnization” Required for No-License Marriages Under DRL § 12 Court: Appellate Division, First Department (Jan. 6, 2026) (Kern, J.) Core...
Stasiewicz v. South Henry’s Lake Outlet HOA / Henry’s Lake Village: Limits on Sua Sponte Res Judicata and “Mootness” Dismissals Under I.R.C.P. 12(b)(1)

Stasiewicz v. South Henry’s Lake Outlet HOA / Henry’s Lake Village: Limits on Sua Sponte Res Judicata and “Mootness” Dismissals Under I.R.C.P. 12(b)(1)

Date: Jan 8, 2026
New Idaho Rule: Courts May Not Raise Res Judicata Sua Sponte, and Rule 12(b)(1) “Mootness” Dismissals Cannot Decide Intertwined Merits—Especially Where a Restrictive Easement Leaves Effectual Relief...
Compensable Consequences in Idaho: Recurrent Injury Remains Compensable Absent Proof of Rash or Deliberate Disregard

Compensable Consequences in Idaho: Recurrent Injury Remains Compensable Absent Proof of Rash or Deliberate Disregard

Date: Jan 8, 2026
Compensable Consequences in Idaho: Recurrent Injury Remains Compensable Absent Proof of Rash or Deliberate Disregard Introduction Miklos v. L&W Supply Corporation (Idaho Supreme Court, Jan. 6, 2026)...
Reciprocal Discipline in New York: When a Foreign Probation Sanction Becomes a Public Censure

Reciprocal Discipline in New York: When a Foreign Probation Sanction Becomes a Public Censure

Date: Jan 7, 2026
Reciprocal Discipline in New York: When a Foreign Probation Sanction Becomes a Public Censure 1. Introduction Matter of Tejada (2026 NY Slip Op 00020) is a reciprocal-discipline decision of the...
Reciprocal Disbarment in New York for Out-of-State Trust-Account Conversion and Client Abandonment Absent Any 22 NYCRR 1240.13 Defense

Reciprocal Disbarment in New York for Out-of-State Trust-Account Conversion and Client Abandonment Absent Any 22 NYCRR 1240.13 Defense

Date: Jan 7, 2026
Reciprocal Disbarment in New York for Out-of-State Trust-Account Conversion and Client Abandonment Absent Any 22 NYCRR 1240.13 Defense Introduction Matter of Richardson-Vargas is a First Department...
Seventh Circuit Tightens Standing in Telehealth-Abortion Challenges: No “Probabilistic” Members, No Generalized Stigma, and No Redress Where Other Statutes Independently Bar the Conduct

Seventh Circuit Tightens Standing in Telehealth-Abortion Challenges: No “Probabilistic” Members, No Generalized Stigma, and No Redress Where Other Statutes Independently Bar the Conduct

Date: Jan 7, 2026
Seventh Circuit Tightens Standing in Telehealth-Abortion Challenges: No “Probabilistic” Members, No Generalized Stigma, and No Redress Where Other Statutes Independently Bar the Conduct I....

      FTC Act Unfairness in the Eleventh Circuit: § 45(n)’s Three-Factor Test Controls and Courts May “Fence In” Hidden-Fee Practices with Unavoidable, Non-Hyperlinked Disclosures and Fee-by-Fee Assent

FTC Act Unfairness in the Eleventh Circuit: § 45(n)’s Three-Factor Test Controls and Courts May “Fence In” Hidden-Fee Practices with Unavoidable, Non-Hyperlinked Disclosures and Fee-by-Fee Assent

Date: Jan 7, 2026
FTC Act Unfairness in the Eleventh Circuit: § 45(n)’s Three-Factor Test Controls and Courts May “Fence In” Hidden-Fee Practices with Unavoidable, Non-Hyperlinked Disclosures and Fee-by-Fee Assent...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert