Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

protected-advice-at-life’s-end:-seventh-circuit-holds-indiana’s-funeral-licensing-ban-on-death-doula-counseling-fails-even-under-intermediate-scrutiny—and-consent-orders-don’t-waive-federal-rights Case Commentaries

New York Appellate Sanctions for AI-Hallucinated Citations: A Nondelegable Duty to Verify Legal Authorities

New York Appellate Sanctions for AI-Hallucinated Citations: A Nondelegable Duty to Verify Legal Authorities

Date: Jan 9, 2026
New York Appellate Sanctions for AI-Hallucinated Citations: A Nondelegable Duty to Verify Legal Authorities 1. Introduction Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v LeTennier (2026 NY Slip Op 00040 [3d Dept...
People v. Clay: No Brady Violation (and No CPL 440.10 Hearing) Where an Allegedly Withheld Photograph Is Not Shown to Be in the People’s Possession and Would Be Inculpatory

People v. Clay: No Brady Violation (and No CPL 440.10 Hearing) Where an Allegedly Withheld Photograph Is Not Shown to Be in the People’s Possession and Would Be Inculpatory

Date: Jan 9, 2026
People v. Clay: No Brady Violation (and No CPL 440.10 Hearing) Where an Allegedly Withheld Photograph Is Not Shown to Be in the People’s Possession and Would Be Inculpatory Court: Appellate Division,...
People v. Bjork: Narrow Grounds to Reopen Suppression Hearings, Limits on “Homicide” Opinions, and What Counts as a Meaningful Jury-Note Response

People v. Bjork: Narrow Grounds to Reopen Suppression Hearings, Limits on “Homicide” Opinions, and What Counts as a Meaningful Jury-Note Response

Date: Jan 9, 2026
People v. Bjork: Narrow Grounds to Reopen Suppression Hearings, Limits on “Homicide” Opinions, and What Counts as a Meaningful Jury-Note Response Introduction In People v Bjork (Appellate Division,...
Final Dismissals of NRS 432B Child-Protection Petitions Are Appealable Final Judgments Under NRAP 3A(b)(1)

Final Dismissals of NRS 432B Child-Protection Petitions Are Appealable Final Judgments Under NRAP 3A(b)(1)

Date: Jan 9, 2026
Final Dismissals of NRS 432B Child-Protection Petitions Are Appealable Final Judgments Under NRAP 3A(b)(1) 1. Introduction In IN RE: N.D., G.D. AND M.D. (FAMILY), 142 Nev., Advance Opinion 2 (Jan. 8,...
Promise-to-File Brief Rule: BIA May Summarily Dismiss and Reject Late Briefs Absent Persuasive Evidence of a Timely Extension Request

Promise-to-File Brief Rule: BIA May Summarily Dismiss and Reject Late Briefs Absent Persuasive Evidence of a Timely Extension Request

Date: Jan 9, 2026
Promise-to-File Brief Rule: BIA May Summarily Dismiss and Reject Late Briefs Absent Persuasive Evidence of a Timely Extension Request 1. Introduction Case: Allaico-Murudumbay v. Bondi, No. 23-7365...
Eleventh Circuit: § 922(g)(1) As-Applied Second Amendment Challenges by Nonviolent Felons Remain Foreclosed

Eleventh Circuit: § 922(g)(1) As-Applied Second Amendment Challenges by Nonviolent Felons Remain Foreclosed

Date: Jan 9, 2026
Eleventh Circuit Rule: Nonviolent-Felon As-Applied Second Amendment Challenges to 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) Are Foreclosed by Rozier and Dubois II Despite Bondi and Florida Commissioner Introduction In...
Post-Bruen/Rehimi Felon-in-Possession Challenges Remain Foreclosed in the Eleventh Circuit; Brief § 3553(c)(2) Variance Explanations Suffice When the Record Is Clear

Post-Bruen/Rehimi Felon-in-Possession Challenges Remain Foreclosed in the Eleventh Circuit; Brief § 3553(c)(2) Variance Explanations Suffice When the Record Is Clear

Date: Jan 9, 2026
Post-Bruen/Rahimi Felon-in-Possession Challenges Remain Foreclosed in the Eleventh Circuit; Brief § 3553(c)(2) Variance Explanations Suffice When the Record Is Clear Case: United States v. Randall...
Autobiographical “Fiction” as Intrinsic Evidence “Necessary to Complete the Story” of a Drug Conspiracy

Autobiographical “Fiction” as Intrinsic Evidence “Necessary to Complete the Story” of a Drug Conspiracy

Date: Jan 9, 2026
Autobiographical “Fiction” as Intrinsic Evidence “Necessary to Complete the Story” of a Drug Conspiracy Introduction In United States v. Kenneth Pertillo (11th Cir. Jan. 8, 2026) (unpublished), the...
Estate of O'Neill (2026 S.D. 1): Collateral Estoppel Cannot Conclusively Establish Prior Credibility Findings in a Different Case

Estate of O'Neill (2026 S.D. 1): Collateral Estoppel Cannot Conclusively Establish Prior Credibility Findings in a Different Case

Date: Jan 9, 2026
Collateral Estoppel Requires Identical, Essential Issues—Prior Credibility Findings Cannot Be Treated as Conclusive in a Separate Undue-Influence Will Contest Case: In the Matter of the Estate of...
Reasonable Reunification Efforts for Incarcerated Parents: Child Permanency Justifies Switching from Reunification to Adoption

Reasonable Reunification Efforts for Incarcerated Parents: Child Permanency Justifies Switching from Reunification to Adoption

Date: Jan 9, 2026
Reasonable Reunification Efforts for Incarcerated Parents: Child Permanency Justifies Switching from Reunification to Adoption 1. Introduction In In the Interest Of: DC, minor child, AC v. The State...
VUTSA Damages: No Burden-Shifting—Plaintiff Must Prove Causation and Amount; Royalty Is the Statutory Backstop

VUTSA Damages: No Burden-Shifting—Plaintiff Must Prove Causation and Amount; Royalty Is the Statutory Backstop

Date: Jan 9, 2026
VUTSA Damages: No Burden-Shifting—Plaintiff Must Prove Causation and Amount; Royalty Is the Statutory Backstop Case: Appian Corporation v. Pegasystems, Inc. Court: Supreme Court of Virginia Date:...
SCUSRAP Fully Supersedes the Common-Law Rule: No Perpetuities Limit Applies to Nondonative Nonvested Interests Excluded by § 27-6-50

SCUSRAP Fully Supersedes the Common-Law Rule: No Perpetuities Limit Applies to Nondonative Nonvested Interests Excluded by § 27-6-50

Date: Jan 9, 2026
SCUSRAP Fully Supersedes the Common-Law Rule: No Perpetuities Limit Applies to Nondonative Nonvested Interests Excluded by § 27-6-50 Case: Spring Valley Interests, LLC v. The Best for Last, LLC (S.C....
Implied Temporary Caretaking Triggers U.S.S.G. § 2A3.2(b)(1) When a Guardian Entrusts a Minor for Overnight Visits

Implied Temporary Caretaking Triggers U.S.S.G. § 2A3.2(b)(1) When a Guardian Entrusts a Minor for Overnight Visits

Date: Jan 9, 2026
Implied Temporary Caretaking Triggers U.S.S.G. § 2A3.2(b)(1) When a Guardian Entrusts a Minor for Overnight Visits 1. Introduction In United States v. Chumwalooky (10th Cir. Jan. 7, 2026)...
§ 3582(c)(2) Amendment 821 Reductions: Prior § 3553(a) Variances Cannot Expand the § 1B1.10(b)(2)(B) Substantial-Assistance Exception

§ 3582(c)(2) Amendment 821 Reductions: Prior § 3553(a) Variances Cannot Expand the § 1B1.10(b)(2)(B) Substantial-Assistance Exception

Date: Jan 9, 2026
§ 3582(c)(2) Amendment 821 Reductions: Prior § 3553(a) Variances Cannot Expand the § 1B1.10(b)(2)(B) Substantial-Assistance Exception Introduction In United States v. Wayne Duke (11th Cir. Jan. 7,...
Soil Friends: Appellate Abandonment of “Clearly Established” Arguments Affirms Qualified Immunity and Allows Reliance on Plaintiffs’ Disavowal of Monell Liability

Soil Friends: Appellate Abandonment of “Clearly Established” Arguments Affirms Qualified Immunity and Allows Reliance on Plaintiffs’ Disavowal of Monell Liability

Date: Jan 9, 2026
Soil Friends: Appellate Abandonment of “Clearly Established” Arguments Affirms Qualified Immunity and Allows Reliance on Plaintiffs’ Disavowal of Monell Liability Case: Soil Friends, LLC v. Charter...
Vague, Non-Physical Sexual Comments and Long-Running Complaints: Insufficient for “Severe or Pervasive” Harassment and for Retaliation Causation Without Additional Evidence

Vague, Non-Physical Sexual Comments and Long-Running Complaints: Insufficient for “Severe or Pervasive” Harassment and for Retaliation Causation Without Additional Evidence

Date: Jan 9, 2026
Vague, Non-Physical Sexual Comments and Long-Running Complaints: Insufficient for “Severe or Pervasive” Harassment and for Retaliation Causation Without Additional Evidence Case: Lorna Vinsant v. WNB...
State v. Frandsen: Text Exhibits Must Be Redacted for Unnoticed 404(b) “Other Acts” Even When Admitted for a Non-Hearsay Purpose; Prior Acquaintance Alone Does Not Establish Juror Bias

State v. Frandsen: Text Exhibits Must Be Redacted for Unnoticed 404(b) “Other Acts” Even When Admitted for a Non-Hearsay Purpose; Prior Acquaintance Alone Does Not Establish Juror Bias

Date: Jan 9, 2026
State v. Frandsen: Text Exhibits Must Be Redacted for Unnoticed 404(b) “Other Acts” Even When Admitted for a Non-Hearsay Purpose; Prior Acquaintance Alone Does Not Establish Juror Bias Court: Supreme...
MDLEA Jurisdiction in Foreign EEZs: EEZ Treated as “High Seas,” Broad Stateless-Vessel Definition, and No U.S. Nexus Requirement

MDLEA Jurisdiction in Foreign EEZs: EEZ Treated as “High Seas,” Broad Stateless-Vessel Definition, and No U.S. Nexus Requirement

Date: Jan 9, 2026
MDLEA Jurisdiction in Foreign EEZs: EEZ Treated as “High Seas,” Broad Stateless-Vessel Definition, and No U.S. Nexus Requirement Case: United States v. Ronald Arregoces Barros (11th Cir. Jan. 7,...
Johnson v. Baltimore Police Department: Plausible Title VII Comparator Pleading Does Not Require a One-to-One Misconduct Match at Rule 12(b)(6)

Johnson v. Baltimore Police Department: Plausible Title VII Comparator Pleading Does Not Require a One-to-One Misconduct Match at Rule 12(b)(6)

Date: Jan 9, 2026
Johnson v. Baltimore Police Department: Plausible Title VII Comparator Pleading Does Not Require a One-to-One Misconduct Match at Rule 12(b)(6) Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth...
U.S.S.G. § 1B1.3(c) Limits Only Acquitted-Conduct Use: Relevant Conduct Beyond the Plea Remains Proper (United States v. Phillip Howard)

U.S.S.G. § 1B1.3(c) Limits Only Acquitted-Conduct Use: Relevant Conduct Beyond the Plea Remains Proper (United States v. Phillip Howard)

Date: Jan 9, 2026
U.S.S.G. § 1B1.3(c) Limits Only Acquitted-Conduct Use: Relevant Conduct Beyond the Plea Remains Proper Case: United States v. Phillip Howard (11th Cir., Jan. 7, 2026) (per curiam) (not for...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert