Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

protected-advice-at-life’s-end:-seventh-circuit-holds-indiana’s-funeral-licensing-ban-on-death-doula-counseling-fails-even-under-intermediate-scrutiny—and-consent-orders-don’t-waive-federal-rights Case Commentaries

Procedural Defects and Corporate Affiliations Do Not Defeat Younger Abstention in Quasi‑Criminal State Usury Enforcement

Procedural Defects and Corporate Affiliations Do Not Defeat Younger Abstention in Quasi‑Criminal State Usury Enforcement

Date: Jan 10, 2026
Procedural Defects and Corporate Affiliations Do Not Defeat Younger Abstention in Quasi‑Criminal State Usury Enforcement Decision: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit (Jan. 7, 2026) (not...
Bruner v. Cassidy (10th Cir. Jan. 8, 2026) — Commentary

Bruner v. Cassidy (10th Cir. Jan. 8, 2026) — Commentary

Date: Jan 10, 2026
Bruner v. Cassidy: Continuing Prone Back-Pressure After a Suspect Is Subdued Defeats Qualified Immunity (Even Where Bodycam Footage Is Ambiguous) 1. Introduction Case: Bruner v. Cassidy, No. 23-6216...
PUC Cannot Impose FCC-Style Presumptive “New Telecom Rate” for ILECs Without Pennsylvania Statutory Authority; Complainant Retains Burden Under 66 Pa.C.S. § 332(a)

PUC Cannot Impose FCC-Style Presumptive “New Telecom Rate” for ILECs Without Pennsylvania Statutory Authority; Complainant Retains Burden Under 66 Pa.C.S. § 332(a)

Date: Jan 10, 2026
PUC Cannot Impose FCC-Style Presumptive “New Telecom Rate” for ILECs Without Pennsylvania Statutory Authority; Complainant Retains Burden Under 66 Pa.C.S. § 332(a) FirstEnergy Pennsylvania Electric...
PUC Lacks Authority to Impose an FCC-Style Presumptive Maximum Pole-Attachment Rate for ILECs; Complainant Bears the Burden to Prove Existing JUA Rates Unreasonable

PUC Lacks Authority to Impose an FCC-Style Presumptive Maximum Pole-Attachment Rate for ILECs; Complainant Bears the Burden to Prove Existing JUA Rates Unreasonable

Date: Jan 10, 2026
PUC Lacks Authority to Impose an FCC-Style Presumptive Maximum Pole-Attachment Rate for ILECs; Complainant Bears the Burden to Prove Existing JUA Rates Unreasonable I. Introduction Case: FirstEnergy...
United States v. Goldy: “Official Act” Is a Legal Definition for the Court; § 666 Requires State-Level Funding Proof Without a Bribe-to-Federal-Funds Nexus

United States v. Goldy: “Official Act” Is a Legal Definition for the Court; § 666 Requires State-Level Funding Proof Without a Bribe-to-Federal-Funds Nexus

Date: Jan 10, 2026
United States v. Goldy: “Official Act” Is a Legal Definition for the Court; § 666 Requires State-Level Funding Proof Without a Bribe-to-Federal-Funds Nexus Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth...
Waiver and Plain-Error Limits on Remmer Challenges to Suspected Jury Intimidation (Sixth Circuit)

Waiver and Plain-Error Limits on Remmer Challenges to Suspected Jury Intimidation (Sixth Circuit)

Date: Jan 10, 2026
Waiver and Plain-Error Limits on Remmer Challenges to Suspected Jury Intimidation (Sixth Circuit) 1. Introduction United States v. Courtland Springfield (consolidated with appeals by Tomarcus...
United States v. Johnson: Romantic Partner Presence Alone Does Not Justify a Michigan v. Long Vehicle Protective Sweep

United States v. Johnson: Romantic Partner Presence Alone Does Not Justify a Michigan v. Long Vehicle Protective Sweep

Date: Jan 10, 2026
United States v. Johnson: Romantic Partner Presence Alone Does Not Justify a Michigan v. Long Vehicle Protective Sweep 1. Introduction In United States v. Johnson (5th Cir. Jan. 7, 2026), the Fifth...
Mid-Trial Brady Disclosure as “Suppression” and the Limits of Federal Habeas Remedies

Mid-Trial Brady Disclosure as “Suppression” and the Limits of Federal Habeas Remedies

Date: Jan 10, 2026
Mid-Trial Brady Disclosure as “Suppression” and the Limits of Federal Habeas Remedies Case: Robert Gary Moore v. State of Maryland Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Date:...
Material Omissions on Immigration Benefit Requests Void “Lawful Admission” When They Shut Off a Relevant Line of Inquiry (Third Circuit)

Material Omissions on Immigration Benefit Requests Void “Lawful Admission” When They Shut Off a Relevant Line of Inquiry (Third Circuit)

Date: Jan 10, 2026
Material Omissions on Immigration Benefit Requests Void “Lawful Admission” When They Shut Off a Relevant Line of Inquiry Case: Ousmane Savane v. Secretary United States Department of Homeland Sec (3d...
Nevada Trust Writs: Adequate Statutory Remedies Bar Prohibition Relief; Document-by-Document Showing Required to Unseal/End Pseudonyms

Nevada Trust Writs: Adequate Statutory Remedies Bar Prohibition Relief; Document-by-Document Showing Required to Unseal/End Pseudonyms

Date: Jan 10, 2026
Nevada Trust Writs: Adequate Statutory Remedies Bar Prohibition Relief; Document-by-Document Showing Required to Unseal/End Pseudonyms 1. Introduction Case: IN RE: DOE IRREVOCABLE TRUST (CIVIL), No....
Perdomo v. City of League City: Body-Camera Video May Defeat Pleadings and Support Qualified Immunity at Rule 12(b)(6) After a Split-Second Takedown

Perdomo v. City of League City: Body-Camera Video May Defeat Pleadings and Support Qualified Immunity at Rule 12(b)(6) After a Split-Second Takedown

Date: Jan 9, 2026
Perdomo v. City of League City: Body-Camera Video May Defeat Pleadings and Support Qualified Immunity at Rule 12(b)(6) After a Split-Second Takedown 1. Introduction Perdomo v. City of League City,...
Lewis v. Delgado: Brief Handcuffing in a High-Risk Stop Does Not Defeat Qualified Immunity Absent Closely Analogous Clearly Established Law—Even with Alleged Notice of Medical Vulnerability

Lewis v. Delgado: Brief Handcuffing in a High-Risk Stop Does Not Defeat Qualified Immunity Absent Closely Analogous Clearly Established Law—Even with Alleged Notice of Medical Vulnerability

Date: Jan 9, 2026
Lewis v. Delgado: Brief Handcuffing in a High-Risk Stop Does Not Defeat Qualified Immunity Absent Closely Analogous Clearly Established Law—Even with Alleged Notice of Medical Vulnerability 1....
Minor Inconsistencies and Intervening Misconduct Defeat FMLA Pretext; WVHRA Disability Requires Substantial Limitation at the Time of the Adverse Action

Minor Inconsistencies and Intervening Misconduct Defeat FMLA Pretext; WVHRA Disability Requires Substantial Limitation at the Time of the Adverse Action

Date: Jan 9, 2026
Minor Inconsistencies and Intervening Misconduct Defeat FMLA Pretext; WVHRA Disability Requires Substantial Limitation at the Time of the Adverse Action Case: Dominique Spatafore v. City of...
Procedural Defects Do Not Defeat Younger Abstention in Pennsylvania’s Quasi‑Criminal Usury Enforcement, and “Prospective” Federal Relief May Still Interfere via Preclusion

Procedural Defects Do Not Defeat Younger Abstention in Pennsylvania’s Quasi‑Criminal Usury Enforcement, and “Prospective” Federal Relief May Still Interfere via Preclusion

Date: Jan 9, 2026
Procedural Defects Do Not Defeat Younger Abstention in Pennsylvania’s Quasi‑Criminal Usury Enforcement, and “Prospective” Federal Relief May Still Interfere via Preclusion 1. Introduction TMX Finance...
On-Call Permission Does Not Convert a Personal Errand into “Traveling Employee” Risk Under New Hampshire Workers’ Compensation Law

On-Call Permission Does Not Convert a Personal Errand into “Traveling Employee” Risk Under New Hampshire Workers’ Compensation Law

Date: Jan 9, 2026
On-Call Permission Does Not Convert a Personal Errand into “Traveling Employee” Risk Under New Hampshire Workers’ Compensation Law Case: Appeal of Michael Messina (Supreme Court of New Hampshire,...
Delayed SORA Proceedings Require a Showing of Prejudice to the Registrant’s Ability to Litigate Risk Level (People v. Collier)

Delayed SORA Proceedings Require a Showing of Prejudice to the Registrant’s Ability to Litigate Risk Level (People v. Collier)

Date: Jan 9, 2026
Delayed SORA Proceedings Require a Showing of Prejudice to the Registrant’s Ability to Litigate Risk Level Case: People v Collier, 2026 NY Slip Op 00074 (NY Ct App Jan. 8, 2026) (Garcia, J.)...
Implied-Covenant Liability for Fund Restructuring that Diverts Bargained-for Revenue Share Beyond the Contract’s Defined Fee-Recipient

Implied-Covenant Liability for Fund Restructuring that Diverts Bargained-for Revenue Share Beyond the Contract’s Defined Fee-Recipient

Date: Jan 9, 2026
Implied-Covenant Liability for Fund Restructuring that Diverts Bargained-for Revenue Share Beyond the Contract’s Defined Fee-Recipient 1. Introduction AMF Trust Ventures LLC v. i80 Group LLC (2026 NY...
Federal “No Retaliatory Animus” Findings Collaterally Estop Later City HRL Retaliation Claims Despite Liberal Construction

Federal “No Retaliatory Animus” Findings Collaterally Estop Later City HRL Retaliation Claims Despite Liberal Construction

Date: Jan 9, 2026
Federal “No Retaliatory Animus” Findings Collaterally Estop Later City HRL Retaliation Claims Despite Liberal Construction 1. Introduction In Abromavage v Deutsche Bank Sec. Inc. (2026 NY Slip Op...
Romano v. Kelly: Reformation of a Settlement Agreement on Motion Where a Scrivener’s Error Defeats the Parties’ Intended Transfer of Entire Real Property

Romano v. Kelly: Reformation of a Settlement Agreement on Motion Where a Scrivener’s Error Defeats the Parties’ Intended Transfer of Entire Real Property

Date: Jan 9, 2026
Romano v. Kelly: Reformation of a Settlement Agreement on Motion Where a Scrivener’s Error Defeats the Parties’ Intended Transfer of Entire Real Property 1. Introduction Romano v Kelly (2026 NY Slip...
Counterclaims Rarely Support Human Rights Law Retaliation; Withdrawal Does Not Moot the Alleged Retaliatory Filing

Counterclaims Rarely Support Human Rights Law Retaliation; Withdrawal Does Not Moot the Alleged Retaliatory Filing

Date: Jan 9, 2026
Counterclaims Rarely Support Human Rights Law Retaliation; Withdrawal Does Not Moot the Alleged Retaliatory Filing 1. Introduction In Yegoryan v BB Med. & Dermatology P.C. (2026 NY Slip Op 00041),...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert