Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

protected-advice-at-life’s-end:-seventh-circuit-holds-indiana’s-funeral-licensing-ban-on-death-doula-counseling-fails-even-under-intermediate-scrutiny—and-consent-orders-don’t-waive-federal-rights Case Commentaries

Post-Snyder § 666 Bribery in the Seventh Circuit: Quid Pro Quo Required, No “Magic Words,” and “Corruptly” Means Intent to Trade Value for Influence

Post-Snyder § 666 Bribery in the Seventh Circuit: Quid Pro Quo Required, No “Magic Words,” and “Corruptly” Means Intent to Trade Value for Influence

Date: Jan 10, 2026
Post-Snyder § 666 Bribery in the Seventh Circuit: Quid Pro Quo Required, No “Magic Words,” and “Corruptly” Means Intent to Trade Value for Influence 1. Introduction United States v. Charles Cui (7th...
Irreparable Harm Requires a Legally Available Referendum: Kemp Bars Injunctive Relief Against Atlanta’s Petition-Circulator Residency Rule

Irreparable Harm Requires a Legally Available Referendum: Kemp Bars Injunctive Relief Against Atlanta’s Petition-Circulator Residency Rule

Date: Jan 10, 2026
Irreparable Harm Requires a Legally Available Referendum: Kemp v. City of Claxton Bars Injunctive Relief Against Atlanta’s Petition-Circulator Residency Rule I. Introduction In Lisa Baker v. City of...
Reindictment After Nolle Prosequi (Before Jeopardy Attaches) Does Not Offend Double Jeopardy or “Judicial Manipulation” Absent Improper State Purpose

Reindictment After Nolle Prosequi (Before Jeopardy Attaches) Does Not Offend Double Jeopardy or “Judicial Manipulation” Absent Improper State Purpose

Date: Jan 10, 2026
Reindictment After Nolle Prosequi (Before Jeopardy Attaches) Does Not Offend Double Jeopardy or “Judicial Manipulation” Absent Improper State Purpose Case: Fayton v. State Court: Supreme Court of...
Chen v. Bondi: Reaffirming that Multiple Interview–Hearing Inconsistencies and Missing Readily Available Corroboration Sustain an Adverse Credibility Finding

Chen v. Bondi: Reaffirming that Multiple Interview–Hearing Inconsistencies and Missing Readily Available Corroboration Sustain an Adverse Credibility Finding

Date: Jan 10, 2026
Chen v. Bondi: Reaffirming that Multiple Interview–Hearing Inconsistencies and Missing Readily Available Corroboration Sustain an Adverse Credibility Finding Introduction In Chen v. Bondi (2d Cir....
Deferential Substantive-Reasonableness Review: Upholding a Below-Guidelines (Statutory-Max) Sentence for Murder-for-Hire Conspiracy Despite Claimed Provocation and Plea Mitigation

Deferential Substantive-Reasonableness Review: Upholding a Below-Guidelines (Statutory-Max) Sentence for Murder-for-Hire Conspiracy Despite Claimed Provocation and Plea Mitigation

Date: Jan 10, 2026
Deferential Substantive-Reasonableness Review: Upholding a Below-Guidelines (Statutory-Max) Sentence for Murder-for-Hire Conspiracy Despite Claimed Provocation and Plea Mitigation Note on status:...
Invited-Error Bar to “Rehabilitation-Based Imprisonment” Challenges in Federal Sentencing

Invited-Error Bar to “Rehabilitation-Based Imprisonment” Challenges in Federal Sentencing

Date: Jan 10, 2026
Invited-Error Bar to “Rehabilitation-Based Imprisonment” Challenges in Federal Sentencing Case: United States v. Brian Joseph McKay (11th Cir. Jan. 9, 2026) (unpublished, “Not for Publication”)...
Generic National Sentencing Statistics Do Not Prove “Unwarranted Disparity” Without Apples-to-Apples Comparability

Generic National Sentencing Statistics Do Not Prove “Unwarranted Disparity” Without Apples-to-Apples Comparability

Date: Jan 10, 2026
Generic National Sentencing Statistics Do Not Prove “Unwarranted Disparity” Without Apples-to-Apples Comparability Introduction In United States v. Oscar Pena-Sanregre (11th Cir. Jan. 9, 2026) (per...
Self-Representation Requires a Knowing Waiver and Courtroom Decorum: Disruptive “Sovereign Citizen” Conduct Permits Counsel Appointment and Trial in the Defendant’s Absence

Self-Representation Requires a Knowing Waiver and Courtroom Decorum: Disruptive “Sovereign Citizen” Conduct Permits Counsel Appointment and Trial in the Defendant’s Absence

Date: Jan 10, 2026
Self-Representation Requires a Knowing Waiver and Courtroom Decorum: Disruptive “Sovereign Citizen” Conduct Permits Counsel Appointment and Trial in the Defendant’s Absence Introduction United States...
Conspiracy Acquittal Does Not Undermine Anti‑Kickback Substantive Convictions; Supervisory Role Bars §4C1.1 Zero‑Point Offender Relief

Conspiracy Acquittal Does Not Undermine Anti‑Kickback Substantive Convictions; Supervisory Role Bars §4C1.1 Zero‑Point Offender Relief

Date: Jan 10, 2026
Conspiracy Acquittal Does Not Undermine Anti‑Kickback Substantive Convictions; Supervisory Role Bars §4C1.1 Zero‑Point Offender Relief Case: United States v. David Byron Copeland (11th Cir. Jan. 9,...
Subjective Recklessness as the Decisive Gatekeeper: Deliberate-Indifference, Prison Diet Claims, and Conclusory “Policy” Pleading in § 1983/RLUIPA Litigation

Subjective Recklessness as the Decisive Gatekeeper: Deliberate-Indifference, Prison Diet Claims, and Conclusory “Policy” Pleading in § 1983/RLUIPA Litigation

Date: Jan 10, 2026
Subjective Recklessness as the Decisive Gatekeeper: Deliberate-Indifference, Prison Diet Claims, and Conclusory “Policy” Pleading in § 1983/RLUIPA Litigation Introduction In Nyka O'Connor v. Barry...
Upward Variances May Rest on Guideline-Accounted Facts, and Disparity Claims Require “Apples-to-Apples” Comparators — United States v. Anna Michelle La Rue

Upward Variances May Rest on Guideline-Accounted Facts, and Disparity Claims Require “Apples-to-Apples” Comparators — United States v. Anna Michelle La Rue

Date: Jan 10, 2026
Upward Variances May Rest on Guideline-Accounted Facts, and Disparity Claims Require “Apples-to-Apples” Comparators — United States v. Anna Michelle La Rue (11th Cir. 2026) 1. Introduction In United...
Procedural Defects and Corporate-Form Arguments Do Not Defeat Younger Abstention in Quasi-Criminal State Usury Enforcement

Procedural Defects and Corporate-Form Arguments Do Not Defeat Younger Abstention in Quasi-Criminal State Usury Enforcement

Date: Jan 10, 2026
Procedural Defects and Corporate-Form Arguments Do Not Defeat Younger Abstention in Quasi-Criminal State Usury Enforcement I. Introduction In CCFI Companies, LLC v. Secretary Pennsylvania Department...
Pre-Sale Payments to the Foreclosing HOA Alone Satisfy Superpriority and Convert a Multi-HOA Foreclosure to Subpriority (Deed of Trust Survives)

Pre-Sale Payments to the Foreclosing HOA Alone Satisfy Superpriority and Convert a Multi-HOA Foreclosure to Subpriority (Deed of Trust Survives)

Date: Jan 10, 2026
Pre-Sale Payments to the Foreclosing HOA Alone Satisfy Superpriority and Convert a Multi-HOA Foreclosure to Subpriority (Deed of Trust Survives) 1. Introduction DEUTSCHE BANK NAT'L TR. CO. v....
Younger Abstention Applies to Pennsylvania’s Quasi‑Criminal Usury Enforcement Despite Alleged Service/Naming Defects, and “Prospective” Federal Relief That Could Have Preclusive Effect Still Interferes

Younger Abstention Applies to Pennsylvania’s Quasi‑Criminal Usury Enforcement Despite Alleged Service/Naming Defects, and “Prospective” Federal Relief That Could Have Preclusive Effect Still Interferes

Date: Jan 10, 2026
Younger Abstention Applies to Pennsylvania’s Quasi‑Criminal Usury Enforcement Despite Alleged Service/Naming Defects, and “Prospective” Federal Relief That Could Have Preclusive Effect Still...
Revised Records of Work Activities Must Be Submitted Before Leaving Office Under 2 NYCRR 315.4(a)(2)

Revised Records of Work Activities Must Be Submitted Before Leaving Office Under 2 NYCRR 315.4(a)(2)

Date: Jan 10, 2026
Revised Records of Work Activities Must Be Submitted Before Leaving Office Under 2 NYCRR 315.4(a)(2) Case: Matter of Reynolds v. DiNapoli, 2026 NY Slip Op 00044 (App Div 3d Dept Jan. 8, 2026) 1....
Failure to Object to a Magistrate Judge’s Report Waives Appellate Review; Qualified Immunity Applies Absent On‑Point Fourth Amendment Stalking-Probable-Cause Precedent

Failure to Object to a Magistrate Judge’s Report Waives Appellate Review; Qualified Immunity Applies Absent On‑Point Fourth Amendment Stalking-Probable-Cause Precedent

Date: Jan 10, 2026
Failure to Object to a Magistrate Judge’s Report Waives Appellate Review; Qualified Immunity Applies Absent On‑Point Fourth Amendment Stalking-Probable-Cause Precedent I. Introduction Case: Deborah...
Upward Variances May Rest on Premeditation Inferences and Victim Psychological Harm (Without § 5K2.3 Departure Procedures)

Upward Variances May Rest on Premeditation Inferences and Victim Psychological Harm (Without § 5K2.3 Departure Procedures)

Date: Jan 10, 2026
Upward Variances May Rest on Premeditation Inferences and Victim Psychological Harm (Without § 5K2.3 Departure Procedures) Introduction In United States v. Kendrick Holland (6th Cir. Jan. 8, 2026),...
United States v. Baskerville/Springfield/Smith (6th Cir. Jan. 8, 2026) — Commentary

United States v. Baskerville/Springfield/Smith (6th Cir. Jan. 8, 2026) — Commentary

Date: Jan 10, 2026
Waiver and Plain-Error Limits on Remmer Jury-Intimidation Claims, Reaffirmation of the Sixth Circuit’s Actual-Bias Rule, and Alleyne Correction for § 924(c) “Discharge” Enhancements Introduction...
Waiver and Plain-Error Limits on Remmer Jury-Intimidation Claims; No Presumption of Prejudice in the Sixth Circuit

Waiver and Plain-Error Limits on Remmer Jury-Intimidation Claims; No Presumption of Prejudice in the Sixth Circuit

Date: Jan 10, 2026
Waiver and Plain-Error Limits on Remmer Jury-Intimidation Claims; No Presumption of Prejudice in the Sixth Circuit I. Introduction United States v. Tomarcus Baskerville (with codefendants Courtland...
Erlinger Does Not Displace Almendarez-Torres: Judges May Apply § 2252A(b)(2)’s 10-Year Mandatory Minimum Based on the Fact of a Chapter 110 Prior

Erlinger Does Not Displace Almendarez-Torres: Judges May Apply § 2252A(b)(2)’s 10-Year Mandatory Minimum Based on the Fact of a Chapter 110 Prior

Date: Jan 10, 2026
Erlinger Does Not Displace Almendarez-Torres: Judges May Apply § 2252A(b)(2)’s 10-Year Mandatory Minimum Based on the Fact of a Chapter 110 Prior Case: United States v. Jason Florence (6th Cir.)...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert