Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

protected-advice-at-life’s-end:-seventh-circuit-holds-indiana’s-funeral-licensing-ban-on-death-doula-counseling-fails-even-under-intermediate-scrutiny—and-consent-orders-don’t-waive-federal-rights Case Commentaries

State v. Cartwright—Commentary

State v. Cartwright—Commentary

Date: Jan 10, 2026
Invited-Omission Rule for § 27-403: A Defendant Who Secures Exclusion of Context Cannot Later Claim the Remaining “Consciousness of Guilt” Threat Evidence Misleads the Jury 1. Introduction State v....
Public-Employee Co-Worker Gross-Negligence Claims Survive Workers’ Compensation Exclusivity, But ITCA Presentment Must Name Each Employee Defendant

Public-Employee Co-Worker Gross-Negligence Claims Survive Workers’ Compensation Exclusivity, But ITCA Presentment Must Name Each Employee Defendant

Date: Jan 10, 2026
Public-Employee Co-Worker Gross-Negligence Claims Survive Workers’ Compensation Exclusivity, But ITCA Presentment Must Name Each Employee Defendant Introduction In Sara Montague, individually, and as...
Equitable Reformation of Easement Deeds to Correct Misnamed Trust Grantors and Erroneous Legal Descriptions Without Protecting Non–Bona Fide Purchasers

Equitable Reformation of Easement Deeds to Correct Misnamed Trust Grantors and Erroneous Legal Descriptions Without Protecting Non–Bona Fide Purchasers

Date: Jan 10, 2026
Equitable Reformation of Easement Deeds to Correct Misnamed Trust Grantors and Erroneous Legal Descriptions Without Protecting Non–Bona Fide Purchasers Case: Mark Fink and Stacey Fink v. Donald...
Inquiry Notice From Prior Pleadings Bars Later Defamation Claims Despite Possible Discovery Rule

Inquiry Notice From Prior Pleadings Bars Later Defamation Claims Despite Possible Discovery Rule

Date: Jan 10, 2026
Inquiry Notice From Prior Pleadings Bars Later Defamation Claims Despite Possible Discovery Rule Case: Linda Betz v. Rebecca Mathisen, Eric Muller, Kelly Rasmuson and Michael Wilson Court: Supreme...
Berryman v. Huffman — AEDPA Deference Permits (at Least on Habeas Review) a Count-by-Count Speedy-Trial Remedy; Fifth Circuit Issues Rule 47.6 Summary Affirmance and Withdraws Prior Published Opinion

Berryman v. Huffman — AEDPA Deference Permits (at Least on Habeas Review) a Count-by-Count Speedy-Trial Remedy; Fifth Circuit Issues Rule 47.6 Summary Affirmance and Withdraws Prior Published Opinion

Date: Jan 10, 2026
AEDPA Deference Permits (at Least on Habeas Review) a Count-by-Count Speedy-Trial Remedy; Fifth Circuit Issues Rule 47.6 Summary Affirmance and Withdraws Prior Published Opinion Case: Berryman v....
Personal Rejection Is Not “Imputed Anti-Gang” Politics: Rigorous Nexus and PSG Membership Proof in MS-13 Gender-Based Asylum Claims

Personal Rejection Is Not “Imputed Anti-Gang” Politics: Rigorous Nexus and PSG Membership Proof in MS-13 Gender-Based Asylum Claims

Date: Jan 10, 2026
Personal Rejection Is Not “Imputed Anti-Gang” Politics: Rigorous Nexus and PSG Membership Proof in MS-13 Gender-Based Asylum Claims Case: Ana Marquez-Cruz v. Pamela Bondi, No. 25-1219 (4th Cir. Jan....
“Required” Evidence and Unsworn Presentment Under 18 U.S.C. § 1546(a): Flexible Immigration Proof Becomes “Required” Once Chosen

“Required” Evidence and Unsworn Presentment Under 18 U.S.C. § 1546(a): Flexible Immigration Proof Becomes “Required” Once Chosen

Date: Jan 10, 2026
“Required” Evidence and Unsworn Presentment Under 18 U.S.C. § 1546(a): Flexible Immigration Proof Becomes “Required” Once Chosen Case: United States v. Oluwatoyin Aborisade (4th Cir. Jan. 8, 2026) |...
Hotel Checkout Ends Fourth Amendment Privacy: No Objectively Reasonable Expectation Five Hours After Checkout Absent Late-Checkout Arrangement

Hotel Checkout Ends Fourth Amendment Privacy: No Objectively Reasonable Expectation Five Hours After Checkout Absent Late-Checkout Arrangement

Date: Jan 10, 2026
Hotel Checkout Ends Fourth Amendment Privacy: No Objectively Reasonable Expectation Five Hours After Checkout Absent Late-Checkout Arrangement 1. Introduction In United States v. Ryan Mendoza (3d...
Acquitted Conduct After U.S.S.G. § 1B1.3(c): Still Usable Under § 3553(a) and § 1B1.4; “Significant” Collateral Consequences for the Concurrent Sentence Doctrine Must Be Concrete and Non‑Speculative

Acquitted Conduct After U.S.S.G. § 1B1.3(c): Still Usable Under § 3553(a) and § 1B1.4; “Significant” Collateral Consequences for the Concurrent Sentence Doctrine Must Be Concrete and Non‑Speculative

Date: Jan 10, 2026
Acquitted Conduct After U.S.S.G. § 1B1.3(c): Still Usable Under § 3553(a) and § 1B1.4; “Significant” Collateral Consequences for the Concurrent Sentence Doctrine Must Be Concrete and Non‑Speculative...
U.S.S.G. § 1B1.3(c) Limits Acquitted-Conduct Use Only in Guideline Calculations; Concurrent Sentence Doctrine Applies Absent Concrete, Non-Speculative Collateral Consequences

U.S.S.G. § 1B1.3(c) Limits Acquitted-Conduct Use Only in Guideline Calculations; Concurrent Sentence Doctrine Applies Absent Concrete, Non-Speculative Collateral Consequences

Date: Jan 10, 2026
U.S.S.G. § 1B1.3(c) Limits Acquitted-Conduct Use Only in Guideline Calculations; Concurrent Sentence Doctrine Applies Absent Concrete, Non-Speculative Collateral Consequences Case: United States v....
Deferral-as-Loss: Unpaid Bribery-Induced Lease Deferrals Count as Full “Loss/Benefit” Under U.S.S.G. § 2C1.1(b)(2), and Immunity-Testimony Prejudice Is Typically Cured by a Limiting Instruction

Deferral-as-Loss: Unpaid Bribery-Induced Lease Deferrals Count as Full “Loss/Benefit” Under U.S.S.G. § 2C1.1(b)(2), and Immunity-Testimony Prejudice Is Typically Cured by a Limiting Instruction

Date: Jan 10, 2026
Deferral-as-Loss: Unpaid Bribery-Induced Lease Deferrals Count as Full “Loss/Benefit” Under U.S.S.G. § 2C1.1(b)(2), and Immunity-Testimony Prejudice Is Typically Cured by a Limiting Instruction 1....
Rule 36 Limits: Clerical Corrections Must Reflect the Statute of Conviction (and PSRs Are Correctable “At Any Time”)

Rule 36 Limits: Clerical Corrections Must Reflect the Statute of Conviction (and PSRs Are Correctable “At Any Time”)

Date: Jan 10, 2026
Rule 36 Limits: Clerical Corrections Must Reflect the Statute of Conviction (and PSRs Are Correctable “At Any Time”) Case: United States v. William Baskerville (3d Cir. Jan. 8, 2026) (not...
Country-Conditions Arguments May Exhaust an Internal-Relocation Challenge; Speculative Hardship Plans Do Not Establish “Exceptional and Extremely Unusual Hardship”

Country-Conditions Arguments May Exhaust an Internal-Relocation Challenge; Speculative Hardship Plans Do Not Establish “Exceptional and Extremely Unusual Hardship”

Date: Jan 10, 2026
Country-Conditions Arguments May Exhaust an Internal-Relocation Challenge; Speculative Hardship Plans Do Not Establish “Exceptional and Extremely Unusual Hardship” I. Introduction Case: Hernandez...
Time-Limited, Health-Furthering Medical Exemptions Do Not Defeat General Applicability of COVID-19 Vaccine Mandates (and Reply-Brief Individualized-Exemption Theories Are Waived)

Time-Limited, Health-Furthering Medical Exemptions Do Not Defeat General Applicability of COVID-19 Vaccine Mandates (and Reply-Brief Individualized-Exemption Theories Are Waived)

Date: Jan 10, 2026
Time-Limited, Health-Furthering Medical Exemptions Do Not Defeat General Applicability of COVID-19 Vaccine Mandates (and Reply-Brief Individualized-Exemption Theories Are Waived) Case: Brox v. Woods...
State v. Butler: Victim’s Age Is a Protected-Class Element Under K.S.A. 21-5601(b)(1) (No Knowledge Required)

State v. Butler: Victim’s Age Is a Protected-Class Element Under K.S.A. 21-5601(b)(1) (No Knowledge Required)

Date: Jan 10, 2026
State v. Butler: Victim’s Age Is a Protected-Class Element Under K.S.A. 21-5601(b)(1) (No Knowledge Required) Introduction In State v. Butler (Kan. Jan. 9, 2026), the Kansas Supreme Court affirmed...
Anders Dismissal Where “Serious Bodily Injury” and Permanent-Scarring Enhancement Are Supported and Sentencing Objections Are Waived

Anders Dismissal Where “Serious Bodily Injury” and Permanent-Scarring Enhancement Are Supported and Sentencing Objections Are Waived

Date: Jan 10, 2026
Anders Dismissal Where “Serious Bodily Injury” and Permanent-Scarring Enhancement Are Supported and Sentencing Objections Are Waived 1. Introduction In United States v. Julian Breal (7th Cir. Jan. 9,...
Post-Snyder § 666 Bribery in the Seventh Circuit: Quid Pro Quo Required, No “Magic Words,” and “Corruptly” Means Intent to Trade Value for Influence

Post-Snyder § 666 Bribery in the Seventh Circuit: Quid Pro Quo Required, No “Magic Words,” and “Corruptly” Means Intent to Trade Value for Influence

Date: Jan 10, 2026
Post-Snyder § 666 Bribery in the Seventh Circuit: Quid Pro Quo Required, No “Magic Words,” and “Corruptly” Means Intent to Trade Value for Influence 1. Introduction United States v. Charles Cui (7th...
Irreparable Harm Requires a Legally Available Referendum: Kemp Bars Injunctive Relief Against Atlanta’s Petition-Circulator Residency Rule

Irreparable Harm Requires a Legally Available Referendum: Kemp Bars Injunctive Relief Against Atlanta’s Petition-Circulator Residency Rule

Date: Jan 10, 2026
Irreparable Harm Requires a Legally Available Referendum: Kemp v. City of Claxton Bars Injunctive Relief Against Atlanta’s Petition-Circulator Residency Rule I. Introduction In Lisa Baker v. City of...
Reindictment After Nolle Prosequi (Before Jeopardy Attaches) Does Not Offend Double Jeopardy or “Judicial Manipulation” Absent Improper State Purpose

Reindictment After Nolle Prosequi (Before Jeopardy Attaches) Does Not Offend Double Jeopardy or “Judicial Manipulation” Absent Improper State Purpose

Date: Jan 10, 2026
Reindictment After Nolle Prosequi (Before Jeopardy Attaches) Does Not Offend Double Jeopardy or “Judicial Manipulation” Absent Improper State Purpose Case: Fayton v. State Court: Supreme Court of...
Chen v. Bondi: Reaffirming that Multiple Interview–Hearing Inconsistencies and Missing Readily Available Corroboration Sustain an Adverse Credibility Finding

Chen v. Bondi: Reaffirming that Multiple Interview–Hearing Inconsistencies and Missing Readily Available Corroboration Sustain an Adverse Credibility Finding

Date: Jan 10, 2026
Chen v. Bondi: Reaffirming that Multiple Interview–Hearing Inconsistencies and Missing Readily Available Corroboration Sustain an Adverse Credibility Finding Introduction In Chen v. Bondi (2d Cir....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert