Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

first-circuit-reinforces-first-amendment-protections-for-secret-audio-recording-of-police-in-public:-interpretation-of-massachusetts& Case Commentaries

Fourth Circuit Tightens Appellate Standing: Compensatory Damages Foreclose Nominal Damages and Declaratory Relief

Fourth Circuit Tightens Appellate Standing: Compensatory Damages Foreclose Nominal Damages and Declaratory Relief

Date: Jun 27, 2025
Compensatory Damages as Full Redress: Hammons v. University of Maryland Medical System Corp. and the Limits of Appellate Standing for Nominal Damages 1. Introduction Jesse Hammons— a transgender man...
United States v. Duane Berry: Affirming Continued § 4241 Custody Post-Dismissal to Facilitate § 4246 Civil Commitment

United States v. Duane Berry: Affirming Continued § 4241 Custody Post-Dismissal to Facilitate § 4246 Civil Commitment

Date: Jun 27, 2025
United States v. Duane Berry: Affirming Continued § 4241 Custody Post-Dismissal to Facilitate § 4246 Civil Commitment Introduction United States v. Duane Berry, No. 24-6385 (4th Cir. June 24 2025),...
Reaffirming the Jurisdictional Limits on Interlocutory Qualified-Immunity Appeals: A Commentary on Calliste v. Lor

Reaffirming the Jurisdictional Limits on Interlocutory Qualified-Immunity Appeals: A Commentary on Calliste v. Lor

Date: Jun 27, 2025
Reaffirming the Jurisdictional Limits on Interlocutory Qualified-Immunity Appeals: A Comprehensive Commentary on Xyavier Calliste v. Officer Xeng Lor (4th Cir. 2025) 1. Introduction Background. On 31...
The Franklin Principle: Relevance-Bound Evidence Requests and “Some Evidence” Sufficiency in Prison Disciplinary Due-Process Review

The Franklin Principle: Relevance-Bound Evidence Requests and “Some Evidence” Sufficiency in Prison Disciplinary Due-Process Review

Date: Jun 27, 2025
The Franklin Principle: Relevance-Bound Evidence Requests and “Some Evidence” Sufficiency in Prison Disciplinary Due-Process Review 1. Introduction Franklin v. Attorney General for the State of New...
“One Bite at the Apple” – The Markley Rule on Claim Preclusion and the Failure to Invoke Diversity Jurisdiction

“One Bite at the Apple” – The Markley Rule on Claim Preclusion and the Failure to Invoke Diversity Jurisdiction

Date: Jun 27, 2025
“One Bite at the Apple” – The Tenth Circuit’s New Rule on Claim Preclusion When a Plaintiff Declines to Plead Existing Diversity Jurisdiction (Markley v. U.S. Bank N.A.) 1. Introduction In Markley v....
United States v. Sanchez-Urias: The Tenth Circuit Clarifies that Appeal-Waiver Exceptions are Triggered by the Sentence Imposed, Not by Guideline-Level Calculations

United States v. Sanchez-Urias: The Tenth Circuit Clarifies that Appeal-Waiver Exceptions are Triggered by the Sentence Imposed, Not by Guideline-Level Calculations

Date: Jun 27, 2025
United States v. Sanchez-Urias: The Tenth Circuit Clarifies that Appeal-Waiver Exceptions are Triggered by the Sentence Imposed, Not by Guideline-Level Calculations 1. Introduction In United States...
United States v. Teerlink: No Contractual “Footnote Escape Hatch” from the Invited-Error Doctrine

United States v. Teerlink: No Contractual “Footnote Escape Hatch” from the Invited-Error Doctrine

Date: Jun 27, 2025
United States v. Teerlink: No Contractual “Footnote Escape Hatch” from the Invited-Error Doctrine Introduction United States v. Teerlink, 94 F.4th ___ (10th Cir. 2025), presented the Tenth Circuit...
“Beyond the Fine Print” – Idaho’s Supreme Court Confirms Broad Judicial Enforcement of Recreational Liability Waivers in Vaughan v. Gateway Parks, LLC (2025)

“Beyond the Fine Print” – Idaho’s Supreme Court Confirms Broad Judicial Enforcement of Recreational Liability Waivers in Vaughan v. Gateway Parks, LLC (2025)

Date: Jun 27, 2025
“Beyond the Fine Print” – Idaho’s Supreme Court Confirms Broad Judicial Enforcement of Recreational Liability Waivers in Vaughan v. Gateway Parks, LLC (2025) 1. Introduction The Idaho Supreme Court’s...
Affirming Judicial Gate-Keeping: The Idaho Supreme Court Clarifies Standards for Vexatious-Litigant Prefiling Orders under ICAR 59

Affirming Judicial Gate-Keeping: The Idaho Supreme Court Clarifies Standards for Vexatious-Litigant Prefiling Orders under ICAR 59

Date: Jun 27, 2025
Affirming Judicial Gate-Keeping: The Idaho Supreme Court Clarifies Standards for Vexatious-Litigant Prefiling Orders under ICAR 59 Introduction Smith v. Hippler, docket no. 51412-2023, is the Idaho...
People v. Thompson (2025): Illinois Supreme Court Endorses Shall-Issue Licensing as Constitutional After Bruen

People v. Thompson (2025): Illinois Supreme Court Endorses Shall-Issue Licensing as Constitutional After Bruen

Date: Jun 27, 2025
People v. Thompson (2025 IL 129965) Illinois Supreme Court Endorses Shall-Issue Licensing as Constitutional After Bruen Introduction In People v. Thompson, the Illinois Supreme Court confronted a...
State v. Garcia: Reinforcing the Actual-Prejudice Standard for Change-of-Venue Motions in the Era of Instant Media

State v. Garcia: Reinforcing the Actual-Prejudice Standard for Change-of-Venue Motions in the Era of Instant Media

Date: Jun 27, 2025
State v. Garcia: Reinforcing the Actual-Prejudice Standard for Change-of-Venue Motions in the Era of Instant Media Introduction State v. Garcia, No. S-1-SC-39925 (N.M. June 26 2025), is a...
People v. Martin: Forward-Looking Suppression Rule for Pre-MRTA Searches

People v. Martin: Forward-Looking Suppression Rule for Pre-MRTA Searches

Date: Jun 27, 2025
People v. Martin: Forward-Looking Suppression Rule for Pre-MRTA Searches Introduction In People v. Martin, 2025 NY Slip Op 03842 (App. Div. 3d Dep’t June 26, 2025), the Third Department confronted a...
The Jakobovitz Rule: Affixing Undated Allonges to a Copy of a Lost Note Does Not Confer Standing in New York Foreclosure Actions

The Jakobovitz Rule: Affixing Undated Allonges to a Copy of a Lost Note Does Not Confer Standing in New York Foreclosure Actions

Date: Jun 27, 2025
The Jakobovitz Rule: Affixing Undated Allonges to a Copy of a Lost Note Does Not Confer Standing in New York Foreclosure Actions 1. Introduction 1900 Capital Trust II v. Jakobovitz (2025 NY Slip Op...
Guaranteed Annual Paid Military Leave for Washington Public Employees Irrespective of Work Schedule – Commentary on Bearden v. City of Ocean Shores (Wash. 2025)

Guaranteed Annual Paid Military Leave for Washington Public Employees Irrespective of Work Schedule – Commentary on Bearden v. City of Ocean Shores (Wash. 2025)

Date: Jun 27, 2025
Guaranteed Annual Paid Military Leave for Washington Public Employees Irrespective of Work Schedule Commentary on Bearden v. City of Ocean Shores, Supreme Court of Washington, 2 Wn.3d ___ (2025) 1....
“Mere Possession” as the Outer Limit: People v. Hoffman and the Narrowing of Illinois’ Sentence-Reduction Statute

“Mere Possession” as the Outer Limit: People v. Hoffman and the Narrowing of Illinois’ Sentence-Reduction Statute

Date: Jun 27, 2025
“Mere Possession” as the Outer Limit: People v. Hoffman (2025) and the Narrowing of § 5-4-1(c-1.5) of the Illinois Unified Code of Corrections I. Introduction In People v. Hoffman, 2025 IL 130344,...
Davis v. State: Delaware Clarifies “Reasonable Means” Under D.R.E. 804(a)(5) and Re-Affirms Forfeiture-by-Wrongdoing

Davis v. State: Delaware Clarifies “Reasonable Means” Under D.R.E. 804(a)(5) and Re-Affirms Forfeiture-by-Wrongdoing

Date: Jun 27, 2025
Davis v. State: Delaware Clarifies “Reasonable Means” Under D.R.E. 804(a)(5) and Re-Affirms Forfeiture-by-Wrongdoing 1. Introduction In Davis v. State, No. 223, 2024 (Del. June 26, 2025), the...

        “Full Faith, Full Bar”: Utah Supreme Court Re-affirms Mandatory
        Respect for Out-of-State Attorney Discipline and Tightens the
        Extraordinary-Waiver Standard  –  Commentary on Marin v. Utah State Bar, 2025 UT 18

“Full Faith, Full Bar”: Utah Supreme Court Re-affirms Mandatory Respect for Out-of-State Attorney Discipline and Tightens the Extraordinary-Waiver Standard – Commentary on Marin v. Utah State Bar, 2025 UT 18

Date: Jun 27, 2025
“Full Faith, Full Bar”: Utah Supreme Court Re-affirms Mandatory Respect for Out-of-State Attorney Discipline and Tightens the Extraordinary-Waiver Standard – Commentary on Marin v. Utah State Bar,...
“Fischer Suspension Doctrine” – Immediate Interim Suspension for Repeated Non-Compliance and Unsubstantiated Hardship Claims in Attorney Disciplinary Investigations

“Fischer Suspension Doctrine” – Immediate Interim Suspension for Repeated Non-Compliance and Unsubstantiated Hardship Claims in Attorney Disciplinary Investigations

Date: Jun 27, 2025
“Fischer Suspension Doctrine” – Immediate Interim Suspension for Repeated Non-Compliance and Unsubstantiated Hardship Claims in Attorney Disciplinary Investigations Introduction Matter of Fischer...

        State v. Best – Idaho Supreme Court Narrows the “Sufficiency-of-the-Evidence”
        Exception to Issue Preservation in Suppression Appeals

State v. Best – Idaho Supreme Court Narrows the “Sufficiency-of-the-Evidence” Exception to Issue Preservation in Suppression Appeals

Date: Jun 27, 2025
State v. Best – Idaho Supreme Court Narrows the “Sufficiency-of-the-Evidence” Exception to Issue Preservation in Suppression Appeals Introduction In State v. Best, the Idaho Supreme Court confronted...
Ramlow v. Mitchell: Idaho Supreme Court Confirms Broad Trial-Court Discretion to Dismiss Parallel Proceedings under I.R.C.P. 12(b)(8)

Ramlow v. Mitchell: Idaho Supreme Court Confirms Broad Trial-Court Discretion to Dismiss Parallel Proceedings under I.R.C.P. 12(b)(8)

Date: Jun 27, 2025
Ramlow v. Mitchell: Idaho Supreme Court Confirms Broad Trial-Court Discretion to Dismiss Parallel Proceedings under I.R.C.P. 12(b)(8) Introduction In Ramlow v. Mitchell, the Idaho Supreme Court...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert