Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

federal Case Commentaries

Exhaustion, Heavy-Burden Remands, and Unfulfilled Threats: The Second Circuit’s Summary Order in Reyes‑Chavarria v. Bondi

Exhaustion, Heavy-Burden Remands, and Unfulfilled Threats: The Second Circuit’s Summary Order in Reyes‑Chavarria v. Bondi

Date: Nov 16, 2025
Exhaustion, Heavy-Burden Remands, and Unfulfilled Threats: The Second Circuit’s Summary Order in Reyes‑Chavarria v. Bondi Introduction In Reyes‑Chavarria v. Bondi, No. 24-1315 (2d Cir. Nov. 13, 2025)...
No PSG Defined by Harm; Exhaustion Required: Second Circuit in Rojas-Toledo and the 2025 AG Reset of Domestic-Violence Asylum Law

No PSG Defined by Harm; Exhaustion Required: Second Circuit in Rojas-Toledo and the 2025 AG Reset of Domestic-Violence Asylum Law

Date: Nov 16, 2025
No PSG Defined by Harm; Exhaustion Required: Second Circuit in Rojas-Toledo and the 2025 AG Reset of Domestic-Violence Asylum Law Introduction In Rojas-Toledo v. Bondi, No. 24-500 (2d Cir. Nov. 13,...
EFTA’s Bona Fide Error Defense Reaches Factual Investigation Errors and Shields § 1693f/§ 1693g Claims Brought via § 1693m (Second Circuit Summary Order)

EFTA’s Bona Fide Error Defense Reaches Factual Investigation Errors and Shields § 1693f/§ 1693g Claims Brought via § 1693m (Second Circuit Summary Order)

Date: Nov 16, 2025
EFTA’s Bona Fide Error Defense Reaches Factual Investigation Errors and Shields § 1693f/§ 1693g Claims Brought via § 1693m (Second Circuit Summary Order) Case: Sari E. Newman v. JPMorgan Chase Bank,...
United States v. Langhorne (2d Cir. 2025): Summary Order Reaffirming Sufficiency Standards, Harmless-Error Disposition of Unpreserved Rule 702 Challenge, Confrontation Clause Limits on Cross-Examination, and Strickland Prejudice; Sentencing Appeal Moot After Release

United States v. Langhorne (2d Cir. 2025): Summary Order Reaffirming Sufficiency Standards, Harmless-Error Disposition of Unpreserved Rule 702 Challenge, Confrontation Clause Limits on Cross-Examination, and Strickland Prejudice; Sentencing Appeal Moot After Release

Date: Nov 16, 2025
United States v. Langhorne (2d Cir. 2025): Summary Order Reaffirming Sufficiency Standards, Harmless-Error Disposition of Unpreserved Rule 702 Challenge, Confrontation Clause Limits on...
PSR Notice and “Self‑Evident” Rationales Sustain Discretionary Supervised‑Release Conditions on Plain‑Error Review: Commentary on United States v. Oliva (2d Cir. 2025)

PSR Notice and “Self‑Evident” Rationales Sustain Discretionary Supervised‑Release Conditions on Plain‑Error Review: Commentary on United States v. Oliva (2d Cir. 2025)

Date: Nov 16, 2025
PSR Notice and “Self‑Evident” Rationales Sustain Discretionary Supervised‑Release Conditions on Plain‑Error Review: Commentary on United States v. Oliva (2d Cir. 2025) Introduction In United States...

      Materialized Risks Must Be Disclosed—Second Circuit Vacates Dismissal of Securities Act Claims and Confirms Rule 8 Pleading for Negligence-Based Section 11/12 Claims (Van v. Bright Health Group, Inc.)

Materialized Risks Must Be Disclosed—Second Circuit Vacates Dismissal of Securities Act Claims and Confirms Rule 8 Pleading for Negligence-Based Section 11/12 Claims (Van v. Bright Health Group, Inc.)

Date: Nov 16, 2025
Materialized Risks Must Be Disclosed—Second Circuit Vacates Dismissal of Securities Act Claims and Confirms Rule 8 Pleading for Negligence-Based Section 11/12 Claims (Van v. Bright Health Group,...
Marketing-Triggered Age Restrictions on Dietary Supplements Survive Central Hudson and Avoid FDCA Preemption: Second Circuit Affirms Denial of Preliminary Injunction in CRN v. James

Marketing-Triggered Age Restrictions on Dietary Supplements Survive Central Hudson and Avoid FDCA Preemption: Second Circuit Affirms Denial of Preliminary Injunction in CRN v. James

Date: Nov 16, 2025
Marketing-Triggered Age Restrictions on Dietary Supplements Survive Central Hudson and Avoid FDCA Preemption: Second Circuit Affirms Denial of Preliminary Injunction in CRN v. James Introduction This...
Paused-Clock Timeliness After Reopening and Strict Pleading Standards in Meme-Stock RICO/Antitrust Suits: Donnahue George v. Ken Griffin (11th Cir. 2025)

Paused-Clock Timeliness After Reopening and Strict Pleading Standards in Meme-Stock RICO/Antitrust Suits: Donnahue George v. Ken Griffin (11th Cir. 2025)

Date: Nov 16, 2025
Paused-Clock Timeliness After Reopening and Strict Pleading Standards in Meme-Stock RICO/Antitrust Suits: Donnahue George v. Ken Griffin (11th Cir. 2025) Introduction In an unpublished, per curiam...
Community-Protection Inferences from Repeated Drug Use Permissibly Support Revocation Sentences: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Within-Guidelines Term After Esteras

Community-Protection Inferences from Repeated Drug Use Permissibly Support Revocation Sentences: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Within-Guidelines Term After Esteras

Date: Nov 16, 2025
Community-Protection Inferences from Repeated Drug Use Permissibly Support Revocation Sentences: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Within-Guidelines Term After Esteras Introduction In United States v. Edward...
No Final Decision, No Federal Case: Sixth Circuit Clarifies Finality for Land‑Use and RLUIPA Claims; Code‑Enforcement Threats Are Not “Threats of Force” Under the FACE Act

No Final Decision, No Federal Case: Sixth Circuit Clarifies Finality for Land‑Use and RLUIPA Claims; Code‑Enforcement Threats Are Not “Threats of Force” Under the FACE Act

Date: Nov 16, 2025
No Final Decision, No Federal Case: Sixth Circuit Clarifies Finality for Land‑Use and RLUIPA Claims; Code‑Enforcement Threats Are Not “Threats of Force” Under the FACE Act Introduction In Daniel...
Enforcement of Prefiling Restrictions and Waiver by Inadequate Briefing: Tenth Circuit Affirms Striking of Post‑Judgment Motion and Labels Appeal Frivolous in Massey v. Computershare

Enforcement of Prefiling Restrictions and Waiver by Inadequate Briefing: Tenth Circuit Affirms Striking of Post‑Judgment Motion and Labels Appeal Frivolous in Massey v. Computershare

Date: Nov 16, 2025
Enforcement of Prefiling Restrictions and Waiver by Inadequate Briefing: Tenth Circuit Affirms Striking of Post‑Judgment Motion and Labels Appeal Frivolous in Massey v. Computershare Introduction In...
No Collateral Attacks on Subject-Matter Jurisdiction: Tenth Circuit reinforces res judicata and upholds fees and filing restrictions in Massey v. Computershare

No Collateral Attacks on Subject-Matter Jurisdiction: Tenth Circuit reinforces res judicata and upholds fees and filing restrictions in Massey v. Computershare

Date: Nov 16, 2025
No Collateral Attacks on Subject-Matter Jurisdiction: Tenth Circuit reinforces res judicata and upholds fees and filing restrictions in Massey v. Computershare Introduction In Massey v. Computershare...
Rejecting Relevant Conduct Triggers § 3584’s Consecutive Default—and Underdeveloped Plain-Error Appeals Are Waived: Commentary on United States v. Cerrato-Avila (10th Cir. 2025)

Rejecting Relevant Conduct Triggers § 3584’s Consecutive Default—and Underdeveloped Plain-Error Appeals Are Waived: Commentary on United States v. Cerrato-Avila (10th Cir. 2025)

Date: Nov 16, 2025
Rejecting Relevant Conduct Triggers § 3584’s Consecutive Default—and Underdeveloped Plain-Error Appeals Are Waived Introduction In United States v. Cerrato-Avila, No. 24-1193 (10th Cir. Nov. 13,...
Tenth Circuit Reaffirms Non‑Cognizability of Restitution Challenges Under § 2255 and Emphasizes Frye Prejudice Showing for Plea‑Bargaining IAC at the COA Stage

Tenth Circuit Reaffirms Non‑Cognizability of Restitution Challenges Under § 2255 and Emphasizes Frye Prejudice Showing for Plea‑Bargaining IAC at the COA Stage

Date: Nov 16, 2025
Tenth Circuit Reaffirms Non‑Cognizability of Restitution Challenges Under § 2255 and Emphasizes Frye Prejudice Showing for Plea‑Bargaining IAC at the COA Stage Introduction In United States v....
Refusal to Participate in Internal Investigation Is Not Protected Activity Absent a Contemporaneous, Good‑Faith Belief of Opposing Discrimination

Refusal to Participate in Internal Investigation Is Not Protected Activity Absent a Contemporaneous, Good‑Faith Belief of Opposing Discrimination

Date: Nov 16, 2025
Refusal to Participate in Internal Investigation Is Not Protected Activity Absent a Contemporaneous, Good‑Faith Belief of Opposing Discrimination Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh...
“Appearance” Requires Readiness to Proceed: Seventh Circuit’s Nonprecedential Reaffirmation on Self-Representation, Speedy Trial Exclusions, and Sentencing Enhancements in United States v. Kevin Smith

“Appearance” Requires Readiness to Proceed: Seventh Circuit’s Nonprecedential Reaffirmation on Self-Representation, Speedy Trial Exclusions, and Sentencing Enhancements in United States v. Kevin Smith

Date: Nov 16, 2025
“Appearance” Requires Readiness to Proceed: Seventh Circuit’s Nonprecedential Reaffirmation on Self-Representation, Speedy Trial Exclusions, and Sentencing Enhancements in United States v. Kevin...
No Default Without Proper Service: Third Circuit Reaffirms Nonparty-Service Requirement and Disfavors Defaults in Pro Se § 1983 Litigation

No Default Without Proper Service: Third Circuit Reaffirms Nonparty-Service Requirement and Disfavors Defaults in Pro Se § 1983 Litigation

Date: Nov 16, 2025
No Default Without Proper Service: Third Circuit Reaffirms Nonparty-Service Requirement and Disfavors Defaults in Pro Se § 1983 Litigation Introduction In John M. Gera v. Borough of Frackville, the...
Waiver-by-Amendment: Third Circuit Finds Plaintiff Forfeits Challenge to Removal by Non-Defendant After Adding Remover as a Party; Case-Management Memoranda Count as “Other Paper” for § 1446(b)(3)

Waiver-by-Amendment: Third Circuit Finds Plaintiff Forfeits Challenge to Removal by Non-Defendant After Adding Remover as a Party; Case-Management Memoranda Count as “Other Paper” for § 1446(b)(3)

Date: Nov 16, 2025
Waiver-by-Amendment: Third Circuit Finds Plaintiff Forfeits Challenge to Removal by Non-Defendant After Adding Remover as a Party; Case-Management Memoranda Count as “Other Paper” for § 1446(b)(3)...
Post-Esteras boundaries on “seriousness” at supervised-release revocation: Third Circuit affirms upward variance in United States v. Hardeman

Post-Esteras boundaries on “seriousness” at supervised-release revocation: Third Circuit affirms upward variance in United States v. Hardeman

Date: Nov 16, 2025
Post-Esteras boundaries on “seriousness” at supervised-release revocation: Third Circuit affirms upward variance in United States v. Hardeman Introduction In United States v. Taire Hardeman, the...
Post‑Esteras Boundaries in Revocation Sentencing: Third Circuit Affirms Upward Variance Grounded in Breach of Trust and Violation Conduct in United States v. Taire Hardeman

Post‑Esteras Boundaries in Revocation Sentencing: Third Circuit Affirms Upward Variance Grounded in Breach of Trust and Violation Conduct in United States v. Taire Hardeman

Date: Nov 16, 2025
Post‑Esteras Boundaries in Revocation Sentencing: Third Circuit Affirms Upward Variance Grounded in Breach of Trust and Violation Conduct United States v. Taire Hardeman, No. 24‑2832 & 24‑3230 (3d...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert