Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

federal Case Commentaries

United States v. Terry: Post-Bruen Reaffirmation of § 922(g)(1) Constitutionality and Clarification of Sentencing-Explanation Duties

United States v. Terry: Post-Bruen Reaffirmation of § 922(g)(1) Constitutionality and Clarification of Sentencing-Explanation Duties

Date: Aug 13, 2025
United States v. Terry: Post-Bruen Reaffirmation of § 922(g)(1) Constitutionality and Clarification of Sentencing-Explanation Duties 1. Introduction United States v. Charod Terron Terry, an...
“Interstate Domestic Violence Ends at Death” – A Fourth-Circuit Limitation on § 2261 and on the Use-of-Fire Enhancement

“Interstate Domestic Violence Ends at Death” – A Fourth-Circuit Limitation on § 2261 and on the Use-of-Fire Enhancement

Date: Aug 13, 2025
“Interstate Domestic Violence Ends at Death” – A Fourth-Circuit Limitation on 18 U.S.C. § 2261 and Confining the § 844(h)(1) Use-of-Fire Enhancement 1. Introduction In United States v. Lawrence...
The “Collective-Injury” Doctrine: A New Limitation on Smith Allocation in South Carolina Set-Off Law – Commentary on W.S. v. Cassandra Daniels, 4th Cir. (2025)

The “Collective-Injury” Doctrine: A New Limitation on Smith Allocation in South Carolina Set-Off Law – Commentary on W.S. v. Cassandra Daniels, 4th Cir. (2025)

Date: Aug 13, 2025
The “Collective-Injury” Doctrine: A New Limitation on Smith Allocation in South Carolina Set-Off Law Commentary on W.S. v. Cassandra Daniels, et al. United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth...
“Collective Injury” Supplants Smith Allocation: The Fourth Circuit’s Affirmance of a Full Set-Off in W.S. v. Cassandra Daniels

“Collective Injury” Supplants Smith Allocation: The Fourth Circuit’s Affirmance of a Full Set-Off in W.S. v. Cassandra Daniels

Date: Aug 13, 2025
“Collective Injury” Supplants Smith Allocation: The Fourth Circuit’s Affirmance of a Full Set-Off in W.S. v. Cassandra Daniels Introduction The Fourth Circuit’s unpublished opinion in W.S. v....
“Jurisdiction First, Mootness Later” – The Tenth Circuit BAP’s Clarification on Stay-Relief Orders Entered Before Case Dismissal

“Jurisdiction First, Mootness Later” – The Tenth Circuit BAP’s Clarification on Stay-Relief Orders Entered Before Case Dismissal

Date: Aug 13, 2025
“Jurisdiction First, Mootness Later” – The Tenth Circuit BAP’s Clarification on Stay-Relief Orders Entered Before Case Dismissal 1. Introduction The Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (BAP) for the Tenth...
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies ADEA Prima Facie Proof: Replacement by a Younger Employee Is Enough — Commentary on Gallimore v. City of Opa-Locka

Eleventh Circuit Clarifies ADEA Prima Facie Proof: Replacement by a Younger Employee Is Enough — Commentary on Gallimore v. City of Opa-Locka

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies ADEA Prima Facie Proof: Replacement by a Younger Employee Is Enough In-Depth Commentary on Sharon Gallimore v. City of Opa-Locka, No. 23-12241 (11th Cir. Aug. 6, 2025) 1....
United States v. Petersen (11th Cir. 2025):  A Clearer Timeliness Standard for Successive Coram Nobis Petitions

United States v. Petersen (11th Cir. 2025): A Clearer Timeliness Standard for Successive Coram Nobis Petitions

Date: Aug 13, 2025
United States v. Petersen (11th Cir. 2025): A Clearer Timeliness Standard for Successive Coram Nobis Petitions Introduction In United States v. David Petersen, the Eleventh Circuit again confronted...
“When Futility Trumps the Right to Amend” – Eleventh Circuit Harmonises Rule 15(a)(1) with § 1915(e)(2) Screening in Willy Toussaint v. U.S. Attorney’s Office

“When Futility Trumps the Right to Amend” – Eleventh Circuit Harmonises Rule 15(a)(1) with § 1915(e)(2) Screening in Willy Toussaint v. U.S. Attorney’s Office

Date: Aug 13, 2025
“When Futility Trumps the Right to Amend” – Eleventh Circuit Harmonises Rule 15(a)(1) with § 1915(e)(2) Screening in Willy Toussaint v. U.S. Attorney’s Office 1. Introduction The unpublished decision...
Second Circuit Clarifies the Reach of FDCA § 379r(a): Marketing and Pricing Claims for OTC Drugs Are Pre-empted When Success Would Impose Additional Label Requirements

Second Circuit Clarifies the Reach of FDCA § 379r(a): Marketing and Pricing Claims for OTC Drugs Are Pre-empted When Success Would Impose Additional Label Requirements

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Second Circuit Clarifies the Reach of FDCA § 379r(a): Marketing and Pricing Claims for OTC Drugs Are Pre-empted When Success Would Impose Additional Label Requirements 1. Introduction In Collaza v....
Second Circuit Flexes Rule 62.1: Appellate Remand Permitted After Sua Sponte Indicative Ruling

Second Circuit Flexes Rule 62.1: Appellate Remand Permitted After Sua Sponte Indicative Ruling

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Second Circuit Flexes Rule 62.1: Appellate Remand Permitted After Sua Sponte Indicative Ruling Introduction In Gustavia Home LLC v. Hoyer; Hoyer v. Bank of America, the United States Court of Appeals...
Mosaic Health v. Sanofi-Aventis: A New Blueprint for Pleading Antitrust Conspiracies and Confirming 340B Safety-Net Provider Standing

Mosaic Health v. Sanofi-Aventis: A New Blueprint for Pleading Antitrust Conspiracies and Confirming 340B Safety-Net Provider Standing

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Mosaic Health v. Sanofi-Aventis: A New Blueprint for Pleading Antitrust Conspiracies and Confirming 340B Safety-Net Provider Standing 1. Introduction In Mosaic Health, Inc. v. Sanofi-Aventis U.S.,...
Third Circuit Re-Affirms Stringent Comparator Standard for “Class-of-One” Equal Protection Claims During Municipal Code Enforcement

Third Circuit Re-Affirms Stringent Comparator Standard for “Class-of-One” Equal Protection Claims During Municipal Code Enforcement

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Third Circuit Re-Affirms Stringent Comparator Standard for “Class-of-One” Equal Protection Claims During Municipal Code Enforcement Charles Jaramillo et al. v. City of Coatesville et al., United...
Reaffirmation of “Crime of Violence” Status for Texas Aggravated Assault-By-Threat and the Limits of Equitable Tolling Based on Late Discovery of New Case Law – Commentary on Artiga Minera v. Bondi (5th Cir. 2025)

Reaffirmation of “Crime of Violence” Status for Texas Aggravated Assault-By-Threat and the Limits of Equitable Tolling Based on Late Discovery of New Case Law – Commentary on Artiga Minera v. Bondi (5th Cir. 2025)

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Reaffirmation of “Crime of Violence” Status for Texas Aggravated Assault-By-Threat and the Limits of Equitable Tolling Based on Late Discovery of New Case Law Introduction The United States Court of...
Fifth Circuit Clarifies ADA Discrimination Standard for Heat-Exposure Claims and Reaffirms Non-Waivable Sovereign Immunity — A Commentary on Baughman v. Bowman

Fifth Circuit Clarifies ADA Discrimination Standard for Heat-Exposure Claims and Reaffirms Non-Waivable Sovereign Immunity — A Commentary on Baughman v. Bowman

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Fifth Circuit Clarifies ADA Discrimination Standard for Heat-Exposure Claims and Reaffirms Non-Waivable Sovereign Immunity — A Commentary on Baughman v. Bowman 1. Introduction Baughman v. Bowman, No....
“Exhaustion as Accrual” – Brook v. Holzerland and the Fifth Circuit’s Clarification of FOIA & Privacy Act Limitation Periods

“Exhaustion as Accrual” – Brook v. Holzerland and the Fifth Circuit’s Clarification of FOIA & Privacy Act Limitation Periods

Date: Aug 13, 2025
“Exhaustion as Accrual” – Brook v. Holzerland and the Fifth Circuit’s Clarification of FOIA & Privacy Act Limitation Periods I. Introduction Brook v. Holzerland, Nos. 24-40640 & 25-40014 (5th Cir....
“Constructive Exhaustion Sets the Clock” – Commentary on Brook v. Holzerland (5th Cir. 2025)

“Constructive Exhaustion Sets the Clock” – Commentary on Brook v. Holzerland (5th Cir. 2025)

Date: Aug 13, 2025
“Constructive Exhaustion Sets the Clock” – Fifth Circuit Clarifies FOIA & Privacy Act Accrual and Rejects Continuing-Violation Tolling Introduction Brook v. Holzerland, Nos. 24-40640 & 25-40014 (5th...
No Forgiveness Without Eligibility: Fifth Circuit Defines PPP Loan-Forgiveness Limits in Bruckner Truck Sales v. Guzman (2025)

No Forgiveness Without Eligibility: Fifth Circuit Defines PPP Loan-Forgiveness Limits in Bruckner Truck Sales v. Guzman (2025)

Date: Aug 13, 2025
No Forgiveness Without Eligibility: Fifth Circuit Defines PPP Loan-Forgiveness Limits in Bruckner Truck Sales v. Guzman (2025) 1. Introduction The Fifth Circuit’s decision in Bruckner Truck Sales,...
“Performance Alone Does Not Rebut Article 1947” – A Comprehensive Commentary on CAM Logistics v. Pratt Industries

“Performance Alone Does Not Rebut Article 1947” – A Comprehensive Commentary on CAM Logistics v. Pratt Industries

Date: Aug 13, 2025
“Performance Alone Does Not Rebut Article 1947” CAM Logistics, L.L.C. v. Pratt Industries — Fifth Circuit, 2025 1. Introduction This appeal presented the Fifth Circuit with a deceptively simple...
Commentary on Doe v. Kerrville ISD: “Parental Obstruction as a Shield – Refining Deliberate-Indifference Standards under Title IX and § 1983”

Commentary on Doe v. Kerrville ISD: “Parental Obstruction as a Shield – Refining Deliberate-Indifference Standards under Title IX and § 1983”

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Parental Obstruction as a Shield – Refining Deliberate-Indifference Standards under Title IX and § 1983 Introduction In Doe v. Kerrville ISD, No. 24-50394 (5th Cir. Aug. 6 2025), the United States...
Unsupported Allegations and PADS Waivers: Fifth Circuit Narrows Mississippi’s McArn Exceptions in Greene v. Entergy Operations

Unsupported Allegations and PADS Waivers: Fifth Circuit Narrows Mississippi’s McArn Exceptions in Greene v. Entergy Operations

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Unsupported Allegations and PADS Waivers: Fifth Circuit Narrows Mississippi’s McArn Exceptions in Greene v. Entergy Operations 1. Introduction In Greene v. Entergy Operations, Inc., No. 24-60603 (5th...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert