Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

federal Case Commentaries

Blaine v. Mystere Living & Healthcare: Appellate Review Is Limited to Preserved Theories of Harm in Title VII Cases

Blaine v. Mystere Living & Healthcare: Appellate Review Is Limited to Preserved Theories of Harm in Title VII Cases

Date: Nov 16, 2025
Appellate Review Is Limited to Preserved Theories of Harm in Title VII Cases Introduction In Blaine v. Mystere Living & Healthcare, Inc., No. 24-3121 (10th Cir. Nov. 14, 2025), a Tenth Circuit panel...
Tenth Circuit Narrows § 1446(b)(3): “Other Paper” Must Originate in the Removed Case; Prior Jurisdictional Dismissals Preclude Re‑Litigation of Administrative Exhaustion

Tenth Circuit Narrows § 1446(b)(3): “Other Paper” Must Originate in the Removed Case; Prior Jurisdictional Dismissals Preclude Re‑Litigation of Administrative Exhaustion

Date: Nov 16, 2025
Tenth Circuit Narrows § 1446(b)(3): “Other Paper” Must Originate in the Removed Case; Prior Jurisdictional Dismissals Preclude Re‑Litigation of Administrative Exhaustion Introduction This published...
Abstention Can Stay FAA § 4 Petitions When Unsettled State-Law Public-Policy Issues Predominate: The Tenth Circuit’s Guidance in Nu Skin Enterprises v. Raab

Abstention Can Stay FAA § 4 Petitions When Unsettled State-Law Public-Policy Issues Predominate: The Tenth Circuit’s Guidance in Nu Skin Enterprises v. Raab

Date: Nov 16, 2025
Abstention Can Stay FAA § 4 Petitions When Unsettled State-Law Public-Policy Issues Predominate: The Tenth Circuit’s Guidance in Nu Skin Enterprises v. Raab Introduction Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc.,...
No Standing to Attack Permit and Discretionary Sign Rules When Denial Rests on an Unchallenged Billboard Ban — Commentary on New South Media Group, LLC v. Rainbow City, Alabama (11th Cir. Nov. 14, 2025)

No Standing to Attack Permit and Discretionary Sign Rules When Denial Rests on an Unchallenged Billboard Ban — Commentary on New South Media Group, LLC v. Rainbow City, Alabama (11th Cir. Nov. 14, 2025)

Date: Nov 16, 2025
No Standing to Attack Permit and Discretionary Sign Rules When Denial Rests on an Unchallenged Billboard Ban Commentary on New South Media Group, LLC v. City of Rainbow City, Alabama, No. 24-10895...
Automobiles as Per Se Instrumentalities of Interstate Commerce and “Provided or Administered” Roads Under § 245: The Eleventh Circuit’s Decision in United States v. William Bryan

Automobiles as Per Se Instrumentalities of Interstate Commerce and “Provided or Administered” Roads Under § 245: The Eleventh Circuit’s Decision in United States v. William Bryan

Date: Nov 16, 2025
Automobiles as Per Se Instrumentalities of Interstate Commerce and “Provided or Administered” Roads Under § 245: The Eleventh Circuit’s Decision in United States v. William Bryan Court: United States...
No Pro Rata Requirement for “Common Enterprise” and Clarified Ponzi-Scheme Loss/Restitution Methodologies: United States v. Maldonado‑Vargas (1st Cir. 2025)

No Pro Rata Requirement for “Common Enterprise” and Clarified Ponzi-Scheme Loss/Restitution Methodologies: United States v. Maldonado‑Vargas (1st Cir. 2025)

Date: Nov 16, 2025
No Pro Rata Requirement for “Common Enterprise” and Clarified Ponzi-Scheme Loss/Restitution Methodologies: United States v. Maldonado‑Vargas (1st Cir. 2025) Introduction United States v....
No CIPA “Interception” When the Browser Sends a Separate, Direct Transmission to a Tracker; CMIA Liability Requires Substantive Medical Content — Cole v. Quest Diagnostics (3d Cir. 2025)

No CIPA “Interception” When the Browser Sends a Separate, Direct Transmission to a Tracker; CMIA Liability Requires Substantive Medical Content — Cole v. Quest Diagnostics (3d Cir. 2025)

Date: Nov 16, 2025
No CIPA “Interception” When the Browser Sends a Separate, Direct Transmission to a Tracker; CMIA Liability Requires Substantive Medical Content Commentary on Angela Cole v. Quest Diagnostics Inc.,...
Medical Safety–Based Denials of MAT Do Not Constitute ADA “Intentional Discrimination” or Eighth Amendment Deliberate Indifference: The Third Circuit’s Nonprecedential Guidance in Rokita v. Klinefelter

Medical Safety–Based Denials of MAT Do Not Constitute ADA “Intentional Discrimination” or Eighth Amendment Deliberate Indifference: The Third Circuit’s Nonprecedential Guidance in Rokita v. Klinefelter

Date: Nov 16, 2025
Medical Safety–Based Denials of MAT Do Not Constitute ADA “Intentional Discrimination” or Eighth Amendment Deliberate Indifference: The Third Circuit’s Nonprecedential Guidance in Rokita v....
Mistaken Refusal to Deal Is Privileged; NJCFA Does Not Reach Negotiated TV Ad Buys: Unimed International Inc. v. Fox News Network, LLC (3d Cir. 2025)

Mistaken Refusal to Deal Is Privileged; NJCFA Does Not Reach Negotiated TV Ad Buys: Unimed International Inc. v. Fox News Network, LLC (3d Cir. 2025)

Date: Nov 16, 2025
Mistaken Refusal to Deal Is Privileged; NJCFA Does Not Reach Negotiated TV Ad Buys Case: Unimed International Inc. v. Fox News Network, LLC, No. 24-2987 (3d Cir. Nov. 13, 2025) Court: United States...
Illegal Street-Drug Overdose as a Superseding Cause in Maritime Wrongful-Death Claims: The Fifth Circuit’s New Rule in Bommarito v. Belle Chasse Marine Transportation

Illegal Street-Drug Overdose as a Superseding Cause in Maritime Wrongful-Death Claims: The Fifth Circuit’s New Rule in Bommarito v. Belle Chasse Marine Transportation

Date: Nov 16, 2025
Illegal Street-Drug Overdose as a Superseding Cause in Maritime Wrongful-Death Claims: The Fifth Circuit’s New Rule in Bommarito v. Belle Chasse Marine Transportation Introduction In Bommarito v....
“Heirs and Assigns Forever” Are Words of Limitation in Texas Land Patents: Pleading a Trespass-to-Try-Title Claim Requires a Plausible Chain of Title

“Heirs and Assigns Forever” Are Words of Limitation in Texas Land Patents: Pleading a Trespass-to-Try-Title Claim Requires a Plausible Chain of Title

Date: Nov 16, 2025
“Heirs and Assigns Forever” Are Words of Limitation in Texas Land Patents: Pleading a Trespass-to-Try-Title Claim Requires a Plausible Chain of Title Introduction In Brown v. Carrington, No. 25-40099...
Post-Confirmation Jurisdiction Ends at the Plan’s Edge: Fifth Circuit Limits “Related-To” Jurisdiction and Rejects Plan-Based Recasting of Post-Confirmation Deals as Executory Contracts

Post-Confirmation Jurisdiction Ends at the Plan’s Edge: Fifth Circuit Limits “Related-To” Jurisdiction and Rejects Plan-Based Recasting of Post-Confirmation Deals as Executory Contracts

Date: Nov 16, 2025
Post-Confirmation Jurisdiction Ends at the Plan’s Edge: Fifth Circuit Limits “Related-To” Jurisdiction and Rejects Plan-Based Recasting of Post-Confirmation Deals as Executory Contracts Introduction...
Fifth Circuit: Buyers of Chattel Paper Are Exempt from Louisiana UCC § 9-210 Accounting Requests, and Pro Se Litigants Risk Sanctions for Fabricated Citations

Fifth Circuit: Buyers of Chattel Paper Are Exempt from Louisiana UCC § 9-210 Accounting Requests, and Pro Se Litigants Risk Sanctions for Fabricated Citations

Date: Nov 16, 2025
Fifth Circuit: Buyers of Chattel Paper Are Exempt from Louisiana UCC § 9-210 Accounting Requests, and Pro Se Litigants Risk Sanctions for Fabricated Citations Introduction In Miller v. Stuart, No....
Thomas v. Parker: Fifth Circuit reaffirms that the trial record controls, summary‑judgment concessions are not judicial admissions, and pro se litigants must make offers of proof

Thomas v. Parker: Fifth Circuit reaffirms that the trial record controls, summary‑judgment concessions are not judicial admissions, and pro se litigants must make offers of proof

Date: Nov 16, 2025
Thomas v. Parker: Fifth Circuit reaffirms that the trial record controls, summary‑judgment concessions are not judicial admissions, and pro se litigants must make offers of proof Court: U.S. Court of...
Bonner and the Fifth Circuit’s Across-the-Board Foreclosure of § 922(g)(1) Challenges—With a Concurrence Urging Reexamination of Commerce Clause and Bruen Methodology

Bonner and the Fifth Circuit’s Across-the-Board Foreclosure of § 922(g)(1) Challenges—With a Concurrence Urging Reexamination of Commerce Clause and Bruen Methodology

Date: Nov 16, 2025
Bonner and the Fifth Circuit’s Across-the-Board Foreclosure of § 922(g)(1) Challenges—With a Concurrence Urging Reexamination of Commerce Clause and Bruen Methodology Case: United States v. Bonner,...
Restitution Under § 1593 Extends to Parents’ Own Proximate Losses; “Relevant Losses” Include Non‑Medical Safety Expenses — United States v. Limon (5th Cir. 2025)

Restitution Under § 1593 Extends to Parents’ Own Proximate Losses; “Relevant Losses” Include Non‑Medical Safety Expenses — United States v. Limon (5th Cir. 2025)

Date: Nov 16, 2025
Restitution Under § 1593 Extends to Parents’ Own Proximate Losses; “Relevant Losses” Include Non‑Medical Safety Expenses — United States v. Limon (5th Cir. 2025) Introduction This Fifth Circuit...
Guardians Are “Victims” Under the TVPA: Fifth Circuit Allows Restitution for Guardians’ Own Proximately Caused Losses and Confirms Non‑Medical Coping Costs Are Compensable — United States v. Limon

Guardians Are “Victims” Under the TVPA: Fifth Circuit Allows Restitution for Guardians’ Own Proximately Caused Losses and Confirms Non‑Medical Coping Costs Are Compensable — United States v. Limon

Date: Nov 16, 2025
Guardians Are “Victims” Under the TVPA: Fifth Circuit Allows Restitution for Guardians’ Own Proximately Caused Losses and Confirms Non‑Medical Coping Costs Are Compensable Commentary on United States...
Post-Loper Bright CIMT Doctrine: Knowing Receipt of Stolen Property Categorically Involves Moral Turpitude

Post-Loper Bright CIMT Doctrine: Knowing Receipt of Stolen Property Categorically Involves Moral Turpitude

Date: Nov 16, 2025
Post-Loper Bright CIMT Doctrine: Knowing Receipt of Stolen Property Categorically Involves Moral Turpitude Introduction In Cesar Solis-Flores v. Pamela Jo Bondi, the Fourth Circuit revisited whether...
Final Means Final: Tenth Circuit Bars Collateral Attacks on Subject‑Matter Jurisdiction and Affirms Vexatious‑Litigant Remedies in Massey v. Computershare

Final Means Final: Tenth Circuit Bars Collateral Attacks on Subject‑Matter Jurisdiction and Affirms Vexatious‑Litigant Remedies in Massey v. Computershare

Date: Nov 16, 2025
Final Means Final: Tenth Circuit Bars Collateral Attacks on Subject‑Matter Jurisdiction and Affirms Vexatious‑Litigant Remedies in Massey v. Computershare Introduction In Massey v. Computershare...
No Collateral Attack on Jurisdiction: Tenth Circuit Reaffirms Res Judicata and Upholds Fees and Filing Restrictions in Massey v. Computershare Limited

No Collateral Attack on Jurisdiction: Tenth Circuit Reaffirms Res Judicata and Upholds Fees and Filing Restrictions in Massey v. Computershare Limited

Date: Nov 16, 2025
No Collateral Attack on Jurisdiction: Tenth Circuit Reaffirms Res Judicata and Upholds Fees and Filing Restrictions in Massey v. Computershare Limited Introduction In Massey v. Computershare Limited,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert