Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

federal Case Commentaries

SEC v. Ahmed (2d Cir. 2025): Tightening Asset-Freeze Relief, Permitting Counsel Withdrawal, Declining Federal Interference with State Tax Levies under the Tax Injunction Act

SEC v. Ahmed (2d Cir. 2025): Tightening Asset-Freeze Relief, Permitting Counsel Withdrawal, Declining Federal Interference with State Tax Levies under the Tax Injunction Act

Date: Nov 19, 2025
SEC v. Ahmed (2d Cir. 2025): Tightening Asset-Freeze Relief, Permitting Counsel Withdrawal, Declining Federal Interference with State Tax Levies under the Tax Injunction Act Introduction In a...
Tinoco v. Bondi (2d Cir. 2025): Reaffirmation that Pending Collateral Attacks Do Not Undermine Conviction Finality; Abandonment and Internal Relocation as Dispositive Bars to Withholding; No Automatic Stay of Removal After BIA Decision

Tinoco v. Bondi (2d Cir. 2025): Reaffirmation that Pending Collateral Attacks Do Not Undermine Conviction Finality; Abandonment and Internal Relocation as Dispositive Bars to Withholding; No Automatic Stay of Removal After BIA Decision

Date: Nov 19, 2025
Tinoco v. Bondi (2d Cir. 2025): Reaffirmation that Pending Collateral Attacks Do Not Undermine Conviction Finality; Abandonment and Internal Relocation as Dispositive Bars to Withholding; No...
Nonfunctional Serialization Requirements and “Common Use”: The Second Circuit Upholds 18 U.S.C. § 922(k) Under Bruen in United States v. Gomez

Nonfunctional Serialization Requirements and “Common Use”: The Second Circuit Upholds 18 U.S.C. § 922(k) Under Bruen in United States v. Gomez

Date: Nov 19, 2025
Nonfunctional Serialization Requirements and “Common Use”: The Second Circuit Upholds 18 U.S.C. § 922(k) Under Bruen in United States v. Gomez Introduction In United States v. Gomez, No. 24-1943-cr...
Tenth Circuit adopts objective, non–administrative-feasibility ascertainability; clarifies PRSA compound-interest accrual “until the day paid”; and limits punitive damages in Oklahoma royalty class actions absent an independent tort

Tenth Circuit adopts objective, non–administrative-feasibility ascertainability; clarifies PRSA compound-interest accrual “until the day paid”; and limits punitive damages in Oklahoma royalty class actions absent an independent tort

Date: Nov 19, 2025
Tenth Circuit adopts objective, non–administrative-feasibility ascertainability; clarifies PRSA compound-interest accrual “until the day paid”; and limits punitive damages in Oklahoma royalty class...
Repeal of 12 U.S.C. § 1441a Does Not Terminate RTC Affordable-Housing Contracts: Eleventh Circuit Confirms FDIC and Its Agents Can Enforce RTC Agreements by Contract and Under 12 U.S.C. § 1831q(n)(4)

Repeal of 12 U.S.C. § 1441a Does Not Terminate RTC Affordable-Housing Contracts: Eleventh Circuit Confirms FDIC and Its Agents Can Enforce RTC Agreements by Contract and Under 12 U.S.C. § 1831q(n)(4)

Date: Nov 18, 2025
Repeal of 12 U.S.C. § 1441a Does Not Terminate RTC Affordable-Housing Contracts: Eleventh Circuit Confirms FDIC and Its Agents Can Enforce RTC Agreements by Contract and Under 12 U.S.C. § 1831q(n)(4)...
Excess Judgment Is for Damages, Not Liability: Eleventh Circuit Limits Use of UM Verdicts in Florida First‑Party Bad Faith Trials

Excess Judgment Is for Damages, Not Liability: Eleventh Circuit Limits Use of UM Verdicts in Florida First‑Party Bad Faith Trials

Date: Nov 18, 2025
Excess Judgment Is for Damages, Not Liability: Eleventh Circuit Limits Use of UM Verdicts in Florida First‑Party Bad Faith Trials Case: Lauren Woods v. Progressive American Insurance Company Court:...
No Emergency Exception to the Takings Clause: Eleventh Circuit Holds Pandemic Closure of Private Beaches Is a Per Se Physical Taking Requiring Just Compensation

No Emergency Exception to the Takings Clause: Eleventh Circuit Holds Pandemic Closure of Private Beaches Is a Per Se Physical Taking Requiring Just Compensation

Date: Nov 18, 2025
No Emergency Exception to the Takings Clause: Eleventh Circuit Holds Pandemic Closure of Private Beaches Is a Per Se Physical Taking Requiring Just Compensation Introduction This published decision...
Under New Jersey Law, Grace-Period Notices Need Not State the Amount Due; Customer-Service Assurances Do Not Estop Policy Lapse Absent Misrepresentation and Reasonable Reliance

Under New Jersey Law, Grace-Period Notices Need Not State the Amount Due; Customer-Service Assurances Do Not Estop Policy Lapse Absent Misrepresentation and Reasonable Reliance

Date: Nov 18, 2025
Under New Jersey Law, Grace-Period Notices Need Not State the Amount Due; Customer-Service Assurances Do Not Estop Policy Lapse Absent Misrepresentation and Reasonable Reliance Introduction In...
Primary Industry Controls: Fifth Circuit Holds SBA May Reassign NAICS Codes and Apply Section 7(a) Size Rules to PPP Affiliation Waivers

Primary Industry Controls: Fifth Circuit Holds SBA May Reassign NAICS Codes and Apply Section 7(a) Size Rules to PPP Affiliation Waivers

Date: Nov 18, 2025
Primary Industry Controls: Fifth Circuit Holds SBA May Reassign NAICS Codes and Apply Section 7(a) Size Rules to PPP Affiliation Waivers Introduction This commentary analyzes the Fifth Circuit’s...
No Silent Summary Judgments: Fifth Circuit Vacates Hostile-Environment Disposition for Failure to Comply with Rule 56(a)’s Reason-Giving Requirement

No Silent Summary Judgments: Fifth Circuit Vacates Hostile-Environment Disposition for Failure to Comply with Rule 56(a)’s Reason-Giving Requirement

Date: Nov 18, 2025
No Silent Summary Judgments: Fifth Circuit Vacates Hostile-Environment Disposition for Failure to Comply with Rule 56(a)’s Reason-Giving Requirement Introduction In Smith v. United Parcel Service,...
Bonner Cements Fifth Circuit Foreclosure of Standard § 922(g)(1) Challenges; Concurrence Flags Commerce Clause and Bruen Methodology Fault Lines

Bonner Cements Fifth Circuit Foreclosure of Standard § 922(g)(1) Challenges; Concurrence Flags Commerce Clause and Bruen Methodology Fault Lines

Date: Nov 18, 2025
Bonner Cements Fifth Circuit Foreclosure of Standard § 922(g)(1) Challenges; Concurrence Flags Commerce Clause and Bruen Methodology Fault Lines Introduction In United States v. Bonner, No. 24-60601...
No Rule 11 Duty to Warn That Criminal Forfeiture Can Exceed the Statutory Maximum Fine; Broad Appeal Waivers Encompass Forfeiture Challenges

No Rule 11 Duty to Warn That Criminal Forfeiture Can Exceed the Statutory Maximum Fine; Broad Appeal Waivers Encompass Forfeiture Challenges

Date: Nov 18, 2025
No Rule 11 Duty to Warn That Criminal Forfeiture Can Exceed the Statutory Maximum Fine; Broad Appeal Waivers Encompass Forfeiture Challenges Introduction In United States v. Shawn Johnson, Nos....
Forfeiture Is Not a “Fine” for Rule 11 Purposes: Fourth Circuit Upholds Plea Advisements, Enforces Appeal Waiver Over Forfeiture, and Reaffirms Bar on As‑Applied § 922(g)(1) Challenges

Forfeiture Is Not a “Fine” for Rule 11 Purposes: Fourth Circuit Upholds Plea Advisements, Enforces Appeal Waiver Over Forfeiture, and Reaffirms Bar on As‑Applied § 922(g)(1) Challenges

Date: Nov 18, 2025
Forfeiture Is Not a “Fine” for Rule 11 Purposes: Fourth Circuit Upholds Plea Advisements, Enforces Appeal Waiver Over Forfeiture, and Reaffirms Bar on As‑Applied § 922(g)(1) Challenges Introduction...
Forfeiture Is Not a “Fine” for Rule 11 Purposes: The Fourth Circuit Clarifies Plea Colloquy Advisements and Appeal-Waiver Limits in United States v. Johnson

Forfeiture Is Not a “Fine” for Rule 11 Purposes: The Fourth Circuit Clarifies Plea Colloquy Advisements and Appeal-Waiver Limits in United States v. Johnson

Date: Nov 18, 2025
Forfeiture Is Not a “Fine” for Rule 11 Purposes: The Fourth Circuit Clarifies Plea Colloquy Advisements and Appeal-Waiver Limits in United States v. Johnson Court: United States Court of Appeals for...
Alternative-Variance “Safety Valve”: The Fourth Circuit Reaffirms That an Explicit, Well‑Reasoned Alternative Sentence Can Neutralize a Guidelines Miscalculation on Plain‑Error Review

Alternative-Variance “Safety Valve”: The Fourth Circuit Reaffirms That an Explicit, Well‑Reasoned Alternative Sentence Can Neutralize a Guidelines Miscalculation on Plain‑Error Review

Date: Nov 18, 2025
Alternative-Variance “Safety Valve”: The Fourth Circuit Reaffirms That an Explicit, Well‑Reasoned Alternative Sentence Can Neutralize a Guidelines Miscalculation on Plain‑Error Review Introduction...
Abandonment, Exhaustion, and Financial Motive: Second Circuit Reaffirms Nexus Requirements in Gang-Related Asylum Claims

Abandonment, Exhaustion, and Financial Motive: Second Circuit Reaffirms Nexus Requirements in Gang-Related Asylum Claims

Date: Nov 16, 2025
Abandonment, Exhaustion, and Financial Motive: Second Circuit Reaffirms Nexus Requirements in Gang-Related Asylum Claims Introduction In Chucuri-Carguachi v. Bondi (2d Cir. Nov. 14, 2025), a...
Victim’s Signed Complaint Can Supply Probable Cause for Any Offense; Pretrial Food-Deprivation Claims Fail Absent Harm or Deliberate Indifference

Victim’s Signed Complaint Can Supply Probable Cause for Any Offense; Pretrial Food-Deprivation Claims Fail Absent Harm or Deliberate Indifference

Date: Nov 16, 2025
Victim’s Signed Complaint Can Supply Probable Cause for Any Offense; Pretrial Food-Deprivation Claims Fail Absent Harm or Deliberate Indifference Introduction In Peterkin v. Carr, No. 24-1148-cv (2d...
Using Real Identities to Overcome Due Diligence Is “At the Crux” Under § 1028A: The Second Circuit’s Application of Dubin in United States v. Colello

Using Real Identities to Overcome Due Diligence Is “At the Crux” Under § 1028A: The Second Circuit’s Application of Dubin in United States v. Colello

Date: Nov 16, 2025
Using Real Identities to Overcome Due Diligence Is “At the Crux” Under § 1028A: The Second Circuit’s Application of Dubin in United States v. Colello Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second...
Deferential Review of “Exceptional and Extremely Unusual Hardship” and No Consolidation of Pending Motions to Reopen: Cruz‑Lopez v. Bondi (6th Cir. 2025)

Deferential Review of “Exceptional and Extremely Unusual Hardship” and No Consolidation of Pending Motions to Reopen: Cruz‑Lopez v. Bondi (6th Cir. 2025)

Date: Nov 16, 2025
Deferential Review of “Exceptional and Extremely Unusual Hardship” and No Consolidation of Pending Motions to Reopen: Cruz‑Lopez v. Bondi (6th Cir. 2025) Introduction In Jovita Cruz‑Lopez v. Pamela...
Reaffirming the “Zone of Choice” in Social Security Cases: ALJ’s Global Record Statement Suffices for Combined-Impacts Review and Omission of Nonfunctional Lab Results Is Not Error

Reaffirming the “Zone of Choice” in Social Security Cases: ALJ’s Global Record Statement Suffices for Combined-Impacts Review and Omission of Nonfunctional Lab Results Is Not Error

Date: Nov 16, 2025
Reaffirming the “Zone of Choice” in Social Security Cases: ALJ’s Global Record Statement Suffices for Combined-Impacts Review and Omission of Nonfunctional Lab Results Is Not Error Introduction This...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert