Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

federal Case Commentaries

United States v. Santos: Second Circuit Re-Affirms Broad District-Court Discretion to Deny Compassionate Release Solely on § 3553(a) Factors

United States v. Santos: Second Circuit Re-Affirms Broad District-Court Discretion to Deny Compassionate Release Solely on § 3553(a) Factors

Date: Jun 30, 2025
United States v. Santos: Second Circuit Re-Affirms Broad District-Court Discretion to Deny Compassionate Release Solely on § 3553(a) Factors Introduction United States v. Santos, No. 22-3213-cr (2d...
Redefining “Paternity Established by Legitimation” –  The Parental-Rights Test under former INA § 321(a)(3) after Lainez v. Bondi

Redefining “Paternity Established by Legitimation” – The Parental-Rights Test under former INA § 321(a)(3) after Lainez v. Bondi

Date: Jun 30, 2025
Redefining “Paternity Established by Legitimation” – The Parental-Rights Test under former INA § 321(a)(3) after Lainez v. Bondi Introduction Case: Lainez v. Bondi, United States Court of Appeals for...

        Collective Inconsistencies & Post-Santos-Zocaria Exhaustion:
        Commentary on Abdul Ohab v. U.S. Attorney General (11th Cir. 2025)

Collective Inconsistencies & Post-Santos-Zocaria Exhaustion: Commentary on Abdul Ohab v. U.S. Attorney General (11th Cir. 2025)

Date: Jun 30, 2025
Collective Inconsistencies & Post-Santos-Zocaria Exhaustion Commentary on Abdul Ohab v. U.S. Attorney General 1. Introduction In Abdul Ohab v. U.S. Attorney General, the Eleventh Circuit Court of...
“No Representation by Proxy”: The Eleventh Circuit Re-affirms Pro-Se Limits, Rule 4(i) Service, and Bivens Restraints in Akash Dixit v. Vincent Fairnot

“No Representation by Proxy”: The Eleventh Circuit Re-affirms Pro-Se Limits, Rule 4(i) Service, and Bivens Restraints in Akash Dixit v. Vincent Fairnot

Date: Jun 30, 2025
“No Representation by Proxy”: The Eleventh Circuit Re-affirms Pro-Se Limits, Rule 4(i) Service, and Bivens Restraints in Akash Dixit v. Vincent Fairnot Introduction The unpublished decision of the...
Divestiture Doctrine Meets Core Proceedings: Eleventh Circuit Holds that Pending Appeals Do Not Halt Claim-Allowance Litigation – Commentary on Alice Guan v. Ellingsworth Residential Community Association, Inc.

Divestiture Doctrine Meets Core Proceedings: Eleventh Circuit Holds that Pending Appeals Do Not Halt Claim-Allowance Litigation – Commentary on Alice Guan v. Ellingsworth Residential Community Association, Inc.

Date: Jun 30, 2025
Divestiture Doctrine Meets Core Proceedings: Eleventh Circuit Holds that Pending Appeals Do Not Halt Claim-Allowance Litigation Introduction Alice Guan, homeowner and erstwhile litigant against her...
Refining the Comparator Standard in Federal-Sector Gender Discrimination Claims: A Commentary on Marshall v. Secretary of the Navy (11th Cir. 2025)

Refining the Comparator Standard in Federal-Sector Gender Discrimination Claims: A Commentary on Marshall v. Secretary of the Navy (11th Cir. 2025)

Date: Jun 30, 2025
Refining the Comparator Standard in Federal-Sector Gender Discrimination Claims: A Commentary on Marshall v. Secretary of the Navy (11th Cir. 2025) 1. Introduction Jonathan Marshall, a Navy...

    “The Family Time Doctrine”: Eleventh Circuit Holds that Alleged Post-Service Damage
    Does Not Defeat a Maritime Lien and Confirms Expedited Sale Power after Owner’s Delay

“The Family Time Doctrine”: Eleventh Circuit Holds that Alleged Post-Service Damage Does Not Defeat a Maritime Lien and Confirms Expedited Sale Power after Owner’s Delay

Date: Jun 30, 2025
“The Family Time Doctrine”: Eleventh Circuit Holds that Alleged Post-Service Damage Does Not Defeat a Maritime Lien and Confirms Expedited Sale Power after Owner’s Delay Introduction In Naval...
United States v. Chandler and the Eleventh Circuit’s Post-Loper Bright Endorsement of Kisor Deference to Sentencing-Guidelines Commentary

United States v. Chandler and the Eleventh Circuit’s Post-Loper Bright Endorsement of Kisor Deference to Sentencing-Guidelines Commentary

Date: Jun 30, 2025
United States v. Chandler and the Eleventh Circuit’s Post-Loper Bright Endorsement of Kisor Deference to Sentencing-Guidelines Commentary Introduction In United States v. Gregory Chandler, Jr., Nos....
Reaffirming Kisor Deference and the 75-to-1 Video-Image Ratio under U.S.S.G. §2G2.2: A Commentary on United States v. Gregory Chandler, Jr.

Reaffirming Kisor Deference and the 75-to-1 Video-Image Ratio under U.S.S.G. §2G2.2: A Commentary on United States v. Gregory Chandler, Jr.

Date: Jun 30, 2025
Reaffirming Kisor Deference and the 75-to-1 Video-Image Ratio under U.S.S.G. § 2G2.2 – Commentary on United States v. Gregory Chandler, Jr. 1. Introduction In United States v. Gregory Chandler, Jr.,...
United States v. Lawson: Clarifying “Reasonable Delay” for Digital-Device Search Warrants in Complex Fraud Investigations

United States v. Lawson: Clarifying “Reasonable Delay” for Digital-Device Search Warrants in Complex Fraud Investigations

Date: Jun 30, 2025
United States v. Lawson: Clarifying “Reasonable Delay” for Digital-Device Search Warrants in Complex Fraud Investigations 1. Introduction The Eleventh Circuit’s unpublished decision in United States...
United States v. Kelvontae Brown: Eleventh Circuit Re-Affirms the Presumptive Constitutionality of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) After Bruen and Rahimi

United States v. Kelvontae Brown: Eleventh Circuit Re-Affirms the Presumptive Constitutionality of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) After Bruen and Rahimi

Date: Jun 30, 2025
United States v. Kelvontae Brown: Eleventh Circuit Re-Affirms the Presumptive Constitutionality of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) After Bruen and Rahimi 1. Introduction United States v. Kelvontae Brown, No....

The Sixth Circuit’s “Element-by-Element” Mandate for Class Certification:
Speerly v. General Motors, LLC and the Re-Calibration of Rule 23 Analysis

The Sixth Circuit’s “Element-by-Element” Mandate for Class Certification: Speerly v. General Motors, LLC and the Re-Calibration of Rule 23 Analysis

Date: Jun 30, 2025
The Sixth Circuit’s “Element-by-Element” Mandate for Class Certification: Speerly v. General Motors, LLC and the Re-Calibration of Rule 23 Analysis 1. Introduction On 27 June 2025 the en-banc United...
United States v. Higgins: “Continuous-Dealer Residence Nexus” and Refreshed-Staleness Doctrine Fortified by the Sixth Circuit

United States v. Higgins: “Continuous-Dealer Residence Nexus” and Refreshed-Staleness Doctrine Fortified by the Sixth Circuit

Date: Jun 30, 2025
United States v. Higgins: “Continuous-Dealer Residence Nexus” and Refreshed-Staleness Doctrine Fortified by the Sixth Circuit Introduction Citation: United States v. Rodney Hamilton Higgins, Jr., No....
No Affirmative Union Duty to Initiate Discrimination Grievance Absent Member Request: Commentary on Sullers v. International Union Elevator Constructors, Local 2 (7th Cir. 2025)

No Affirmative Union Duty to Initiate Discrimination Grievance Absent Member Request: Commentary on Sullers v. International Union Elevator Constructors, Local 2 (7th Cir. 2025)

Date: Jun 30, 2025
No Affirmative Union Duty to Initiate Discrimination Grievance Absent Member Request: A Detailed Commentary on Anthony B. Sullers, Sr. v. International Union of Elevator Constructors, Local 2, 7th...
Seventh Circuit Confirms Muldrow’s “Some-Harm” Standard Applies Broadly to ADEA Claims – A Comment on Mary Arnold v. United Airlines, Inc.

Seventh Circuit Confirms Muldrow’s “Some-Harm” Standard Applies Broadly to ADEA Claims – A Comment on Mary Arnold v. United Airlines, Inc.

Date: Jun 30, 2025
Seventh Circuit Confirms Muldrow’s “Some-Harm” Standard Applies Broadly to ADEA Claims Introduction Mary Ann Arnold spent twenty-six years working in corporate communications at United Airlines...

        United States v. Haddad, Jr.: The Seventh Circuit Clarifies Plain-Error Review 
        and Anders Procedure in Supervised-Release Revocations

United States v. Haddad, Jr.: The Seventh Circuit Clarifies Plain-Error Review and Anders Procedure in Supervised-Release Revocations

Date: Jun 30, 2025
United States v. Haddad, Jr.: The Seventh Circuit Clarifies Plain-Error Review and Anders Procedure in Supervised-Release Revocations 1. Introduction In United States v. Ronald Haddad, Jr., Nos....
Seventh Circuit Clarifies Plain-Error Review of Impermissible § 3553(a) Factors in Supervised-Release Revocations – Comment on United States v. Haddad

Seventh Circuit Clarifies Plain-Error Review of Impermissible § 3553(a) Factors in Supervised-Release Revocations – Comment on United States v. Haddad

Date: Jun 30, 2025
Seventh Circuit Clarifies Plain-Error Review of Impermissible § 3553(a) Factors in Supervised-Release Revocations Comprehensive Commentary on United States v. Ronald Haddad, Jr., Nos. 24-2855 et al....
United States v. Haddad, Jr.: Seventh Circuit Clarifies Plain-Error Review When Impermissible § 3553(a) Factors Appear in Revocation Sentencing

United States v. Haddad, Jr.: Seventh Circuit Clarifies Plain-Error Review When Impermissible § 3553(a) Factors Appear in Revocation Sentencing

Date: Jun 30, 2025
United States v. Haddad, Jr.: Seventh Circuit Clarifies Plain-Error Review When Impermissible § 3553(a) Factors Appear in Revocation Sentencing Introduction Ronald Haddad, Jr. appealed the revocation...
United States v. Haddad: Clarifying Plain-Error Review When Impermissible § 3553(a) Factors Creep into Revocation Sentencing

United States v. Haddad: Clarifying Plain-Error Review When Impermissible § 3553(a) Factors Creep into Revocation Sentencing

Date: Jun 30, 2025
United States v. Haddad: Clarifying Plain-Error Review When Impermissible § 3553(a) Factors Creep into Revocation Sentencing Introduction United States v. Ronald Haddad, Jr., Nos. 24-2855, 25-1484,...
Constitutional Supremacy and the Court’s Mandatory Jurisdiction: A Commentary on Louisiana v. Callais (2025)

Constitutional Supremacy and the Court’s Mandatory Jurisdiction: A Commentary on Louisiana v. Callais (2025)

Date: Jun 30, 2025
Constitutional Supremacy and the Court’s Mandatory Jurisdiction: A Commentary on Louisiana v. Callais (606 U.S. ___ (2025)) 1. Introduction Louisiana v. Callais is the latest chapter in the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert