Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

ensuring-indictment-validity:-prosecutor& Case Commentaries

Unattested State Crime Lab Autopsy Reports: Error, But Harmless Where Cause of Death Is Undisputed and Liability Is as an Accomplice — Commentary on Nathaniel Fort v. State of Arkansas, 2025 Ark. 148

Unattested State Crime Lab Autopsy Reports: Error, But Harmless Where Cause of Death Is Undisputed and Liability Is as an Accomplice — Commentary on Nathaniel Fort v. State of Arkansas, 2025 Ark. 148

Date: Oct 10, 2025
Unattested State Crime Lab Autopsy Reports: Error, But Harmless Where Cause of Death Is Undisputed and Liability Is as an Accomplice Introduction In Nathaniel Fort v. State of Arkansas, 2025 Ark....
Proration Compelled: Third Circuit Holds First Step Act’s “for each year” Requires Pro-Rated Good-Conduct Time for Partial-Year Sentences

Proration Compelled: Third Circuit Holds First Step Act’s “for each year” Requires Pro-Rated Good-Conduct Time for Partial-Year Sentences

Date: Oct 10, 2025
Proration Compelled: Third Circuit Holds First Step Act’s “for each year” Requires Pro-Rated Good-Conduct Time for Partial-Year Sentences Introduction In a precedential opinion, the U.S. Court of...
No Outsourcing Escape Hatch: Third Circuit Holds States Remain Liable Under ADA Title II and the Rehabilitation Act for Prison Services Run by Private Contractors

No Outsourcing Escape Hatch: Third Circuit Holds States Remain Liable Under ADA Title II and the Rehabilitation Act for Prison Services Run by Private Contractors

Date: Oct 10, 2025
No Outsourcing Escape Hatch: States Remain Liable Under ADA Title II and the Rehabilitation Act for Prison Services Run by Private Contractors Introduction In a precedential opinion with sweeping...
Accessible Eviction Notice Required: Third Circuit Revives ADA/§504 Claims and Limits Quasi‑Judicial Immunity for Constables

Accessible Eviction Notice Required: Third Circuit Revives ADA/§504 Claims and Limits Quasi‑Judicial Immunity for Constables

Date: Oct 10, 2025
Accessible Eviction Notice Required: Third Circuit Revives ADA/§504 Claims and Limits Quasi‑Judicial Immunity for Constables Introduction In William Murphy v. State of Delaware Justices of the Peace,...
Chhim v. City of Houston: Pleading Employment Claims Requires Comparator Facts and Decisionmaker Knowledge; Five-Month Temporal Gap Insufficient for Retaliation, and Unbriefed Issues Are Forfeited

Chhim v. City of Houston: Pleading Employment Claims Requires Comparator Facts and Decisionmaker Knowledge; Five-Month Temporal Gap Insufficient for Retaliation, and Unbriefed Issues Are Forfeited

Date: Oct 10, 2025
Chhim v. City of Houston: Pleading Employment Claims Requires Comparator Facts and Decisionmaker Knowledge; Five-Month Temporal Gap Insufficient for Retaliation, and Unbriefed Issues Are Forfeited...
Rooker-Feldman Does Not Bar Defamation Suits Targeting Opposing Counsel’s Litigation Statements: The Fifth Circuit’s Clarification in English v. Crochet

Rooker-Feldman Does Not Bar Defamation Suits Targeting Opposing Counsel’s Litigation Statements: The Fifth Circuit’s Clarification in English v. Crochet

Date: Oct 10, 2025
Rooker-Feldman Does Not Bar Defamation Suits Targeting Opposing Counsel’s Litigation Statements: The Fifth Circuit’s Clarification in English v. Crochet Introduction In English v. Crochet, the U.S....
No Safe Harbor in “Ordinary Business” Spending: Fifth Circuit Remands § 523(a)(6) Collateral-Conversion Claim and Reaffirms Strict Debtor-Favorable Standards Under §§ 727(a)(2)(A), (a)(3), and 523(a)(2)(A)

No Safe Harbor in “Ordinary Business” Spending: Fifth Circuit Remands § 523(a)(6) Collateral-Conversion Claim and Reaffirms Strict Debtor-Favorable Standards Under §§ 727(a)(2)(A), (a)(3), and 523(a)(2)(A)

Date: Oct 10, 2025
No Safe Harbor in “Ordinary Business” Spending: Fifth Circuit Remands § 523(a)(6) Collateral-Conversion Claim and Reaffirms Strict Debtor-Favorable Standards Under §§ 727(a)(2)(A), (a)(3), and...
No Reasonable Expectation of Privacy for Trespassers in Tents on Posted Public Land: United States v. Parkerson (5th Cir. 2025)

No Reasonable Expectation of Privacy for Trespassers in Tents on Posted Public Land: United States v. Parkerson (5th Cir. 2025)

Date: Oct 10, 2025
No Reasonable Expectation of Privacy for Trespassers in Tents on Posted Public Land: United States v. Parkerson (5th Cir. 2025) Introduction In United States v. Parkerson, the U.S. Court of Appeals...
No Prior Warning Required: Fourth Circuit Affirms Default-for-Discovery Abuse, Post-Default Evidentiary Exclusions, and Net‑Revenue Restitution with “Fencing‑In” Injunction Under the CFPA

No Prior Warning Required: Fourth Circuit Affirms Default-for-Discovery Abuse, Post-Default Evidentiary Exclusions, and Net‑Revenue Restitution with “Fencing‑In” Injunction Under the CFPA

Date: Oct 10, 2025
No Prior Warning Required: Fourth Circuit Affirms Default-for-Discovery Abuse, Post-Default Evidentiary Exclusions, and Net‑Revenue Restitution with “Fencing‑In” Injunction Under the CFPA...
Enforcing Separation Agreements in Alaska: Capacity, Duress, and Unconscionability as Gatekeepers to Unequal Property Divisions

Enforcing Separation Agreements in Alaska: Capacity, Duress, and Unconscionability as Gatekeepers to Unequal Property Divisions

Date: Oct 10, 2025
Enforcing Separation Agreements in Alaska: Capacity, Duress, and Unconscionability as Gatekeepers to Unequal Property Divisions Case: Burton Haviland Jr. v. Kimberly Haviland Court: Supreme Court of...
Active Efforts Under ICWA During Pretrial Incarceration: Relative Placement and Tribal Engagement Can Satisfy the Standard

Active Efforts Under ICWA During Pretrial Incarceration: Relative Placement and Tribal Engagement Can Satisfy the Standard

Date: Oct 10, 2025
Active Efforts Under ICWA During Pretrial Incarceration: Relative Placement and Tribal Engagement Can Satisfy the Standard Introduction In Enzo C. v. State, DFCS, OCS, the Alaska Supreme Court...
Reaffirming Hearing Requirements for Rule 11 Sanctions and Mandatory AS 25.20.115 Findings; Written Orders Control “Shared Physical Custody” Under Rule 90.3

Reaffirming Hearing Requirements for Rule 11 Sanctions and Mandatory AS 25.20.115 Findings; Written Orders Control “Shared Physical Custody” Under Rule 90.3

Date: Oct 10, 2025
Reaffirming Hearing Requirements for Rule 11 Sanctions and Mandatory AS 25.20.115 Findings; Written Orders Control “Shared Physical Custody” Under Rule 90.3 Note: This is a memorandum opinion and...
Holistic “Active Efforts” Under ICWA and the Effect of Parental Disappearance: Roger S. v. State of Alaska (Memorandum Opinion, Oct. 8, 2025)

Holistic “Active Efforts” Under ICWA and the Effect of Parental Disappearance: Roger S. v. State of Alaska (Memorandum Opinion, Oct. 8, 2025)

Date: Oct 10, 2025
Holistic “Active Efforts” Under ICWA and the Effect of Parental Disappearance: Roger S. v. State of Alaska (Memorandum Opinion, Oct. 8, 2025) Note on precedential status: This is a memorandum opinion...
Prejudgment Interest Must Be Netted Against Interim Distributions When a Marital Business Is Awarded as of the Separation Date

Prejudgment Interest Must Be Netted Against Interim Distributions When a Marital Business Is Awarded as of the Separation Date

Date: Oct 10, 2025
Prejudgment Interest Must Be Netted Against Interim Distributions When a Marital Business Is Awarded as of the Separation Date Case: Ryan A. Johnston v. Tiffany G. Adkins f/k/a Tiffany G. Johnston;...
No Civil Contempt Without an Unequivocal Mandate: Clarifying Valuation Orders, Attachments, Joinder, and Appendix Adequacy in Baran v. Mechel

No Civil Contempt Without an Unequivocal Mandate: Clarifying Valuation Orders, Attachments, Joinder, and Appendix Adequacy in Baran v. Mechel

Date: Oct 10, 2025
No Civil Contempt Without an Unequivocal Mandate: Clarifying Valuation Orders, Attachments, Joinder, and Appendix Adequacy in Baran v. Mechel Introduction This commentary examines the Appellate...
Survival Clauses and Post-Reconveyance Closings: Limits on the Merger Doctrine and Voluntary Payment Defense at the CPLR 3211 Stage

Survival Clauses and Post-Reconveyance Closings: Limits on the Merger Doctrine and Voluntary Payment Defense at the CPLR 3211 Stage

Date: Oct 10, 2025
Survival Clauses and Post-Reconveyance Closings: Limits on the Merger Doctrine and Voluntary Payment Defense at the CPLR 3211 Stage Introduction In Brooklyn Tabernacle v. Thor 180 Livingston, LLC,...
Plea in Satisfaction Bars §1983 Fabricated‑Evidence and Malicious Prosecution Claims; CPLR 4401 Judgment After Mistrial Permitted — Dawoodi v. City of New York

Plea in Satisfaction Bars §1983 Fabricated‑Evidence and Malicious Prosecution Claims; CPLR 4401 Judgment After Mistrial Permitted — Dawoodi v. City of New York

Date: Oct 10, 2025
Plea in Satisfaction Bars §1983 Fabricated‑Evidence and Malicious Prosecution Claims; CPLR 4401 Judgment After Mistrial Permitted — Dawoodi v. City of New York Introduction This commentary examines...
Equipment-Supplying Contractor’s Lack of Site Control Defeats Labor Law § 200 and § 241(6) Claims but Not Common-Law Negligence Under Espinal — DeMarco v. C.A.C. Industries, Inc.

Equipment-Supplying Contractor’s Lack of Site Control Defeats Labor Law § 200 and § 241(6) Claims but Not Common-Law Negligence Under Espinal — DeMarco v. C.A.C. Industries, Inc.

Date: Oct 10, 2025
Equipment-Supplying Contractor’s Lack of Site Control Defeats Labor Law § 200 and § 241(6) Claims but Not Common-Law Negligence Under Espinal — DeMarco v. C.A.C. Industries, Inc. Introduction In...
Pleading in the Alternative Preserved at the 3211 Stage Absent a Conceded Contract; Veil-Piercing Requires Specific Wrongdoing: Commentary on Jobble, Inc. v. CF Alerts Corp.

Pleading in the Alternative Preserved at the 3211 Stage Absent a Conceded Contract; Veil-Piercing Requires Specific Wrongdoing: Commentary on Jobble, Inc. v. CF Alerts Corp.

Date: Oct 10, 2025
Pleading in the Alternative Preserved at the 3211 Stage Absent a Conceded Contract; Veil-Piercing Requires Specific Wrongdoing: Commentary on Jobble, Inc. v. CF Alerts Corp. Court: Appellate Division...
Kane v. Mount Pleasant: Second Department Broadly Applies CPLR 306-b’s “Interest of Justice” Standard to Excuse Multi‑Year Service Delay Where Defendants Had Immediate Notice and No Prejudice

Kane v. Mount Pleasant: Second Department Broadly Applies CPLR 306-b’s “Interest of Justice” Standard to Excuse Multi‑Year Service Delay Where Defendants Had Immediate Notice and No Prejudice

Date: Oct 10, 2025
Kane v. Mount Pleasant: Second Department Broadly Applies CPLR 306-b’s “Interest of Justice” Standard to Excuse Multi‑Year Service Delay Where Defendants Had Immediate Notice and No Prejudice...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert