Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

state Case Commentaries

No Due Process Violation from Extensive Representation Hearings; “Reasonable Efforts” Satisfied Despite Parental Noncooperation — Commentary on R.G. (Father) v. State of Alaska, DFCS/OCS

No Due Process Violation from Extensive Representation Hearings; “Reasonable Efforts” Satisfied Despite Parental Noncooperation — Commentary on R.G. (Father) v. State of Alaska, DFCS/OCS

Date: Aug 31, 2025
No Due Process Violation from Extensive Representation Hearings; “Reasonable Efforts” Satisfied Despite Parental Noncooperation — Commentary on R.G. (Father) v. State of Alaska, DFCS/OCS Memorandum...
Riverside Reaffirmed: Idaho Supreme Court Confirms Bench-Trier May Resolve Conflicting Inferences at Summary Judgment; No “Rent Substitution” Credit for Affiliate-Funded Construction Absent Proof

Riverside Reaffirmed: Idaho Supreme Court Confirms Bench-Trier May Resolve Conflicting Inferences at Summary Judgment; No “Rent Substitution” Credit for Affiliate-Funded Construction Absent Proof

Date: Aug 31, 2025
Riverside Reaffirmed: Bench-Trier Summary Judgment and the Limits of “Rent Substitution” under a Triple‑Net Lease Introduction In Erie Properties, LLC v. Global Growth Holdings, Inc., the Idaho...
Imminent Danger Without Observable Impairment: Positive Methamphetamine UA and Ignoring Infant Car-Seat Instructions Suffice for Neglect in Wyoming

Imminent Danger Without Observable Impairment: Positive Methamphetamine UA and Ignoring Infant Car-Seat Instructions Suffice for Neglect in Wyoming

Date: Aug 31, 2025
Imminent Danger Without Observable Impairment: Positive Methamphetamine UA and Ignoring Infant Car-Seat Instructions Suffice for Neglect in Wyoming Introduction In In the Interest of MC, Minor Child:...
State v. McGuire: Idaho Supreme Court Clarifies Dual “Duty” Standards—Broad for Felony Battery on Officers, Narrow (Lawfulness-Dependent) for Resisting; Burden-Shifting Misconduct Cured by Prompt Judicial Intervention

State v. McGuire: Idaho Supreme Court Clarifies Dual “Duty” Standards—Broad for Felony Battery on Officers, Narrow (Lawfulness-Dependent) for Resisting; Burden-Shifting Misconduct Cured by Prompt Judicial Intervention

Date: Aug 31, 2025
State v. McGuire: Idaho Supreme Court Clarifies Dual “Duty” Standards—Broad for Felony Battery on Officers, Narrow (Lawfulness-Dependent) for Resisting; Burden-Shifting Misconduct Cured by Prompt...
Implicit Compliance with Adm.Code 4121-3-34(D)(3)(i): Hearing Officers Need Not Itemize Every Psychological Restriction in PTD Orders

Implicit Compliance with Adm.Code 4121-3-34(D)(3)(i): Hearing Officers Need Not Itemize Every Psychological Restriction in PTD Orders

Date: Aug 31, 2025
Implicit Compliance with Adm.Code 4121-3-34(D)(3)(i): Hearing Officers Need Not Itemize Every Psychological Restriction in PTD Orders Introduction In State ex rel. Urban v. Wano Expiditing, Inc.,...
No Ex Post Facto Relief Where Duty Pre‑Existed 2007 SVORA: Waiver by Unconditional Plea and Direct‑Appeal Bar Reaffirmed (Benton v. State, Mont. 2025) – Nonprecedential

No Ex Post Facto Relief Where Duty Pre‑Existed 2007 SVORA: Waiver by Unconditional Plea and Direct‑Appeal Bar Reaffirmed (Benton v. State, Mont. 2025) – Nonprecedential

Date: Aug 31, 2025
No Ex Post Facto Relief Where Duty Pre‑Existed 2007 SVORA: Waiver by Unconditional Plea and Direct‑Appeal Bar Reaffirmed Benton v. State, 2025 MT 191N (Mont. Aug. 26, 2025) — Memorandum opinion,...
Girasole v. Paws Up: Inherent Risk Defines Duty—No Liability Without Atypical Hazards or Statutory Exception Under Montana’s Equine Activities Act

Girasole v. Paws Up: Inherent Risk Defines Duty—No Liability Without Atypical Hazards or Statutory Exception Under Montana’s Equine Activities Act

Date: Aug 31, 2025
Girasole v. Paws Up: Inherent Risk Defines Duty—No Liability Without Atypical Hazards or Statutory Exception Under Montana’s Equine Activities Act Introduction In Girasole v. Paws Up, the Supreme...
Logical Inferences Must Be Record‑Rooted: Montana Supreme Court Clarifies the “Some Evidence” Threshold for Self‑Defense Jury Instructions in State v. Holcomb (2025 MT 190)

Logical Inferences Must Be Record‑Rooted: Montana Supreme Court Clarifies the “Some Evidence” Threshold for Self‑Defense Jury Instructions in State v. Holcomb (2025 MT 190)

Date: Aug 31, 2025
Logical Inferences Must Be Record‑Rooted: Montana Supreme Court Clarifies the “Some Evidence” Threshold for Self‑Defense Jury Instructions in State v. Holcomb (2025 MT 190) Introduction In State v....
Email Notice Counts: Montana Supreme Court Clarifies PFO Notice “Given” Need Not Be Filed by the Omnibus Deadline and Minor Tardiness Does Not Mandate Reversal Absent Prejudice

Email Notice Counts: Montana Supreme Court Clarifies PFO Notice “Given” Need Not Be Filed by the Omnibus Deadline and Minor Tardiness Does Not Mandate Reversal Absent Prejudice

Date: Aug 31, 2025
Email Notice Counts: Montana Supreme Court Clarifies PFO Notice “Given” Need Not Be Filed by the Omnibus Deadline and Minor Tardiness Does Not Mandate Reversal Absent Prejudice Case Comment: State v....
State v. Jacques (Conn. 2025): No Second Probable Cause Hearing After Appellate Reversal; Medical Memory Loss Does Not Defeat Confrontation or Whelan; Clarified Reliability Gatekeeping for Jailhouse Informants

State v. Jacques (Conn. 2025): No Second Probable Cause Hearing After Appellate Reversal; Medical Memory Loss Does Not Defeat Confrontation or Whelan; Clarified Reliability Gatekeeping for Jailhouse Informants

Date: Aug 31, 2025
State v. Jacques: Probable Cause Survives Appellate Suppression; Medical Memory Loss Does Not Bar Confrontation or Whelan; Reliability Threshold for Jailhouse Informants Affirmed Introduction In...
When the Record Is Not Enough: Hawai‘i Supreme Court Requires an EA as a Matter of Law for HEPA Exemptions Not Supported on the Face of the Agency Record

When the Record Is Not Enough: Hawai‘i Supreme Court Requires an EA as a Matter of Law for HEPA Exemptions Not Supported on the Face of the Agency Record

Date: Aug 31, 2025
When the Record Is Not Enough: Hawai‘i Supreme Court Requires an EA as a Matter of Law for HEPA Exemptions Not Supported on the Face of the Agency Record Introduction In Ke Kauhulu O Mānā v. Board of...
Deliberate Interval and Distinct-Injury Test Reaffirmed: Georgia Supreme Court Clarifies Non‑Merger of Aggravated Assault and Malice Murder in Allen v. State

Deliberate Interval and Distinct-Injury Test Reaffirmed: Georgia Supreme Court Clarifies Non‑Merger of Aggravated Assault and Malice Murder in Allen v. State

Date: Aug 31, 2025
Deliberate Interval and Distinct-Injury Test Reaffirmed: Georgia Supreme Court Clarifies Non‑Merger of Aggravated Assault and Malice Murder in Allen v. State Introduction In Allen v. State, the...
Foster v. State: Admissions as Direct Evidence Limit OCGA § 24-14-6; Minimal Corroboration of Confessions and Deference to Continuance Denials

Foster v. State: Admissions as Direct Evidence Limit OCGA § 24-14-6; Minimal Corroboration of Confessions and Deference to Continuance Denials

Date: Aug 31, 2025
Foster v. State: Admissions as Direct Evidence Limit OCGA § 24-14-6; Minimal Corroboration of Confessions and Deference to Continuance Denials Introduction In Foster v. State (Supreme Court of...
Income Approach Restored for LIHTC Valuations: Georgia Supreme Court Overrules Freedom Heights and Clarifies OCGA § 48-5-2(3)(B)(vii)(II)

Income Approach Restored for LIHTC Valuations: Georgia Supreme Court Overrules Freedom Heights and Clarifies OCGA § 48-5-2(3)(B)(vii)(II)

Date: Aug 31, 2025
Income Approach Restored for LIHTC Valuations: Georgia Supreme Court Overrules Freedom Heights and Clarifies OCGA § 48-5-2(3)(B)(vii)(II) Introduction In Gateway Pines Hahira, LP v. Lowndes County...
Hall v. State: Georgia Supreme Court Rejects “Generic Motive to Control” Under Rule 404(b) but Upholds Prior Domestic Violence to Prove Intent and Absence of Accident; Excited Utterances by Non-Eyewitness Child Clarified

Hall v. State: Georgia Supreme Court Rejects “Generic Motive to Control” Under Rule 404(b) but Upholds Prior Domestic Violence to Prove Intent and Absence of Accident; Excited Utterances by Non-Eyewitness Child Clarified

Date: Aug 31, 2025
Hall v. State: Georgia Supreme Court Rejects “Generic Motive to Control” Under Rule 404(b) but Upholds Prior Domestic Violence to Prove Intent and Absence of Accident; Excited Utterances by...
Pursuit Eliminates Justification and Defendant Admissions Defeat Georgia’s Circumstantial Evidence Rule: A Commentary on Mack v. State (Ga. 2025)

Pursuit Eliminates Justification and Defendant Admissions Defeat Georgia’s Circumstantial Evidence Rule: A Commentary on Mack v. State (Ga. 2025)

Date: Aug 31, 2025
Pursuit Eliminates Justification and Defendant Admissions Defeat Georgia’s Circumstantial Evidence Rule: A Commentary on Mack v. State (Ga. 2025) Introduction In Mack v. State, the Supreme Court of...
No Voluntary Manslaughter Charge Without Serious Provocation: Georgia Supreme Court Reaffirms Plain-Error Limits and Strickland Prejudice in Marrow v. State

No Voluntary Manslaughter Charge Without Serious Provocation: Georgia Supreme Court Reaffirms Plain-Error Limits and Strickland Prejudice in Marrow v. State

Date: Aug 31, 2025
No Voluntary Manslaughter Charge Without Serious Provocation: Georgia Supreme Court Reaffirms Plain-Error Limits and Strickland Prejudice in Marrow v. State Introduction In Marrow v. State (Supreme...
Payne v. State: Limiting Debelbot and Clarifying Photo‑Lineup Challenges—Media Exposure Arguments Go to Weight, and “50%” Reasonable‑Doubt Misstatements Are Deficient but Not Automatically Prejudicial

Payne v. State: Limiting Debelbot and Clarifying Photo‑Lineup Challenges—Media Exposure Arguments Go to Weight, and “50%” Reasonable‑Doubt Misstatements Are Deficient but Not Automatically Prejudicial

Date: Aug 31, 2025
Payne v. State: Limiting Debelbot and Clarifying Photo‑Lineup Challenges—Media Exposure Arguments Go to Weight, and “50%” Reasonable‑Doubt Misstatements Are Deficient but Not Automatically...
Limiting the “Bolstering” Harmless-Error Rule: Prior Inconsistent Statements Fall Outside the Exclusion in Georgia

Limiting the “Bolstering” Harmless-Error Rule: Prior Inconsistent Statements Fall Outside the Exclusion in Georgia

Date: Aug 31, 2025
Limiting the “Bolstering” Harmless-Error Rule: Prior Inconsistent Statements Fall Outside the Exclusion in Georgia Introduction In Richardson v. State (Supreme Court of Georgia, Aug. 26, 2025), the...
Scott v. State (Ga. 2025): Independent Evidence Required to Show Prejudice on Ineffective-Assistance Claims Based on Unpursued Delusional-Compulsion Defenses; No Abuse in Denying Serial Continuances

Scott v. State (Ga. 2025): Independent Evidence Required to Show Prejudice on Ineffective-Assistance Claims Based on Unpursued Delusional-Compulsion Defenses; No Abuse in Denying Serial Continuances

Date: Aug 31, 2025
Scott v. State (Ga. 2025): Independent Evidence Required to Show Prejudice on Ineffective-Assistance Claims Based on Unpursued Delusional-Compulsion Defenses; No Abuse in Denying Serial Continuances...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert