Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

protection-of-fanciful-trademarks-and-recovery-of-infringer& Case Commentaries

"Fairness Is Judged at the Time of Settlement": Sixth Circuit Affirms Arm’s‑Length, Pro Rata Class Settlement and Rejects Unproven “Reverse Auction” Allegations in Michigan Surplus‑Proceeds Takings Litigation

"Fairness Is Judged at the Time of Settlement": Sixth Circuit Affirms Arm’s‑Length, Pro Rata Class Settlement and Rejects Unproven “Reverse Auction” Allegations in Michigan Surplus‑Proceeds Takings Litigation

Date: Oct 10, 2025
"Fairness Is Judged at the Time of Settlement": Sixth Circuit Affirms Arm’s‑Length, Pro Rata Class Settlement and Rejects Unproven “Reverse Auction” Allegations in Michigan Surplus‑Proceeds Takings...
Seventh Circuit Clarifies Martin: No Independent Duty for a Second ALJ to Address a Prior ALJ’s Findings on Remand; Substantial Evidence Controls

Seventh Circuit Clarifies Martin: No Independent Duty for a Second ALJ to Address a Prior ALJ’s Findings on Remand; Substantial Evidence Controls

Date: Oct 10, 2025
Seventh Circuit Clarifies Martin: No Independent Duty for a Second ALJ to Address a Prior ALJ’s Findings on Remand; Substantial Evidence Controls Introduction This commentary analyzes the Seventh...
No CERCLA Recovery Without Proven Causation; Clean Water Act Penalties Accrue Per Unpermitted Discharge: Commentary on The Courtland Company, Inc. v. Union Carbide Corporation (4th Cir. Oct. 6, 2025)

No CERCLA Recovery Without Proven Causation; Clean Water Act Penalties Accrue Per Unpermitted Discharge: Commentary on The Courtland Company, Inc. v. Union Carbide Corporation (4th Cir. Oct. 6, 2025)

Date: Oct 10, 2025
No CERCLA Recovery Without Proven Causation; Clean Water Act Penalties Accrue Per Unpermitted Discharge Commentary on The Courtland Company, Inc. v. Union Carbide Corporation (4th Cir. Oct. 6, 2025)...
CERCLA Cost Recovery, CWA Penalties Per Discharge, and RCRA Injunctions: Fourth Circuit’s Unpublished Affirmance in Courtland Co. v. Union Carbide

CERCLA Cost Recovery, CWA Penalties Per Discharge, and RCRA Injunctions: Fourth Circuit’s Unpublished Affirmance in Courtland Co. v. Union Carbide

Date: Oct 10, 2025
CERCLA Cost Recovery, CWA Penalties Per Discharge, and RCRA Injunctions: Fourth Circuit’s Unpublished Affirmance in Courtland Co. v. Union Carbide Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit...
Per-Discharge Clean Water Act Penalties and “Necessary” CERCLA Costs: Fourth Circuit Guidance in Courtland Co. v. Union Carbide

Per-Discharge Clean Water Act Penalties and “Necessary” CERCLA Costs: Fourth Circuit Guidance in Courtland Co. v. Union Carbide

Date: Oct 10, 2025
Per-Discharge Clean Water Act Penalties and “Necessary” CERCLA Costs: Fourth Circuit Guidance in Courtland Co. v. Union Carbide Introduction In a sprawling environmental dispute spanning multiple...
Per Discharge, Not Per Permitless Day: Fourth Circuit Affirms CWA Penalties Framework and Causation Limits on CERCLA Cost Recovery in Courtland Co. v. Union Carbide

Per Discharge, Not Per Permitless Day: Fourth Circuit Affirms CWA Penalties Framework and Causation Limits on CERCLA Cost Recovery in Courtland Co. v. Union Carbide

Date: Oct 10, 2025
Per Discharge, Not Per Permitless Day: Fourth Circuit Affirms CWA Penalties Framework and Causation Limits on CERCLA Cost Recovery in Courtland Co. v. Union Carbide Introduction This unpublished per...
Tenth Circuit Clarifies Evidence Required to Prove Government “Unable or Unwilling” in Failure‑to‑Report Asylum Claims: Rosas‑Garcia v. Bondi

Tenth Circuit Clarifies Evidence Required to Prove Government “Unable or Unwilling” in Failure‑to‑Report Asylum Claims: Rosas‑Garcia v. Bondi

Date: Oct 10, 2025
Tenth Circuit Clarifies Evidence Required to Prove Government “Unable or Unwilling” in Failure‑to‑Report Asylum Claims: Rosas‑Garcia v. Bondi Introduction This commentary examines the Tenth Circuit’s...
Stagnation, Child-Centric Timing, and Appellate Civility Reaffirmed in Vermont TPR Appeals: In re A.C. (Vt. 2025)

Stagnation, Child-Centric Timing, and Appellate Civility Reaffirmed in Vermont TPR Appeals: In re A.C. (Vt. 2025)

Date: Oct 10, 2025
Stagnation, Child-Centric Timing, and Appellate Civility Reaffirmed in Vermont TPR Appeals: In re A.C. (Vt. 2025) Note on precedential value: This is an entry order of a three-justice panel of the...
Termination Need Not Await Permanent Placement: Past Conduct Can Establish Inability to Parent Within a Reasonable Time

Termination Need Not Await Permanent Placement: Past Conduct Can Establish Inability to Parent Within a Reasonable Time

Date: Oct 10, 2025
Termination Need Not Await Permanent Placement: Past Conduct Can Establish Inability to Parent Within a Reasonable Time Case: In re A.S., W.S., A.S., M.S., and A.S., Juveniles (A.S., Father) Court:...
Stagnation Reaffirmed: Partial Case‑Plan Compliance Does Not Bar Termination Where Domestic‑Violence Accountability and Consistent Contact Are Lacking

Stagnation Reaffirmed: Partial Case‑Plan Compliance Does Not Bar Termination Where Domestic‑Violence Accountability and Consistent Contact Are Lacking

Date: Oct 10, 2025
Stagnation Reaffirmed: Partial Case‑Plan Compliance Does Not Bar Termination Where Domestic‑Violence Accountability and Consistent Contact Are Lacking Case: In re K.L., Juvenile (J.G., Father), No....
Vermont TPR Clarified: No Comparative “Foster Parent vs. Parent” Balancing, Relative Placement Irrelevant at TPR, and Appellants Must Cure Transcript Defects

Vermont TPR Clarified: No Comparative “Foster Parent vs. Parent” Balancing, Relative Placement Irrelevant at TPR, and Appellants Must Cure Transcript Defects

Date: Oct 10, 2025
Vermont TPR Clarified: No Comparative “Foster Parent vs. Parent” Balancing, Relative Placement Irrelevant at TPR, and Appellants Must Cure Transcript Defects Case: In re K.L. and M.L., Juveniles,...
Immediate Clarification Controls: Vermont Affirms Written Mittimus Where Court Corrects Oral Misstatement; Record-as-a-Whole Satisfies Rule 11(f)

Immediate Clarification Controls: Vermont Affirms Written Mittimus Where Court Corrects Oral Misstatement; Record-as-a-Whole Satisfies Rule 11(f)

Date: Oct 10, 2025
Immediate Clarification Controls: Vermont Affirms Written Mittimus Where Court Corrects Oral Misstatement; Record-as-a-Whole Satisfies Rule 11(f) Case: State v. Christopher Cochran, No. 24-AP-281...
Lay Authentication of Home‑Security Footage and Non‑Incidental Restraint Confirmed: State v. Stevens (Vt. 2025)

Lay Authentication of Home‑Security Footage and Non‑Incidental Restraint Confirmed: State v. Stevens (Vt. 2025)

Date: Oct 10, 2025
Lay Authentication of Home‑Security Footage and Non‑Incidental Restraint Confirmed: State v. Stevens (Vt. 2025) Note: This is a three‑justice entry order of the Vermont Supreme Court and, under...
Functional Impairment Controls When Post-Injury Earnings Are Equal or Greater: Iowa Supreme Court Clarifies § 85.34(2)(v) in Den Hartog Industries v. Dungan

Functional Impairment Controls When Post-Injury Earnings Are Equal or Greater: Iowa Supreme Court Clarifies § 85.34(2)(v) in Den Hartog Industries v. Dungan

Date: Oct 10, 2025
Functional Impairment Controls When Post-Injury Earnings Are Equal or Greater: Iowa Supreme Court Clarifies § 85.34(2)(v) in Den Hartog Industries v. Dungan Introduction In Den Hartog Industries and...
Retroactive Authentication of Bodycam-Captured Surveillance Video: Iowa Supreme Court Confirms Subsequent Witness Testimony Can Cure Foundational Defects Under Rule 5.901

Retroactive Authentication of Bodycam-Captured Surveillance Video: Iowa Supreme Court Confirms Subsequent Witness Testimony Can Cure Foundational Defects Under Rule 5.901

Date: Oct 10, 2025
Retroactive Authentication of Bodycam-Captured Surveillance Video: Iowa Supreme Court Confirms Subsequent Witness Testimony Can Cure Foundational Defects Under Rule 5.901 Case: State of Iowa v....
Curtilage Requires Proof: Indiana Supreme Court Limits As‑Applied Attacks on the One‑Acre Homestead Cap

Curtilage Requires Proof: Indiana Supreme Court Limits As‑Applied Attacks on the One‑Acre Homestead Cap

Date: Oct 10, 2025
Curtilage Requires Proof: Indiana Supreme Court Limits As‑Applied Attacks on the One‑Acre Homestead Cap Introduction In Tulsi Sawlani, M.D., et al. v. Lake County Assessor (Indiana Supreme Court,...
Confrontation Beyond “Similar Motive”: Michigan Supreme Court flags distinct constitutional and evidentiary inquiries and questions diligence when cooperators go missing

Confrontation Beyond “Similar Motive”: Michigan Supreme Court flags distinct constitutional and evidentiary inquiries and questions diligence when cooperators go missing

Date: Oct 9, 2025
Confrontation Beyond “Similar Motive”: The Michigan Supreme Court flags distinct constitutional and evidentiary inquiries and questions diligence when cooperators go missing Introduction In People of...
Oros and Chambers Remain Controlling—But the Court Signals Reassessment of Premeditation and Police “Effect-on-Listener” Testimony in People v. Turner

Oros and Chambers Remain Controlling—But the Court Signals Reassessment of Premeditation and Police “Effect-on-Listener” Testimony in People v. Turner

Date: Oct 9, 2025
Oros and Chambers Remain Controlling—But the Court Signals Reassessment of Premeditation and Police “Effect-on-Listener” Testimony in People v. Turner Case: People of Michigan v. Keith Devon Turner,...
OV 13 Means “Felonious Activity,” Not “Felony Convictions”: Denial of Leave in People v. Carey and the Unresolved Scope of Kaczmarek for Post‑Revocation Guidelines Challenges

OV 13 Means “Felonious Activity,” Not “Felony Convictions”: Denial of Leave in People v. Carey and the Unresolved Scope of Kaczmarek for Post‑Revocation Guidelines Challenges

Date: Oct 9, 2025
OV 13 Means “Felonious Activity,” Not “Felony Convictions”: Denial of Leave in People v. Carey and the Unresolved Scope of Kaczmarek for Post‑Revocation Guidelines Challenges Introduction In People...
Retaliatory Eviction at the End of “Hybrid” Leases: Michigan Supreme Court Signals Reconsideration of the Fixed‑Term Exception and Remands for Full Review

Retaliatory Eviction at the End of “Hybrid” Leases: Michigan Supreme Court Signals Reconsideration of the Fixed‑Term Exception and Remands for Full Review

Date: Oct 9, 2025
Retaliatory Eviction at the End of “Hybrid” Leases: Michigan Supreme Court Signals Reconsideration of the Fixed‑Term Exception and Remands for Full Review Introduction In Prudential Properties v....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert