Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

new-precedent-on... Case Commentaries

No Standing to Appeal a Fully Successful Rule 36 Motion: Finality, Clerical Amendments, and Multi‑Count Judgments in United States v. Dhinsa (2d Cir. 2025)

No Standing to Appeal a Fully Successful Rule 36 Motion: Finality, Clerical Amendments, and Multi‑Count Judgments in United States v. Dhinsa (2d Cir. 2025)

Date: Dec 16, 2025
No Standing to Appeal a Fully Successful Rule 36 Motion: Finality, Clerical Amendments, and Multi‑Count Judgments in United States v. Dhinsa (2d Cir. 2025) I. Introduction The Second Circuit’s...
Foreseeable Telephonic Contacts and the Limits of Acceptance-of-Responsibility Reductions: Commentary on United States v. Washington (2d Cir. 2025)

Foreseeable Telephonic Contacts and the Limits of Acceptance-of-Responsibility Reductions: Commentary on United States v. Washington (2d Cir. 2025)

Date: Dec 16, 2025
Foreseeable Telephonic Contacts and the Limits of Acceptance-of-Responsibility Reductions: Commentary on United States v. Washington (2d Cir. 2025) I. Introduction The Second Circuit’s summary order...
Qualified Immunity and Unsettled Prisoner Rights in Chronic Discipline Classification: Commentary on Baltas v. Jones (2d Cir. 2025)

Qualified Immunity and Unsettled Prisoner Rights in Chronic Discipline Classification: Commentary on Baltas v. Jones (2d Cir. 2025)

Date: Dec 16, 2025
Qualified Immunity and Unsettled Prisoner Rights in Chronic Discipline Classification: Commentary on Baltas v. Jones (2d Cir. 2025) I. Introduction The Second Circuit’s summary order in Baltas v....

    Issue Preservation and Medical-Opinion Evaluation in Social Security Disability Appeals:
    Commentary on Joshua Childress v. Commissioner of Social Security (11th Cir. 2025)

Issue Preservation and Medical-Opinion Evaluation in Social Security Disability Appeals: Commentary on Joshua Childress v. Commissioner of Social Security (11th Cir. 2025)

Date: Dec 16, 2025
Issue Preservation and Medical-Opinion Evaluation in Social Security Disability Appeals: Commentary on Joshua Childress v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner (11th Cir., Dec. 15, 2025) I....
United States v. Khedkar: Deferential Appellate Review and Guideline Enhancements in Undercover Child-Enticement Cases

United States v. Khedkar: Deferential Appellate Review and Guideline Enhancements in Undercover Child-Enticement Cases

Date: Dec 16, 2025
United States v. Khedkar: Deferential Appellate Review and Guideline Enhancements in Undercover Child-Enticement Cases I. Introduction United States v. Amol Chandrashekhar Khedkar (11th Cir. No....
Internal Personnel Disputes, Public Concern, and Constructive Discharge: Commentary on Friedman v. Town of Pembroke Park

Internal Personnel Disputes, Public Concern, and Constructive Discharge: Commentary on Friedman v. Town of Pembroke Park

Date: Dec 16, 2025
Internal Personnel Disputes, Public Concern, and Constructive Discharge: A Commentary on Friedman v. Town of Pembroke Park (11th Cir. 2025) I. Introduction This commentary examines the Eleventh...
Ambiguous Health-Related Remarks and Remote-Work Friction Are Not Enough: The Eleventh Circuit’s High Bar for Proving Disability Discrimination in Probationary Employment (Emily Laughlin v. Miami‑Dade County)

Ambiguous Health-Related Remarks and Remote-Work Friction Are Not Enough: The Eleventh Circuit’s High Bar for Proving Disability Discrimination in Probationary Employment (Emily Laughlin v. Miami‑Dade County)

Date: Dec 16, 2025
Ambiguous Health-Related Remarks and Remote-Work Friction Are Not Enough: The Eleventh Circuit’s High Bar for Proving Disability Discrimination in Probationary Employment I. Introduction The Eleventh...
Perez v. City of San Antonio: Limiting Texas’s Religious Services Clause and Applying Strict Scrutiny to Public Land Management

Perez v. City of San Antonio: Limiting Texas’s Religious Services Clause and Applying Strict Scrutiny to Public Land Management

Date: Dec 15, 2025
Perez v. City of San Antonio: Limiting Texas’s Religious Services Clause and Applying Strict Scrutiny to Public Land Management I. Introduction In Perez v. City of San Antonio, No. 23-50746 (5th Cir....
United States v. Watson: Modified Categorical Approach, “Relating To” Predicate Sex Offenses, and State Registration Duties Under § 2260A

United States v. Watson: Modified Categorical Approach, “Relating To” Predicate Sex Offenses, and State Registration Duties Under § 2260A

Date: Dec 15, 2025
United States v. Watson: Modified Categorical Approach, “Relating To” Predicate Sex Offenses, and State Registration Duties Under § 2260A I. Introduction In United States v. Roland Vance Watson, No....
Pretext, Preselection, and Comparative Qualifications in Title VII Promotion Cases: Commentary on Hood‑Wilson v. Board of Trustees, Community College of Baltimore County

Pretext, Preselection, and Comparative Qualifications in Title VII Promotion Cases: Commentary on Hood‑Wilson v. Board of Trustees, Community College of Baltimore County

Date: Dec 15, 2025
Pretext, Preselection, and Comparative Qualifications in Title VII Promotion Cases: Commentary on Hood‑Wilson v. Board of Trustees, Community College of Baltimore County 1. Introduction This...
Extraordinary Reasons, Ordinary Deference: Appellate Review of Compassionate Release After United States v. Washington (4th Cir. 2025)

Extraordinary Reasons, Ordinary Deference: Appellate Review of Compassionate Release After United States v. Washington (4th Cir. 2025)

Date: Dec 15, 2025
Extraordinary Reasons, Ordinary Deference: Appellate Review of Compassionate Release After United States v. Washington (4th Cir. 2025) I. Introduction In United States v. Mitchell Washington, No....
Equitable Timeliness, Not Statutes of Limitation, Governs Last-Minute Method‑of‑Execution Stays: Commentary on Frank A. Walls v. Secretary, Department of Corrections

Equitable Timeliness, Not Statutes of Limitation, Governs Last-Minute Method‑of‑Execution Stays: Commentary on Frank A. Walls v. Secretary, Department of Corrections

Date: Dec 15, 2025
Equitable Timeliness, Not Statutes of Limitation, Governs Last-Minute Method‑of‑Execution Stays: Commentary on Frank A. Walls v. Secretary, Department of Corrections I. Introduction The Eleventh...
“Timely Amendment” Under the Alabama Medical Liability Act: Commentary on Ex parte Coosa Valley Medical Center (SC‑2024‑0767) and Ex parte Marble City Family Care & Obstetrics (SC‑2024‑0770)

“Timely Amendment” Under the Alabama Medical Liability Act: Commentary on Ex parte Coosa Valley Medical Center (SC‑2024‑0767) and Ex parte Marble City Family Care & Obstetrics (SC‑2024‑0770)

Date: Dec 15, 2025
“Timely Amendment” Under the Alabama Medical Liability Act: Commentary on Ex parte Coosa Valley Medical Center and Ex parte Marble City Family Care & Obstetrics, P.C. I. Introduction This decision...
No Automatic Vacatur of Domesticated Foreign Judgments Upon Reversal in the Rendering State: Commentary on Shumate v. Berry Contracting, L.P.

No Automatic Vacatur of Domesticated Foreign Judgments Upon Reversal in the Rendering State: Commentary on Shumate v. Berry Contracting, L.P.

Date: Dec 15, 2025
No Automatic Vacatur of Domesticated Foreign Judgments Upon Reversal in the Rendering State Commentary on Shumate v. Berry Contracting, L.P., Supreme Court of Alabama (Dec. 12, 2025) I. Introduction...
No Waiver of State-Court Venue Objections When Removal Makes the Defense “Unavailable”: Commentary on Benchmark Insurance Co. v. Harris

No Waiver of State-Court Venue Objections When Removal Makes the Defense “Unavailable”: Commentary on Benchmark Insurance Co. v. Harris

Date: Dec 15, 2025
No Waiver of State-Court Venue Objections When Removal Makes the Defense “Unavailable” Commentary on Benchmark Insurance Company, et al. v. Harris, Supreme Court of Mississippi (Dec. 11, 2025) I....
No Automatic Attorney’s Fees on Rule 41(a)(2) Dismissal With Prejudice: Busby v. Lamar and the Limits of Curative Conditions in Mississippi

No Automatic Attorney’s Fees on Rule 41(a)(2) Dismissal With Prejudice: Busby v. Lamar and the Limits of Curative Conditions in Mississippi

Date: Dec 15, 2025
No Automatic Attorney’s Fees on Rule 41(a)(2) Dismissal With Prejudice: Busby v. Lamar and the Limits of Curative Conditions in Mississippi I. Introduction The Supreme Court of Mississippi’s decision...
Prospective Constitutional Relief, State Officers, and the Court of Claims Act Notice Provision: Commentary on Michigan Immigrant Rights Center v. Governor

Prospective Constitutional Relief, State Officers, and the Court of Claims Act Notice Provision: Commentary on Michigan Immigrant Rights Center v. Governor

Date: Dec 14, 2025
Prospective Constitutional Relief, State Officers, and the Court of Claims Act Notice Provision: Commentary on Michigan Immigrant Rights Center v. Governor I. Introduction The Michigan Supreme...
Procedural Management of Complex Infrastructure Litigation: The Michigan Supreme Court’s Time‑Extension Order in Dubrulle v. Great Lakes Water Authority

Procedural Management of Complex Infrastructure Litigation: The Michigan Supreme Court’s Time‑Extension Order in Dubrulle v. Great Lakes Water Authority

Date: Dec 14, 2025
Procedural Management of Complex Infrastructure Litigation: The Michigan Supreme Court’s Time‑Extension Order in Dubrulle v. Great Lakes Water Authority I. Introduction The document reproduced above...
Reassignment Without Disqualification: The Nevada Supreme Court’s Use of Supervisory Authority to Protect the Presumption of Innocence in Williams v. District Court

Reassignment Without Disqualification: The Nevada Supreme Court’s Use of Supervisory Authority to Protect the Presumption of Innocence in Williams v. District Court

Date: Dec 14, 2025
Reassignment Without Disqualification: The Nevada Supreme Court’s Use of Supervisory Authority to Protect the Presumption of Innocence in Williams v. District Court I. Introduction The Nevada Supreme...
Zavalza v. State and the Nevada Supreme Court’s Tightening of Harmless Error, Lost Evidence, and Non‑Traditional Expert Standards

Zavalza v. State and the Nevada Supreme Court’s Tightening of Harmless Error, Lost Evidence, and Non‑Traditional Expert Standards

Date: Dec 14, 2025
Zavalza v. State and the Nevada Supreme Court’s Tightening of Harmless Error, Lost Evidence, and Non‑Traditional Expert Standards Introduction In Julius Edward Zavalza v. State of Nevada, No. 89057,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert