Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

federal Case Commentaries

United States v. Autry: Strengthening Judicial Discretion to Depart Upward for Category VI Offenders under U.S.S.G. § 4A1.3

United States v. Autry: Strengthening Judicial Discretion to Depart Upward for Category VI Offenders under U.S.S.G. § 4A1.3

Date: Aug 6, 2025
United States v. Autry: Strengthening Judicial Discretion to Depart Upward for Category VI Offenders under U.S.S.G. § 4A1.3 1. Introduction The Sixth Circuit’s unpublished decision in United States...
United States v. Moore: The Sixth Circuit’s Blueprint on Judicial Neutrality, Digital-Evidence Authentication, and Expert Qualifications

United States v. Moore: The Sixth Circuit’s Blueprint on Judicial Neutrality, Digital-Evidence Authentication, and Expert Qualifications

Date: Aug 6, 2025
United States v. Moore: The Sixth Circuit’s Blueprint on Judicial Neutrality, Digital-Evidence Authentication, and Expert Qualifications 1. Introduction In United States v. Marchello Moore (6th Cir.,...
United States v. Pancholi: Sixth Circuit Declares Bad-Faith Is NOT Required to Exclude Surprise Defense Witnesses

United States v. Pancholi: Sixth Circuit Declares Bad-Faith Is NOT Required to Exclude Surprise Defense Witnesses

Date: Aug 6, 2025
United States v. Pancholi: Sixth Circuit Declares Bad-Faith Is NOT Required to Exclude Surprise Defense Witnesses Introduction In United States v. Yogesh K. Pancholi, No. 24-1127 (Aug. 5, 2025), the...
Tenth Circuit Clarifies Relation-Back, Joinder, and Continuing-Violation Limits in Prisoner § 1983 Litigation – The “Amaro Rule”

Tenth Circuit Clarifies Relation-Back, Joinder, and Continuing-Violation Limits in Prisoner § 1983 Litigation – The “Amaro Rule”

Date: Aug 6, 2025
Tenth Circuit Clarifies Relation-Back, Joinder, and Continuing-Violation Limits in Prisoner § 1983 Litigation – The “Amaro Rule” Introduction Amaro v. New Mexico Corrections Department is a...
“The 15-Day Rule” for Protection Applications and Waiver by Inattention: A Commentary on Chavez-Govea v. Bondi (10th Cir. 2025)

“The 15-Day Rule” for Protection Applications and Waiver by Inattention: A Commentary on Chavez-Govea v. Bondi (10th Cir. 2025)

Date: Aug 6, 2025
“The 15-Day Rule” for Protection Applications and Waiver by Inattention: A Comprehensive Commentary on Chavez-Govea v. Bondi, 10th Cir. (2025) 1. Introduction Chavez-Govea v. Bondi is a precedential...
Signature Optional for Proof-of-Service in EOIR Electronic Filings – Commentary on Cortez v. Bondi

Signature Optional for Proof-of-Service in EOIR Electronic Filings – Commentary on Cortez v. Bondi

Date: Aug 6, 2025
Signature Optional for Proof-of-Service in EOIR Electronic Filings: A Detailed Commentary on Cortez v. Bondi, 67 F.4th ___ (10th Cir. 2025) 1. Introduction Background: Ana Sofia Cortez and her minor...
“Ellis Doctrine”: Evidentiary Objections Are Not Reviewable on Interlocutory Qualified-Immunity Appeals & District Courts Must Conduct Defendant-Specific “Clearly Established” Analyses

“Ellis Doctrine”: Evidentiary Objections Are Not Reviewable on Interlocutory Qualified-Immunity Appeals & District Courts Must Conduct Defendant-Specific “Clearly Established” Analyses

Date: Aug 6, 2025
Ellis v. Salt Lake City Corporation: The Tenth Circuit’s New Limits on Collateral-Order Review and a Reminder of Individualised “Clearly Established” Duties I. Introduction Ellis v. Salt Lake City...
Clarifying Rebuttal Standards under the Black Lung Benefits Act: 10th Circuit Bars Employer Evidence that Conflates Clinical and Legal Pneumoconiosis

Clarifying Rebuttal Standards under the Black Lung Benefits Act: 10th Circuit Bars Employer Evidence that Conflates Clinical and Legal Pneumoconiosis

Date: Aug 6, 2025
Clarifying Rebuttal Standards under the Black Lung Benefits Act: 10th Circuit Bars Employer Evidence that Conflates Clinical and Legal Pneumoconiosis 1. Introduction In Energy West Mining Company v....
“No Short-Circuiting Summary Judgment”:  Snyder v. Beam Technologies and the Tenth Circuit’s Twin Pronouncements on Trade-Secret Protection and Rule 702 Procedure

“No Short-Circuiting Summary Judgment”: Snyder v. Beam Technologies and the Tenth Circuit’s Twin Pronouncements on Trade-Secret Protection and Rule 702 Procedure

Date: Aug 6, 2025
“No Short-Circuiting Summary Judgment” – A Commentary on Snyder v. Beam Technologies, Inc., 134 F.4th 1078 (10th Cir. 2025) I. Introduction In Snyder v. Beam Technologies, the United States Court of...
“Rigorous Analysis” Re-defined: Seventh Circuit Demands Full Engagement with Expert Disputes at the Class-Certification Stage

“Rigorous Analysis” Re-defined: Seventh Circuit Demands Full Engagement with Expert Disputes at the Class-Certification Stage

Date: Aug 6, 2025
“Rigorous Analysis” Re-defined: Seventh Circuit Demands Full Engagement with Expert Disputes at the Class-Certification Stage 1. Introduction Arandell Corporation v. Xcel Energy Inc. is the latest...
Chicago Wine Co. v. Braun (7th Cir. 2025):  Seventh Circuit Re-Affirms State Authority to Impose In-State-Presence Requirements and Common-Carrier Bans on Retail Alcohol Deliveries

Chicago Wine Co. v. Braun (7th Cir. 2025): Seventh Circuit Re-Affirms State Authority to Impose In-State-Presence Requirements and Common-Carrier Bans on Retail Alcohol Deliveries

Date: Aug 6, 2025
Chicago Wine Co. v. Braun: Seventh Circuit Re-Affirms State Authority to Impose In-State-Presence Requirements and Common-Carrier Bans on Retail Alcohol Deliveries 1. Introduction In Chicago Wine...
Ontiveros v. Exxon Mobil: Seventh Circuit Clarifies Comparator Requirements and Evidentiary Threshold at Summary Judgment

Ontiveros v. Exxon Mobil: Seventh Circuit Clarifies Comparator Requirements and Evidentiary Threshold at Summary Judgment

Date: Aug 6, 2025
Ontiveros v. Exxon Mobil: Seventh Circuit Clarifies Comparator Requirements and Evidentiary Threshold at Summary Judgment 1. Introduction Gricelda Ontiveros, a forty-two-year-old customer service...
From “De Minimis” to “Objective Substantial Hardship”: The Seventh Circuit’s Re-Calibration of Groff in Kluge v. Brownsburg

From “De Minimis” to “Objective Substantial Hardship”: The Seventh Circuit’s Re-Calibration of Groff in Kluge v. Brownsburg

Date: Aug 6, 2025
From “De Minimis” to “Objective Substantial Hardship” Kluge v. Brownsburg Community School Corporation, 7th Cir. (2025) 1. Introduction John M. Kluge, an Indiana high-school orchestra teacher,...
“From ‘Modest Showing’ to ‘Material Factual Dispute’: The Seventh Circuit’s New Standard for Issuing Notice in FLSA/ADEA Collective Actions

“From ‘Modest Showing’ to ‘Material Factual Dispute’: The Seventh Circuit’s New Standard for Issuing Notice in FLSA/ADEA Collective Actions

Date: Aug 6, 2025
From “Modest Showing” to “Material Factual Dispute”: The Seventh Circuit’s New Standard for Issuing Notice in FLSA/ADEA Collective Actions Introduction Monica Richards v. Eli Lilly & Company is a...
Nissenbaum v. Jennings: Clarifying “Reasonable Probability” for Lost-Plea Ineffective-Assistance Claims under AEDPA

Nissenbaum v. Jennings: Clarifying “Reasonable Probability” for Lost-Plea Ineffective-Assistance Claims under AEDPA

Date: Aug 6, 2025
Nissenbaum v. Jennings (7th Cir. 2025): Clarifying “Reasonable Probability” for Lost-Plea Ineffective-Assistance Claims under AEDPA 1. Introduction The Seventh Circuit’s decision in Nathan Nissenbaum...
“Officer-Discretion Vagueness” and the End of the 25-Foot Buffer: Seventh Circuit Reins-in Police Authority & Universal Injunctions in Reporters Committee v. Rokita

“Officer-Discretion Vagueness” and the End of the 25-Foot Buffer: Seventh Circuit Reins-in Police Authority & Universal Injunctions in Reporters Committee v. Rokita

Date: Aug 6, 2025
“Officer-Discretion Vagueness” and the End of the 25-Foot Buffer: The Seventh Circuit Reins-in Police Authority & Universal Injunctions in Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press v. Rokita...
United States v. Dukes: The Seventh Circuit Re-draws the Line Between Direct Evidence and Rule 404(b) Other-Act Evidence

United States v. Dukes: The Seventh Circuit Re-draws the Line Between Direct Evidence and Rule 404(b) Other-Act Evidence

Date: Aug 6, 2025
United States v. Dukes: The Seventh Circuit Re-draws the Line Between Direct Evidence and Rule 404(b) Other-Act Evidence Introduction United States v. Kashif Dukes, No. 24-1928 (7th Cir. Aug. 5,...
“Deliberate Indifference in the Box” – The First Circuit’s New Standard on Solitary-Confinement Liability in Cintron v. Bibeault

“Deliberate Indifference in the Box” – The First Circuit’s New Standard on Solitary-Confinement Liability in Cintron v. Bibeault

Date: Aug 6, 2025
“Deliberate Indifference in the Box” – The First Circuit’s New Standard on Solitary-Confinement Liability 1. Introduction Cintron v. Bibeault, No. 22-1716 (1st Cir. Aug. 5 2025), marks the most...
United States v. Fasasi: Second Circuit Clarifies the Boundaries of Plain-Error Review, Rule 32 PSR Verification, and the “Substantial Overseas Conduct” Fraud Enhancement

United States v. Fasasi: Second Circuit Clarifies the Boundaries of Plain-Error Review, Rule 32 PSR Verification, and the “Substantial Overseas Conduct” Fraud Enhancement

Date: Aug 6, 2025
United States v. Fasasi: Second Circuit Clarifies the Boundaries of Plain-Error Review, Rule 32 PSR Verification, and the “Substantial Overseas Conduct” Fraud Enhancement 1. Introduction United...
“Post-Bruen Constitutionality of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) and Probable-Cause Parameters in Multi-State Drug Conspiracies” – A Commentary on United States v. Miller (2d Cir. 2025)

“Post-Bruen Constitutionality of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) and Probable-Cause Parameters in Multi-State Drug Conspiracies” – A Commentary on United States v. Miller (2d Cir. 2025)

Date: Aug 6, 2025
Post-Bruen Constitutionality of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) and Probable-Cause Parameters in Multi-State Drug Conspiracies A Detailed Commentary on United States v. Miller, 23-7699-cr (2d Cir. Aug. 4,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert