Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

federal Case Commentaries

No Magic Words: Implied “Reasonable Efforts” Under Rule 4(m) and a Heightened Deliberate-Indifference/Monell Showing in Prisoner § 1983 Suits

No Magic Words: Implied “Reasonable Efforts” Under Rule 4(m) and a Heightened Deliberate-Indifference/Monell Showing in Prisoner § 1983 Suits

Date: Nov 9, 2025
No Magic Words: Implied “Reasonable Efforts” Under Rule 4(m) and a Heightened Deliberate-Indifference/Monell Showing in Prisoner § 1983 Suits Introduction In James Daryl West v. Sabrina Schultz, the...
No Police-Report Hearsay to Prove Dram Shop Liability at Summary Judgment: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Strict Application of FRE 803(8), 804(b)(3), and 807 in Hambrick v. Wells Fargo

No Police-Report Hearsay to Prove Dram Shop Liability at Summary Judgment: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Strict Application of FRE 803(8), 804(b)(3), and 807 in Hambrick v. Wells Fargo

Date: Nov 9, 2025
No Police-Report Hearsay to Prove Dram Shop Liability at Summary Judgment: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Strict Application of FRE 803(8), 804(b)(3), and 807 in Hambrick v. Wells Fargo Court: U.S. Court...
AEDPA Deference and Florida Arson Sentencing: No Double Jeopardy Relief for Dual Convictions of Arson of a Dwelling and Arson Causing Great Bodily Harm

AEDPA Deference and Florida Arson Sentencing: No Double Jeopardy Relief for Dual Convictions of Arson of a Dwelling and Arson Causing Great Bodily Harm

Date: Nov 9, 2025
AEDPA Deference and Florida Arson Sentencing: No Double Jeopardy Relief for Dual Convictions of Arson of a Dwelling and Arson Causing Great Bodily Harm Introduction In Joseph Haas v. Secretary,...
Clisby’s “All Claims” Rule Requires Clear, Independent Pleading: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Where Plea-Advice Ineffective-Assistance Theory Was Not Distinctly Pled

Clisby’s “All Claims” Rule Requires Clear, Independent Pleading: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Where Plea-Advice Ineffective-Assistance Theory Was Not Distinctly Pled

Date: Nov 9, 2025
Clisby’s “All Claims” Rule Requires Clear, Independent Pleading: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Where Plea-Advice Ineffective-Assistance Theory Was Not Distinctly Pled Introduction In Manuel Emilio Alvarez...
Perceived Speech, No Conduct Required: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Heffernan Applies to Public-Employee Retaliation Even Where the Employee Did Nothing

Perceived Speech, No Conduct Required: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Heffernan Applies to Public-Employee Retaliation Even Where the Employee Did Nothing

Date: Nov 9, 2025
Perceived Speech, No Conduct Required: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Heffernan Applies to Public-Employee Retaliation Even Where the Employee Did Nothing Introduction This commentary analyzes the...
Practical Antagonism, Not Formal Deadlock, Controls Realignment in Derivative LLC Actions

Practical Antagonism, Not Formal Deadlock, Controls Realignment in Derivative LLC Actions

Date: Nov 9, 2025
Practical Antagonism, Not Formal Deadlock, Controls Realignment in Derivative LLC Actions Case: Qatalyst Inc v. Pipes.AI, LLC, et al. Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit...
Leaving to Avoid Overtime for Prenatal Spousal Care May Be Protected FMLA Leave; Employer’s Failure to Notify Can Proximately Cause Termination — Commentary on James v. FedEx Freight (11th Cir. 2025)

Leaving to Avoid Overtime for Prenatal Spousal Care May Be Protected FMLA Leave; Employer’s Failure to Notify Can Proximately Cause Termination — Commentary on James v. FedEx Freight (11th Cir. 2025)

Date: Nov 9, 2025
Leaving to Avoid Overtime for Prenatal Spousal Care May Be Protected FMLA Leave; Employer’s Failure to Notify Can Proximately Cause Termination — Commentary on James v. FedEx Freight (11th Cir. 2025)...
Objective “Reasonably Believable” Standard Governs “Credible Threats of Violence” under U.S.S.G. § 4C1.1, with Keene-Based Harmless-Error Backstop

Objective “Reasonably Believable” Standard Governs “Credible Threats of Violence” under U.S.S.G. § 4C1.1, with Keene-Based Harmless-Error Backstop

Date: Nov 9, 2025
Objective “Reasonably Believable” Standard Governs “Credible Threats of Violence” under U.S.S.G. § 4C1.1, with Keene-Based Harmless-Error Backstop Introduction In United States v. Alexandre Ovadia,...
Compassionate Release After the 2023 Guideline Amendments: Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms that § 3553(a) Alone Can Defeat Relief (United States v. Varela)

Compassionate Release After the 2023 Guideline Amendments: Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms that § 3553(a) Alone Can Defeat Relief (United States v. Varela)

Date: Nov 9, 2025
Compassionate Release After the 2023 Guideline Amendments: Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms that § 3553(a) Alone Can Defeat Relief Introduction In United States v. Danny Varela, No. 25-11314 (11th Cir....
United States v. Forbes: Acquitted Conduct Still Usable at Pre–Amendment 826 Sentencings; Lay “Code-Word” Testimony Upheld; §2D1.1(b)(1) Firearm Enhancement Requires Less Than §924(c)

United States v. Forbes: Acquitted Conduct Still Usable at Pre–Amendment 826 Sentencings; Lay “Code-Word” Testimony Upheld; §2D1.1(b)(1) Firearm Enhancement Requires Less Than §924(c)

Date: Nov 9, 2025
United States v. Forbes: Acquitted Conduct Still Usable at Pre–Amendment 826 Sentencings; Lay “Code-Word” Testimony Upheld; §2D1.1(b)(1) Firearm Enhancement Requires Less Than §924(c) Court: U.S....
State Law at the Time of the Prior Conviction Controls: Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms Dubois Rule for Guidelines “Controlled Substance Offense” Predicates

State Law at the Time of the Prior Conviction Controls: Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms Dubois Rule for Guidelines “Controlled Substance Offense” Predicates

Date: Nov 9, 2025
State Law at the Time of the Prior Conviction Controls: Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms Dubois Rule for Guidelines “Controlled Substance Offense” Predicates Introduction In United States v. Jacklin...
Divisibility of N.J. § 2C:14‑2c and Predicate “Sex Offense Conviction” Status under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.5(a): Eleventh Circuit’s Analysis in United States v. Hass

Divisibility of N.J. § 2C:14‑2c and Predicate “Sex Offense Conviction” Status under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.5(a): Eleventh Circuit’s Analysis in United States v. Hass

Date: Nov 9, 2025
Divisibility of N.J. § 2C:14‑2c and Predicate “Sex Offense Conviction” Status under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.5(a): Eleventh Circuit’s Analysis in United States v. Hass Introduction In United States v. Hass...
United States v. Hill: Timeliness and Materiality as Gatekeepers—No Brady Duty for State-Held Evidence and No CI Disclosure When Informant Is Peripheral

United States v. Hill: Timeliness and Materiality as Gatekeepers—No Brady Duty for State-Held Evidence and No CI Disclosure When Informant Is Peripheral

Date: Nov 9, 2025
United States v. Hill: Timeliness and Materiality as Gatekeepers—No Brady Duty for State-Held Evidence and No CI Disclosure When Informant Is Peripheral Introduction In this unpublished, per curiam...
United States v. Lagary Williams: Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms No-Notice Rule for Upward Variances and Permits Use of Uncharged Overdose Death Under § 3553(a)

United States v. Lagary Williams: Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms No-Notice Rule for Upward Variances and Permits Use of Uncharged Overdose Death Under § 3553(a)

Date: Nov 9, 2025
United States v. Lagary Williams: Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms No-Notice Rule for Upward Variances and Permits Use of Uncharged Overdose Death Under § 3553(a) Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the...
No Bona Fide Doubt, No Hearing: Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms Trial-Court Discretion to Decline Mid‑Trial Competency Re‑Evaluation and to Impose an Upward § 3553(a) Variance

No Bona Fide Doubt, No Hearing: Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms Trial-Court Discretion to Decline Mid‑Trial Competency Re‑Evaluation and to Impose an Upward § 3553(a) Variance

Date: Nov 9, 2025
No Bona Fide Doubt, No Hearing: Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms Trial-Court Discretion to Decline Mid‑Trial Competency Re‑Evaluation and to Impose an Upward § 3553(a) Variance Case: United States v....
Sixth Circuit Clarifies: Complete Denial of Union Intervention Is Immediately Appealable; Police Union May Intervene as of Right at the Liability Stage When Monell Claims Target CBA-Rooted Policies

Sixth Circuit Clarifies: Complete Denial of Union Intervention Is Immediately Appealable; Police Union May Intervene as of Right at the Liability Stage When Monell Claims Target CBA-Rooted Policies

Date: Nov 9, 2025
Sixth Circuit Clarifies: Complete Denial of Union Intervention Is Immediately Appealable; Police Union May Intervene as of Right at the Liability Stage When Monell Claims Target CBA-Rooted Policies...
Night Blindness Can Qualify as an ADA Disability: Sixth Circuit Affirms Broad ADAAA Standard and Protects Good‑Faith Accommodation Requests

Night Blindness Can Qualify as an ADA Disability: Sixth Circuit Affirms Broad ADAAA Standard and Protects Good‑Faith Accommodation Requests

Date: Nov 9, 2025
Night Blindness Can Qualify as an ADA Disability: Sixth Circuit Affirms Broad ADAAA Standard and Protects Good‑Faith Accommodation Requests Introduction In Rebecca Edwards v. Shelby County, Tennessee...
Tenth Circuit Clarifies: Requests to Reply to a Magistrate’s R&R Do Not Toll the Appeal Deadline; Finality Assessed on the Face of the Judgment

Tenth Circuit Clarifies: Requests to Reply to a Magistrate’s R&R Do Not Toll the Appeal Deadline; Finality Assessed on the Face of the Judgment

Date: Nov 9, 2025
Tenth Circuit Clarifies: Requests to Reply to a Magistrate’s R&R Do Not Toll the Appeal Deadline; Finality Assessed on the Face of the Judgment Introduction In MacIntyre v. Supreme Court of Colorado,...
Tenth Circuit Confirms: § 1983 Injunctive/Declaratory Relief Requires Official-Capacity Suits; New Mexico Civil Rights Act Does Not Waive Eleventh Amendment Immunity in Federal Court

Tenth Circuit Confirms: § 1983 Injunctive/Declaratory Relief Requires Official-Capacity Suits; New Mexico Civil Rights Act Does Not Waive Eleventh Amendment Immunity in Federal Court

Date: Nov 9, 2025
Tenth Circuit Confirms: § 1983 Injunctive/Declaratory Relief Requires Official-Capacity Suits; New Mexico Civil Rights Act Does Not Waive Eleventh Amendment Immunity in Federal Court Introduction In...
When Video Shows Ongoing Resistance, K‑9 Force to Secure Handcuffs Is Not “Malicious and Sadistic” Under the Eighth Amendment

When Video Shows Ongoing Resistance, K‑9 Force to Secure Handcuffs Is Not “Malicious and Sadistic” Under the Eighth Amendment

Date: Nov 9, 2025
When Video Shows Ongoing Resistance, K‑9 Force to Secure Handcuffs Is Not “Malicious and Sadistic” Under the Eighth Amendment Introduction This commentary examines the Seventh Circuit’s...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert