Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

federal Case Commentaries


      Ordinary-Meaning Rule Defines “Trade or Craft” as Manual/Artistic Skill and Limits ERISA Deference to the Administrator’s Stated Reasons

Ordinary-Meaning Rule Defines “Trade or Craft” as Manual/Artistic Skill and Limits ERISA Deference to the Administrator’s Stated Reasons

Date: Nov 8, 2025
Ordinary-Meaning Rule Defines “Trade or Craft” as Manual/Artistic Skill and Limits ERISA Deference to the Administrator’s Stated Reasons Introduction In Clyde Rombach, III v. Plumbers Local Union No....
Contemporaneous Falsity and Strategic-Review Disclosures Defeat Omission-Based Securities Claims

Contemporaneous Falsity and Strategic-Review Disclosures Defeat Omission-Based Securities Claims

Date: Nov 8, 2025
Contemporaneous Falsity and Strategic-Review Disclosures Defeat Omission-Based Securities Claims Introduction In a non-precedential but instructive decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third...
United States v. Marc Anthony: Third Circuit clarifies that mental impairment and low Miranda-comprehension testing do not, without police coercion, invalidate a Miranda waiver; “knowing and intelligent” appeal carveouts construed to encompass voluntariness

United States v. Marc Anthony: Third Circuit clarifies that mental impairment and low Miranda-comprehension testing do not, without police coercion, invalidate a Miranda waiver; “knowing and intelligent” appeal carveouts construed to encompass voluntariness

Date: Nov 8, 2025
United States v. Marc Anthony: Third Circuit clarifies that mental impairment and low Miranda-comprehension testing do not, without police coercion, invalidate a Miranda waiver; “knowing and...
Credible Testimony Is Not Enough: Fifth Circuit Confirms IJs May Demand Reasonably Obtainable Corroboration for VAWA Cancellation and Enforces Exhaustion of Niz‑Chavez Stop‑Time Claims

Credible Testimony Is Not Enough: Fifth Circuit Confirms IJs May Demand Reasonably Obtainable Corroboration for VAWA Cancellation and Enforces Exhaustion of Niz‑Chavez Stop‑Time Claims

Date: Nov 8, 2025
Credible Testimony Is Not Enough: Fifth Circuit Confirms IJs May Demand Reasonably Obtainable Corroboration for VAWA Cancellation and Enforces Exhaustion of Niz‑Chavez Stop‑Time Claims Introduction...
Additional Straight‑Time Pay Does Not Defeat the HCE Salary‑Basis Test; Magistrate Judges May Tax Costs Under Rule 54(d)(1): Commentary on Descant v. CTCI Americas (5th Cir. 2025)

Additional Straight‑Time Pay Does Not Defeat the HCE Salary‑Basis Test; Magistrate Judges May Tax Costs Under Rule 54(d)(1): Commentary on Descant v. CTCI Americas (5th Cir. 2025)

Date: Nov 8, 2025
Additional Straight‑Time Pay Does Not Defeat the HCE Salary‑Basis Test; Magistrate Judges May Tax Costs Under Rule 54(d)(1) Introduction In Descant v. CTCI Americas, No. 25‑40112 (5th Cir. Nov. 6,...
Fifth Circuit Holds Unrebutted, Defendant‑Specific Forfeiture Orders Can Establish the $10,000 Threshold for Aggravated‑Felony Money‑Laundering Determinations

Fifth Circuit Holds Unrebutted, Defendant‑Specific Forfeiture Orders Can Establish the $10,000 Threshold for Aggravated‑Felony Money‑Laundering Determinations

Date: Nov 8, 2025
Fifth Circuit Holds Unrebutted, Defendant‑Specific Forfeiture Orders Can Establish the $10,000 Threshold for Aggravated‑Felony Money‑Laundering Determinations Introduction In Dominguez Reyes v....
“Melting Ice Is Not Enough”: Fifth Circuit Refines Creation and Temporal Proof Under Louisiana’s Merchant Liability Act

“Melting Ice Is Not Enough”: Fifth Circuit Refines Creation and Temporal Proof Under Louisiana’s Merchant Liability Act

Date: Nov 8, 2025
“Melting Ice Is Not Enough”: Fifth Circuit Refines Creation and Temporal Proof Under Louisiana’s Merchant Liability Act Introduction In Howard v. Brookshire Grocery Company (Super 1 Foods), No....
Reese v. United Petroleum Transports: Fifth Circuit Reaffirms Gonzalez–Caston Factors for Appointing Counsel in Title VII Cases and Enforces Ragas’s Specific-Evidence Requirement on Appeal

Reese v. United Petroleum Transports: Fifth Circuit Reaffirms Gonzalez–Caston Factors for Appointing Counsel in Title VII Cases and Enforces Ragas’s Specific-Evidence Requirement on Appeal

Date: Nov 8, 2025
Reese v. United Petroleum Transports: Fifth Circuit Reaffirms Gonzalez–Caston Factors for Appointing Counsel in Title VII Cases and Enforces Ragas’s Specific-Evidence Requirement on Appeal...
Benefits Determinations Disguised as FTCA Medical Negligence Are Jurisdictionally Barred: The Fifth Circuit’s Reaffirmation in Smart v. United States

Benefits Determinations Disguised as FTCA Medical Negligence Are Jurisdictionally Barred: The Fifth Circuit’s Reaffirmation in Smart v. United States

Date: Nov 8, 2025
Benefits Determinations Disguised as FTCA Medical Negligence Are Jurisdictionally Barred: The Fifth Circuit’s Reaffirmation in Smart v. United States Introduction In Smart v. United States, No....
Moody’s Comparative Facial-Challenge Framework Governs: Fifth Circuit Vacates Drag-Show Injunction and Limits Standing to AG’s Enforcement of S.B. 12 Section One

Moody’s Comparative Facial-Challenge Framework Governs: Fifth Circuit Vacates Drag-Show Injunction and Limits Standing to AG’s Enforcement of S.B. 12 Section One

Date: Nov 8, 2025
Moody’s Comparative Facial-Challenge Framework Governs: Fifth Circuit Vacates Drag-Show Injunction and Limits Standing to AG’s Enforcement of S.B. 12 Section One Introduction In Woodlands Pride v....
No Per Se Prejudice from Lost Appeal; Electronic Service Starts Reopening Clock — Azamov v. Bondi (2d Cir. 2025)

No Per Se Prejudice from Lost Appeal; Electronic Service Starts Reopening Clock — Azamov v. Bondi (2d Cir. 2025)

Date: Nov 8, 2025
No Per Se Prejudice from Lost Appeal; Electronic Service Starts Reopening Clock — Azamov v. Bondi (2d Cir. 2025) Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (Summary Order —...
Speculation Is Not Prejudice: The Second Circuit’s Doubly Deferential Strickland–AEDPA Framework Illustrated in Cortez v. Kopp

Speculation Is Not Prejudice: The Second Circuit’s Doubly Deferential Strickland–AEDPA Framework Illustrated in Cortez v. Kopp

Date: Nov 8, 2025
Speculation Is Not Prejudice: The Second Circuit’s Doubly Deferential Strickland–AEDPA Framework Illustrated in Cortez v. Kopp Note: This decision is a Summary Order of the U.S. Court of Appeals for...
Precision Required in Big Apple Map Prior Written Notice and Bar on Post‑Discovery Expansion of § 50‑e Claim Locations

Precision Required in Big Apple Map Prior Written Notice and Bar on Post‑Discovery Expansion of § 50‑e Claim Locations

Date: Nov 8, 2025
Precision Required in Big Apple Map Prior Written Notice and Bar on Post‑Discovery Expansion of § 50‑e Claim Locations Case: Lieder v. City of New York, No. 24-3071-cv (2d Cir. Nov. 6, 2025) (summary...
Preservation Is Paramount: Second Circuit Affirms Verdict in Tatas v. Ali Baba’s Terrace Inc. on Waiver, Plain Error, and Rule 403 Discretion

Preservation Is Paramount: Second Circuit Affirms Verdict in Tatas v. Ali Baba’s Terrace Inc. on Waiver, Plain Error, and Rule 403 Discretion

Date: Nov 8, 2025
Preservation Is Paramount: Second Circuit Affirms Verdict in Tatas v. Ali Baba’s Terrace Inc. on Waiver, Plain Error, and Rule 403 Discretion Introduction In a non-precedential summary order, the...
“Good Cause” Means New, Uncontrollable Grounds Plus Diligence: Second Circuit Clarifies § 1455(b)(1) and Reopens the Door to Post‑Trial Federal Officer Removal in New York v. Trump

“Good Cause” Means New, Uncontrollable Grounds Plus Diligence: Second Circuit Clarifies § 1455(b)(1) and Reopens the Door to Post‑Trial Federal Officer Removal in New York v. Trump

Date: Nov 8, 2025
“Good Cause” Means New, Uncontrollable Grounds Plus Diligence: Second Circuit Clarifies § 1455(b)(1) and Reopens the Door to Post‑Trial Federal Officer Removal in New York v. Trump Introduction This...
Attaching QWRs Saves a RESPA Claim from Summary Judgment; Borrower Default Bars Contract Claims and Supports Foreclosure — Eleventh Circuit’s Partial Remand in Embry v. Carrington

Attaching QWRs Saves a RESPA Claim from Summary Judgment; Borrower Default Bars Contract Claims and Supports Foreclosure — Eleventh Circuit’s Partial Remand in Embry v. Carrington

Date: Nov 8, 2025
Attaching QWRs Saves a RESPA Claim from Summary Judgment; Borrower Default Bars Contract Claims and Supports Foreclosure — Eleventh Circuit’s Partial Remand in Embry v. Carrington Note: This is an...
Residence Alone Is Not Enough: Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms Plaintiff’s Burden to Allege and Prove Florida Contacts for Personal Jurisdiction Over Nonresident Defendants

Residence Alone Is Not Enough: Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms Plaintiff’s Burden to Allege and Prove Florida Contacts for Personal Jurisdiction Over Nonresident Defendants

Date: Nov 8, 2025
Residence Alone Is Not Enough: Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms Plaintiff’s Burden to Allege and Prove Florida Contacts for Personal Jurisdiction Over Nonresident Defendants Court: U.S. Court of Appeals...
Ordinary Criminality Is Not Nexus: Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms Pecuniary-Motive Rule and Rejects Imputed Anti‑Gang Political Opinion in Osorio‑Villalobos

Ordinary Criminality Is Not Nexus: Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms Pecuniary-Motive Rule and Rejects Imputed Anti‑Gang Political Opinion in Osorio‑Villalobos

Date: Nov 8, 2025
Ordinary Criminality Is Not Nexus: Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms Pecuniary-Motive Rule and Rejects Imputed Anti‑Gang Political Opinion in Osorio‑Villalobos Introduction In this unpublished, per curiam...
Reaffirming Deference to Adverse Credibility Findings and the Chenery/Bagamasbad Limits on Appellate Review When the BIA Denies on Credibility Alone

Reaffirming Deference to Adverse Credibility Findings and the Chenery/Bagamasbad Limits on Appellate Review When the BIA Denies on Credibility Alone

Date: Nov 8, 2025
Reaffirming Deference to Adverse Credibility Findings and the Chenery/Bagamasbad Limits on Appellate Review When the BIA Denies on Credibility Alone Introduction In Sakib Ahmod v. U.S. Attorney...
Eleventh Circuit: Receiving a Non‑EEOC Subpoena Is Not Protected “Participation” Under Title VII; Two Isolated Advances Insufficiently Severe or Pervasive; Stray Age Remarks Don’t Prove Pretext

Eleventh Circuit: Receiving a Non‑EEOC Subpoena Is Not Protected “Participation” Under Title VII; Two Isolated Advances Insufficiently Severe or Pervasive; Stray Age Remarks Don’t Prove Pretext

Date: Nov 8, 2025
Eleventh Circuit: Receiving a Non‑EEOC Subpoena Is Not Protected “Participation” Under Title VII; Two Isolated Advances Insufficiently Severe or Pervasive; Stray Age Remarks Don’t Prove Pretext Case:...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert