Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

federal Case Commentaries

From Possibility to Probability: Sixth Circuit Clarifies Causation Standard in Tennessee Products-Liability Actions

From Possibility to Probability: Sixth Circuit Clarifies Causation Standard in Tennessee Products-Liability Actions

Date: Aug 6, 2025
From Possibility to Probability: Sixth Circuit Clarifies Causation Standard in Tennessee Products-Liability Actions Introduction This commentary examines the Sixth Circuit’s unpublished opinion in...
“Intent to Confine” Suffices: Eleventh Circuit Holds False-Imprisonment Judgments Are Nondischargeable under § 523(a)(6) Despite Debtor’s Good-Faith Belief

“Intent to Confine” Suffices: Eleventh Circuit Holds False-Imprisonment Judgments Are Nondischargeable under § 523(a)(6) Despite Debtor’s Good-Faith Belief

Date: Aug 6, 2025
“Intent to Confine” Suffices: Eleventh Circuit Holds False-Imprisonment Judgments Are Nondischargeable under § 523(a)(6) Despite Debtor’s Good-Faith Belief 1. Introduction The Court of Appeals for...
“Isolated Attorney Endorsements” and Strickland Prejudice: Seventh Circuit Clarifies Ineffective-Assistance Analysis under AEDPA

“Isolated Attorney Endorsements” and Strickland Prejudice: Seventh Circuit Clarifies Ineffective-Assistance Analysis under AEDPA

Date: Aug 6, 2025
“Isolated Attorney Endorsements” and Strickland Prejudice: Seventh Circuit Clarifies Ineffective-Assistance Analysis under AEDPA Introduction In Eric Benson Skeens v. Ron Neal, the United States...
Forfeiture at the Hearing: Cain v. Bisignano Solidifies the Seventh Circuit Rule on Vocational-Expert Objections and Reaffirms the “Minimal Articulation” Standard

Forfeiture at the Hearing: Cain v. Bisignano Solidifies the Seventh Circuit Rule on Vocational-Expert Objections and Reaffirms the “Minimal Articulation” Standard

Date: Aug 6, 2025
Forfeiture at the Hearing: Cain v. Bisignano Solidifies the Seventh Circuit Rule on Vocational-Expert Objections and Reaffirms the “Minimal Articulation” Standard Introduction In Jonathan D. Cain v....
Seventh Circuit Tightens the Nexus and Relocation Requirements in Cartel-Violence Claims:  P.A-V. v. Bondi (2025)

Seventh Circuit Tightens the Nexus and Relocation Requirements in Cartel-Violence Claims: P.A-V. v. Bondi (2025)

Date: Aug 6, 2025
Seventh Circuit Tightens the Nexus and Relocation Requirements in Cartel-Violence Claims: Commentary on P. A.-V. v. Bondi, 21-2737 (7th Cir. 2025) 1. Introduction P. A.-V. v. Bondi is the latest in a...
The “Otherwise-Applicable Guideline Range” Doctrine: Seventh Circuit Re-Affirms Deference to Commentary When Calculating Career-Offender Sentences under § 4B1.1(c)(2)

The “Otherwise-Applicable Guideline Range” Doctrine: Seventh Circuit Re-Affirms Deference to Commentary When Calculating Career-Offender Sentences under § 4B1.1(c)(2)

Date: Aug 6, 2025
The “Otherwise-Applicable Guideline Range” Doctrine: United States v. Daniel Stewart (7th Cir. 2025) Introduction In United States v. Daniel Stewart, the Seventh Circuit tackled a thorny question in...
When Consumer-Protection Claims “Sound in Fraud”: Eleventh Circuit Requires Rule 9(b) Particularity for FDUTPA Allegations

When Consumer-Protection Claims “Sound in Fraud”: Eleventh Circuit Requires Rule 9(b) Particularity for FDUTPA Allegations

Date: Aug 6, 2025
When Consumer-Protection Claims “Sound in Fraud”: Eleventh Circuit Requires Rule 9(b) Particularity for FDUTPA Allegations 1. Introduction In Alin Pop v. LuliFama.com LLC, No. 24-11048 (11th Cir....
Partial-Withdrawal Credits Must Be Applied at “Step Two” of the MPPAA Formula – 
            Commentary on Perfection Bakeries Inc. v. Retail, Wholesale & Department Store Int’l Union Pension Fund

Partial-Withdrawal Credits Must Be Applied at “Step Two” of the MPPAA Formula – Commentary on Perfection Bakeries Inc. v. Retail, Wholesale & Department Store Int’l Union Pension Fund

Date: Aug 6, 2025
Partial-Withdrawal Credits Must Be Applied at “Step Two” of the MPPAA Formula (Perfection Bakeries Inc. v. Retail, Wholesale & Department Store International Union Pension Fund, 11th Cir., 2025)...
Clarifying Medical-Necessity & Qualified-Immunity Standards in Transgender Inmate Care: Bayse v. Philbin (11th Cir. 2025)

Clarifying Medical-Necessity & Qualified-Immunity Standards in Transgender Inmate Care: Bayse v. Philbin (11th Cir. 2025)

Date: Aug 6, 2025
Clarifying Medical-Necessity & Qualified-Immunity Standards in Transgender Inmate Care: Bayse v. Philbin (11th Cir. 2025) Introduction In Bayse v. Philbin, No. 24-11299 (11th Cir. Aug. 1, 2025), the...
“The Post-Daubert Reasonable-Juror Threshold for Class Certification” – Commentary on City of Philadelphia v. Banc of Am. Securities LLC (2d Cir. 2025)

“The Post-Daubert Reasonable-Juror Threshold for Class Certification” – Commentary on City of Philadelphia v. Banc of Am. Securities LLC (2d Cir. 2025)

Date: Aug 6, 2025
“The Post-Daubert Reasonable-Juror Threshold for Class Certification” Commentary on City of Philadelphia v. Banc of Am. Securities LLC (2d Cir. 2025) 1. Introduction On 1 August 2025, the United...
“Chain-of-Speculation” Insufficiency and Minor-Service NTAs: A Commentary on Lopez-Avila v. Bondi

“Chain-of-Speculation” Insufficiency and Minor-Service NTAs: A Commentary on Lopez-Avila v. Bondi

Date: Aug 6, 2025
“Chain-of-Speculation” Insufficiency and Minor-Service NTAs: An In-Depth Commentary on Lopez-Avila v. Bondi 1. Introduction The Second Circuit’s summary order in Lopez-Avila v. Bondi (Aug. 1 2025)...
Second Circuit Re-Affirms § 922(g)(1) Constitutionality Post-Zherka: A Commentary on United States v. Martin (2025)

Second Circuit Re-Affirms § 922(g)(1) Constitutionality Post-Zherka: A Commentary on United States v. Martin (2025)

Date: Aug 6, 2025
Second Circuit Re-Affirms § 922(g)(1) Constitutionality Post-Zherka: Comprehensive Commentary on United States v. Martin (2d Cir. 2025) 1. Introduction United States v. Martin, No. 23-7507-cr,...
Affirming Broad District Court Discretion in AVAA Restitution Calculations: United States v. Schmitt (2d Cir. 2025)

Affirming Broad District Court Discretion in AVAA Restitution Calculations: United States v. Schmitt (2d Cir. 2025)

Date: Aug 6, 2025
Affirming Broad District Court Discretion in AVAA Restitution Calculations: United States v. Schmitt (2d Cir. 2025) Introduction United States v. Schmitt concerns the appeal of Michael Schmitt, who...
“Certifying Speech”: Volokh v. James and the Future Scrutiny of Social-Media Disclosure Mandates

“Certifying Speech”: Volokh v. James and the Future Scrutiny of Social-Media Disclosure Mandates

Date: Aug 6, 2025
“Certifying Speech”: Volokh v. James and the Future Scrutiny of Social-Media Disclosure Mandates I. Introduction Volokh v. James, No. 23-356 (2d Cir. Aug. 1, 2025), is the Second Circuit’s first deep...
“Contextual Conduct Comparator Doctrine” – Mann v. Koch Foods of Ashland LLC (11th Cir. 2025)

“Contextual Conduct Comparator Doctrine” – Mann v. Koch Foods of Ashland LLC (11th Cir. 2025)

Date: Aug 6, 2025
“Contextual Conduct Comparator Doctrine” – Mann v. Koch Foods of Ashland LLC (11th Cir. 2025) Introduction In Belinda Mann v. Koch Foods of Ashland LLC, No. 24-10709 (11th Cir. Aug. 1, 2025), the...
Eleventh Circuit Affirms Broad Judicial Discretion to Deny §1329 Modifications Seeking Post-Petition Personal-Injury Proceeds

Eleventh Circuit Affirms Broad Judicial Discretion to Deny §1329 Modifications Seeking Post-Petition Personal-Injury Proceeds

Date: Aug 6, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Affirms Broad Judicial Discretion to Deny §1329 Modifications Seeking Post-Petition Personal-Injury Proceeds Introduction On 1 August 2025 the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Discretion Re-Affirmed: Post-Petition Personal-Injury Proceeds Need Not Trigger Chapter 13 Plan Modification – Commentary on Christopher Conte v. Peggy Proffitt (11th Cir. 2025)

Discretion Re-Affirmed: Post-Petition Personal-Injury Proceeds Need Not Trigger Chapter 13 Plan Modification – Commentary on Christopher Conte v. Peggy Proffitt (11th Cir. 2025)

Date: Aug 6, 2025
Discretion Re-Affirmed: Post-Petition Personal-Injury Proceeds Need Not Trigger Chapter 13 Plan Modification – Commentary on Christopher Conte v. Peggy Proffitt (11th Cir. 2025) 1. Introduction This...
United States v. Sharper: Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms Constitutionality of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) After Bruen and Rahimi

United States v. Sharper: Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms Constitutionality of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) After Bruen and Rahimi

Date: Aug 6, 2025
United States v. Sharper: Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms Constitutionality of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) After Bruen and Rahimi Introduction On 1 August 2025, the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Evergreen Clauses Trump the One-Employee Unit Rule: Third Circuit Fortifies § 9(a) Collective-Bargaining Agreements

Evergreen Clauses Trump the One-Employee Unit Rule: Third Circuit Fortifies § 9(a) Collective-Bargaining Agreements

Date: Aug 6, 2025
Evergreen Clauses Trump the One-Employee Unit Rule: Third Circuit Fortifies § 9(a) Collective-Bargaining Agreements Introduction Case: Brian Trematore Plumbing & Heating Co., Inc. v. Sheet Metal...
Norton v. Adams: Narrowing the Path for Federal Injunctions of State Foreclosure Sales under the Anti-Injunction Act

Norton v. Adams: Narrowing the Path for Federal Injunctions of State Foreclosure Sales under the Anti-Injunction Act

Date: Aug 5, 2025
Norton v. Adams: Narrowing the Path for Federal Injunctions of State Foreclosure Sales under the Anti-Injunction Act Introduction In Bruce Norton v. Joseph C. Adams, No. 25-2361 (3d Cir. Aug. 1...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert