Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

federal Case Commentaries


    Actual Innocence as a Gateway Around § 2254 Procedural Bars:
    Commentary on Julien v. Stancil (10th Cir. 2025)

Actual Innocence as a Gateway Around § 2254 Procedural Bars: Commentary on Julien v. Stancil (10th Cir. 2025)

Date: Dec 2, 2025
Actual Innocence as a Gateway Around § 2254 Procedural Bars: Commentary on Julien v. Stancil (10th Cir. 2025) I. Introduction Julien v. Stancil, No. 25-1302 (10th Cir. Nov. 26, 2025), is a...
Equitable Tolling, Motions to Reconsider, and the Limits of Judicial Review of BIA Sua Sponte Authority: Commentary on Carhuamaca‑Vilcahuaman v. Bondi (10th Cir. 2025)

Equitable Tolling, Motions to Reconsider, and the Limits of Judicial Review of BIA Sua Sponte Authority: Commentary on Carhuamaca‑Vilcahuaman v. Bondi (10th Cir. 2025)

Date: Dec 2, 2025
Equitable Tolling, Motions to Reconsider, and the Limits of Judicial Review of BIA Sua Sponte Authority: Commentary on Carhuamaca‑Vilcahuaman v. Bondi (10th Cir. 2025) I. Introduction This commentary...
Facially Constitutional Use‑of‑Force Policies and Single‑Incident Failure‑to‑Train Liability for Jail Suicide Risks: Commentary on Thao v. Grady County Criminal Justice Authority (10th Cir. 2025)

Facially Constitutional Use‑of‑Force Policies and Single‑Incident Failure‑to‑Train Liability for Jail Suicide Risks: Commentary on Thao v. Grady County Criminal Justice Authority (10th Cir. 2025)

Date: Dec 2, 2025
Facially Constitutional Use‑of‑Force Policies and Single‑Incident Failure‑to‑Train Liability for Jail Suicide Risks: Commentary on Thao v. Grady County Criminal Justice Authority (10th Cir. 2025) I....
Implied License to Knock and Trespass-Based Terry Stops: Commentary on Gonzalez v. Brunnemer

Implied License to Knock and Trespass-Based Terry Stops: Commentary on Gonzalez v. Brunnemer

Date: Dec 2, 2025
Implied License to Knock and Trespass-Based Terry Stops: A Detailed Commentary on Gonzalez v. Brunnemer (10th Cir. 2025) I. Introduction This commentary analyzes the Tenth Circuit’s unpublished but...
United States v. Honors: Tenth Circuit Limits Custodial No‑Contact Orders and Demands Compelling Justification for Familial Restrictions on Supervised Release

United States v. Honors: Tenth Circuit Limits Custodial No‑Contact Orders and Demands Compelling Justification for Familial Restrictions on Supervised Release

Date: Dec 2, 2025
United States v. Honors: Tenth Circuit Limits Custodial No‑Contact Orders and Demands Compelling Justification for Familial Restrictions on Supervised Release I. Introduction In United States v....
United States v. SpineFrontier, Inc.: Limiting Implied Waiver of Corporate Attorney‑Client Privilege When Executives Raise “Involvement‑of‑Counsel” Defenses

United States v. SpineFrontier, Inc.: Limiting Implied Waiver of Corporate Attorney‑Client Privilege When Executives Raise “Involvement‑of‑Counsel” Defenses

Date: Dec 2, 2025
United States v. SpineFrontier, Inc.: Limiting Implied Waiver of Corporate Attorney‑Client Privilege When Executives Raise “Involvement‑of‑Counsel” Defenses Introduction This First Circuit decision...
Restrepo Castano v. Bondi: Partial but “Fruitful” State Protection and the “Unwilling or Unable” Standard in Gang-Based Asylum Claims

Restrepo Castano v. Bondi: Partial but “Fruitful” State Protection and the “Unwilling or Unable” Standard in Gang-Based Asylum Claims

Date: Dec 2, 2025
Restrepo Castano v. Bondi: Partial but “Fruitful” State Protection and the “Unwilling or Unable” Standard in Gang-Based Asylum Claims I. Introduction In Restrepo Castano v. Bondi, No. 24‑2117 (1st...
United States v. Tang: Foreseeability and Proof of Firearm Use in Joint Hobbs Act Robberies Under the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines

United States v. Tang: Foreseeability and Proof of Firearm Use in Joint Hobbs Act Robberies Under the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines

Date: Dec 2, 2025
United States v. Tang: Foreseeability and Proof of Firearm Use in Joint Hobbs Act Robberies Under the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines I. Introduction The First Circuit’s decision in United States v. Tang,...
When “Notwithstanding” Controls: Shapiro v. U.S. Social Security Administration and the Priority of Social Security Act § 1306(c) over FOIA’s Fee‑Preclusion Rule

When “Notwithstanding” Controls: Shapiro v. U.S. Social Security Administration and the Priority of Social Security Act § 1306(c) over FOIA’s Fee‑Preclusion Rule

Date: Dec 1, 2025
When “Notwithstanding” Controls: Shapiro v. U.S. Social Security Administration and the Priority of Social Security Act § 1306(c) over FOIA’s Fee‑Preclusion Rule I. Introduction In Shapiro v. U.S....
Buller v. Commissioner: The § 6213(a) Deficiency Petition Deadline as a Nonjurisdictional, Equitably Tollable Rule

Buller v. Commissioner: The § 6213(a) Deficiency Petition Deadline as a Nonjurisdictional, Equitably Tollable Rule

Date: Dec 1, 2025
Buller v. Commissioner: The § 6213(a) Deficiency Petition Deadline as a Nonjurisdictional, Equitably Tollable Rule I. Introduction In Buller v. Commissioner, No. 24-1557 (2d Cir. Nov. 26, 2025) (as...
Reaffirming Mt. Healthy at the Preliminary Injunction Stage: 
    First Amendment Retaliation and Local Permitting in Minocqua Brewing Co. v. Hess

Reaffirming Mt. Healthy at the Preliminary Injunction Stage: First Amendment Retaliation and Local Permitting in Minocqua Brewing Co. v. Hess

Date: Dec 1, 2025
Reaffirming Mt. Healthy at the Preliminary Injunction Stage: First Amendment Retaliation and Local Permitting in Minocqua Brewing Company LLC v. Hess I. Introduction The Seventh Circuit’s decision in...
The Saving Clause as a Jurisdictional Bar: Detailed Commentary on Shannon Wayne Agofsky v. Baysore

The Saving Clause as a Jurisdictional Bar: Detailed Commentary on Shannon Wayne Agofsky v. Baysore

Date: Dec 1, 2025
The Saving Clause as a Jurisdictional Bar: Seventh Circuit Realigns with National Consensus in Shannon Wayne Agofsky v. Baysore I. Introduction This commentary examines the Seventh Circuit’s decision...
“Enough Truth to Make Investors Second‑Guess”: The Eleventh Circuit’s Flexible Corrective‑Disclosure Standard for Loss Causation in City of Hollywood Police Officers’ Retirement System v. NextEra Energy, Inc.

“Enough Truth to Make Investors Second‑Guess”: The Eleventh Circuit’s Flexible Corrective‑Disclosure Standard for Loss Causation in City of Hollywood Police Officers’ Retirement System v. NextEra Energy, Inc.

Date: Dec 1, 2025
“Enough Truth to Make Investors Second‑Guess”: The Eleventh Circuit’s Flexible Corrective‑Disclosure Standard for Loss Causation in City of Hollywood Police Officers’ Retirement System v. NextEra...
Rejecting “Presidential Tolling” and Weaponized Shotgun Pleadings: The Eleventh Circuit’s Decision in Trump v. Clinton / Habba v. Dolan

Rejecting “Presidential Tolling” and Weaponized Shotgun Pleadings: The Eleventh Circuit’s Decision in Trump v. Clinton / Habba v. Dolan

Date: Dec 1, 2025
Rejecting “Presidential Tolling” and Weaponized Shotgun Pleadings: The Eleventh Circuit’s Decision in Trump v. Clinton / Habba v. Dolan I. Introduction This consolidated Eleventh Circuit opinion,...
Trump v. Clinton (11th Cir. 2025): No Special Tolling for Sitting Presidents and Robust Sanctions for Abusive Political Litigation

Trump v. Clinton (11th Cir. 2025): No Special Tolling for Sitting Presidents and Robust Sanctions for Abusive Political Litigation

Date: Dec 1, 2025
Trump v. Clinton (11th Cir. 2025): No Special Tolling for Sitting Presidents and Robust Sanctions for Abusive Political Litigation I. Introduction This consolidated appeal from the Eleventh Circuit...
Rejecting “Presidential Tolling” and Sanctioning Politicized Shotgun Pleadings: Commentary on Donald J. Trump v. Hillary R. Clinton (11th Cir. 2025)

Rejecting “Presidential Tolling” and Sanctioning Politicized Shotgun Pleadings: Commentary on Donald J. Trump v. Hillary R. Clinton (11th Cir. 2025)

Date: Dec 1, 2025
Rejecting “Presidential Tolling” and Sanctioning Politicized Shotgun Pleadings: Commentary on Donald J. Trump v. Hillary R. Clinton (11th Cir. 2025) I. Introduction This Eleventh Circuit decision...
No “Presidential Tolling,” Shotgun Pleadings, and Sanctions for Political Litigation: Commentary on Trump v. Clinton (11th Cir. 2025)

No “Presidential Tolling,” Shotgun Pleadings, and Sanctions for Political Litigation: Commentary on Trump v. Clinton (11th Cir. 2025)

Date: Dec 1, 2025
No “Presidential Tolling,” Shotgun Pleadings, and Sanctions for Political Litigation: Commentary on Trump v. Clinton (11th Cir. 2025) Introduction This commentary analyzes the Eleventh Circuit’s...
Mootness of Interlocutory Appeals After Bankruptcy Stay Relief: Commentary on In re 155 Chambersfood, Inc.

Mootness of Interlocutory Appeals After Bankruptcy Stay Relief: Commentary on In re 155 Chambersfood, Inc.

Date: Dec 1, 2025
Mootness of Interlocutory Appeals After Bankruptcy Stay Relief: Commentary on In re 155 Chambersfood, Inc. (2d Cir. Nov. 26, 2025) I. Introduction This commentary analyzes the Second Circuit’s...

    Thieriot v. Laggner: Application of New York’s Brettler Rule on Anti‑Assignment Clauses,
    “Consummation” of Share Sales, and Joinder of Contracting Parties

Thieriot v. Laggner: Application of New York’s Brettler Rule on Anti‑Assignment Clauses, “Consummation” of Share Sales, and Joinder of Contracting Parties

Date: Dec 1, 2025
Thieriot v. Laggner: Application of New York’s Brettler Rule on Anti‑Assignment Clauses, “Consummation” of Share Sales, and Joinder of Contracting Parties I. Introduction In Thieriot v. Laggner, No....
Erde v. Carranza: Strict Enforcement of IDEA Issue Exhaustion and Limits on “Opening the Door” in FAPE Transportation Disputes

Erde v. Carranza: Strict Enforcement of IDEA Issue Exhaustion and Limits on “Opening the Door” in FAPE Transportation Disputes

Date: Dec 1, 2025
Erde v. Carranza: Strict Enforcement of IDEA Issue Exhaustion and Limits on “Opening the Door” in FAPE Transportation Disputes I. Introduction Erde v. Carranza, No. 25-54-cv (2d Cir. Nov. 26, 2025)...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert