Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

clarifying-state-action-doctrine:-acgme&amp Case Commentaries

Muniz v. United States (3d Cir. 2025): The Administrative-Remedy Bar to New Bivens Actions

Muniz v. United States (3d Cir. 2025): The Administrative-Remedy Bar to New Bivens Actions

Date: Aug 18, 2025
Muniz v. United States (3d Cir. 2025): The Administrative-Remedy Bar to New Bivens Actions 1. Introduction Rolando Muniz, a federal inmate, sought damages after an allegedly avoidable toe amputation...
Montiel Rubio v. Bondi: The Fifth Circuit Fortifies the “Voluntary-Return” Rule in Asylum, Withholding, and CAT Proceedings

Montiel Rubio v. Bondi: The Fifth Circuit Fortifies the “Voluntary-Return” Rule in Asylum, Withholding, and CAT Proceedings

Date: Aug 18, 2025
Montiel Rubio v. Bondi: The Fifth Circuit Fortifies the “Voluntary-Return” Rule in Asylum, Withholding, and CAT Proceedings Introduction In Montiel Rubio v. Bondi, decided 13 August 2025, the United...
Beyond the Sanctuary: Defining the Limits of Texas’s Religious-Services Clause on Public Lands

Beyond the Sanctuary: Defining the Limits of Texas’s Religious-Services Clause on Public Lands

Date: Aug 18, 2025
Beyond the Sanctuary: Defining the Limits of Texas’s Religious-Services Clause on Public Lands 1. Introduction Perez v. City of San Antonio, No. 23-50746 (5th Cir. Aug. 13, 2025) is a sweeping...
“Harmless” Guideline Miscalculations after United States v. Abercrombie: When a Clear Crime-of-Violence Error Is Not Plain Error Requiring Vacatur

“Harmless” Guideline Miscalculations after United States v. Abercrombie: When a Clear Crime-of-Violence Error Is Not Plain Error Requiring Vacatur

Date: Aug 18, 2025
“Harmless” Guideline Miscalculations after United States v. Abercrombie: Fifth Circuit Clarifies When Clear Crime–of–Violence Errors Do Not Satisfy the Plain-Error Standard Introduction The Fifth...
Seventh Circuit Clarifies the Post-Shinn Landscape: No Rhines Stay, No § 3599 Funding, and Limited Competency Stays When State Procedures Foreclose Relief

Seventh Circuit Clarifies the Post-Shinn Landscape: No Rhines Stay, No § 3599 Funding, and Limited Competency Stays When State Procedures Foreclose Relief

Date: Aug 18, 2025
Seventh Circuit Clarifies the Post-Shinn Landscape: No Rhines Stay, No § 3599 Funding, and Limited Competency Stays When State Procedures Foreclose Relief 1. Introduction Jeffrey Alan Weisheit,...
“Arguable Probable Cause” Solidified: Tentative Identifications, Qualified Immunity, and the Limits of Fabricated-Evidence Claims after Mack v. City of Chicago

“Arguable Probable Cause” Solidified: Tentative Identifications, Qualified Immunity, and the Limits of Fabricated-Evidence Claims after Mack v. City of Chicago

Date: Aug 18, 2025
“Arguable Probable Cause” Solidified: Tentative Identifications, Qualified Immunity, and the Limits of Fabricated-Evidence Claims after Mack v. City of Chicago I. Introduction The Seventh Circuit’s...
Reaffirming Stinson Deference: Career-Offender Status & Controlled-Substance Conspiracies after United States v. Deon Pugh

Reaffirming Stinson Deference: Career-Offender Status & Controlled-Substance Conspiracies after United States v. Deon Pugh

Date: Aug 18, 2025
Reaffirming Stinson Deference: Career-Offender Status & Controlled-Substance Conspiracies after United States v. Deon Pugh Introduction On 13 August 2025 the Seventh Circuit delivered a significant...
Reaffirming the Owens Doctrine: Seventh Circuit Clarifies Confrontation and Authentication Standards in United States v. Diaz

Reaffirming the Owens Doctrine: Seventh Circuit Clarifies Confrontation and Authentication Standards in United States v. Diaz

Date: Aug 18, 2025
Reaffirming the Owens Doctrine: Seventh Circuit Clarifies Confrontation and Authentication Standards in United States v. Diaz Introduction On 13 August 2025 the United States Court of Appeals for the...
“Beyond the Subpoena Power” – Seventh Circuit Defines Rule 15
            Unavailability and Clarifies Waiver of Confrontation Rights
            in United States v. Shawn Baldwin

“Beyond the Subpoena Power” – Seventh Circuit Defines Rule 15 Unavailability and Clarifies Waiver of Confrontation Rights in United States v. Shawn Baldwin

Date: Aug 18, 2025
“Beyond the Subpoena Power” – Seventh Circuit Defines Rule 15 Unavailability and Clarifies Waiver of Confrontation Rights Commentary on United States v. Shawn Baldwin, No. 21-2925 (7th Cir. 2025) 1....
Fourth Circuit Confirms Fifth-Amendment Right to Effective Retained Counsel in Removal Proceedings: Commentary on Sulma Guandique-De Romero v. Pamela Bondi

Fourth Circuit Confirms Fifth-Amendment Right to Effective Retained Counsel in Removal Proceedings: Commentary on Sulma Guandique-De Romero v. Pamela Bondi

Date: Aug 18, 2025
Fourth Circuit Confirms Fifth-Amendment Right to Effective Retained Counsel in Removal Proceedings (Sulma Guandique-De Romero v. Pamela Bondi, 24-1154, decided 13 Aug 2025) Introduction The published...
“Miss the Clock, Lose the Power” – Fourth Circuit Affirms Automatic Approval of Wireless-Tower Applications When Virginia Localities Exceed the 150-Day Statutory Deadline

“Miss the Clock, Lose the Power” – Fourth Circuit Affirms Automatic Approval of Wireless-Tower Applications When Virginia Localities Exceed the 150-Day Statutory Deadline

Date: Aug 18, 2025
“Miss the Clock, Lose the Power” – Fourth Circuit Affirms Automatic Approval of Wireless-Tower Applications When Virginia Localities Exceed the 150-Day Statutory Deadline Introduction Tillman...
Constructive Possession through “Tools-of-the-Trade” & the Nexus Test under § 924(c): Commentary on United States v. Carlisa Allen (4th Cir. 2025)

Constructive Possession through “Tools-of-the-Trade” & the Nexus Test under § 924(c): Commentary on United States v. Carlisa Allen (4th Cir. 2025)

Date: Aug 18, 2025
Constructive Possession through “Tools-of-the-Trade” & the Nexus Test under § 924(c): Commentary on United States v. Carlisa Allen, No. 24-4169 (4th Cir. Aug. 13 2025) 1. Introduction In United...

    Incomplete Discovery and Post-Plea Misconduct: The Fourth Circuit’s
    Materiality Standard for Rule 11(d)(2)(B) Withdrawals and Flexibility
    in § 3E1.1 Acceptance-of-Responsibility Credits

Incomplete Discovery and Post-Plea Misconduct: The Fourth Circuit’s Materiality Standard for Rule 11(d)(2)(B) Withdrawals and Flexibility in § 3E1.1 Acceptance-of-Responsibility Credits

Date: Aug 18, 2025
Incomplete Discovery and Post-Plea Misconduct: The Fourth Circuit’s Materiality Standard for Rule 11(d)(2)(B) Withdrawals and Flexibility in § 3E1.1 Acceptance-of-Responsibility Credits Introduction...
Immaterial Discovery Errors and Post-Plea Conduct: The Milam Standard for Guilty-Plea Withdrawal and Acceptance-of-Responsibility Credits

Immaterial Discovery Errors and Post-Plea Conduct: The Milam Standard for Guilty-Plea Withdrawal and Acceptance-of-Responsibility Credits

Date: Aug 18, 2025
Immaterial Discovery Errors and Post-Plea Conduct: The Milam Standard for Guilty-Plea Withdrawal and Acceptance-of-Responsibility Credits Introduction United States v. David Milam, Nos. 23-4527/28/29...
The Milam Materiality Doctrine: Non-Prejudicial Discovery Errors Cannot Justify Withdrawal of a Guilty Plea

The Milam Materiality Doctrine: Non-Prejudicial Discovery Errors Cannot Justify Withdrawal of a Guilty Plea

Date: Aug 18, 2025
The Milam Materiality Doctrine: Non-Prejudicial Discovery Errors Cannot Justify Withdrawal of a Guilty Plea Introduction United States v. David Milam, Nos. 23-4527/28/29 (4th Cir. 2025), presented...
United States v. Myrick: When a Hearing Does NOT End Speedy-Trial Tolling under § 3161(h)(1)(D)–(H)

United States v. Myrick: When a Hearing Does NOT End Speedy-Trial Tolling under § 3161(h)(1)(D)–(H)

Date: Aug 18, 2025
United States v. Myrick: When a Hearing Does NOT End Speedy-Trial Tolling under § 3161(h)(1)(D)–(H) Introduction United States v. Melvin Leon Myrick, No. 23-4768 (4th Cir. Aug. 13, 2025), offers the...
Beyond the Mis-Instruction: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies that Erroneous “Unlawful-Activity” Stand-Your-Ground Charge Does Not, Without More, Establish Strickland Prejudice

Beyond the Mis-Instruction: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies that Erroneous “Unlawful-Activity” Stand-Your-Ground Charge Does Not, Without More, Establish Strickland Prejudice

Date: Aug 18, 2025
Beyond the Mis-Instruction: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies that Erroneous “Unlawful-Activity” Stand-Your-Ground Charge Does Not, Without More, Establish Strickland Prejudice Introduction Larry Felton...

        Villarino II and the CAFA Threshold: Eleventh Circuit Requires Determination of Amount-in-Controversy Before Merits Dismissal

Villarino II and the CAFA Threshold: Eleventh Circuit Requires Determination of Amount-in-Controversy Before Merits Dismissal

Date: Aug 18, 2025
Villarino II and the CAFA Threshold: Eleventh Circuit Requires Determination of Amount-in-Controversy Before Merits Dismissal 1. Introduction In Shane Villarino v. Kenneth Joekel, No. 24-11124 (11th...
United States v. Wilks (11th Cir. 2025): Narrowing “Fair-and-Just” Plea Withdrawals and Re-affirming Wide Latitude for Upward Variances

United States v. Wilks (11th Cir. 2025): Narrowing “Fair-and-Just” Plea Withdrawals and Re-affirming Wide Latitude for Upward Variances

Date: Aug 18, 2025
United States v. Wilks (11th Cir. 2025): Narrowing “Fair-and-Just” Plea Withdrawals and Re-affirming Wide Latitude for Upward Variances Introduction United States v. Javonne Wilks, decided on 13...
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Predicate-Offense Scope: Alabama “Sexual Misconduct” Convictions Qualify as “Relating to Sexual Abuse” for Federal Child-Pornography Enhancements

Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Predicate-Offense Scope: Alabama “Sexual Misconduct” Convictions Qualify as “Relating to Sexual Abuse” for Federal Child-Pornography Enhancements

Date: Aug 18, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Predicate-Offense Scope: Alabama “Sexual Misconduct” Convictions Qualify as “Relating to Sexual Abuse” for Federal Child-Pornography Enhancements Introduction United States...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert