Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

application-of-the-sixth-amendment&amp Case Commentaries

United States v. Powell (2d Cir. 2025): Nonprecedential Guidance on Composite Surveillance Videos, Excited-Utterance Identifications, and Upward Variances in Violent Robberies

United States v. Powell (2d Cir. 2025): Nonprecedential Guidance on Composite Surveillance Videos, Excited-Utterance Identifications, and Upward Variances in Violent Robberies

Date: Nov 1, 2025
United States v. Powell (2d Cir. 2025): Nonprecedential Guidance on Composite Surveillance Videos, Excited-Utterance Identifications, and Upward Variances in Violent Robberies Introduction This...
Second Circuit Reins in “Standard” Supervised Release Conditions: Family-Contact Restrictions Require On‑the‑Record Justification; SDNY Risk‑Notification Condition Struck; Suspicion‑Based Search Condition Upheld — United States v. Rodriguez (2d Cir. 2025)

Second Circuit Reins in “Standard” Supervised Release Conditions: Family-Contact Restrictions Require On‑the‑Record Justification; SDNY Risk‑Notification Condition Struck; Suspicion‑Based Search Condition Upheld — United States v. Rodriguez (2d Cir. 2025)

Date: Nov 1, 2025
Second Circuit Reins in “Standard” Supervised Release Conditions: Family-Contact Restrictions Require On‑the‑Record Justification; SDNY Risk‑Notification Condition Struck; Suspicion‑Based Search...
Medication-Compliance Language May Clarify, Not Expand, an Oral Mental-Health Condition; Reasonable-Suspicion Electronic-Device Search Conditions Upheld Where the Record Shows E-Communications (United States v. Woods, 2d Cir. 2025)

Medication-Compliance Language May Clarify, Not Expand, an Oral Mental-Health Condition; Reasonable-Suspicion Electronic-Device Search Conditions Upheld Where the Record Shows E-Communications (United States v. Woods, 2d Cir. 2025)

Date: Nov 1, 2025
Medication-Compliance Language May Clarify, Not Expand, an Oral Mental-Health Condition; Reasonable-Suspicion Electronic-Device Search Conditions Upheld Where the Record Shows E-Communications Case:...
Chen v. Rubio: Second Circuit Limits “Mandel” Review to Cases Burdening a U.S. Citizen’s Constitutional Rights and Extends Muñoz Beyond Spouses to Parents and Siblings

Chen v. Rubio: Second Circuit Limits “Mandel” Review to Cases Burdening a U.S. Citizen’s Constitutional Rights and Extends Muñoz Beyond Spouses to Parents and Siblings

Date: Nov 1, 2025
Chen v. Rubio: Second Circuit Limits “Mandel” Review to Cases Burdening a U.S. Citizen’s Constitutional Rights and Extends Muñoz Beyond Spouses to Parents and Siblings Introduction In Chen v. Rubio,...
Reese v. SSA: Post-Dated Mental-Health Reports Are Not Chronologically Relevant Without Pre-Decision Corroboration; De Novo Review Permits Courts to Reach Materiality Not Addressed by the Appeals Council

Reese v. SSA: Post-Dated Mental-Health Reports Are Not Chronologically Relevant Without Pre-Decision Corroboration; De Novo Review Permits Courts to Reach Materiality Not Addressed by the Appeals Council

Date: Nov 1, 2025
Reese v. SSA: Post-Dated Mental-Health Reports Are Not Chronologically Relevant Without Pre-Decision Corroboration; De Novo Review Permits Courts to Reach Materiality Not Addressed by the Appeals...
No Backdoor via Rule 60(b)(4): Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms Law‑of‑the‑Case Limits and Imposes Rule 38 Sanctions in Foley v. Orange County

No Backdoor via Rule 60(b)(4): Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms Law‑of‑the‑Case Limits and Imposes Rule 38 Sanctions in Foley v. Orange County

Date: Nov 1, 2025
No Backdoor via Rule 60(b)(4): Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms Law‑of‑the‑Case Limits and Imposes Rule 38 Sanctions in Foley v. Orange County Introduction In this unpublished, per curiam opinion, the U.S....
From FCHR “No Cause” to Federal Preclusion: Eleventh Circuit Bars § 1981 Claims and Reaffirms Strict Title VII Timeliness and Plausibility Requirements

From FCHR “No Cause” to Federal Preclusion: Eleventh Circuit Bars § 1981 Claims and Reaffirms Strict Title VII Timeliness and Plausibility Requirements

Date: Nov 1, 2025
From FCHR “No Cause” to Federal Preclusion: Eleventh Circuit Bars § 1981 Claims and Reaffirms Strict Title VII Timeliness and Plausibility Requirements Introduction In Elias Makere v. Allstate...
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Rule 60(b)(3)’s One‑Year Clock Runs from Entry of the “Order,” Not Delayed by Rule 58’s Separate-Document Requirement; Reaffirms Exacting Standard for “Fraud on the Court” under Rule 60(d)(3)

Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Rule 60(b)(3)’s One‑Year Clock Runs from Entry of the “Order,” Not Delayed by Rule 58’s Separate-Document Requirement; Reaffirms Exacting Standard for “Fraud on the Court” under Rule 60(d)(3)

Date: Nov 1, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Rule 60(b)(3)’s One‑Year Clock Runs from Entry of the “Order,” Not Delayed by Rule 58’s Separate-Document Requirement; Reaffirms Exacting Standard for “Fraud on the Court”...
Prior Prostitution Does Not Defeat Enticement or Undue-Influence Findings: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Broad Aiding-and-Abetting Liability in Minor Sex-Trafficking Cases

Prior Prostitution Does Not Defeat Enticement or Undue-Influence Findings: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Broad Aiding-and-Abetting Liability in Minor Sex-Trafficking Cases

Date: Nov 1, 2025
Prior Prostitution Does Not Defeat Enticement or Undue-Influence Findings: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Broad Aiding-and-Abetting Liability in Minor Sex-Trafficking Cases Introduction This non-argument,...
Light-Duty Requests Are Protected ADA Activity, But Medical Proof and Comparator Evidence Remain Essential: Sixth Circuit Affirms Summary Judgment in Moore v. Next Generation Hospitality

Light-Duty Requests Are Protected ADA Activity, But Medical Proof and Comparator Evidence Remain Essential: Sixth Circuit Affirms Summary Judgment in Moore v. Next Generation Hospitality

Date: Nov 1, 2025
Light-Duty Requests Are Protected ADA Activity, But Medical Proof and Comparator Evidence Remain Essential Commentary on Demond Alex Moore v. Next Generation Hospitality LLC, No. 24-4050 (6th Cir....
Kemp did not open a “back door”: Sixth Circuit reaffirms that Rule 60(b)(1) cannot revive an untimely appeal caused by counsel’s misreading of finality and Rule 4

Kemp did not open a “back door”: Sixth Circuit reaffirms that Rule 60(b)(1) cannot revive an untimely appeal caused by counsel’s misreading of finality and Rule 4

Date: Nov 1, 2025
Kemp did not open a “back door”: Sixth Circuit reaffirms that Rule 60(b)(1) cannot revive an untimely appeal caused by counsel’s misreading of finality and Rule 4 Introduction This Sixth Circuit...
Logistics Control Equals Managerial Role: Sixth Circuit Affirms §3B1.1(c) Enhancement Based on Directing a Co-Participant Without Proof of Profit Share or Direct Communications

Logistics Control Equals Managerial Role: Sixth Circuit Affirms §3B1.1(c) Enhancement Based on Directing a Co-Participant Without Proof of Profit Share or Direct Communications

Date: Nov 1, 2025
Logistics Control Equals Managerial Role: Sixth Circuit Affirms §3B1.1(c) Enhancement Based on Directing a Co-Participant Without Proof of Profit Share or Direct Communications Introduction In United...
Victim Humiliation as a Non‑Guidelines Aggravator and Foreseeability-Based Firearm Enhancements in Carjackings: United States v. Haile (6th Cir. 2025)

Victim Humiliation as a Non‑Guidelines Aggravator and Foreseeability-Based Firearm Enhancements in Carjackings: United States v. Haile (6th Cir. 2025)

Date: Nov 1, 2025
Victim Humiliation as a Non‑Guidelines Aggravator and Foreseeability-Based Firearm Enhancements in Carjackings: United States v. Haile (6th Cir. 2025) Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth...
Adequate Prison Care and § 3553(a) Balancing Can Defeat Compassionate Release Even for End-Stage Organ Disease: Commentary on United States v. Korey Moody (6th Cir. Oct. 29, 2025)

Adequate Prison Care and § 3553(a) Balancing Can Defeat Compassionate Release Even for End-Stage Organ Disease: Commentary on United States v. Korey Moody (6th Cir. Oct. 29, 2025)

Date: Nov 1, 2025
Adequate Prison Care and § 3553(a) Balancing Can Defeat Compassionate Release Even for End-Stage Organ Disease Commentary on United States v. Korey Moody, No. 24-4095 (6th Cir. Oct. 29, 2025) (Not...
“Just to Be Safe” Is Not Reasonable Suspicion: The Tenth Circuit Narrows Terry Frisks and Rejects Hypothetical Protective Sweeps in United States v. Huerta

“Just to Be Safe” Is Not Reasonable Suspicion: The Tenth Circuit Narrows Terry Frisks and Rejects Hypothetical Protective Sweeps in United States v. Huerta

Date: Nov 1, 2025
“Just to Be Safe” Is Not Reasonable Suspicion: The Tenth Circuit Narrows Terry Frisks and Rejects Hypothetical Protective Sweeps in United States v. Huerta Introduction In United States v. Huerta,...
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Limits on Ancillary Enforcement: No Rule 69/Section 56.29 Constructive-Trust Proceedings Against Non‑Judgment Debtors

Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Limits on Ancillary Enforcement: No Rule 69/Section 56.29 Constructive-Trust Proceedings Against Non‑Judgment Debtors

Date: Nov 1, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Limits on Ancillary Enforcement: No Rule 69/Section 56.29 Constructive-Trust Proceedings Against Non‑Judgment Debtors Introduction This appeal arises at the intersection of...
Acceptance ≠ Interchangeability: Seventh Circuit Holds ABPN’s MOC Is Not a CME Substitute for Antitrust Tying Purposes

Acceptance ≠ Interchangeability: Seventh Circuit Holds ABPN’s MOC Is Not a CME Substitute for Antitrust Tying Purposes

Date: Nov 1, 2025
Acceptance ≠ Interchangeability: Seventh Circuit Holds ABPN’s MOC Is Not a CME Substitute for Antitrust Tying Purposes Introduction In Emily Elizabeth Lazarou v. American Board of Psychiatry and...
Seventh Circuit Holds Rule 35(b)(1)’s One-Year Deadline Is a Waivable Claim-Processing Rule; District Courts May Weigh Frivolous Postconviction Litigation When Fixing Substantial-Assistance Reductions

Seventh Circuit Holds Rule 35(b)(1)’s One-Year Deadline Is a Waivable Claim-Processing Rule; District Courts May Weigh Frivolous Postconviction Litigation When Fixing Substantial-Assistance Reductions

Date: Nov 1, 2025
Rule 35(b)(1)’s One-Year Deadline Is a Waivable Claim-Processing Rule; District Courts May Weigh Frivolous Postconviction Litigation When Fixing Substantial-Assistance Reductions Introduction In...
Claim Preclusion Applies to Malpractice Claims Against Opposing Counsel as Privies When Based on the Same Transaction: Commentary on Zirvi v. Illumina, Inc. (3d Cir. 2025)

Claim Preclusion Applies to Malpractice Claims Against Opposing Counsel as Privies When Based on the Same Transaction: Commentary on Zirvi v. Illumina, Inc. (3d Cir. 2025)

Date: Oct 31, 2025
Claim Preclusion Applies to Malpractice Claims Against Opposing Counsel as Privies When Based on the Same Transaction: Commentary on Zirvi v. Illumina, Inc. (3d Cir. 2025) Introduction In this...
Compassionate Release Is Not a Backdoor § 2255: Third Circuit Clarifies Limits on Ruan-Based Trial Error, Parental Caregiving, and Medical Hardship

Compassionate Release Is Not a Backdoor § 2255: Third Circuit Clarifies Limits on Ruan-Based Trial Error, Parental Caregiving, and Medical Hardship

Date: Oct 31, 2025
Compassionate Release Is Not a Backdoor § 2255: Third Circuit Clarifies Limits on Ruan-Based Trial Error, Parental Caregiving, and Medical Hardship Case: United States v. William O’Brien, III, No....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert