Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

affirmation-of-district-court Case Commentaries

Reliability Without Revealing the Algorithm: Vermont Affirms V.R.E. 702 Admission of Proprietary Practice-Valuation Methods and Discounts Professional Goodwill Absent a Noncompete

Reliability Without Revealing the Algorithm: Vermont Affirms V.R.E. 702 Admission of Proprietary Practice-Valuation Methods and Discounts Professional Goodwill Absent a Noncompete

Date: Sep 6, 2025
Reliability Without Revealing the Algorithm: Vermont Affirms V.R.E. 702 Admission of Proprietary Practice-Valuation Methods and Discounts Professional Goodwill Absent a Noncompete Introduction In...
No-Modification Means No-Modification: Idaho Supreme Court Clarifies Grandfathered Lake Encroachments, Procedures, and Abatement Enforcement

No-Modification Means No-Modification: Idaho Supreme Court Clarifies Grandfathered Lake Encroachments, Procedures, and Abatement Enforcement

Date: Sep 6, 2025
No-Modification Means No-Modification: Temporary Post‑1974 Changes Defeat Grandfathered Lake Encroachment Permits; § 58‑1306 Procedures Inapplicable; Administrative Abatement Requires Judicial...
Clarifying § 1103(a)(9) and Rule 26.1(c) in Delaware TPR Appeals: Medical Examiner Evidence Can Establish “Unexplained Death or Serious Injury,” and Documentation Gaps Sustain “Failure to Plan”

Clarifying § 1103(a)(9) and Rule 26.1(c) in Delaware TPR Appeals: Medical Examiner Evidence Can Establish “Unexplained Death or Serious Injury,” and Documentation Gaps Sustain “Failure to Plan”

Date: Sep 6, 2025
Clarifying § 1103(a)(9) and Rule 26.1(c) in Delaware TPR Appeals: Medical Examiner Evidence Can Establish “Unexplained Death or Serious Injury,” and Documentation Gaps Sustain “Failure to Plan”...
Deviation Over Threshold: Vermont Affirms Zero‑Support/Private‑School‑Tuition Arrangement and Time‑Bars Post‑Judgment Child Tax Credit Reallocation

Deviation Over Threshold: Vermont Affirms Zero‑Support/Private‑School‑Tuition Arrangement and Time‑Bars Post‑Judgment Child Tax Credit Reallocation

Date: Sep 6, 2025
Deviation Over Threshold: Vermont Affirms Zero‑Support/Private‑School‑Tuition Arrangement and Time‑Bars Post‑Judgment Child Tax Credit Reallocation Case: Catherine Hutchings v. Justin Bramhall...
Vermont Reaffirms the Narrow Scope of Sentence Reconsideration: No Hearing or COVID-Specific Findings Required

Vermont Reaffirms the Narrow Scope of Sentence Reconsideration: No Hearing or COVID-Specific Findings Required

Date: Sep 6, 2025
Vermont Reaffirms the Narrow Scope of Sentence Reconsideration: No Hearing or COVID-Specific Findings Required Introduction In State v. Walter Taylor, III (Vt. Sept. 5, 2025), a three-justice panel...
State v. Prue: Vermont Supreme Court Reaffirms That a Guilty Plea Requires a Personal, Theory‑Specific Factual Basis Under Rule 11(f), Reviewed Under Bridger on Direct Appeal

State v. Prue: Vermont Supreme Court Reaffirms That a Guilty Plea Requires a Personal, Theory‑Specific Factual Basis Under Rule 11(f), Reviewed Under Bridger on Direct Appeal

Date: Sep 6, 2025
State v. Prue: Vermont Supreme Court Reaffirms That a Guilty Plea Requires a Personal, Theory‑Specific Factual Basis Under Rule 11(f), Reviewed Under Bridger on Direct Appeal Court: Vermont Supreme...
CHINS-B Reversal Does Not Preclude DCF Physical-Abuse Substantiation: Distinct Causes and Issues Clarified by the Vermont Supreme Court

CHINS-B Reversal Does Not Preclude DCF Physical-Abuse Substantiation: Distinct Causes and Issues Clarified by the Vermont Supreme Court

Date: Sep 6, 2025
CHINS-B Reversal Does Not Preclude DCF Physical-Abuse Substantiation: Distinct Causes and Issues Clarified by the Vermont Supreme Court Note on precedential weight: This was an entry order by a...
Adequate Findings Over Form: Vermont Supreme Court Affirms Termination Without a Standalone “Stagnation” Section and Confirms Waiver of Child-Testimony Claim

Adequate Findings Over Form: Vermont Supreme Court Affirms Termination Without a Standalone “Stagnation” Section and Confirms Waiver of Child-Testimony Claim

Date: Sep 6, 2025
Adequate Findings Over Form: Vermont Supreme Court Affirms Termination Without a Standalone “Stagnation” Section and Confirms Waiver of Child-Testimony Claim Introduction This commentary examines the...
Qualified Immunity Shields Police in Landlord–Tenant Disputes When Abandonment Under 9 V.S.A. § 4462 Is Not Clearly Established

Qualified Immunity Shields Police in Landlord–Tenant Disputes When Abandonment Under 9 V.S.A. § 4462 Is Not Clearly Established

Date: Sep 6, 2025
Qualified Immunity Shields Police in Landlord–Tenant Disputes When Abandonment Under 9 V.S.A. § 4462 Is Not Clearly Established Court: Supreme Court of Vermont (Three-Justice Panel Entry Order) Case:...
Maher v. Maher: Vermont Supreme Court Affirms Trial-Court Discretion to Confine Long‑Weekend Parenting Time to the Child’s Residence and to Prioritize Primary‑Caregiver and Community‑Continuity Factors Under 15 V.S.A. § 665

Maher v. Maher: Vermont Supreme Court Affirms Trial-Court Discretion to Confine Long‑Weekend Parenting Time to the Child’s Residence and to Prioritize Primary‑Caregiver and Community‑Continuity Factors Under 15 V.S.A. § 665

Date: Sep 6, 2025
Maher v. Maher: Vermont Supreme Court Affirms Trial-Court Discretion to Confine Long‑Weekend Parenting Time to the Child’s Residence and to Prioritize Primary‑Caregiver and Community‑Continuity...
No Immunity Without Compliance: Vermont Affirms Tow-Company Duty of Care and Sufficiency of Owner Testimony for Missing Vehicle Contents

No Immunity Without Compliance: Vermont Affirms Tow-Company Duty of Care and Sufficiency of Owner Testimony for Missing Vehicle Contents

Date: Sep 6, 2025
No Immunity Without Compliance: Vermont Affirms Tow-Company Duty of Care and Sufficiency of Owner Testimony for Missing Vehicle Contents Grey Barreda v. Handy's Service Center, Vermont Supreme Court,...
Easements Run With the Dominant Estate They Are Granted To: No Expansion to After-Acquired Parcels Absent Express Grant or Necessity

Easements Run With the Dominant Estate They Are Granted To: No Expansion to After-Acquired Parcels Absent Express Grant or Necessity

Date: Sep 6, 2025
Easements Run With the Dominant Estate They Are Granted To: No Expansion to After-Acquired Parcels Absent Express Grant or Necessity Introduction This commentary examines the Vermont Supreme Court’s...
Limiting Anderson’s First‑Filed Rule: District Courts Need Not Defer to the Industrial Commission on Idaho Code § 72‑209(3) “Willful or Unprovoked Physical Aggression” — Dominguez Partially Overruled

Limiting Anderson’s First‑Filed Rule: District Courts Need Not Defer to the Industrial Commission on Idaho Code § 72‑209(3) “Willful or Unprovoked Physical Aggression” — Dominguez Partially Overruled

Date: Sep 5, 2025
Limiting Anderson’s First‑Filed Rule: District Courts Need Not Defer to the Industrial Commission on Idaho Code § 72‑209(3) “Willful or Unprovoked Physical Aggression” — Dominguez Partially Overruled...
Row v. State: Shinn Is Not a Trigger for Successive State Post‑Conviction Relief and Rule 44.2 Does Not Create a Right to Effective Post‑Conviction Counsel

Row v. State: Shinn Is Not a Trigger for Successive State Post‑Conviction Relief and Rule 44.2 Does Not Create a Right to Effective Post‑Conviction Counsel

Date: Sep 5, 2025
Row v. State: Shinn Is Not a Trigger for Successive State Post‑Conviction Relief and Rule 44.2 Does Not Create a Right to Effective Post‑Conviction Counsel Introduction In Row v. State, the Idaho...
Admissibility and Diligence as Gatekeepers in Successive Rule 3.851 Motions: Florida Supreme Court Rejects Third-Party Confession Declarations and “New Support for Old Claims”

Admissibility and Diligence as Gatekeepers in Successive Rule 3.851 Motions: Florida Supreme Court Rejects Third-Party Confession Declarations and “New Support for Old Claims”

Date: Sep 5, 2025
Admissibility and Diligence as Gatekeepers in Successive Rule 3.851 Motions: Florida Supreme Court Rejects Third-Party Confession Declarations and “New Support for Old Claims” Introduction In Ernest...
Fraud Scienter Clarified and Disclosure Act Accrual Fixed at Closing: The Idaho Supreme Court’s Dual Holdings in VanRenselaar v. Batres

Fraud Scienter Clarified and Disclosure Act Accrual Fixed at Closing: The Idaho Supreme Court’s Dual Holdings in VanRenselaar v. Batres

Date: Sep 5, 2025
Fraud Scienter Clarified and Disclosure Act Accrual Fixed at Closing: The Idaho Supreme Court’s Dual Holdings in VanRenselaar v. Batres Introduction In VanRenselaar v. Batres, the Idaho Supreme Court...
Ohio Supreme Court mandates facility‑specific “rate for direct care costs” drives 60% allocation to nursing‑home quality pool under R.C. 5165.26(E)

Ohio Supreme Court mandates facility‑specific “rate for direct care costs” drives 60% allocation to nursing‑home quality pool under R.C. 5165.26(E)

Date: Sep 4, 2025
Facility‑Specific “Rate for Direct Care Costs,” Not Group “Price,” Controls the 60% Quality‑Pool Allocation: A Textualist Course Correction in Medicaid Nursing‑Home Payments Case Overview Decision:...
Swearing-In Does Not Moot Eligibility Challenges; Election-Law Injunctions Must Satisfy Montana’s Four-Factor Test

Swearing-In Does Not Moot Eligibility Challenges; Election-Law Injunctions Must Satisfy Montana’s Four-Factor Test

Date: Sep 4, 2025
Swearing-In Does Not Moot Eligibility Challenges; Election-Law Injunctions Must Satisfy Montana’s Four-Factor Test Case: Bartel v. Middlestead, 2025 MT 195 (Mont. Sept. 2, 2025) Court: Supreme Court...
“Taxes Relating to the Property” in Liquidation MOUs: No Implied Duty to Reserve for a Debtor’s Capital Gains; Extrinsic Evidence Controls Before Contra Proferentem

“Taxes Relating to the Property” in Liquidation MOUs: No Implied Duty to Reserve for a Debtor’s Capital Gains; Extrinsic Evidence Controls Before Contra Proferentem

Date: Sep 4, 2025
“Taxes Relating to the Property” in Liquidation MOUs: No Implied Duty to Reserve for a Debtor’s Capital Gains; Extrinsic Evidence Controls Before Contra Proferentem Introduction Gabert v. Seaman,...
Johnson v. State Farm (Mont. 2025): Attorney Fees Are Part of “Made Whole,” But Only for Covered Losses; Coverage‑Segmented Subrogation Clarified

Johnson v. State Farm (Mont. 2025): Attorney Fees Are Part of “Made Whole,” But Only for Covered Losses; Coverage‑Segmented Subrogation Clarified

Date: Sep 4, 2025
Johnson v. State Farm (Mont. 2025): Attorney Fees Are Part of “Made Whole,” But Only for Covered Losses; Coverage‑Segmented Subrogation Clarified Introduction In Johnson v. State Farm Ins., 2025 MT...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert