Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

4th Circuit Case Commentaries


Fourth-Circuit Clarifies “Joint-Venture Constructive Possession” and Plain-Error Limits on Competency Challenges – A Commentary on United States v. Cristian Cabrera-Rivas (2025)

Fourth-Circuit Clarifies “Joint-Venture Constructive Possession” and Plain-Error Limits on Competency Challenges – A Commentary on United States v. Cristian Cabrera-Rivas (2025)

Date: Jul 3, 2025
Fourth-Circuit Clarifies “Joint-Venture Constructive Possession” and Plain-Error Limits on Competency Challenges A Comprehensive Commentary on United States v. Cristian Cabrera-Rivas, 93 F.4th ___...
“Total Relevant Conduct” Means Total: United States v. Dehaven Craig and the Limits on Government-Sought Guideline Enhancements

“Total Relevant Conduct” Means Total: United States v. Dehaven Craig and the Limits on Government-Sought Guideline Enhancements

Date: Jul 3, 2025
“Total Relevant Conduct” Means Total: United States v. Dehaven Craig and the Limits on Government-Sought Guideline Enhancements Introduction On 30 June 2025 the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Fourth Circuit Clarifies that Palomar-Santiago Does Not Eliminate “Procedural-Error” Excusal under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(d)(1): A Commentary on United States v. Victor Castro-Aleman

Fourth Circuit Clarifies that Palomar-Santiago Does Not Eliminate “Procedural-Error” Excusal under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(d)(1): A Commentary on United States v. Victor Castro-Aleman

Date: Jun 29, 2025
Fourth Circuit Clarifies that Palomar-Santiago Does Not Eliminate “Procedural-Error” Excusal under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(d)(1) Commentary on United States v. Victor Castro-Aleman, 4th Cir., 26 June 2025...
Chappell v. TruckPro: Clarifying the Pre-ponderance Standard for Product Identification in South Carolina Strict-Liability Claims

Chappell v. TruckPro: Clarifying the Pre-ponderance Standard for Product Identification in South Carolina Strict-Liability Claims

Date: Jun 29, 2025
Chappell v. TruckPro, LLC – Fourth Circuit Clarifies the “Preponderance” Threshold for Linking a Product to a Distributor in South Carolina Strict-Liability Litigation 1. Introduction This commentary...
No Immediate Interaction, No State-Created Danger: Fourth Circuit Clarifies Limits of Substantive Due Process in Paton v. City of Norfolk

No Immediate Interaction, No State-Created Danger: Fourth Circuit Clarifies Limits of Substantive Due Process in Paton v. City of Norfolk

Date: Jun 29, 2025
No Immediate Interaction, No State-Created Danger: Fourth Circuit Clarifies Limits of Substantive Due Process in Paton v. City of Norfolk Introduction In Kathy Paton v. City of Norfolk, Virginia, the...

        “From Disability to Limitation”: Fourth Circuit Re-defines the Employer’s Duty of Notice
        in ADA Accommodations – Commentary on Sally Tarquinio v. Johns Hopkins University APL (4th Cir. 2025)

“From Disability to Limitation”: Fourth Circuit Re-defines the Employer’s Duty of Notice in ADA Accommodations – Commentary on Sally Tarquinio v. Johns Hopkins University APL (4th Cir. 2025)

Date: Jun 29, 2025
“From Disability to Limitation”: Fourth Circuit Re-defines the Employer’s Duty of Notice in ADA Accommodations Commentary on Sally W. Tarquinio v. Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory,...
United States v. McCray: Clarifying the Scope of Sentencing Explanations When a Downward Variance Is Granted

United States v. McCray: Clarifying the Scope of Sentencing Explanations When a Downward Variance Is Granted

Date: Jun 29, 2025
United States v. McCray: Clarifying the Scope of Sentencing Explanations When a Downward Variance Is Granted Introduction In United States v. Fredrick Wendell McCray, No. 24-4078 (4th Cir....

        United States v. Poynter, Jr.: Fourth Circuit Re-Affirms
        The Reliability of Historical Cell-Site Analysis and Clarifies Plain-Error Review of Rule 702/403 Challenges

United States v. Poynter, Jr.: Fourth Circuit Re-Affirms The Reliability of Historical Cell-Site Analysis and Clarifies Plain-Error Review of Rule 702/403 Challenges

Date: Jun 29, 2025
United States v. Poynter, Jr.: Fourth Circuit Re-Affirms the Reliability of Historical Cell-Site Analysis and Clarifies Plain-Error Review of Rule 702/403 Challenges 1. Introduction The Fourth...
Fourth Circuit Clarifies Non-Binding Nature of EOIR OPPM 17-04 and the Limited Reach of the Accardi Doctrine in Cancellation-of-Removal Cap Cases

Fourth Circuit Clarifies Non-Binding Nature of EOIR OPPM 17-04 and the Limited Reach of the Accardi Doctrine in Cancellation-of-Removal Cap Cases

Date: Jun 27, 2025
Fourth Circuit Clarifies Non-Binding Nature of EOIR OPPM 17-04 and the Limited Reach of the Accardi Doctrine in Cancellation-of-Removal Cap Cases Introduction The published opinion in Alex Zalaya...
“The Vehicle Must Be Yours”: Erie Insurance v. Cooper and the New Limits on Mandatory UIM Offers for Non-Owned Vehicles

“The Vehicle Must Be Yours”: Erie Insurance v. Cooper and the New Limits on Mandatory UIM Offers for Non-Owned Vehicles

Date: Jun 27, 2025
“The Vehicle Must Be Yours”: Erie Insurance v. Cooper and the New Limits on Mandatory UIM Offers for Non-Owned Vehicles 1. Introduction Erie Insurance Property & Casualty Company v. James Skylar...
No Double Redress: The Fourth Circuit Bars Appeals for Nominal Damages Once Compensatory Damages Are Awarded — Commentary on Hammons v. UMMS

No Double Redress: The Fourth Circuit Bars Appeals for Nominal Damages Once Compensatory Damages Are Awarded — Commentary on Hammons v. UMMS

Date: Jun 27, 2025
No Double Redress: The Fourth Circuit Bars Appeals for Nominal Damages Once Compensatory Damages Are Awarded 1. Introduction In Jesse Hammons v. University of Maryland Medical System Corporation, the...
Fourth Circuit Tightens Appellate Standing: Compensatory Damages Foreclose Nominal Damages and Declaratory Relief

Fourth Circuit Tightens Appellate Standing: Compensatory Damages Foreclose Nominal Damages and Declaratory Relief

Date: Jun 27, 2025
Compensatory Damages as Full Redress: Hammons v. University of Maryland Medical System Corp. and the Limits of Appellate Standing for Nominal Damages 1. Introduction Jesse Hammons— a transgender man...
United States v. Duane Berry: Affirming Continued § 4241 Custody Post-Dismissal to Facilitate § 4246 Civil Commitment

United States v. Duane Berry: Affirming Continued § 4241 Custody Post-Dismissal to Facilitate § 4246 Civil Commitment

Date: Jun 27, 2025
United States v. Duane Berry: Affirming Continued § 4241 Custody Post-Dismissal to Facilitate § 4246 Civil Commitment Introduction United States v. Duane Berry, No. 24-6385 (4th Cir. June 24 2025),...
Reaffirming the Jurisdictional Limits on Interlocutory Qualified-Immunity Appeals: A Commentary on Calliste v. Lor

Reaffirming the Jurisdictional Limits on Interlocutory Qualified-Immunity Appeals: A Commentary on Calliste v. Lor

Date: Jun 27, 2025
Reaffirming the Jurisdictional Limits on Interlocutory Qualified-Immunity Appeals: A Comprehensive Commentary on Xyavier Calliste v. Officer Xeng Lor (4th Cir. 2025) 1. Introduction Background. On 31...
“Chinnery v. Kaiser” – The Fourth Circuit Reaffirms the Minimal Pleading Standard for Sincerity in Title VII Religious-Accommodation Claims

“Chinnery v. Kaiser” – The Fourth Circuit Reaffirms the Minimal Pleading Standard for Sincerity in Title VII Religious-Accommodation Claims

Date: Jun 25, 2025
Chinnery v. Kaiser: The Fourth Circuit Reaffirms the Minimal Pleading Standard for Sincerity in Title VII Religious-Accommodation Claims Introduction The unpublished opinion in Naisha Chinnery v....
United States v. Adams: Fourth Circuit Re-Affirms the “Central Thesis” Standard for Sentencing Explanations

United States v. Adams: Fourth Circuit Re-Affirms the “Central Thesis” Standard for Sentencing Explanations

Date: Jun 25, 2025
United States v. Adams: Fourth Circuit Re-Affirms the “Central Thesis” Standard for Sentencing Explanations Introduction The Fourth Circuit’s unpublished decision in United States v. Maurice Adams...
United States v. Yelizarov: Narrowing the “Miscarriage-of-Justice” Escape Hatch to Appellate-Waiver Clauses After a § 924(c) Vacatur

United States v. Yelizarov: Narrowing the “Miscarriage-of-Justice” Escape Hatch to Appellate-Waiver Clauses After a § 924(c) Vacatur

Date: Jun 25, 2025
United States v. Yelizarov: Narrowing the “Miscarriage-of-Justice” Escape Hatch to Appellate-Waiver Clauses After a § 924(c) Vacatur Introduction The Fourth Circuit’s published decision in United...
Fourth Circuit Clarifies Enforceability of Appeal-Waivers after § 924(c) Vacatur: A Commentary on United States v. Stanislav Yelizarov (2025)

Fourth Circuit Clarifies Enforceability of Appeal-Waivers after § 924(c) Vacatur: A Commentary on United States v. Stanislav Yelizarov (2025)

Date: Jun 25, 2025
Fourth Circuit Clarifies Enforceability of Appeal-Waivers after § 924(c) Vacatur: A Commentary on United States v. Stanislav Yelizarov (2025) 1. Introduction In United States v. Stanislav Yelizarov,...
“Infancy in Arms” –  McCoy v. ATF and the Recognition of a Historical
‘Infancy Doctrine’ Limitation on Commercial Fire-Arm Sales

“Infancy in Arms” – McCoy v. ATF and the Recognition of a Historical ‘Infancy Doctrine’ Limitation on Commercial Fire-Arm Sales

Date: Jun 20, 2025
“Infancy in Arms” – McCoy v. ATF and the Recognition of a Historical ‘Infancy Doctrine’ Limitation on Commercial Fire-Arm Sales 1. Introduction In Joshua McCoy v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms...
Frazier v. Prince George’s County: No Article III Adverseness to Sitting Judges and No Quasi-Judicial Immunity for Municipalities in § 1983 Actions

Frazier v. Prince George’s County: No Article III Adverseness to Sitting Judges and No Quasi-Judicial Immunity for Municipalities in § 1983 Actions

Date: Jun 20, 2025
Frazier v. Prince George’s County: No Article III Adverseness to Sitting Judges and No Quasi-Judicial Immunity for Municipalities in § 1983 Actions Introduction In Robert Frazier v. Prince George’s...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert