Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Circumstantial Proof of Drug Knowledge and Strict Enforcement of Rogers: Commentary on United States v. Scott (4th Cir. 2025) I. Introduction This commentary examines the Fourth Circuit’s unpublished...
Pleading Religious Objections and Defining Vaccination Status Under Federal Anti‑Discrimination Law: A Commentary on Finn v. Humane Society of the United States (4th Cir. 2025) I. Introduction The...
Swink v. Southern Health Partners: Objective Deliberate Indifference, Monell Liability for Contracted Jail Healthcare, and Expert Causation I. Introduction In Juliana Swink v. Southern Health...
When Statutory Review Schemes “Malfunction”: The Fourth Circuit’s New Functionality Overlay on Thunder Basin and CSRA Preclusion in Nat’l Ass’n of Immigration Judges v. Owen I. Introduction This...
United States v. Robinson: Redressability, Mootness, and the Nonjurisdictional Character of AEDPA’s Second-or-Successive Bar I. Introduction In United States v. Carlos Demond Robinson, No. 22‑7200...
Futility of Reporting and Ignored Evidence: The Fourth Circuit Strengthens “Unable or Unwilling” and CAT Acquiescence Standards in Ramos Marquez v. Bondi I. Introduction In Carlos Andres Ramos...
Pleading “Reasonable Measures” Under the DTSA: Confidentiality Agreements as Sufficient at the Rule 12 Stage Commentary on Samuel Sherbrooke Corporate, Ltd. v. Mayer, No. 24‑2173 (4th Cir. Nov. 18,...
Conspiracy, Relevant Conduct, and Supervised Release: The Fourth Circuit’s Framework for International Firearms Trafficking in United States v. Nji I. Introduction In this consolidated appeal, the...
United States v. Palmer: Narrowing Rule 704(b) After Diaz and Rejecting Padilla-Based Collateral Attacks on State Pleas I. Introduction In United States v. Gregory Maxwell Palmer, No. 23‑4538 (4th...
Only Pre‑Motion Delay Counts: Speedy Trial Act Clarification and Supervised‑Release Pronouncement in United States v. Lamborn I. Introduction This published opinion of the United States Court of...
Freezing the Speedy Trial Act Clock at the Motion to Dismiss and Enforcing Oral Pronouncement of Supervised Release: Commentary on United States v. Le (4th Cir. 2025) I. Introduction This commentary...
United States v. Lamborn (Tony Le): Fourth Circuit Adopts Motion‑Cutoff Rule for Speedy Trial Act and Confirms Non‑Retroactivity of the Acquitted‑Conduct Guideline Amendment I. Introduction This...
Relevant Conduct, Willful Blindness, and Supervised Release Conditions in Firearms Conspiracies: United States v. Wilson Che Fonguh (4th Cir. 2025) I. Introduction The Fourth Circuit’s published...
United States v. Tita: Circumstantial Knowledge, Pinkerton Liability, and Supervised Release Conditions in a Firearms Smuggling Conspiracy I. Introduction In United States v. Tita (consolidated with...
United States v. Yoo: Limiting Speedy Trial Act Dismissals to Pre‑Motion Delay and Enforcing Oral Pronouncement of Supervised Release Conditions I. Introduction The Fourth Circuit’s published...
Self‑Executing Voluntary Dismissals Under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i): Converting a “Motion to Dismiss Without Prejudice” into a Notice in Connelly v. Daystar Builders, Inc. I. Introduction In Robert D....
United States v. Henderson: Supplemental Safety‑Valve Briefing as Good Cause for Late Guideline Objections and the Evidentiary Threshold for Firearm Enhancements I. Introduction United States v....
No Rule 11 Duty to Warn That Criminal Forfeiture Can Exceed the Statutory Maximum Fine; Broad Appeal Waivers Encompass Forfeiture Challenges Introduction In United States v. Shawn Johnson, Nos....
Forfeiture Is Not a “Fine” for Rule 11 Purposes: Fourth Circuit Upholds Plea Advisements, Enforces Appeal Waiver Over Forfeiture, and Reaffirms Bar on As‑Applied § 922(g)(1) Challenges Introduction...
Forfeiture Is Not a “Fine” for Rule 11 Purposes: The Fourth Circuit Clarifies Plea Colloquy Advisements and Appeal-Waiver Limits in United States v. Johnson Court: United States Court of Appeals for...