Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

3d Circuit Case Commentaries

Extended Traffic Stops and Reasonable Suspicion: Analysis of U.S. v. Stanger

Extended Traffic Stops and Reasonable Suspicion: Analysis of U.S. v. Stanger

Date: Feb 7, 2025
Extended Traffic Stops and Reasonable Suspicion: Analysis of United States v. Stanger Introduction In the case of United States of America v. Tanya Jaynene Stanger and Bryce Richard Stanger, the...
Limitation on Successive Rule 60(b)(1) Motions in Federal Appeals: Insights from OMAR SIERRE FOLK v. WARDEN MCKEAN FCI

Limitation on Successive Rule 60(b)(1) Motions in Federal Appeals: Insights from OMAR SIERRE FOLK v. WARDEN MCKEAN FCI

Date: Feb 7, 2025
Limitation on Successive Rule 60(b)(1) Motions in Federal Appeals: Insights from OMAR SIERRE FOLK v. WARDEN MCKEAN FCI Introduction In the case of Omar Sierre Folk v. Warden McKean FCI, the United...
Affirmation of Younger Abstention in Disciplinary Proceedings: Rosellini v. Wilcox and Its Implications

Affirmation of Younger Abstention in Disciplinary Proceedings: Rosellini v. Wilcox and Its Implications

Date: Feb 7, 2025
Affirmation of Younger Abstention in Disciplinary Proceedings: Rosellini v. Wilcox and Its Implications Introduction In Rosellini v. Wilcox, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit...
Lyles v. Greyhound Bus Lines: Clarifying State Action Requirements under 42 U.S.C. §1983

Lyles v. Greyhound Bus Lines: Clarifying State Action Requirements under 42 U.S.C. §1983

Date: Feb 7, 2025
Lyles v. Greyhound Bus Lines: Clarifying State Action Requirements under 42 U.S.C. §1983 Introduction Lyles v. Greyhound Bus Lines; Allied Universal Security is a noteworthy case adjudicated by the...
Affirmation of Judicial Immunity in §1983 Claims: Elad v. Truist Bank

Affirmation of Judicial Immunity in §1983 Claims: Elad v. Truist Bank

Date: Feb 6, 2025
Affirmation of Judicial Immunity in §1983 Claims: Elad v. Truist Bank Introduction Elad v. Truist Bank is a significant case that addresses the boundaries of judicial and quasi-judicial immunity in...
Affirming Extraterritorial Criminal Jurisdiction under the Foreign Commerce and Necessary and Proper Clauses: United States v. Corrigan Clay

Affirming Extraterritorial Criminal Jurisdiction under the Foreign Commerce and Necessary and Proper Clauses: United States v. Corrigan Clay

Date: Feb 6, 2025
Affirming Extraterritorial Criminal Jurisdiction under the Foreign Commerce and Necessary and Proper Clauses: United States v. Corrigan Clay Introduction In the case of United States of America v....
Court of Appeals Upholds BIA's Aggregate Hardship Assessment in Luna-Mendez v. Attorney General

Court of Appeals Upholds BIA's Aggregate Hardship Assessment in Luna-Mendez v. Attorney General

Date: Feb 6, 2025
Court of Appeals Upholds BIA's Aggregate Hardship Assessment in Luna-Mendez v. Attorney General Introduction The case of Benjamin Luna-Mendez v. Attorney General United States of America presents a...
Enhanced Requirements for Residual Functional Capacity Explanations in Disability Determinations: Ginder v. Commissioner of Social Security

Enhanced Requirements for Residual Functional Capacity Explanations in Disability Determinations: Ginder v. Commissioner of Social Security

Date: Feb 2, 2025
Enhanced Requirements for Residual Functional Capacity Explanations in Disability Determinations Introduction The case of Francine Leah Ginder v. Commissioner of Social Security serves as a pivotal...
Deliberate Indifference in Prison Medical Care: Chruby v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections

Deliberate Indifference in Prison Medical Care: Chruby v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections

Date: Feb 2, 2025
Deliberate Indifference in Prison Medical Care: Chruby v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections Introduction Chruby v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections is a significant appellate decision that...
Enhanced Scrutiny on Liability Waiver Presentation in Admiralty Law: Thompson v. Over the Line VI

Enhanced Scrutiny on Liability Waiver Presentation in Admiralty Law: Thompson v. Over the Line VI

Date: Feb 2, 2025
Enhanced Scrutiny on Liability Waiver Presentation in Admiralty Law: Thompson v. Over the Line VI Introduction The case of Christine Thompson v. Over the Line VI, LLC; Jordan Maupin adjudicated by...
Substantive Reasonableness in Sentencing for Supervised Release Violations: Analysis of United States v. Abbinanti

Substantive Reasonableness in Sentencing for Supervised Release Violations: Analysis of United States v. Abbinanti

Date: Feb 2, 2025
Substantive Reasonableness in Sentencing for Supervised Release Violations: Analysis of United States v. Abbinanti Introduction United States of America v. Joseph Abbinanti is a pivotal case...
Affirmation of Appellate Waiver in Federal Sentencing: United States v. Damone D. Oakley

Affirmation of Appellate Waiver in Federal Sentencing: United States v. Damone D. Oakley

Date: Feb 2, 2025
Affirmation of Appellate Waiver in Federal Sentencing: United States v. Damone D. Oakley Introduction The case of United States of America v. Damone D. Oakley serves as a pivotal example in the realm...
Affirmation of First Amendment Protections in Government Employee Speech: FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE PENNSYLVANIA LODGE et al. v. Township of Springfield

Affirmation of First Amendment Protections in Government Employee Speech: FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE PENNSYLVANIA LODGE et al. v. Township of Springfield

Date: Feb 2, 2025
Affirmation of First Amendment Protections in Government Employee Speech: FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE PENNSYLVANIA LODGE et al. v. Township of Springfield Introduction The case of Fraternal Order of...
Affirmation of Conviction in United States v. Deon Reese: Implications for Voir Dire Procedures

Affirmation of Conviction in United States v. Deon Reese: Implications for Voir Dire Procedures

Date: Feb 2, 2025
Affirmation of Conviction in United States v. Deon Reese: Implications for Voir Dire Procedures Introduction In the case of United States of America v. Deon Reese, decided by the United States Court...
DOE's Energy Conservation Standards for Pool Pump Motors Upheld: A Comprehensive Analysis of Zodiac Pool Systems LLC v. U.S. Department of Energy

DOE's Energy Conservation Standards for Pool Pump Motors Upheld: A Comprehensive Analysis of Zodiac Pool Systems LLC v. U.S. Department of Energy

Date: Feb 2, 2025
DOE's Energy Conservation Standards for Pool Pump Motors Upheld: A Comprehensive Analysis of Zodiac Pool Systems LLC v. U.S. Department of Energy Introduction The case of Zodiac Pool Systems LLC v....
Affirmation of District Court's Sentencing in United States v. Matthew Holmes

Affirmation of District Court's Sentencing in United States v. Matthew Holmes

Date: Feb 2, 2025
Affirmation of District Court's Sentencing in United States v. Matthew Holmes 1. Introduction United States of America v. Matthew Holmes is a judicial decision rendered by the United States Court of...
Affirmation of Bankruptcy Court's Objection to Shareholder's FLSA Claim in In re: U Lock, Inc., Debtor GEORGE SNYDER, Appellant

Affirmation of Bankruptcy Court's Objection to Shareholder's FLSA Claim in In re: U Lock, Inc., Debtor GEORGE SNYDER, Appellant

Date: Jan 31, 2025
Affirmation of Bankruptcy Court's Objection to Shareholder's FLSA Claim in In re: U Lock, Inc., Debtor GEORGE SNYDER, Appellant Introduction This commentary examines the Third Circuit Court of...
Affirmation of Clemons's Sentencing and Withdrawal of Anders Motion in United States v. Albert Clemons

Affirmation of Clemons's Sentencing and Withdrawal of Anders Motion in United States v. Albert Clemons

Date: Jan 31, 2025
Affirmation of Clemons's Sentencing and Withdrawal of Anders Motion in United States v. Albert Clemons Introduction United States of America v. Albert Clemons is a case adjudicated by the United...
Application of Federal Rule of Evidence 403 in Admitting Evidence under Rule 404(b): Insights from U.S. v. Guibbonz Marcellus

Application of Federal Rule of Evidence 403 in Admitting Evidence under Rule 404(b): Insights from U.S. v. Guibbonz Marcellus

Date: Jan 29, 2025
Application of Federal Rule of Evidence 403 in Admitting Evidence under Rule 404(b): Insights from United States v. Guibbonz Marcellus Introduction The case of United States of America v. Guibbonz...
Affirmation of TCPA §227(b)(1)(C): Implications for Unsolicited Fax Advertisements

Affirmation of TCPA §227(b)(1)(C): Implications for Unsolicited Fax Advertisements

Date: Jan 29, 2025
Affirmation of TCPA §227(b)(1)(C): Implications for Unsolicited Fax Advertisements Introduction In the landmark case Steven A. Conner, DPM, P.C., Individually and on behalf of all others Similarly...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert