Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

3d Circuit Case Commentaries

A Witness’s Prior Letter Is Not Substantive Evidence Unless the Witness Vouches for Its Truth; “Or Otherwise” in the Federal Kidnapping Statute Encompasses Drug‑Debt Recoupment — United States v. Perkins (3d Cir. 2025)

A Witness’s Prior Letter Is Not Substantive Evidence Unless the Witness Vouches for Its Truth; “Or Otherwise” in the Federal Kidnapping Statute Encompasses Drug‑Debt Recoupment — United States v. Perkins (3d Cir. 2025)

Date: Apr 5, 2025
A Witness’s Prior Letter Is Not Substantive Evidence Unless the Witness Vouches for Its Truth; “Or Otherwise” in the Federal Kidnapping Statute Encompasses Drug‑Debt Recoupment — United States v....
No Ongoing Violation, No Young Exception: Third Circuit Reaffirms Eleventh Amendment Bar and Requires Without-Prejudice Dismissal in Official-Capacity § 1983 Suits

No Ongoing Violation, No Young Exception: Third Circuit Reaffirms Eleventh Amendment Bar and Requires Without-Prejudice Dismissal in Official-Capacity § 1983 Suits

Date: Apr 4, 2025
No Ongoing Violation, No Young Exception: Third Circuit Reaffirms Eleventh Amendment Bar and Requires Without-Prejudice Dismissal in Official-Capacity § 1983 Suits Introduction In Corsnitz v....
“Preserve It or Lose It”: Third Circuit Reaffirms Waiver for Failure to Challenge Magistrate’s Denial of Counsel and Upholds Immunity Bar to § 1983 Claims Against State Family‑Court Actors

“Preserve It or Lose It”: Third Circuit Reaffirms Waiver for Failure to Challenge Magistrate’s Denial of Counsel and Upholds Immunity Bar to § 1983 Claims Against State Family‑Court Actors

Date: Apr 4, 2025
“Preserve It or Lose It”: Third Circuit Reaffirms Waiver for Failure to Challenge Magistrate’s Denial of Counsel and Upholds Immunity Bar to § 1983 Claims Against State Family‑Court Actors...
“Dispute Arises” Under the EFAA Means Employer–Employee Opposition, Not Injury or EEOC Filing: Third Circuit’s Precedential Clarification in Cornelius v. CVS

“Dispute Arises” Under the EFAA Means Employer–Employee Opposition, Not Injury or EEOC Filing: Third Circuit’s Precedential Clarification in Cornelius v. CVS

Date: Apr 3, 2025
“Dispute Arises” Under the EFAA Means Employer–Employee Opposition, Not Injury or EEOC Filing: Third Circuit’s Precedential Clarification in Cornelius v. CVS Introduction In a precedential opinion,...
Selective Enforcement Discovery in Prison Contraband Cases: Small Samples, Self‑Selection, and Mandatory Referral Policies Can Justify Denial

Selective Enforcement Discovery in Prison Contraband Cases: Small Samples, Self‑Selection, and Mandatory Referral Policies Can Justify Denial

Date: Apr 3, 2025
Selective Enforcement Discovery in Prison Contraband Cases: Small Samples, Self‑Selection, and Mandatory Referral Policies Can Justify Denial Introduction In United States v. Brian Foster (3d Cir....
Essential Features of the Three-Tier System: Third Circuit Replaces Freeman with Tennessee Wine’s Test and Upholds New Jersey’s Retailer Physical Presence and In-State Wholesaler Requirements

Essential Features of the Three-Tier System: Third Circuit Replaces Freeman with Tennessee Wine’s Test and Upholds New Jersey’s Retailer Physical Presence and In-State Wholesaler Requirements

Date: Apr 3, 2025
Essential Features of the Three-Tier System: Third Circuit Replaces Freeman with Tennessee Wine’s Test and Upholds New Jersey’s Retailer Physical Presence and In-State Wholesaler Requirements...
Noncompliance Controls: Qualified Immunity and Pennsylvania Sovereign Immunity for a Single Pepper‑Spray Burst Against a Medically Restricted Inmate

Noncompliance Controls: Qualified Immunity and Pennsylvania Sovereign Immunity for a Single Pepper‑Spray Burst Against a Medically Restricted Inmate

Date: Apr 3, 2025
Noncompliance Controls: Qualified Immunity and Pennsylvania Sovereign Immunity for a Single Pepper‑Spray Burst Against a Medically Restricted Inmate Introduction This commentary analyzes the Third...
“No Pro Se Penalty” After Abandonment: Third Circuit Extends Martinez to Self‑Represented PCRA Filings and Finds Ineffective Assistance for Misclassifying § 922(g)(1) Under Pennsylvania Guidelines

“No Pro Se Penalty” After Abandonment: Third Circuit Extends Martinez to Self‑Represented PCRA Filings and Finds Ineffective Assistance for Misclassifying § 922(g)(1) Under Pennsylvania Guidelines

Date: Apr 3, 2025
“No Pro Se Penalty” After Abandonment: Third Circuit Extends Martinez to Self‑Represented PCRA Filings and Finds Ineffective Assistance for Misclassifying § 922(g)(1) Under Pennsylvania Guidelines...
Paid Professional Advice Is Protected Speech: Third Circuit Requires First Amendment Scrutiny of New Jersey’s Ban on Compensation for Veterans‑Claims Counseling

Paid Professional Advice Is Protected Speech: Third Circuit Requires First Amendment Scrutiny of New Jersey’s Ban on Compensation for Veterans‑Claims Counseling

Date: Apr 2, 2025
Paid Professional Advice Is Protected Speech: Third Circuit Requires First Amendment Scrutiny of New Jersey’s Ban on Compensation for Veterans‑Claims Counseling Introduction In a precedential opinion...
From Possibility to Probability: Third Circuit Reaffirms That Understaffing Allegations and Abstract Capacity Models Do Not Satisfy Rule 9(b)’s “Reliable Indicia” Requirement in FCA Cases

From Possibility to Probability: Third Circuit Reaffirms That Understaffing Allegations and Abstract Capacity Models Do Not Satisfy Rule 9(b)’s “Reliable Indicia” Requirement in FCA Cases

Date: Apr 2, 2025
From Possibility to Probability: Third Circuit Reaffirms That Understaffing Allegations and Abstract Capacity Models Do Not Satisfy Rule 9(b)’s “Reliable Indicia” Requirement in FCA Cases Note: The...
Rule 56 Clarified: Unverified Complaints and Unsworn Prison Grievances Are Not Competent Summary-Judgment Evidence; Non-Assertive Commands Are Non-Hearsay — Commentary on Travillion v. Wetzel (3d Cir. Apr. 1, 2025)

Rule 56 Clarified: Unverified Complaints and Unsworn Prison Grievances Are Not Competent Summary-Judgment Evidence; Non-Assertive Commands Are Non-Hearsay — Commentary on Travillion v. Wetzel (3d Cir. Apr. 1, 2025)

Date: Apr 2, 2025
Rule 56 Clarified: Unverified Complaints and Unsworn Prison Grievances Are Not Competent Summary-Judgment Evidence; Non-Assertive Commands Are Non-Hearsay Case: Jamar L. Travillion v. John E. Wetzel,...
Third Circuit’s Brookins Rule: Mandatory Content for Anders Briefs in Supervised Release Revocation Appeals

Third Circuit’s Brookins Rule: Mandatory Content for Anders Briefs in Supervised Release Revocation Appeals

Date: Apr 2, 2025
Third Circuit’s Brookins Rule: Mandatory Content for Anders Briefs in Supervised Release Revocation Appeals Introduction In United States v. Anthony Brookins (3d Cir. Apr. 1, 2025) (precedential),...
No Formal Hierarchy Required: Third Circuit Affirms Tier III Designation of the Grey Wolves and Broad Reach of the INA’s Material-Support Bar

No Formal Hierarchy Required: Third Circuit Affirms Tier III Designation of the Grey Wolves and Broad Reach of the INA’s Material-Support Bar

Date: Apr 2, 2025
No Formal Hierarchy Required: Third Circuit Affirms Tier III Designation of the Grey Wolves and Broad Reach of the INA’s Material-Support Bar Case: Askin Ozturk v. Attorney General of the United...
Third Circuit Reaffirms: No Per Se “Futility” Bar—Reimposing Supervised Release for Deterrence and Rehabilitation Is Substantively Reasonable Even After Repeated Violations

Third Circuit Reaffirms: No Per Se “Futility” Bar—Reimposing Supervised Release for Deterrence and Rehabilitation Is Substantively Reasonable Even After Repeated Violations

Date: Apr 2, 2025
Third Circuit Reaffirms: No Per Se “Futility” Bar—Reimposing Supervised Release for Deterrence and Rehabilitation Is Substantively Reasonable Even After Repeated Violations Case: United States v....
Flexible Campus Due Process and Strict Causation for Retaliation: The Third Circuit’s Clarifications in Williams v. Pennsylvania State University

Flexible Campus Due Process and Strict Causation for Retaliation: The Third Circuit’s Clarifications in Williams v. Pennsylvania State University

Date: Apr 2, 2025
Flexible Campus Due Process and Strict Causation for Retaliation: The Third Circuit’s Clarifications in Williams v. Pennsylvania State University Introduction In Williams v. Pennsylvania State...
End-Organ Effects or Explanation Required: Third Circuit Upholds ALJ’s Step‑3 Use of Record Silence and “Simple Tasks” RFC After Moderate Mental Limitations

End-Organ Effects or Explanation Required: Third Circuit Upholds ALJ’s Step‑3 Use of Record Silence and “Simple Tasks” RFC After Moderate Mental Limitations

Date: Apr 1, 2025
End-Organ Effects or Explanation Required: Third Circuit Upholds ALJ’s Step‑3 Use of Record Silence and “Simple Tasks” RFC After Moderate Mental Limitations Case: Ramon Placencia v. Commissioner of...
Reasonable Suspicion to Detain Managers of Unlicensed Bars; Deleted Undercover Texts Do Not Trigger Due‑Process Spoliation Absent Apparent Exculpatory Value or Bad Faith

Reasonable Suspicion to Detain Managers of Unlicensed Bars; Deleted Undercover Texts Do Not Trigger Due‑Process Spoliation Absent Apparent Exculpatory Value or Bad Faith

Date: Apr 1, 2025
Reasonable Suspicion to Detain Managers of Unlicensed Bars; Deleted Undercover Texts Do Not Trigger Due‑Process Spoliation Absent Apparent Exculpatory Value or Bad Faith Introduction In United States...
Minimal Explanation Suffices for Compassionate Release Denials; Amendment 826 Is Not Retroactive Under § 3582(c)(2)

Minimal Explanation Suffices for Compassionate Release Denials; Amendment 826 Is Not Retroactive Under § 3582(c)(2)

Date: Mar 29, 2025
Minimal Explanation Suffices for Compassionate Release Denials; Amendment 826 Is Not Retroactive Under § 3582(c)(2) Introduction This commentary analyzes the Third Circuit’s per curiam disposition in...
Reaffirming MVRA Restitution Proof and Explanation Requirements: PSR Assertions Alone Are Insufficient — United States v. Thomas (3d Cir. 2025)

Reaffirming MVRA Restitution Proof and Explanation Requirements: PSR Assertions Alone Are Insufficient — United States v. Thomas (3d Cir. 2025)

Date: Mar 29, 2025
Reaffirming MVRA Restitution Proof and Explanation Requirements: PSR Assertions Alone Are Insufficient — United States v. Thomas (3d Cir. 2025) Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit...
Third Circuit Reaffirms Non‑Retroactivity of Amendment 826 and Clarifies Limits on “Unusually Long Sentence” Compassionate Release Under § 1B1.13(b)(6)

Third Circuit Reaffirms Non‑Retroactivity of Amendment 826 and Clarifies Limits on “Unusually Long Sentence” Compassionate Release Under § 1B1.13(b)(6)

Date: Mar 29, 2025
Third Circuit Reaffirms Non‑Retroactivity of Amendment 826 and Clarifies Limits on “Unusually Long Sentence” Compassionate Release Under § 1B1.13(b)(6) Introduction In United States v. Omelyan...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert