Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

2d Circuit Case Commentaries

Rule 16b-3(d) Board Approval Needs Facts, Not Formal Labels: Second Circuit Clarifies Knowledge Standard for Deputized Directors in Roth v. Armistice Capital

Rule 16b-3(d) Board Approval Needs Facts, Not Formal Labels: Second Circuit Clarifies Knowledge Standard for Deputized Directors in Roth v. Armistice Capital

Date: Aug 31, 2025
Rule 16b-3(d) Board Approval Needs Facts, Not Formal Labels: Second Circuit Clarifies Knowledge Standard for Deputized Directors in Roth v. Armistice Capital Introduction In Roth v. Armistice...
Second Circuit (en banc) Overrules Truscello: All Non‑Mandatory Supervised‑Release Conditions Must Be Pronounced at Sentencing

Second Circuit (en banc) Overrules Truscello: All Non‑Mandatory Supervised‑Release Conditions Must Be Pronounced at Sentencing

Date: Aug 31, 2025
Second Circuit (en banc) Overrules Truscello: All Non‑Mandatory Supervised‑Release Conditions Must Be Pronounced at Sentencing Introduction In United States v. Maiorana, the U.S. Court of Appeals for...
Castro‑Castro v. Bondi: Second Circuit Reaffirms Limits on Reopening and Administrative Closure to Pursue DHS Prosecutorial Discretion; DHS Enforcement Memos Are Not “New Evidence”

Castro‑Castro v. Bondi: Second Circuit Reaffirms Limits on Reopening and Administrative Closure to Pursue DHS Prosecutorial Discretion; DHS Enforcement Memos Are Not “New Evidence”

Date: Aug 31, 2025
Castro‑Castro v. Bondi: Second Circuit Reaffirms Limits on Reopening and Administrative Closure to Pursue DHS Prosecutorial Discretion; DHS Enforcement Memos Are Not “New Evidence” Court: U.S. Court...
Ambiguity in State Confidentiality Law Defeats “Clearly Established” Prong: Second Circuit Grants Qualified Immunity for VHRC Officials and Confirms the Commission’s Sovereign Immunity

Ambiguity in State Confidentiality Law Defeats “Clearly Established” Prong: Second Circuit Grants Qualified Immunity for VHRC Officials and Confirms the Commission’s Sovereign Immunity

Date: Aug 31, 2025
Ambiguity in State Confidentiality Law Defeats “Clearly Established” Prong: Second Circuit Grants Qualified Immunity for VHRC Officials and Confirms the Commission’s Sovereign Immunity Case: Leise v....
Good-Faith Reliance on Cellphone Warrants with Minimal Nexus: The Second Circuit’s Guidance in United States v. Santos

Good-Faith Reliance on Cellphone Warrants with Minimal Nexus: The Second Circuit’s Guidance in United States v. Santos

Date: Aug 31, 2025
Good-Faith Reliance on Cellphone Warrants with Minimal Nexus: The Second Circuit’s Guidance in United States v. Santos Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (Summary Order) Date: August...
When “Hypothetical” Risk Factors Mask Realized Risks—and Strategy Labels Mislead: The Second Circuit’s Partial Revival of Peloton Securities Claims

When “Hypothetical” Risk Factors Mask Realized Risks—and Strategy Labels Mislead: The Second Circuit’s Partial Revival of Peloton Securities Claims

Date: Aug 31, 2025
When “Hypothetical” Risk Factors Mask Realized Risks—and Strategy Labels Mislead: The Second Circuit’s Partial Revival of Peloton Securities Claims Introduction This commentary analyzes the Second...
O’Neill v. Deml: Second Circuit Holds No Duty to Warn Pro Se § 2254 Petitioners About Mixed Petitions, Stays, or AEDPA Deadlines

O’Neill v. Deml: Second Circuit Holds No Duty to Warn Pro Se § 2254 Petitioners About Mixed Petitions, Stays, or AEDPA Deadlines

Date: Aug 31, 2025
O’Neill v. Deml: Second Circuit Holds No Duty to Warn Pro Se § 2254 Petitioners About Mixed Petitions, Stays, or AEDPA Deadlines Introduction In O’Neill v. Deml, No. 23-620 (2d Cir. Aug. 27, 2025),...
After Egbert, DHS’s § 287.10 Grievance Scheme Forecloses Bivens Claims Against HSI Agents; Fabrication‑Based False Arrest Presents a New Bivens Context in the Second Circuit

After Egbert, DHS’s § 287.10 Grievance Scheme Forecloses Bivens Claims Against HSI Agents; Fabrication‑Based False Arrest Presents a New Bivens Context in the Second Circuit

Date: Aug 31, 2025
After Egbert, DHS’s § 287.10 Grievance Scheme Forecloses Bivens Claims Against HSI Agents; Fabrication‑Based False Arrest Presents a New Bivens Context in the Second Circuit Introduction In...
Schnabel Goes Offline: Later‑Sent, Unflagged Arbitration Clauses in Mailed “Welcome Packages” Do Not Bind Absent Clear Notice and Assent

Schnabel Goes Offline: Later‑Sent, Unflagged Arbitration Clauses in Mailed “Welcome Packages” Do Not Bind Absent Clear Notice and Assent

Date: Aug 31, 2025
Schnabel Goes Offline: Later‑Sent, Unflagged Arbitration Clauses in Mailed “Welcome Packages” Do Not Bind Absent Clear Notice and Assent Introduction In Sudakow v. CleanChoice Energy, Inc., the...
Depraved‑Mind Attempted Murder Qualifies as a “Crime of Violence” Under the Guidelines: United States v. Delgado (2d Cir. 2025)

Depraved‑Mind Attempted Murder Qualifies as a “Crime of Violence” Under the Guidelines: United States v. Delgado (2d Cir. 2025)

Date: Aug 31, 2025
Depraved‑Mind Attempted Murder Qualifies as a “Crime of Violence” Under the Guidelines: United States v. Delgado (2d Cir. 2025) Introduction United States v. Delgado is a precedential Second Circuit...
Post-Bruen Challenges to Pistol Permit Denials: Second Circuit Reaffirms Absolute Judicial Immunity and Eleventh Amendment Limits on Suits Against State Judges

Post-Bruen Challenges to Pistol Permit Denials: Second Circuit Reaffirms Absolute Judicial Immunity and Eleventh Amendment Limits on Suits Against State Judges

Date: Aug 31, 2025
Post-Bruen Challenges to Pistol Permit Denials: Second Circuit Reaffirms Absolute Judicial Immunity and Eleventh Amendment Limits on Suits Against State Judges Introduction This commentary analyzes...
Terminal-Only Mandates Are ANCA “Access Restrictions” Even If Valid Under the ADA’s Proprietor Exception: Commentary on Delux Public Charter v. County of Westchester (2d Cir. 2025, Summary Order)

Terminal-Only Mandates Are ANCA “Access Restrictions” Even If Valid Under the ADA’s Proprietor Exception: Commentary on Delux Public Charter v. County of Westchester (2d Cir. 2025, Summary Order)

Date: Aug 31, 2025
Terminal-Only Mandates Are ANCA “Access Restrictions” Even If Valid Under the ADA’s Proprietor Exception In Delux Public Charter v. County of Westchester, the Second Circuit (by summary order) held...
Self‑Evident Rationale and Reasonable‑Suspicion Digital Search Conditions on Supervised Release: The Second Circuit’s Affirmance in United States v. Miller

Self‑Evident Rationale and Reasonable‑Suspicion Digital Search Conditions on Supervised Release: The Second Circuit’s Affirmance in United States v. Miller

Date: Aug 31, 2025
Self‑Evident Rationale and Reasonable‑Suspicion Digital Search Conditions on Supervised Release: The Second Circuit’s Affirmance in United States v. Miller Note: This decision was issued as a Summary...
The Blocking-Date Rule: Second Circuit Holds TRIA “Agency or Instrumentality” Status Is Fixed as of the Date Assets Are Blocked, While Confirming FSIA Immunity for Central Bank Funds

The Blocking-Date Rule: Second Circuit Holds TRIA “Agency or Instrumentality” Status Is Fixed as of the Date Assets Are Blocked, While Confirming FSIA Immunity for Central Bank Funds

Date: Aug 31, 2025
The Blocking-Date Rule: Second Circuit Holds TRIA “Agency or Instrumentality” Status Is Fixed as of the Date Assets Are Blocked, While Confirming FSIA Immunity for Central Bank Funds Introduction...
Second Circuit Holds LoLA’s Six‑Month Deadline Is a Non‑Jurisdictional Claim‑Processing Rule; Untimely Petitions Must Be Dismissed Under Rule 12(b)(6)

Second Circuit Holds LoLA’s Six‑Month Deadline Is a Non‑Jurisdictional Claim‑Processing Rule; Untimely Petitions Must Be Dismissed Under Rule 12(b)(6)

Date: Aug 31, 2025
Second Circuit Holds LoLA’s Six‑Month Deadline Is a Non‑Jurisdictional Claim‑Processing Rule; Untimely Petitions Must Be Dismissed Under Rule 12(b)(6) Introduction This commentary analyzes the Second...
No Ratification Without Agreement to Be Bound: Second Circuit Clarifies Rule 17 in Trademark Suits and Limits Non‑Owner § 43(a) Standing When Enforcement Rights Are Assigned

No Ratification Without Agreement to Be Bound: Second Circuit Clarifies Rule 17 in Trademark Suits and Limits Non‑Owner § 43(a) Standing When Enforcement Rights Are Assigned

Date: Aug 31, 2025
No Ratification Without Agreement to Be Bound: Second Circuit Clarifies Rule 17 in Trademark Suits and Limits Non‑Owner § 43(a) Standing When Enforcement Rights Are Assigned Introduction In Ripple...

        “Materiality of Temporal Inconsistencies in Credibility Assessments” — 
        Commentary on Bannikov v. Bondi (2d Cir. 2025)

“Materiality of Temporal Inconsistencies in Credibility Assessments” — Commentary on Bannikov v. Bondi (2d Cir. 2025)

Date: Aug 26, 2025
Materiality of Temporal Inconsistencies in Credibility Assessments — Analytical Commentary on Bannikov v. Bondi, 24-1202 (2d Cir. 2025) 1. Introduction Parties: Russian nationals Pavel Bannikov,...
“Active Protection” Defeats Persecution: The Second Circuit’s Clarification of the Unwilling-or-Unable Standard in Gualan-Pomaquiza v. Bondi

“Active Protection” Defeats Persecution: The Second Circuit’s Clarification of the Unwilling-or-Unable Standard in Gualan-Pomaquiza v. Bondi

Date: Aug 26, 2025
“Active Protection” Defeats Persecution: The Second Circuit’s Clarification of the Unwilling-or-Unable Standard in Gualan-Pomaquiza v. Bondi Introduction In Gualan-Pomaquiza v. Bondi, No. 23-7852 (2d...
Continuing EEOC Subpoena Power After a Right-to-Sue Letter: Analysis of EEOC v. AAM Holding Corp.

Continuing EEOC Subpoena Power After a Right-to-Sue Letter: Analysis of EEOC v. AAM Holding Corp.

Date: Aug 26, 2025
Continuing EEOC Subpoena Power After a Right-to-Sue Letter: The Second Circuit’s Decision in EEOC v. AAM Holding Corp. Introduction On 25 August 2025 the United States Court of Appeals for the Second...

        Second Circuit Authorizes Pre-Revocation Detention of Supervisees under 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(1) —
        Comment on United States v. Mercado (2025)

Second Circuit Authorizes Pre-Revocation Detention of Supervisees under 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(1) — Comment on United States v. Mercado (2025)

Date: Aug 26, 2025
Second Circuit Authorizes Pre-Revocation Detention of Supervisees under 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(1) Commentary on United States v. Mercado, 25-206-cr (2d Cir. Aug. 25 2025) 1. Introduction United States...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert