Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

10th Circuit Case Commentaries

Distinct Statute of Limitations for Contribution Actions in Environmental Cleanup Cases

Distinct Statute of Limitations for Contribution Actions in Environmental Cleanup Cases

Date: Feb 22, 2025
Distinct Statute of Limitations for Contribution Actions in Environmental Cleanup Cases Introduction This commentary examines the recent decision in Atlantic Richfield Company v. NL Industries, Inc.;...
Reaffirming Exemptions for Pro Se Prisoners in Summary Judgment Motions

Reaffirming Exemptions for Pro Se Prisoners in Summary Judgment Motions

Date: Feb 20, 2025
Reaffirming Exemptions for Pro Se Prisoners in Summary Judgment Motions Introduction The case of Chadwick Jordan v. David Steward presents a significant judicial commentary on the treatment of pro se...
Preserving Jury Instruction Objections and the Limits of Rule 408 in Retaliation Claims

Preserving Jury Instruction Objections and the Limits of Rule 408 in Retaliation Claims

Date: Feb 20, 2025
Preserving Jury Instruction Objections and the Limits of Rule 408 in Retaliation Claims Introduction This commentary reviews the United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit’s decision in the case...
Revisiting Consent Standards: Qualified Immunity and the Burden of Consent in Prison Sexual Abuse Cases

Revisiting Consent Standards: Qualified Immunity and the Burden of Consent in Prison Sexual Abuse Cases

Date: Feb 20, 2025
Revisiting Consent Standards: Qualified Immunity and the Burden of Consent in Prison Sexual Abuse Cases Introduction The Judgment in the case of SAVANAHA WORKS v. TIMOTHY BYERS, et al., decided by...
Revisiting Finality in §2255 Proceedings: Reopening Motions and Jurisdictional Timeliness

Revisiting Finality in §2255 Proceedings: Reopening Motions and Jurisdictional Timeliness

Date: Feb 18, 2025
Revisiting Finality in §2255 Proceedings: Reopening Motions and Jurisdictional Timeliness Introduction The case of United States of America v. Arrick Warren presents complex procedural issues arising...
Affirming Judicial Restraint: Federal Abstention and Sanctions Against Abusive Litigation

Affirming Judicial Restraint: Federal Abstention and Sanctions Against Abusive Litigation

Date: Feb 18, 2025
Affirming Judicial Restraint: Federal Abstention and Sanctions Against Abusive Litigation Introduction This commentary reviews the recent decision of the United States Court of Appeals, Tenth...
The Endurance of Felon Dispossession Jurisprudence: Revisiting McCane in Light of Rahimi

The Endurance of Felon Dispossession Jurisprudence: Revisiting McCane in Light of Rahimi

Date: Feb 18, 2025
The Endurance of Felon Dispossession Jurisprudence: Revisiting McCane in Light of Rahimi Introduction The case of Melynda Vincent v. Pamela J. Bondi presents a significant judicial reaffirmation of...
Judicial Clarification on Managerial Control in CCE and the Merging of Lesser-Included Drug Offenses

Judicial Clarification on Managerial Control in CCE and the Merging of Lesser-Included Drug Offenses

Date: Feb 18, 2025
Judicial Clarification on Managerial Control in CCE and the Merging of Lesser-Included Drug Offenses Introduction The case of UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. LUIS ALFREDO JACOBO (a/k/a Lokz) represents a...
Clarifying Federal Claims in Eminent Domain Cases: The Intersection of Younger Abstention, URA Limitations, and APA Boundaries

Clarifying Federal Claims in Eminent Domain Cases: The Intersection of Younger Abstention, URA Limitations, and APA Boundaries

Date: Feb 18, 2025
Clarifying Federal Claims in Eminent Domain Cases: The Intersection of Younger Abstention, URA Limitations, and APA Boundaries Introduction This commentary examines the recent decision in the case of...
Clarifying the "New Judgment" in Habeas Applications: Brent L. Alford v. Donald Langford

Clarifying the "New Judgment" in Habeas Applications: Brent L. Alford v. Donald Langford

Date: Feb 18, 2025
Clarifying the "New Judgment" in Habeas Applications: Brent L. Alford v. Donald Langford Introduction The case of Brent L. Alford v. Donald Langford, decided by the United States Court of Appeals for...
The Imperative of Timely Pretrial Motions: Waiver of Untimely Arguments in Inventory Searches

The Imperative of Timely Pretrial Motions: Waiver of Untimely Arguments in Inventory Searches

Date: Feb 18, 2025
The Imperative of Timely Pretrial Motions: Waiver of Untimely Arguments in Inventory Searches Introduction This commentary examines the United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit's decision in the...
Timeliness of Habeas Corpus Appeals: Insights from Victorino v. Warden

Timeliness of Habeas Corpus Appeals: Insights from Victorino v. Warden

Date: Feb 13, 2025
Timeliness of Habeas Corpus Appeals: Insights from Victorino v. Warden Introduction In the case of Angel D. Victorino v. Terry Jacques, L.C.F. Warden; Attorney General of the State of Colorado, the...
Clarifying the Limits of Search Incident to Arrest: Insights from United States v. Williams

Clarifying the Limits of Search Incident to Arrest: Insights from United States v. Williams

Date: Feb 10, 2025
Clarifying the Limits of Search Incident to Arrest: Insights from United States v. Williams Introduction The case of United States of America v. Eric Lamont Williams presents a pivotal examination of...
Tenth Circuit Upholds Strict 300-Day Deadline for EEOC Charges upon Resignation

Tenth Circuit Upholds Strict 300-Day Deadline for EEOC Charges upon Resignation

Date: Feb 10, 2025
Tenth Circuit Upholds Strict 300-Day Deadline for EEOC Charges upon Resignation Introduction The case of David Perez v. City and County of Denver addresses critical issues surrounding employment...
Establishing Requirements for Disability Claims Under the ADA: Insights from McDade v. Weston County Hospital District

Establishing Requirements for Disability Claims Under the ADA: Insights from McDade v. Weston County Hospital District

Date: Feb 10, 2025
Establishing Requirements for Disability Claims Under the ADA: Insights from McDade v. Weston County Hospital District Introduction In the case of Amanda McDade, Plaintiff-Appellant v. Weston County...
Tenth Circuit Clarifies Standards for Certificate of Appealability in Rule 60(b)(6) Habeas Relief

Tenth Circuit Clarifies Standards for Certificate of Appealability in Rule 60(b)(6) Habeas Relief

Date: Feb 10, 2025
Tenth Circuit Clarifies Standards for Certificate of Appealability in Rule 60(b)(6) Habeas Relief Introduction The case of Daryl A. Hess v. Christe Quick elucidates critical procedural standards...
Denial of Certificate of Appealability in Habeas Corpus Petitions under AEDPA

Denial of Certificate of Appealability in Habeas Corpus Petitions under AEDPA

Date: Feb 8, 2025
Denial of Certificate of Appealability in Habeas Corpus Petitions under AEDPA Introduction In the case of William Claude Mead v. Randy Harding, the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth...
Reaffirmation of the Rooker-Feldman Doctrine in Moore v. Hebert

Reaffirmation of the Rooker-Feldman Doctrine in Moore v. Hebert

Date: Feb 8, 2025
Reaffirmation of the Rooker-Feldman Doctrine in Moore v. Hebert Introduction In the case of Maurice Bernard Moore v. Daniel L. Hebert et al., the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit...
Reaffirming the Business Necessity Standard for Fitness-for-Duty Examinations under the ADA: Baker v. Alliance for Sustainable Energy

Reaffirming the Business Necessity Standard for Fitness-for-Duty Examinations under the ADA: Baker v. Alliance for Sustainable Energy

Date: Feb 8, 2025
Reaffirming the Business Necessity Standard for Fitness-for-Duty Examinations under the ADA: Baker v. Alliance for Sustainable Energy Introduction The case of Donald Baker v. Alliance for Sustainable...
10th Circuit Establishes Strict Interpretation of "Good Reason" in Severance Plans

10th Circuit Establishes Strict Interpretation of "Good Reason" in Severance Plans

Date: Feb 8, 2025
10th Circuit Establishes Strict Interpretation of "Good Reason" in Severance Plans Introduction The case of David Hoff v. Amended and Restated Anadarko Petroleum Corp. addresses the critical...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert